Software Testing Assignment

[Student Name]
[Student ID]

Date:
Table of Contents
Introduction:....................................................................................................................................3

Research Paper and ISO/IEEE/IEEE 29119-2 Standard Description:.............................................3

Responses to Questions for the Standard:.......................................................................................4

Commonalities and Differences between Research Paper and ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2 standard:. 5

Conclusion:......................................................................................................................................6
Introduction:
The compliance of standards is a crucial component of software testing methods, as it serves as
an assurance that the duties will be carried out in a manner that is both effective and efficient.
They contribute to a decrease in the risk of errors and system breakdowns by providing
suggested practices for testing. This helps ensure that software products fulfil quality criteria,
which in turn contributes to a reduction in the risk of errors and system breakdowns. In this
study, the topics that are explored include the standard ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2 as well as the
repercussions that this standard has for software testing. In addition to this, it examines the
research paper that was authored by S. Kumar and R. Kumar and is titled "A Survey on Software
Testing Techniques and Tools." It cites the standard as a source of information and conducts its
investigation based on that standard. Both of these topics receive extensive coverage throughout
the course of this study, which begins with the introduction and continues until the conclusion.

Research Paper and ISO/IEEE/IEEE 29119-2 Standard Description:

The research starts out with compiling a list of software testing strategies and instruments, and
then it moves on to determining the extent to which the aforementioned techniques and
programmes are compatible with the ISO/IEEE/IEEE 29119-2 standard. To put it another way,
the purpose of the study is to ascertain whether or not the methods and instruments used for
testing software are suitable for use in accordance with the ISO/IEEE/IEEE 29119-2 standard.
The standard is a thorough international standard for software testing that describes the testing
methods and activities that need to be carried out in order for software testing to be successful.
The standard was developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is responsible for developing the standard.
(ISO). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is the organisation that is tasked
with the development of the standard. (ISO). An organisation that is in charge of developing
standards on a global basis is the one that came up with the formula for the standard. It is hoped
that the application of the standard would occur on a scale that is comparable to that of the entire
planet when it comes to its scope. The necessity of test planning, design, execution, and
reporting, as well as the provision of such a framework by the standard for software testing, is
highlighted throughout the course of this publication. Additionally, the standard for software
testing provides this framework. In addition to this, the standard for software testing supplies a
structure of this kind. In addition to this, the standard provides a particular framework within
which software can be evaluated and tested. In addition to this, the standard itself will serve as
the basis upon which this project will be constructed.

Responses to Questions for the Standard:

The following are the questions and also responses to these questions for the standard are given
as below:

“What is the standard name? Title and number?”

The standard's complete title is "ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2 Software Testing - Part 2: Test
Processes," and it was published in 2011.

“Who holds the copyright for the standard?”

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the International Electrotechnical

Commission (IEC), and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) all share
ownership of the intellectual property that is linked with the standard.

“Amongst the acknowledged contributors to the document, which universities were involved (if
any)?”

In the list of people who are contributed with the research paper, there is not a single person
affiliated with a university institution to be found.

“What is the scope or intent of the standard?”

Building a testing framework that can be applied to software development projects of any size or
level of complexity is the objective of the standard, which has set this as its primary objective.

“What are key terms and understandings needed for the standard to be understood and
applied?”

This framework is designed to be implemented in a wide variety of different kinds of projects.

The phases of test planning, test design, test execution, test reporting, and test completion are
crucial for gaining a comprehensive understanding of and making full use of this standard. When
applied to the process of testing software, the standard provides a methodical structure that, when
followed, ensures that all testing is performed and minimises the likelihood that there will be
problems with the final release.

“In your own words, what does application of the standard result in? Or in other words, what
does the standard do?”

The quality and dependability of software products are enhanced by its standardised and
methodical approach to testing.

“Finally, what specific relevance to software testing is the standard?”

The standard establishes a complete and generally acknowledged framework for software testing,
including the phases of preparation, design, execution, and reporting.

Commonalities and Differences between Research Paper and ISO/IEC/IEEE

29119-2 standard:
In this section, both the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119-2 standard and the research study that S. Kumar
and R. Kumar wrote will be compared and contrasted in terms of the similarities and differences
that can be found between the two. This comparison and contrast will take place in terms of the
similarities and differences that can be found between the two. Both articles underline how
important it is to approach software testing in a methodical manner and provide suggestions on
how to improve the quality of your own tests. Both papers also discuss how important it is to
conduct software testing in a methodical manner. In addition to that, the papers compare and
contrast two different testing methodologies that can be used to software. In spite of the fact that
the standard provides a full list of suggestions for test procedures and activities, the primary
focus of this research study is on testing methodologies and instruments rather than the standards
themselves. This is because the standard provides a comprehensive list of recommendations for
test procedures and activities. This is due to the fact that the standard provides a vast number of
recommendations for different kinds of testing techniques and activities. While the research
paper investigates several testing strategies and technologies that can be utilised to enable
successful testing, the standard presents an organised and methodical approach to software
testing that ensures test coverage and minimises the likelihood that there will be flaws in the final
product. This is in contrast to the research paper, which investigates several testing strategies and
technologies that can be utilised to enable successful testing. In contrast, the study article
analyses several testing strategies and technologies that can be applied to facilitate successful
testing. These strategies and technologies include both manual and automated testing. On the
other hand, the research study investigates a variety of testing processes and technologies in
order to make testing more effective. This needs to be done in order to make the paper usable. In
contrast to this, the study piece analyses a range of different testing methods and technologies
that are able to be utilised in order to give effective testing. These processes and technologies are
able to be employed in order to give effective testing. These methods and technologies are
possible to be implemented in order to carry out examinations. The standard establishes a
framework for testing procedures and activities; the research paper shows how to put the
standard into practise by making use of a number of different strategies and tools. This is where
you may find the framework that the standard offers for you. When considered together, these
two documents make up what would be referred to as the testing framework.

Conclusion:
Therefore, in its conclusion, the study presents a concise summary of its findings and emphasises
how important it is to follow consistent standards while testing software. The document
demonstrates the significance of the standard by saying that the standard is essential in the
software testing sector, pointing out that it is a useful resource for businesses that are looking to
improve their testing techniques, and pointing out that it is a good resource for firms that wish to
improve their testing procedures. In addition to that, the document discusses the significance of
the standard and explains why it is important. After the analysis has been completed, the
conclusion that can be drawn is that the two papers provide a comprehensive set of rules and
processes that are capable of being employed to aid in the performance of software testing that is
both efficient and effective. This conclusion can be drawn because the two documents give a
comprehensive collection of rules and procedures that are capable of being utilised to aid in the
performance of software testing that is both efficient and effective. This particular conclusion is
brought to the reader's notice in the report in order to summarise the findings.

References:

Jayakumar, K.R. and Abran, A. (2013). A Survey of Software Test Estimation Techniques.
Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 06(10), pp.47–52.
doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2013.610a006.
Guevara-Vega, C.P., Cárdenas-Hernández, W.A., Landeta, P.A., Rea-Peñafiel, X.M. and Quiña-
Mera, J.A. (2022). Software Test Management to Improve Software Product Quality.
Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp.426–440.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03884-6_31.

ISO, “ISO/IEC DIS 29119—1, 2, 3, & 4: Software and Systems Engineering—Software Testing
—Part 1, 2, 3, & 4,” International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, 2012

http://eprints.dkit.ie/743/1/MSc%20Thesis%20for%20Graduate%20Studies%20Office%20-
%20Signed.pdf

Wichmann, B.A. and Cox, M.G. (1992). Problems and strategies for software component testing
standards. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 2(4), pp.167–185.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.4370020403.