0% found this document useful (0 votes)
381 views2 pages

Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (Ltia) : Assigned Score Remarks Criteria Point Score Point Value Self-Assessment

This document contains an assessment form for the Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (LTIA). It evaluates barangays on various criteria related to their efficiency and effectiveness in dispute resolution. The form contains 5 sections that examine factors like timely settlement procedures, record keeping, reporting, monthly meetings, settlement rates and quality, compliance with resolutions, settlement techniques used, coordination with other agencies, and information campaigns. Barangays are assigned point scores in each criteria and their total is calculated to determine how well they meet the objectives of the Katarungang Pambarangay system for interpersonal dispute resolution.

Uploaded by

Jhon Paul Avila
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
381 views2 pages

Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (Ltia) : Assigned Score Remarks Criteria Point Score Point Value Self-Assessment

This document contains an assessment form for the Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards (LTIA). It evaluates barangays on various criteria related to their efficiency and effectiveness in dispute resolution. The form contains 5 sections that examine factors like timely settlement procedures, record keeping, reporting, monthly meetings, settlement rates and quality, compliance with resolutions, settlement techniques used, coordination with other agencies, and information campaigns. Barangays are assigned point scores in each criteria and their total is calculated to determine how well they meet the objectives of the Katarungang Pambarangay system for interpersonal dispute resolution.

Uploaded by

Jhon Paul Avila
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES AWARDS (LTIA)

ASSESSMENT FORM

A. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
Barangay: ________________________________________________ Region : VIII
City or Municipality: BARUGO
Province: LEYTE

B. EVALUATION CRITERIA
ASSIGNED SCORE

POINT POINT SELF- REMARKS


CRITERIA
SCORE VALUE ASSESSMENT

I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION

A). Observance of Settlement Procedure and Settlement Deadlines 5


1. a) Proper Recording of every dispute 2.5
b) Sending of Summons to Parties within the prescribed period 1 to 3
days only 2.5
2. Settlement and Award Period 10 8.48
a). Mediation (within 15 days after initial confrontation with the Lupon
Chairman) 10
b). Conciliation (15 days after initial confrontation with the Pangkat) with
column of the date of initial confrontation 8
c). Conciliation with extendible period of another 15 days 6
d). Arbitration (within 10 days from the date of the agreement to arbitrate) 4
e). Conciliation beyond 46 days but not more than 60 days 2

To compute: cases settled x assigned point score = Score


total number of cases filed
Actual Illustration:
Total Number of cases : 25
Mediated cases : 18
Conciliated cases : 3
Arbitrated Cases : 2
Mediated cases : 18 x 10 = 7.2
25
Conciliated cases : 3 x 8 = 0.96
25
Arbitrated cases :2 x 4 = 0.32
25
Total Score = 7.2 + 0.96 + 0.32 = 8.48 pts

B. Systematic Maintenance of Records 5


Records of Cases by docket number
Manually 1
Computerized 1
Copies of minutes of Lupon meetings with attendance sheets 1
Copies of reports submitted to the Court and to the DILG on file 1
All records are kept on file in a secured filing cabinet(s) 1
C. Timely Submission of Reports to Concerned Agencies 5
1. To the Court: 4
● complete and on time = 4
● complete but not on time = 2
● incomplete and not on time = 1
● no submission = 0
2. To the DILG 1
● Annual Report submitted to the DILG City or Municipal Office
not later than the 30th of January of the ensuing year
D. Conduct of Monthly Meetings Exclusively on KP Matters 10
● Notice of Meeting (must contain the attendance) 2
To compute:
number of Notice of Meeting containing the attendance X 2
12
● Minutes of the Meeting 8
To compute:
number of reported KP meetings X 8
12

II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE


KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
ASSIGNED SCORE

POINT POINT SELF- REMARKS


CRITERIA
SCORE VALUE ASSESSMENT
A. Quantity of settled cases against filed 10
90-100% 10
80-89% 8
70-79% 6
60-69% 4
59% below 2
To Compute:
Total number of settled cases x 100
Total no. of cases filed - cases outside the jurisdiction of KP

B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 10


•Zero case repudiated 5
•Non-recurrence of cases settled 5
C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or award
10
after the cases have been settled
80-100% (with supporting documents) 10
70-79% (with supporting documents) 8
60-69% (with supporting documents) 6
50-51% (with supporting documents) 4
49 and below (with supporting documents) 2
To Compute :
Total Number of Complied Settlement or Award X 100
Total no. of cases filed- Cases outside the jurisdiction of KP

III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE LUPONG


TAGAPAMAYAPA
A. Settlement Technique 5
Settlement technique utilized by Lupon
● Reported more than one settlement technique 5
● Reported one settlement technique 3
● No report 0
B. Coordination with Concerned Agencies relating to disputes filed
PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR, Office of the Prosecutor, Court, DOJ,
CHR , volunteer groups/organizations, NGOs, CSOs, Barangay Justice
Advocates 5 5
C. Sustained information drive to promote Katarungang
Pambarangay 5
● IEC materials produced 2
● IEC activities conducted 2
● Innovative Campaign Strategy 1
E. KP Training or seminar within the assessment period 10
1. Conducted by the Barangay 6
2. Training conducted by government or non-government organizations
participated by Lupon members 4
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5
Building structure or space 5
V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT 5
1. City, Municipal or Provincial and NGAs 3
2. People's Organization, NGOs or Private Sector and others 2
TOTAL SCORE #REF!

________________________________
Punong Barangay/ Barangay Secretary
(Signature over printed Name) Date: _________________________

You might also like