WELCOME _ IDEAS CONSULTING Ideas Exploring the Changing Social Contexts of Learning December 3, 2017 Contemporary learning environments might be best understood when viewed as a complex mix of environments and overlapping social networks. Learners fluidly move between social networks and their learning is influenced by their participation within and across these physical and Virtual networks. Understanding how mobile, global anc virtual social networks influence our interpretation of socio- cultural theories of learning might allow us to better understand the interplay of settings and contexts within which learning occurs and in doing so better understand how learning may be facilitated The socio-cultural perspective on education has its origins in the work of Lev Vygotsky (Géncii & Gauvain, 2012) and is an approach which considers the individual and their interactions with the social environment as central to understanding the processes of learning. Learning is said to be that which occurs through interaction between the individual, and all that their biology brings to the table and COLLECTIONS CONTACT Search Ideas The Ideas Blog shares and archives strategies and resources that the sites contributors have submitted to the site, Use the Search bar or Tag Cloud to find content relevant to your needs Nigel Coutts A great chance to join an inspiring team of teachers as we build the culture of a new campus together at. https:lt.co/lua39nQti Jul §, 2022, 11:59 AM Nigel Coutts RT @John3999: htips:lit.cofMAKpXFiQRs Jenny Gore telling it as itis. What she said!the social context in which learning occurs. Such an approach shifts our thinking about learning and development as processes contained and constrained within the individual's biology to a more diverse understanding that incorporates the social context within which all learning is seen to occur. For educators, this approach encourages us to look at the learning environment and the social context in which the learning we design for our students occurs and ‘presents a fuller and more accurate picture of children’s, learning and development.’ (Géncti & Gauvain, 2012 p126) Sociocultural, and the in some ways related social-cognitive approaches build upon earlier research that focused on the individual as the unit of development but seek to explain the differences which were observed across groups anc contexts which could not be explained without a wider frame of reference. By expanding the frame of reference to include the social context within which learning and development occurs a more complex image emerges of the interactions anc processes which are at play. Vygotsky's (1978) research shows how interactions between the child and their socia environment enables leaning. He explores the gap between what a child can do now independently and that they can do with assistance. Termed the ‘Zone of Proximal Development(ZPD), this is the gap into which teachers hope to move their students (Vygotsky, 1978). Teaching strategies such as formative assessment (Black & Wiliam, 1998) seek to identify where the ZPD is for students and then provide appropriate leaming situations which scaffold student's growth through this zone. Effective teaching will provide @ context that allows students to achieve success on learning initially pitched within this zone with guidance while moving towards internalisation of new learning evidenced by success when the scaffolds are removed. It is with this process in mind that we develop teaching programmes and curriculums. Given the multitude frames which might be used to inform our understanding of what culture is, (Jary & Jary, 1991) how itis constructed and how it shapes and is shaped by interactions with individuals and groups it unsurprising that there are multiple perspectives upon the nature of socio- cultural learning. This complexity is expanded when comparisons are made between socio-cultural perspectives and social-cognitive perspectives are considered. Emerging from the work of Albert Bandura (1977) social-cog} Jun 24, 2022, 7:09 AM Nigel Coutts RT @ryanagill: We're back! Join us....For the first time in two years, our Building Capability for Critical and Creative thinking co... https://tcofkxZruQrVz7 May 11,2022, 5:52 PM Nigel Coutts A challenge for Twitter folk - Does anyone know a Golf Course designer ‘who might like to share some wisdom on the d... httpsilit.co/HuFf3SFviO Mar 25, 2022, 10:17 AM Nigel Coutts RT @mrbarlow: Learn more about Cultures of Thinking here - https:/It.colelHUjRO1}Z @ProjectZeroHGSE @easieonline @RonRitchhart #pzmet Mar 19, 2022, 10:13 AM Nigel Coutts RT @RonRitchhart It's been awhile since | have posted a blog but was feeling inspired to address struggles that some teachers have w. https://t.co/Rk7mGmLxrW Mar 1, 2022, 6:16 PM Nigel Coutts RT @stephygsalazar: So keen to be a mentor & workshop facilitator for this hackathon which gives pre-service teachers the opp to play w... https://t.co/Hss3XXtyWs. Feb 18,2022, 6:13 PMtheories like socio-cultural approaches are concerned with the learning that occurs within societies and the cross- cultural differences which such perspectives reveal. ‘In contrast, social cognitive researchers have devoted considerable attention to the role of social variables in learning, how motivational processes affect learning, anc how social cognitive principles can be best applied to enhance students’ learning from instruction.’ (Schunk, 2012 117) A further differentiator is evident in the significance given to vicarious learning or learning purely through observation of others that is present in social-cognitive theory but is not evident in socio-cultural theories which emphasise translation of observations of others into action of learning by imitation of the observed behaviours. Social- cognitivists would show that learning can be acquired without the imitation phase. For teachers, social-cognitivist approaches shine a light on the factors which result in motivation towards learning. Learning is said to be enhanced when individuals have positive self-efficacy for leaming (Bandura 1977), Motivational theories such as self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) and attribution theory (Weiner, 2004) point to factors such as autonomy, purpose and mastery (Ryan & Deci) and locus of control (Weiner - intemal/external stable/unstable controllable/uncontrollable) as key factors which influence engagement and perceptions of success, In social-cognitive theory these factors are described as acting upon the individual through changes in levels of self-efficacy. When social aspects of learning are accounted for the provision of a safe, supportive and nurturing learning environment is broadly considered to be significant (Tir, 2011)(Marzano & Pickering, 1997). The complexity of social environments within which learning occurs presents challenges to educators looking to manage the environment in which learning occurs. Students are less likely to engage with challenging learning in settings where they feel unsafe or believe that their attempts to engage are likely to be judged negatively or where the rewards available are low. (Atkinson, 1957) (Dweck & Legget, 1988) (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000). A shifting emphasis on what is valued as the outcome of formal education places greater emphasis on the capacity of individuals to be creative collaborators. In ‘Participatory Creativity’, Edward Clapp (2017) details the importance of collaborations between individuals in a form of collective Subscribe: Copy ths link into your RSS enabled application http:/ithelearnersway.netlideas? format=rss change change management collaboration COVID19 creativity culture curriculum deep-learning design thinking education Education future Google IBLICT innovation INQUIry leadership learning Learning literacy mathematics PBL post-normal questions readings reflection science aces technology Inking uDL understanding VUCA writingagency derived from the work of Bandura. Collective agency acknowledge the role of the individual within efforts of a greater collective. Informed by this perspective and Cskiszentmihalyi’s view of creativity as a product of social systems, Clapp builds a model of creativity that results from the collective efforts of society and focuses on the processes through which ideas evolve rather than a more traditional view which attribution of a product to an individual. Creativity in such a models like learning in socio-cultural perspectives a social phenomenon. Significant differences in the socio-cultural setting within which the individual experiences learning can be shown te account for varied outcomes. An example of this can be seen in the exposure to language which occurs in different settings. Hart & Risely (2003) show that a five-year-old chile growing up in a home with parents categorised as professionals would have been exposed to 45 million words. By contrast a child growing up in a working-class family would have been exposed to 26 million words and only 13 million if growing up in a lower-class family. This gap in exposure must be seen as more significant than a deficit in vocabulary within a socio-cultural perspective that emphasises the development of language as a critical component for development in general. According to Vygotsky, children learn to use language regulate their psychological functions (Géncii & Gauvain, 2012) ane language is an essential tool in the scaffolding and modelling of learning that occurs both within schools and other environments in which learners learn. This gap in exposure presents significant equity challenges for educationa systems. Traditionally the socio-cultural setting in which learning anc development occurs has been defined by the physical settings in which the learner is situated and the culture that is attached to that. Relationships between the individual and their immediate family play an important role in the early years of learning, as the child grows the social context in which they learn widens and peers, teachers and the wider community begin to play a part. As the child interacts with a growing number of social contexts they are able to draw upon an expanding set of models and observations as they lear to regulate their behaviour and adopt (and modify) the cultural norms required for adult life (Génci & Gauvain 2012). In more recent times this social context has become increasingly difficult to define,Through a variety of factors, such as globalisation, increasec mobility and technology enabled networks, the individual is increasingly found to exist simultaneously across multiple cultures and societies (Leander, Phillips & Taylor, 2010). These multiple contexts and cultures bring to the learner new challenges and require learning of multiple norms along with the pressure to activate the appropriate norms for each context. The once clear boundaries of the social context of learning and development is increasingly blurred and stretched by technologies and networks. In seeking to understand how this space influences learning and development itis necessary to consider the individual, the interacting social networks (physical and virtual) and the technology as agents which influence development. At best the experienced reality is ‘complicated’ (Boyd, 2014) as the individual within the Virtual world is able to fluidly shape and reshape both identity and context. ‘When teens engage with networkec media, they're trying to take control of their lives and their relationship to society. In doing so, they begin to understand how people relate to one another and how information flows between people.’ (Boyd, 2014 p92) The blurring of socia contexts further complicates the learning environment experienced by young people when it is recognised that they spend much of their time living within a culture that the adults in their world know little about. The norms, language, symbols, signs and meanings of the virtual worlds may be borrowed or appropriated from the physical world but are often wildly misinterpreted when decontextualised. Further still access to resources, knowledge and tools derived from technologies and their networked lives are viewed with suspicion in many traditional learning environments thus bringing artificial barriers to learning and de-contextualising the skills learned in school from those valued in the ‘real world’ From the research of Vygotsky, Bandura and others across socio-cultural and socio-cognitive perspectives we have been provided with a theoretical tool kit with which to better understand the interplay of the individual, society anc culture. As we move further into an age dominated by technology and networks itis incumbent on all those with an interest in learning and development to look at the interplay of forces which act upon the individual. By seeking to understand the influences that physical and virtual contexts have on learning we can begin to imagine a model ofeducation which makes best use of the diverse environments in which our young people are immersed. By Nigel Coutts Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk- taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cis, NJ: Prentice Hall Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998), Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, King’s College. London: School of Education Boyd, D. (2014) Its complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press. Csiksgentminalyi, M. (2013) Flow: The psychology of happiness’ and creativity: The psychology of discovery anc invention. New York; Harper Perennial Clapp, E. (2017) Participatory creativity: Introducing access and equity to the creative classroom. New York: Routledge Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. Géneii, A., & Gauvain, M. (2012). Sociocultural approaches to educational psychology: theory, research, andapplication. In. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan (Editors-in-Chief). ‘APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol.1. Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues, 125-154. Hart, B., & Risley, T. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator 27(1), 4~ 9 Jary, D., & Jary, J. (1991) Collins dictionary of sociology; second edition. Glasgow: Harper Collins. Marzano, R. & Pickering, D. (2009) Dimensions of Learning Trainers manual 2nd Edition. USA: ASCD Publications. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory anc the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development. and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Schunk, D. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan (Editors-in-Chief). APA EducationalPsychology Handbook: Vol.1. Theories, Constructs, anc Critical Issues, 101 -123 Tirri, K. (2011) Holistic schoo! pedagogy and values: Finnish teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research 50 pp159-195 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, Trans. & Ed., V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934) Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 88-81 Share 1 Likes IDEAS NEWER OLDER Comments (1) Newest First 5 yeas ago * 1 Like Well brought together and reasoned. A good read and lots to ponder especially for those of us working in low socio economic schoolsena This work is licensed under a Creative Commons. Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Intemational License