Raw Data

Name Patient Name

DOB 9/3/1988
DOT 9/2/2021
ID S

YSQ-L3 YSQ-R Please refer to "Revisions to the Young S

Score
Item No. Item No.
2 1 3

deprivation
3 2 5

emotional
5 3 5 1. Input patient name, DOB (date of birth), D
7 4 5 2. Input scores for each item
9 5 5 3. Results will be automatically generated a
12 6 1 4. Results show as follows:
14 7 5 Results Table: Overall summary of
abandonment

15 8 5 column > Sort and Filter (in the Hom

19 9 1 Mean Scores: Graph of average sco
21 10 3 Main Results: Graph of percentage
24 11 5 indicate other clinically relevant them
25 12 1 Extreme scores: Graph of percenta
26 13 4 can indicate other clinically relevant t
29 14 4 5. Use the Scores to Date page to track a p
mistrust / abuse social isolation

31 15 5 to the first available column in the Scores

33 16 4
39 17 4 Key
40 18 6 ed Emotional Deprivation
45 19 4 ab Abandonment
46 20 5 ma Mistrust / Abuse
49 21 6 si Social Isolation
50 22 4 ds Defectiveness / Shame
52 23 1 fa Failure
55 24 2 di Dependence / Incompetence
defectiveness /

56 25 2 vh Vulnerability to Harm
shame

59 26 2 em Enmeshment
60 27 5 sb Subjugation

Page 1
 defectiveness /
shame
Raw Data

62 28 1 ss Self-Sacrifice
68 29 4 flc Fear of Losing Control
69 30 4 ec Emotional Constriction
71 31 6 us Unrelenting Standards
72 32 5 et Entitlement

failure
73 33 4 is Insufficient Self Control
76 34 6 as Approval-Seeking
77 35 4 np Negativity / Pessimism
78 36 1 pu-s Punitiveness (Self Directed)
81 37 5 incompetence pu-o Punitiveness (Other Directed)
82 38 4 dependence /
84 39 1
86 40 4 ed ab ma si
90 41 3 4.60 3.13 4.60 4.00
91 42 6
92 43 1
vulnerability to harm

94 44 1 ed ab ma si
96 45 4 67% 40% 77% 63%
97 46 3
98 47 6
100 48 5 ed ab ma si
104 49 2 80% 38% 40% 40%
106 50 1
107 51 5
enmeshment

108 52 4
109 53 3
111 54 6
114 55 4
115 56 4
117 57 1
subjugation

119 58 4
120 59 3
122 60 5
125 61 1

Page 2
 Raw Data

128 62 4
129 63 5

self-sacrifice
133 64 3
137 65 4
139 66 2
140 67 3
143 68 1

fear of losing
control
144 69 4
145 70 3
146 71 5
147 72 2
constriction

148 73 4
emotional

149 74 4
150 75 5
151 76 6
152 77 5
unrelenting standards

153 78 5
156 79 1
158 80 5
162 81 3
164 82 5
167 83 4
168 84 1
171 85 2
entitlement

172 86 3
175 87 6
176 88 5
178 89 4
180 90 1
insufficient self-control

181 91 1
186 92 2
187 93 5
189 94 1
191 95 6

Page 3
 ient self-control
Raw Data

193 96 2
194 97 6
195 98 5

approval
seeking
197 99 6
204 100 5
205 101 1
210 102 4
212 103 5

negativity /
pessimism
213 104 3
214 105 5
216 106 5
218 107 1
219 108 5
punitiveness -

221 109 5
self

224 110 4
230 111 4
232 112 1
222 113 4
punitiveness
- other

223 114 1
227 115 5
229 116 3

Page 4
 Raw Data

Young Schema Questionnaire - Revised (YSQ-R)

Spreadsheet developed by Ozgur Yalcin, Murdoch University, anima.com

sions to the Young Schema Questionnaire using Rasch Analysis: The YSQ-R" for the resear
doi: 10.1080/00050067.2021.1979885

Instructions
DOB (date of birth), DOT (date of test), and ID (if relevant)
h item
matically generated and can be viewed in the tabs across the bottom
ows:
Overall summary of scores. For ease of interpretation, you can sort columns from highest/lowest
nd Filter (in the Home ribbon menu) > Sort Largest to Smallest
Graph of average scores for each schema. An average score of 4 or above is usually considered
Graph of percentage of items scoring 4 or above for each schema. As this may or may not be refl
inically relevant themes
s: Graph of percentage of items scoring 5 or above for each schema. As this may or may not be
er clinically relevant themes
Date page to track a patient's progress or keep a record of multiple patients in one document. Co
column in the Scores to Date page

Incompetence

Page 5
 Raw Data

Self Directed)
Other Directed)

Mean Scores
ds fa di vh em sb ss flc ec
2.67 4.83 3.13 3.50 3.86 2.80 3.50 3.25 4.20

Main Results (percentage of 4's,5's, and 6's)

ds fa di vh em sb ss flc ec
25% 81% 40% 42% 55% 30% 36% 38% 63%

Extreme Scores (percentage of scores of 5's and 6's)

ds fa di vh em sb ss flc ec
17% 50% 25% 33% 29% 20% 17% 25% 40%

Page 6
 Raw Data

vised (YSQ-R)

ch University, anima.com.au

he YSQ-R" for the research article published in Australian Psychologist

1979885

umns from highest/lowest scores by selecting any cell in that

ove is usually considered clinically relevant (indicated by the red line)

his may or may not be reflected in the schema's mean score, this can

s this may or may not be reflected in the schema's mean score, this

ents in one document. Copy Column B from this page and paste

Page 7
 Raw Data

us et is as np pus puo
4.00 3.50 2.57 4.60 3.83 3.80 3.25

and 6's)
us et is as np pu-s pu-o
57% 42% 26% 73% 53% 60% 38%

f 5's and 6's)

us et is as np pu-s pu-o
57% 33% 29% 80% 50% 40% 25%

Page 8
 B C D E F
2 YSQ-R: Score Profile
3 Patient Name: Patient Name Date of Test: 9/2/2021
4 Schema % 5-6 % 4-5-6 Mean Scores
5 ED Emotional Deprivation 80% 67% 4.6
6 AB Abandonment 38% 40% 3.1
7 MA Mistrust / Abuse 40% 77% 4.6
8 SI Social Isolation 40% 63% 4.0
9 DS Defectiveness / Shame 17% 25% 2.7
10 FA Failure 50% 81% 4.8
11 DI Dependence / Incompetence 25% 40% 3.1
12 VH Vulnerability to Harm 33% 42% 3.5
13 EM Enmeshment 29% 55% 3.9
14 ET Entitlement 33% 42% 3.5
15 IS Insufficient Self Control 29% 26% 2.6
16 SB Subjugation 20% 30% 2.8
17 SS Self-Sacrifice 17% 36% 3.5
18 AS Approval-Seeking 80% 73% 4.6
19 FLC Fear of Losing Control 25% 38% 3.3
20 EC Emotional Constriction 40% 63% 4.2
21 US Unrelenting Standards 57% 57% 4.0
22 NP Negativity / Pessimism 50% 53% 3.8
23 PU-S Punitiveness (Self Directed) 40% 60% 3.8
24 PU-O Punitiveness (Other Directed) 25% 38% 3.3
 Mean Scores

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
1
Patient Name
2
6
3

4
5
5
6

7
8
4
9

10
11
3
12

13
14
2
15
16
17 1
18
19

20 0
21 ed ab ma si ds fa di vh em sb ss flc ec us et is as np pus puo
22

23 Mean Scores

Page 10
 Main Results

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
1

2
Patient Name
3 100%
4
90%
5
6
80%
7
8 70%
9

10
60%
11
50%
12

13 40%
14

15 30%
16
17
20%
18
10%
19

20 0%
21 ed ab ma si ds fa di vh em sb ss flc ec us et is as np pu-s pu-o
22

23 Main Results (4, 5 or 6's)

Page 11
 Extreme Scores

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
1

2
Patient Name
3 100%
4
90%
5
6
80%
7
8 70%
9

10
60%
11
50%
12

13 40%
14

15 30%
16
20%
17

18 10%
19

20 0%
ed ab ma si ds fa di vh em sb ss flc ec us et is as np pu-s pu-o
21
22

23 Extreme Scores (5 or 6's)

Page 12
Cumulative scores

Name Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6

DOB
DOT
ID
Q001
Q002
Q003
Q004
Q005
Q006
Q007
Q008
Q009
Q010
Q011
Q012
Q013
Q014
Q015
Q016
Q017
Q018
Q019
Q020
Q021
Q022
Q023
Q024
Q025
Q026
Q027
Q028
Q029
Q030
Q031
Q032
Q033
Q034
Q035
Q036
Q037
Q038
Q039
Q040
Q041
Q042
Q043
Q044
Q045
Q046
Q047
Q048
Q049
Q050
Q051
Q052
Q053
Q054
Q055
Q056
Q057
Q058
Q059
Q060
Q061
Q062
Q063
Q064
Q065
Q066
Q067
Q068
Q069
Q070
Q071
Q072
Q073
Q074
Q075
Q076
Q077
Q078
Q079
Q080
Q081
Q082
Q083
Q084
Q085
Q086
Q087
Q088
Q089
Q090
Q091
Q092
Q093
Q094
Q095
Q096
Q097
Q098
Q099
Q100
Q101
Q102
Q103
Q104
Q105
Q106
Q107
Q108
Q109
Q110
Q111
Q112
Q113
Q114
Q115
Q116