The document outlines a movie review between Steve and Mike on the 2004 horror-comedy film Shaun of the Dead. Steve views it favorably as one of the best zombie films, praising the pacing, balance of thrills and laughs, and writing. Mike is more critical, seeing it as an unoriginal rehash of zombie cliches with a forgettable script and two-dimensional characters, though acknowledges the talented cast. They disagree on whether it offers a fresh take on the genre or is just a typical zombie film without originality.
The document outlines a movie review between Steve and Mike on the 2004 horror-comedy film Shaun of the Dead. Steve views it favorably as one of the best zombie films, praising the pacing, balance of thrills and laughs, and writing. Mike is more critical, seeing it as an unoriginal rehash of zombie cliches with a forgettable script and two-dimensional characters, though acknowledges the talented cast. They disagree on whether it offers a fresh take on the genre or is just a typical zombie film without originality.
The document outlines a movie review between Steve and Mike on the 2004 horror-comedy film Shaun of the Dead. Steve views it favorably as one of the best zombie films, praising the pacing, balance of thrills and laughs, and writing. Mike is more critical, seeing it as an unoriginal rehash of zombie cliches with a forgettable script and two-dimensional characters, though acknowledges the talented cast. They disagree on whether it offers a fresh take on the genre or is just a typical zombie film without originality.
Movie name: Shaun of Premise: zombie the Dead – play on apocalypse in London. words. Film opening: slow Genre: horror-comedy signs of zombie Year of release: 2004 apocalypse Box office and critical Inciting incident: the reception: $30 million girl in the garden gross/$6 million Main conflict: can budget, 92% on Rotten Shaun become a Tomatoes: better person, get Liz Stars: Simon Pegg and back and survive the Nicholas Frost zombies?
Technical Aspects Steve Mike
Acting: body language Acting: emotions of of the characters characters through Camera work: the long voices pan Camera work: the Pacing: fast quick sweep Special effects: still Pacing: fast looks good years later Special effects: a good mix of practical make- up and CG
Genre Stuff Steve Mike
Comparison: Romero Comparison: zombie “Living Dead” Trilogy comedies like “Warm Tropes: the slow- Bodies” moving zombie, search Tropes: the climax *no for the safe place spoilers~!* The characters: arc of Characters: the the main character supporting cast and minor characters
Opinion Steve Mike
Favorite film of the A tired, unoriginal genre, can do no rehash of typical wrong zombie cliches Great jokes for those Tries too hard to be familiar with genre funny; it’s not A fresh new story for A talented cast, but a zombie movie lovers horrible script
Wrap-up Fast-paced, good Fast-paced but
balance of thrills and forgettable. laughs, well-written, 2-dimnsional well-acted, one of the characters that I best zombie films ever. couldn’t care about Absolutely A typical zombie film recommended without an original bone in the script. Only recommended for hardcore zombie fanatics – they say that you have to kill the brain to kill the zombie, but like most zombie films, this one has no brain.