Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTANCY
FULLTIME COURSE
ACCA KNOWLEDGE MODULE
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (F2)
A. COSTING METHODS
A costing method is designed to suit the way goods are processed or manufactured or
the ways services are provided.
We will consider these important costing methods:
-Job
-Batch
-Service
Note: Costs for each job are recorded on a job cost sheet or job card.
Rectification costs
If the finished output is found to be substandard, it may be possible to rectify the fault.
Rectification costs can be treated in two ways:
1 Job, Batch and Service Costing; Process costing| F2
a)If the rectification work is not a frequent occurrence, but arises on occasions with
specific jobs to which it can be traced directly, then the rectification costs should be
charged as a direct cost to the jobs concerned.
b) If the rectification is regarded as a normal part of the work carried out generally
in the department, then the rectification costs should be treated as production
overheads. This means that they will be included in the total of production
overheads for the department and absorbed into the cost of all jobs for the period,
using the overhead absorption rate.
Work in progress
At the year end, the value of work in progress is imply the sum of the costs
incurred on incomplete jobs (provided that the costs are lower than the net
realizable value of the customer order)
Pricing a job
The method commonly used is cost plus pricing. This means that the desired profit
margin is added to total costs to arrive at the selling price.
A cost card can be drawn up for each job or batch using absorption costing or marginal
costing techniques in the same way as for individual products.
A job cost card would look like:
Job XYZ
$
Direct materials X
Direct labour (hrs x $/hr) X
Variable overheads (hrs x $/hr) X
Prime cost X
Fixed overheads X
Total cost X
Profit X
Selling price of job X
The organisation may also absorb non-production overheads and include these in the
estimate of the total jobs cost.
The profit on the job may be calculated in one of two ways:
-Mark-up
-Margin
Mark-up
A profit mark-up is calculated as a percentage of the total costs of the job.
For example a 20% mark up on a job with total costs of $20,000 would be calculated as
follows:
% $
Selling price 120 24,000
Total cost (100) (20,000)
Profit 20 4,000
Margin
A profit margin is calculated as a percentage of the selling price of the job.
Example 1
Suggest three examples of businesses that use job costing.
Example 2
A company is preparing for job X112. The job requires materials worth $1,350 and 150
hours of labour.
Labour is paid at $6 per hour, variable overheads are absorbed at a rate of $2 per
labour hour and fixed overheads at a rate of $3 per labour hour.
Required
(a) What is the selling price of job X112 if the company wants to earn a margin of 25%?
(b) What is the selling price of job X112 if the company wants to earn of mark-up of
25%?
Example 3
F Ltd. is a jobbing company. On 1 June 2011, there was one uncompleted job in the
factory. The job card for this work is summarized as follows:
Job card, Job No. 6832
Costs to date: $
3 Job, Batch and Service Costing; Process costing| F2
Direct materials 630
Direct labour (120 hours) 350
Factory overhead ($2 per direct labour 240
hour)
Factory costs to date 1220
During June, three new jobs were started in the factory, and costs of production were as
follows:
Direct materials $
Issued to: Job 6832 2,390
Job 6833 1,680
Job 6834 3,950
Job 6835 4,420
Damaged inventory written off from 2,300
stores
Material transfers $
Job 6834 to Job 6833 250
Job 6832 to Job 6834 620
The cost of labour hours during June 2011 was $3 per hour, and production overhead is
absorbed at the rate of $2 per direct labour hour. Production overheads incurred during
the month amounted to $3,800. Completed jobs were delivered to customers as soon as
they were completed, and the invoiced amounts were as follows:
Job 6832 $5,500
Job 6834 $8,000
Job 6835 $7,500
Administration and marketing overheads are added to the cost of sales at the rate of
20% of factory costs. Actual costs incurred during June 2011 amounted to $3,200.
Required:
(i) Prepare the job accounts for each individual job during June 2011 (the accounts
should only show the cost of production, and not the full cost of sale).
(ii) Prepare the summarized job cost cards for each job, and calculate the profit on
each completed job.
In general, the procedures for costing batches are very similar to those for costing jobs.
(a) The batch is treated as a job during production and the costs are collected.
(b)Once the batch has been completed, the cost per unit can be calculated as the
total batch cost divided into the number of units in the batch.
Example 4
R Ltd. manufactures Brazils to order and has the following budgeted overheads for the
year, based on normal activity levels.
Production Budgeted Budgeted activity
departments overheads, $
Welding 12,000 3,000 labour hours
Assembly 20,000 2,000 labour hours
Selling and administrative overheads are 25% of factory cost. An order for 500 Brazils,
made as Batch 38, incurred the following costs.
Materials $24,000
Labour 200 hours in the Welding department at $5 per hour
400 hours in the Assembly department at $10 per hour
Required: Calculate the cost per unit for Batch 38
Example 6
Suggested cost units that might be used by the service industry companies listed below.
Example 7
In the last year the following information was collected:
Total kg of excess baggage carried 100,000 kg
Total miles excess baggage carried 30,000 miles
Total cost incurred (eg extra fuel) $5m
Required: What is the cost of carrying an extra 3kg an extra 7,500 miles?
Example 2
Input and costs same as in example 1.
Losses normally account for 10% of input.
Output was 900 units.
Required; Prepare the Process I ledger account
Example 3
Required: Prepare the Process and Scrap ledger accounts for the following situations
using data as in example 1.
(a) All scrapped units have a scrap value of $20 each.
(b) Suppose that the scrap merchant does not pay $20 per unit as anticipated, but only
$19.
Abnormal loss
This is the excess of actual spoilage over normal spoilage. The abnormal loss should be
valued at the same cost per unit as a good unit and any losses or gains taken to the
income statement for the period.
Example 4
As before, but output to Process II is 880 units not 900 units as expected.
Required: Prepare appropriate ledger accounts.
Abnormal gains
This is the shortfall of actual spoilage from normal spoilage. It is treated in the same
way as the abnormal loss. (Actual loss is less than the normal loss expected.)
Example 5
As before but output to process II is 920 units, not 900 units as expected.
Required: Prepare appropriate ledger accounts.
Required: Prepare accounts for the cutting process, the pasting process, abnormal
loss, abnormal gain and scrap
Valuing WIP
If we compare the value of one unit of WIP with the value of one unit of good output the
value of the unit of WIP will be less than the value of one unit of good output. This is
because WIP is only partially completed. To make comparison easier we restate
partially completed units in terms of equivalent whole units.
Example 8
Previous processes
The output from one process may undergo further processing in a subsequent process.
Say we have Process I and Process II. The output from Process I becomes an input into
Process II. So in Process II we may have:
– opening WIP,
– materials from Process I,
– added materials,
– and conversion costs.
All WIP in Process II must by definition be 100% complete in terms of Process I
inputs (the Process I material).
Example 11
M Ltd. produces an item which is manufactured in two consecutive processes.
Information relating to process2 during September 2011 is as follows:
Opening inventory 800 units
Degree of completion: $
Process 1 materials 100% 4,700
Added materials 40% 600
Conversion cost 30% 1,000
6,300
During September 2011, 3000 units were transferred from process 1 at a valuation of
$18,100. Added materials cost $9,600 and conversion costs were $11,800.
Closing inventory at 30 September 2011 amounted to 1,000 units which were 100%
complete with respect to process 1 materials, 60% complete with respect to added
materials. Conversion cost work was 40% complete.
M Ltd. uses a weighted average cost system for the valuation of output and closing
inventory.
12 Job, Batch and Service Costing; Process costing| F2
Required: Prepare the process 2 account for September 2011.
Further points
FIFO or weighted average?
Questions will not always state which method to use. You can make this choice by
looking at how the opening WIP is quoted.
Information about opening WIP includes:
(1) % complete – materials FIFO Method
% complete – conversion
Total cost brought forward
(2) Not given % complete information Weighted Average Method
Total cost brought forward broken down into:
-$ materials
$ conversion
Joint products
Joint products are two or more products which are output from the same processing
operation, but which are indistinguishable from each other up to their point of
separation.
They each have a substantial sales value either immediately or after further processing.
By-product
These are products produced at the same time and in the same process as the joint
products but are recognised by a relatively low sales value compared to the main
product or joint products and are produced in much smaller volumes. They are
secondary to the main products / processes.
Example 12
State three examples of joint products and by-products.
Treatment
By-products
(a) Do not allocate joint costs to them.
(b) If usual occurrence then calculate net proceeds of by-products and reduce process
costs by this amount.
(c) If one-off then calculate net proceeds and treat as miscellaneous income.
Joint products
Cannot identify until split-off point.
Therefore common costs incurred up to split-off point need to be apportioned on some
basis to the joint products.
Method of apportionment:
(a) physical units
(b) relative sales value
Physical units
Apportioning common costs on the basis of the proportion that the output of each
product be as by weight or volume of output.
Example 14
From example 11 now suppose both products can be sold immediately.
P1 sells at $2/kg
P2 sells at $5/kg
Required
What is the profit on each under:
(a) physical measurement apportionment?
(b) relative sales value apportionment?
Example 15
Three joint products are manufactured in a common process, which consists of two
consecutive stages. Output from process 1 is transferred to process 2, and output from
process 2 consists of the three joint products, Hans, Nils and Bumpsydaisies. All joint
products are sold as soon as they are produced.
Data for period 2 of 2011 are as follows:
Process 1 Process 2
Opening and closing inventory None None
Direct material (30,000 units at $2 per $60,000 -
unit)
Conversion costs $76,500 $226,200
Normal loss 10% of input 10% of input
Scrap value of normal loss $0.50 per unit $2 per unit
Output 26,000 units 10,000 units of Han
7,000 units of Nil
6,000 units of
Bumpsydaisy
Selling prices are $18 per unit of Han, $20 per unit of Nil and $30 per unit of
Bumpsydaisy.
Required:
A by-product has some commercial value and any income generated from it may be
treated as follows:
(i) Income (minus any post-separation further processing or selling costs) from the sale
of the by-product may be added to sales of the main product, thereby increasing
sales turnover for the period.
(ii) The sales of the by-product may be treated as a separate, incidental source of
income against which are set only post-separation costs (if any) of the by-product. The
revenue would be recorded in the income statement as ‘other income’.
(iii) The sales income of the by-product may be deducted from the cost of
production or cost of sales of the main product.
(iv) The net realizable value of the by-product may be deducted from the cost of
production of the main product. The net realizable value is the final saleable value
of the by-product minus any post-separation costs. Any closing inventory valuation of
the main product or joint products would therefore be reduced.
Note: The method you are most likely to come across in examinations is method (iv).
Example 16
During November 2011, S Co. recorded the following results:
Opening inventory Main product P, nil
By-product Z, nil
Cost of production $120,000
Sales of the main product amounted to 90% of output during the period, and 10% of
production was held as closing inventory at 30 November.
Sales revenue from the main product during November 2011 was $150,000.
A by-product Z is produced, and output had a net sales value of $1,000. Of this output,
$700 was sold during the month, and $300 was still in inventory at 30 November.
Required: Calculate the profit for November using the four methods of accounting for
by-products.
Steps in ABC
(1) Group overheads into activities, according to how they are driven. These are known
as cost pools.
(2) Identify the cost drivers for each activity, ie what causes the activity cost to be
incurred.
(3) Calculate a cost per unit of cost driver.
(4) Absorb activity costs into production based on usage of cost drivers.
The difference between unit costs under absorption costing and ABC depends upon the
proportion of overhead in each category.
If most overheads are unit level or facility sustaining the costs will be similar.
If overheads are batch or product sustaining costs, the resulting unit costs will be very
different.
Advantages of ABC
Unit costs calculated under ABC accurately reflect the activities performed and
resources used to make the product.
ABC helps in distinguishing between profitable and unprofitable products and
customers.
By focusing attention on cost drivers ABC helps managers understand and
manage overhead cost.
An understanding of cost driver rates helps in budgeting overhead expenditure.
Product life cycle costing considers all the costs that will be incurred from design to
abandonment of a new product and compares these to the revenues that can be
generated from selling this product at different target prices throughout the product's
life.
Different costs are incurred at different stages of a product’s life. Early stages will
involve research and development costs, buying in technical data, and the training of
staff. Later come marketing, production, stock holding and distribution costs.
Eventually retirement and disposal costs may be involved.
Traditional cost accounting systems do not accumulate costs over a product’s entire life
but focus instead on (normally) twelve month accounting periods. As a result the total
profitability of a product over its entire life becomes difficult to determine. Life-cycle
costing involves accumulating costs and revenues over a product’s entire life and hence
allows the total profitability of a product to be determined.
Collected data are compared with budgeted costs to check whether expected savings
have been realised.
Advantages of LCC:
All costs (production and non production) will be traced to individual products
over their complete life cycles and hence individual product profitability can be
more accurately measured.
Non production costs will become more visible and the potential for their control
is increased.
More accurate feedback on the success or failure of new products will be
available
Improvement of decision-making and cost control. The early development costs
would have to be seen in the context of the expected trading results, therefore
preventing a serious over spend at this stage or under pricing at the launch point.
c) Target costing
In a modern environment with shortening product lifecycles, organisations have to
continually redesign their products. It is essential that they try to achieve a target cost
during the product’s development.
As product life cycles have become much shorter, the planning, development and design
stage of a product is critical to an organisation's cost management process. Cost
reduction must be considered at this stage of a product’s life cycle, rather than during
the production process.
Target costing involves setting a selling price for your product by reference to the
market. From this your desired profit margin is deducted leaving you with a target
cost.
Target Costing:
Goals of TQM
(a) To gain competitive advantage via continuously improved quality
(b) To continuously reduce the cost of providing enhanced quality
(c) Innovation
(d) Provide first class customer service
(e) To involve all employees
23 Job, Batch and Service Costing; Process costing| F2
Design for quality
Design quality into an organisation's products and operations from the outset.
(a) Reduce the number of parts in a product
(b) Use components common to other products in the organisation
(c) Improve physical characteristics to meet customers’ needs
Performance measurement
Traditional variance analysis is not appropriate in a TQM environment, due to the focus
on
• continuous improvement
• quality as opposed to cost