You are on page 1of 6

Plant and Soil 150: 289-294, 1993.

© 1993 KluwerAcademic Publishers. Printedin the Netherlands. PLSO 9824

Boron deficiency in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] peanut (Arachis


hypogaea L.) and black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]: Symptoms in
seeds and differences among soybean cultivars in susceptibility to boron
deficiency

B. R E R K A S E M 1, R.W. BELL,2 S. L O D K A E W a and J.F. L O N E R A G A N 2


1Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand and 2School of Biological and
Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia

Received 19 October 1992. Accepted in revised form 27 January 1993

Key words: black gram, boron deficiency, hollow heart, peanut, soybean cultivars

Abstract

The susceptibility of soybean cultivars (cvs) to boron (B) deficiency was examined in three experiments
on a Typic Tropaqualf in Northern Thailand: one experiment also included peanut cv Tainan 9 and
black gram cv Regur.
Without added B (B0), B deficiency depressed seed yield by 60% in soybean cv NW1 compared with
30% in cv SJ5, 40% in cv 7016, 45% in peanut, and 93% in black gram. B deficiency also induced a
localised depression on the internal surface of one or both cotyledons of some soybean seeds resembling
the symptom of 'hollow heart' in peanut seeds. It induced 50% hollow heart in peanut, 17% in soybean
cv NWl, 5% in SJ5, and 1% in 7016: black gram seeds had no symptoms. Addition of B decreased or
eliminated the symptoms.
In a comparison of 19 soybean cvs, the incidence of hollow heart symptoms in seeds at B0 varied
widely from none in two cvs to 75% in cv Buchanan: cv NWl showed intermediate susceptibility to B
deficiency with 36% hollow heart in its seed while SJ5 was insensitive with 1%. Application of B
eliminated hollow heart except from one seed in one cultivar. The results suggest that susceptibility to B
deficiency is sufficiently important and variable among soybean genotypes to warrant its inclusion as a
selection criterion when breeding cultivars for areas with low soil B.

Introduction widely used throughout the country. However,


when a new cultivar (NW1) was released and
Soybean is generally regarded as having a low grown in the area, it became B deficient sug-
susceptibility to B deficiency (Martens and Wes- gesting that the reputation of soybean for low
termann, 1991). Recent experiments on a low B susceptibility to B deficiency may be more an
soil in Northern Thailand supported this opinion accidental property of the cultivars in common
when B deficiency had no effect on soybean but use than an inherent property of the specie in
halved the seed yield of sunflower and black general. The present experiments were under-
gram and induced severe hollow heart symptoms taken to explore differences among soybean
in peanut seed (Rerkasem et al., 1988). The cultivars in their susceptibility to B deficiency
soybean cultivar used in the Thai experiments and to compare them with one common cultivar
was SJ5, an established cultivar which has been each of peanut and black gram.
290 Rerkasem et al.

Materials and m e t h o d s Experiment 2

Soybean (Glycine max cv. N W l ) seeds were In January 1988, soybean cv. NW1, soybean cv.
sown in three experiments in the field at Chiang SJ5, soybean cv 7016 peanut (Arachis hypogaea
Mai, Thailand on a sandy loam textured Typic cv. Tainan 9), and black gram (Vigna mungo cv
Tropaqualf of the San Sai series. Regur) were sown as subplots in each of the
In Experiments 1 and 2, seeds were sown on residual B treatment main plots of Experiment 1.
the site of an earlier experiment with four Seeds were harvested, examined and analysed as
replications of four B treatments as main plots described for Experiment 1.
and four cropping sequences as subplots (Experi-
ment 3, Rerkasem et al., 1988). In the original Experiment 3
experiment, B was applied as borax
(Na2B4OT.10H20) to supply 0, 1, 2, and 4 k g B In January 1989, 19 soybean genotypes from
ha -1 (referred to as B0, B1, B2, B4) immedi- diverse sources were sown as subplots within
ately prior to the sowing of the first crop in duplicate main plots of two B treatments, no B
D e c e m b e r 1983. In January 1987, soybean was (B0) and B applied as borax at 1 kg B ha -1 (B1).
sown as the 9th crop in the fourth cropping The seeds of each genotype were sown at a
sequence subplots and its response to the origi- spacing of 0.20 m in rows 0.25 m apart on raised
nal B treatments is reported as Experiment 1 of beds 1 × 2 m 2 in size. At maturity, 100 seeds
the present paper. On the same subplots rice was from each subplot were assessed for hollow
sown as crop 10 and, in January 1988, the heart.
subplots were split for planting five genotypes as
the l l t h crop since applying the original borax
treatments. Prior to sowing the genotypes of Results and discussion
crop 11, 13kg P h a -1 as calcium aerophos
(Ca(H2PO4)2) and 25 kg K ha -1 as K2SO 4 were Hollow heart and DM of seed
applied to each subplot. The hot water soluble B
levels in the 0 to 10 cm layer of soil in B0, B1, In the absence of applied B in Experiment 1, B
B2 and B4 treatments after crop 11 were 0.05, deficiency depressed by 33% the seed dry matter
0.08, 0.10 and 0.12mg B kg -1 soil respectively, (DM) of the recently released soybean cv N W l
when determined as described previously (Rer- (Table 1). It also induced a localized depression
kasem et al., 1988). Crop 11 is reported as on the internal surface of one or both cotyledons
Experiment 2 in the present paper. of 22% of the seeds. In severe cases, the internal
depression was very large and the seeds were
shrivelled and deformed. Some seeds also had a
Experiment i small external 'dimple' on the testa surface

N W l soybean seeds were harvested at maturity, Table 1. Effects of soil B treatments on dry matter, B
examined for symptoms, dried at 75°C, dry concentration and incidence of hollow heart in seeds of
ashed at 500°C for 10 h, and analysed for B by an soybean cv. NWl. (Experiment 1)
azomethine-H procedure as described previously Soil B treatment
( R e r k a s e m et al., 1988). The cotyledons of 100 B0 B1 B2 B4
seeds from each B treatment were separated and
examined for indentations of their internal sur- B concentration
(mg B kg- 1) 10a 14bc 16c 20d
faces; seeds with abnormal indentations were Dry matter (kg ha -1) 1219a 1893b 1833b 1646b
classified as 'hollow heart' because of the re- Hollow heart (%) 22a 2b lb 0b
semblance of the disorder to the symptom of Values within a row are significantly different (p <0.05)
'hollow heart' in B deficient peanut seed (Harris unless followed by the same letter; Duncan's Multiple Range
and Brolman, 1966). Test.
Boron deficiency in soybean 291

apparently due to a localised depression on the pressed seed DM by 45%. Black gram cv Regur
external surface of the cotyledon. showed no symptoms of hollow heart but, at B0,
The internal symptoms on the cotyledons of many of its seeds were shrivelled and B de-
the affected soybean seeds resembled the symp- ficiency depressed its seed DM by over 90%.
toms of 'hollow heart' in peanuts (Harris and The results indicate that seed yield of soybean
Brolman, 1966) so closely that the same term cv NWl was more susceptible to B deficiency
'hollow heart' will be used to describe the than were seed yields of peanut cv Tainan 9 and
symptom in both species. Application of B at all soybean cvs SJ5 and 7016 but much less sucept-
levels enhanced seed DM and decreased the ible than seed yield of black gram cv Regur. In
incidence of hollow heart to 2% or less. the expression of hollow heart symptoms, soy-
When compared with the established soybean bean cv NW1 was also more susceptible to B
cv SJ5 and the promising new cv 7016 in Experi- deficiency than soybean cvs SJ5 and 7016 al-
ment 2, NWl was more susceptible to B de- though less susceptible than peanut.
ficiency (Table 2). At B0, B deficiency induced That soybean cv NW1 is more susceptible to B
17% hollow heart in NW1 but only 5% in SJ5 deficiency than cv SJ5 was confirmed when 19
and 0.5% in 7016: it also depressed seed DM by soybean cvs were compared in Experiment 3: at
60% in NW1, 30% in SJ5 and 40% in 7016. B0, NWl had 36% hollow heart in its seed while
In the development of hollow heart symptoms, SJ5 had 1%. Only Buchanan with 75% hollow
soybean cv NW1 was appreciably less susceptible heart was more susceptible than NWl. Two
to B deficiency than peanut cv Tainan 9 but in cultivars (8219-59-4 and 8037-42-1) were as sus-
the depression of seed DM it was more suscep- ceptible as NW1 and five others (B107, 82A-
tible (Table 2). At B0, B deficiency induced 50% 1842, CM60, Wilis, SJ1) were as insensitive as
hollow heart in peanut cv Tainan 9 and de- SJ5. Nine cultivars (UFV80-84, Farrer, 7016,

Table 2. Effects of soil B treatments on dry matter, B concentration and incidence of hollow heart in seeds of soybean cultivars
NW1, SJ5 and 7016, peanut cv. Tainan 9, and black gram cv. Regur. (Experiment 2)
Cultivar Soil B treatment
B0 B1 B2 B4
Seed dry matter (kg ha l)
NW1 668a 1176b 1400bc 1697c
SJ5 1333a 1809b 1755b 1901b
7016 1457a 1964ab 2019b 2315b
Tainan 9 2170a 3503b 3749b 3973b
Regur 84a 51 lb 720c 1193d

B concentration (mg B kg 1)o


NWl 7cd llefg llefg 19ij
SJ5 8cd 10def 14ghi 16hi
7016 8cd 12efgh 13fgh 18ij
Tainan 9 4b llefg 1lefg 14ghi
Regur 3a 5b 7cd 9de

Hollow heart ( % )b
NWl 16.8b 3.3c 4.8c 0.0d
SJ5 4.8c 0.0d 0.0d 0.0d
7016 0.5d 0.0d 0.0d 0.0d
Tainan 9 49.8a 10.0b 8.0bc 0.0d
Values within rows for seed dry matter and values within rows and columns for B concentration and hollow heart are significantly
different (p < 0.05) unless followed by the same letter; Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
aAnalysis of variance after log transformation.
bAnalysis of variance after arcsin transformation. No deformed seeds were observed in black gram.
292 R e r k a s e m et al.

V a l d e r , 8207-24-3, C a n a p o l i s , SK1, Shi Shi, h o l l o w h e a r t while S J5 s e e d w i t h 10 m g B kg -1


B R 1 ) w e r e i n t e r m e d i a t e b e t w e e n N W l a n d SJ5 h a d n o n e a n d 7016 w i t h 8 m g B kg -1 h a d o n l y
in t h e i r s u s c e p t i b i l i t y to B deficiency. A p p l i c a - 0.5% hollow heart. While not conclusive, the
t i o n o f B e l i m i n a t e d h o l l o w h e a r t in all cultivars results suggest t h a t t h e g r e a t e r s u s c e p t i b i l i t y o f
e x c e p t B R 1 w h i c h h a d s y m p t o m s in o n l y o n e cv N W l to B d e f i c i e n c y results f r o m a p o o r e r
seed. u t i l i z a t i o n o f B in t h e s e e d r a t h e r t h a n in t h e
s u p p l y o f B to t h e s e e d . W h e n t a k e n t o g e t h e r
B o r o n concentrations in seeds with t h e results o f E x p e r i m e n t 1, t h e r e s u l t s also
suggest t h a t s o y b e a n p l a n t s with s e e d B c o n c e n -
I n E x p e r i m e n t 1, s e e d s f r o m t h e B0 t r e a t m e n t t r a t i o n s o f 8 o r less m g B k g -1 D M a r e B
w i t h a high i n c i d e n c e o f h o l l o w h e a r t h a d an deficient, o f 9 to 13 m a y b e deficient, a n d o f 14
a v e r a g e B c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f 1 0 m g B kg -~ D M : o r m o r e a r e n o t deficient.
s e e d s f r o m t r e a t m e n t s w i t h 2 % o r less h o l l o w I n e a c h B t r e a t m e n t o f E x p e r i m e n t 2, b l a c k
h e a r t h a d 14 o r m o r e m g B kg -~ D M ( T a b l e 1). g r a m cv R e g u r h a d B c o n c e n t r a t i o n s in its s e e d
I n e a c h B t r e a t m e n t o f E x p e r i m e n t 2, all o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y half o f t h o s e in t h e s o y b e a n
s o y b e a n cvs h a d s i m i l a r B c o n c e n t r a t i o n s in t h e i r s e e d . Since in e a c h t r e a t m e n t its s e e d y i e l d was
s e e d : t h e y i n c r e a s e d f r o m a b o u t 8 m g kg -1 D M also l o w e r t h a n t h a t o f t h e s o y b e a n cvs, t h e
at B 0 t o 16 o r m o r e at B4 ( T a b l e 2). S o y b e a n h i g h e r s u s c e p t i b i l i t y o f b l a c k g r a m cv R e g u r to B
s e e d w i t h 12 o r m o r e m g B kg -~ D M h a d no deficiency a p p e a r s to r e s u l t f r o m a p o o r e r a b i l i t y
h o l l o w h e a r t in a n y cv o r t r e a t m e n t . S o y b e a n cv to s u p p l y its s e e d with B. B l a c k g r a m cv R e g u r
N W 1 s e e d with l l m g B kg -1 h a d 3 to 5 % p l a n t s with s e e d B c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f 7 o r less m g

Table 3. Effect of soil B treatments on incidence of hollow heart in seeds of nineteen soybean cultivars. (Experiment 3)
Cultivar Source Soil B treatment a Significance b
B0 B1
Hollow heart (%)
B107 Australia 0a 0 NS
82A- 1842 Thailand 0a 0 NS

CM60 Thailand lab 0 NS


SJ5 Thailand lab 0 NS

Wilis Indonesia lab 0 NS


SJ1 Thailand 4ab 0 NS

UFV 80-84 Australia 8bc 0 *


Farrer Australia 9bc 0 *
7016 Thailand 9bc 0 *
Valder Australia 1lbc 0 *
8207-24-3 Thailand 1lbc 0 *
Canapolis Australia 13bc 0 *
SK1 Thailand 17c 0 *
Shi Shi Taiwan 19c 0 *
BR1 Australia 19c 1 *

NW1 Thailand 36de 0 **


8219-59-4 Thailand 41de 0 **
8037-42-1 Thailand 54ef 0 **

Buchanan Australia 75f 0 ***


aStatistical analysis after arcsin transformation of square root of proportion of seeds with hollow heart; for comparisons within the
B0 column, values are significantly different (p < 0.05) unless followed by the same letter; Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
bFor comparisons within a row: NS = not significant at p <0.05; *significant at p <0.05, **p <0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Boron deficiency in soybean 293

B k g - I were B deficient and of 9 or m o r e were in the present and other experiments ( R e r k a s e m


not. et al., 1988) should also not be taken as an
A t B0, the B concentration in the seed of indication of the behaviour of these species in
p e a n u t cv Tainan 9 was only half that of the general since, in other experiments a wide vari-
soybean cvs: in all other B treatments, it was ation in the susceptibility of their cultivars to B
similar. Peanut seed with 11 or less mg B kg -1 deficiency has been found (Keerati-Kasikorn
had 8% or m o r e hollow heart symptoms and personal communication; R e r k a s e m , 1990).
seed with 14 or m o r e mg B kg -1 had none. The results suggest that the reputation of
soybean for low susceptibility to B deficiency
may be more an accidental property of the
Discussion cultivars in c o m m o n use than an inherent prop-
erty of the specie in general; they also suggest
T h e present study has shown that B deficiency that susceptibility to B deficiency is sufficiently
produces internal d a m a g e of cotyledons in soy- important and variable a m o n g soybean geno-
b e a n seeds similar to the hollow heart s y m p t o m types to warrant its inclusion as a selection
in p e a n u t seeds. In this paper, the s y m p t o m in criterion when breeding cultivars for areas with
soybean has b e e n called hollow heart and it is low soil B. It may be noted that of the Thai
p r o p o s e d that this n a m e be adopted for general genotypes in the present study, SJ1, SJ5 and
use. CM60 which were relatively tolerant of low B
In peanuts, hollow heart is specific to B were selected in Chiang Mai on soil types similar
deficiency and has been used for diagnosis of B to that of the present study: N W l and SK1 which
deficiency in crops (Harris and Gilman, 1957; were appreciably m o r e susceptible to B de-
Netsangtip et al., 1985). It is suggested that, ficiency were selected in areas where B de-
since there are no reports of other factors caus- ficiency is not common.
ing hollow heart in soybean seed, the symptom
m a y also be specific to B deficiency in soybean
and might therefore provide a simple criterion Acknowledgements
for diagnosis of B deficiency.
In the present experiments, hollow heart in The authors are grateful to the University of
soybean a p p e a r e d no m o r e sensitive to B de- Chiang Mai for the provision of facilities and to
ficiency than seed D M , since appreciable levels the Australian Centre for International Agricul-
of hollow heart were always associated with a tural Research, C a n b e r r a (Project 8603) for
significant depression in seed D M . In this respect financial support.
it contrasts with hollow heart in peanut which is
generally a m o r e sensitive indicator of B de-
ficiency than is seed D M (Cox et al., 1982; Hill References
and Morrill, 1974; Morrill et al., 1977; R e r k a s e m
et al., 1988). Cox F R, Adams F and Tucker B B 1982 Liming, fertilization
In several studies, soybean crops did not and mineral nutrition. In Peanut Science and Technology.
respond to B when grown on low B soils on Eds. H E Pattee and C T Young. Amer. Peanut Res. and
which other crop species were severely B de- Educ. Soc. Inc., Texas. pp 139-164.
ficient (Oertli and Roth, 1969; R e r k a s e m et al., Harris H C and Brolman J B 1966 Comparison of calcium
and boron deficiency in peanut. II. Seed quality in relation
1988), leading to the generalisation that soybean to histology and viability. Agron. J. 58, 578-582.
crops are insensitive to B deficiency (Martens Harris H C and Gilman R L 1957 Effect of boron on peanuts.
and Westermann, 1991). The present experi- Soil Science 84, 233-242.
ments show that this generalisation is not valid Hill W E and Morrill L G 1974 Assessing boron needs for
for the specie as a whole, since soybean cultivars improving peanut yield and quality Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
Proc. 38, 791-794.
varied widely in their susceptibility to B de- Martens D C and Westermann D T 1991 Fertilizer applica-
ficiency on a low B soil. The high susceptibility tions for correcting micronutrient deficiencies. In Mi-
to B deficiency of peanut and black gram shown cronutrients in Agriculture. 2nd Ed. Eds. J J Mortvedt,
294 Boron deficiency in soybean
F R Cox, L M Shuman and R M Welch. pp 549-592. Soil Rerkasem B 1990 Comparison of green gram (Vigna radiata)
Sci. Soc. Amer. Book Series No 4. and blackgram (Vigna mungo) in boron deficiency. In
Morrill L G, Hill W E, Chrudilmsky W W, Ashlock L O, Proc. Mungbean Meeting '90. Chiang Mai, Thailand, 23-
Tripp L D, Tucker B B and Weatherly L 1977 Boron 24 Feb. 1990. Ed. C Thavarasook. pp 167-174. Tropical
requirements of Spanish peanuts in Oklahoma: Effects on Agric. Res. Center, Japan, Thailand Office, Bangkok.
yield and quality and interaction with other nutrients. Rerkasem B, Netsangtip R, Bell R W, Loneragan J F and
Agric. Exp. Stn. Oklahoma State Univ. Report No Mp-99. Hiranburana N 1988 Comparative species responses to
Netsangtip R, Rerkasem B, Bell R W and Loneragan J F boron on a Typic Tropaqualf in Northern Thailand. Plant
1985 A field survey of boron deficiency in peanut grown in and Soil 106, 15-21.
the Chiang Mai valley. Thai Agric. Res. J. 3, 171-175.
Oertli J J and Roth J A 1969 Boron nutrition of sugar beet, Section editor: A C Borstlap
cotton, and soybean. Agron. J. 64, 234-237.

You might also like