MOOT COURT (CIVIL CASE 1)

(CASE HEADING) ILLEGAL DEMOLITION OF PLAINTIFF COMPOUND

WALL BY WRONGFUL ACT

To

The Hon’ble MOOT COURT of PSR Law College Turangi Kakinada ,

I Request the Hon’ble moot court of PSR Law College to give me permission

to present my arguments on behalf of my Client Mr. A to pray for justice on

the wrongful. Illegal demolition of His House Compound wall by Staff of

Kakinada Municipal Corporation.

Facts of Case :

Mr. A is Hindu, married , Aged 55 Years and Living at D.No: 36, 9 th Road

Gandhi Nagar Kakinada. The said Door number pertaining to His Own House

located as said above (D.No : 36, 9 th Road, Gandhi Nagar Kakinada. He is

enjoying said property with full rights for the last 35 years after he got this

property from his father. ( Annex. No. 1 to 12 Shows then Tax Receipts on

my clients name with Municipal Assessment No. of the house for the last 10

years and …….Annex : 2 Shows the Electricity Bills payment receipts then

……..Annex : 3 Shows the Municipal water Receipts for the last 10 years.

On the 17th March 2022 at about 0800 Hrs group of people comprises some

of municipal staff and headed by Municipal Commissioner are reached to our

street and started taking measurements of roads and started marking with

red color paintings on both walls and houses which are beside of the road.

We civilians residing there asked them for the reason for marking. A simple

answer from them is : Just for Future Expansion ( In case if occurs) these

exercise they are doing for records purpose.

All of the sudden as this is Holiday to all Govt offices and Courts ( due to the

local leader demise) at bout 07oo Hrs the same group of officials who ever

visited our street before the date ( ie., 17 th March 2022) appeared again

with Bulldozer and JCB machines. About 80 daily works who are engaged

by these officials are also associated with them with tools and tackles which

are generally used for earthen works.

Again Our civilian group asked the Commissioner the reason for assembling

of all these men and machinery. The simple answer is Govt. decided to go

for Road Expansion in this area so they decided to Remove the

Constructions as marked yesterday .

We asked to give a time upto Next Govt Working day ie., Monday. They said

they will look into the possibilities . After that they conducted one meeting

among themselves and All Official Staff are disappeared. Only the Contractor

with His Men and Machinery remained. We are trying to contact Official

Staff of Municipal Corporation and Other Authorities like RDO, Joint

Collector, Collector , But No Use. Contractor started the work of demolition

and complete before 1600 Hrs on that day. In this Unethical illegal Monster

Canada My client lost his east side compound wall completely.

1. The plaintiff is, therefore, constrained to file this civil suit seeking appropriate
reliefs and remedies against the defendant.

Prayer :

(a) declaration that the demolition of the plaintiff's compound wall by the
defendant is illegal, arbitrary, and without any justification;

(b) An order directing the defendant to pay compensation to the plaintiff for
the damages suffered, including the loss of property, privacy, and security,
and for the mental agony and harassment caused DUE TO HIGH HANDED
UNRTHICAL, ILLEGAL, MONSTER CANADA ACTVITIES OF DEFENDANT.

(c) An injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's
property rights and from taking any further illegal or arbitrary actions;

(d) Any other relief or remedy that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in

the circumstances of the case.

Court Fee Details :

9. The plaintiff values the suit for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction at
Rs. [Amount].

PLACE: KAKINADA

DATE: 18TH MARCH 2022.

Advocate for the Plaintiff ( XX X X X)

 II. Moot Court --- 2 for Breach of Contract (SECTION 74, ), The Indian

Contract Act 1872.

I request the Hon’ble MOOT COURT of PSR Law College to give me

permission to submit my arguments on behalf my client M/s XYZ
Corporation IN THE MOOT COURT OF __PSR LAW COLLEGE _____ AT
____TURANGI KAKINADA___

Civil Suit No. ___279___________ of ___2022_________

Plaintiff: XYZ Corporation [18, RAMARAJU ROAD, BROADIPET

GUNTUR ,ANDHRA PRADESH 522010]

Defendant: ABC Corporation [D.No._27, 3 RD FLOOR, CHEKURI COMPLEX,

BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA , ANDHRA PRADESH_520010 ]

PLAINT :

1. The plaintiff, XYZ Corporation, is a company incorporated under the laws of

the state of _18, RAMARAJU ROAD, BROADIPET GUNTUR ,ANDHRA
PRADESH____ and carries on business.
2. The defendant, ABC Corporation, is also a company incorporated under the
laws of the state of __D.No._27, 3RD FLOOR, CHEKURI COMPLEX, BENZ
CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA , ANDHRA PRADESH_520010 ___ and carries on
business..
3. On [02ND JANUARY 2020], the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a
contract for the supply of goods as per the terms and conditions contained
therein.
4. As per the contract, the plaintiff was to supply [BLEACHER FOR EDIBLE
OIL REFINERY 250TONS CAPACITY] to the defendant within [THREE
MONTHS ]from the date of the contract, and the defendant was to make the
payment within [THIRTY DAYS] from the date of receipt of the goods.
5. The plaintiff duly supplied the goods to the defendant within the stipulated
time, but the defendant failed to make the payment as per the contract.
6. Despite repeated demands and reminders, the defendant failed to make the
payment, thereby committing a breach of the contract as per Section 74,
Indian Contact Act 1872.
7. As a result of the breach, the plaintiff has suffered financial loss and
damages, including the cost of goods supplied, interest, and other incidental
expenses.
8. The plaintiff has made several representations to the defendant, seeking
redressal of his grievances and payment of the outstanding amount, but to
no avail.
9. The plaintiff is, therefore, constrained to file this civil suit seeking appropriate
reliefs and remedies against the defendant as pe Section 74, Indian Contract
Act 1872.

PRAYER :

10. The plaintiff prays for the following reliefs:

 (a) A decree for the outstanding amount of Rs. [Amount] along with interest
at [Interest Rate] per annum from the date of the breach till the date of
realization;

(b) An order directing the defendant to pay the costs of this suit;

(c) Any other relief or remedy that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in
the circumstances of the case.

11. The plaintiff values the suit for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction at
Rs. [Amount].

PLACE: GUNTUR

DATE: 22ND MARCH 2022.

Advocate for the Plaintiff ( X X X X X )

MOOT COURT (CRIMINAL CASE 1)

I. (CASE HEADING) PLAINT BY ACCUSED FOR BAIL IN

CHEATING CASE :
II. To

The Hon’ble MOOT COURT of PSR Law College Turangi

Kakinada ,

I Request the Hon’ble moot court of PSR Law College to give me

permission to present my arguments on behalf of my Client Mr

PILLI RAVI , Accused in OS 234/2022.

Accused Mr. Pilli Ravi detained under sections IPC415, IPC 420.

Facts of Case : My client accused I above sections and in custody since

12th April 2023 . He is readymade clothes shop owner at Shop .No.5

Santha Cheruvu Municipal Shopping Complex, Kakinada 533002.

My Client sold the Guaranteed Product of TWILLS ( Premium Brand

Clothes) to Mr. B ( Resident of 27, Road No. 9, Ramarao Pet Kakinada)

on 15th March 2023. Total Invoice Value is : Rs 50000-00 ( Rs. Fifty

Thousand Only) . Before Purchase the Goods The Buyer ( Mr. B checked

all the items very well , satisfied then received the Products from our shop

then proceeded on his own job.

On the 17th March 2023 Mr. B returned to our shop and claimed some of

the Dresses are partially Damaged and exhibited to me and to my staff

too. I discussed with The Company TWILL s they said that they will check

the damaged clothes and do the justice to customer.

 But Customer didn’t accepted our plea and demanded Total amount of Rs

50000-00 back on the spot immediately.

We tried to convince the customer but he is not in position to hear our

words. Mr. B then proceeded police station and lodged a complaint on the

above said sections. Meanwhile TWILL Regional manager resigned.

Other Person who deputed in that Regional Manager Position is not a

position to respond didn’t responded to meet my needs.

Section 415 of the IPC defines cheating as "whoever, by deceiving any

person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver
any property to any person or to consent that any person shall retain any
property." &

Additionally, Section 420 of the IPC deals with the punishment for cheating
and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, and it is commonly used in
cheating cases in India..

I submit that I am innocent of the charges levelled against me and I have full
faith in the judiciary. I am willing to cooperate fully with the investigation and
have no intention of absconding or tampering with the evidence.

I will fulfil the customer requirements and do the justice in cooperation with
TWILLS management.

My family and 14 workers depends on me for their livelihood and I am the

sole breadwinner. If I am not released on bail, my family and the workers
whose families depends purely on me will suffer immense financial hardship
and even to their daily bread and butter.

PRAYER :

I assure this Honorable Court if grant me bail, I will abide by all the
conditions imposed upon me and will not in any manner interfere with the
investigation or tamper with evidence.

I, therefore, humbly pray that this Honorable Court may be pleased to grant
me bail in this case on such terms and conditions as deemed fit.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

[PILLI RAVI]

[PILLI RAVI]

MOOT COURT ( Criminal Case –2)

(Heading of Case) PLAINT BY STATE AGAINST ISSUING A BAIL TO

DEFENDANT IN RAPE CASE

 I request the Hon’ble moot court PSR Law College to give me the

permission to present my arguments from Sate to Oppose the Bail to

Accused Mr. A.

Case No : 126/2022

State : AP Government – Prosecution

Accused ( Defendant) : Mr Mohammad Kareem aged 36 years,

Mohammadan, Married

The accused is the custody now at Rajamahendravaram Central Jail since

12th Nov 2022.

The defendant has been accused of committing a heinous crime of rape,

which has caused immense physical, emotional, and psychological harm to
the victim. The State recognizes the right of the defendant to apply for bail
but urges the court to consider the serious nature of the crime and the
potential threat to public safety.

ARGUMENT

2. The granting of bail to the defendant would pose a significant threat to public
safety. He may attempt to flee, intimidate the victim, or tamper with the
evidence. The defendant is a high-risk offender, and therefore, he should not
be granted bail.
3. The defendant has a history of violent behavior, which makes him more likely
to reoffend. This, coupled with the seriousness of the charges against him,
 makes him an imminent threat to society. Given the circumstances, it is in
the best interest of the public to deny his application for bail.
4. It is well-established that the purpose of bail is to ensure that the defendant
appears in court for trial. However, in cases where the defendant poses a
threat to public safety or is likely to flee, the court may refuse to grant bail.
The State believes that the defendant's release would undermine the safety
of the victim and society at large.

5. The State urges the court to consider the gravity of the offense and the
potential risks to the victim and society at large. We request the court to
refuse bail to the defendant in the rape case.

( CONCLUSION ) PRAYER :

WHEREFORE, the State respectfully requests that the court denies the
defendant's application for bail, and orders that he remain in custody until his
trial.

Respectfully submitted,