Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thermodynamic Properties of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide - Widom and Frenkel Lines
Thermodynamic Properties of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide - Widom and Frenkel Lines
Supercritical fluids are widely used in a number of important technological applications, yet the theoretical
progress in the field has been rather moderate. Fairly recently, a new understanding of the liquidlike and gaslike
properties of supercritical fluids has come to the fore, particularly with the advent of the Widom and Frenkel
lines that aim to demarcate different physical properties on the phase diagram. Here, we report the results of a
computational study of supercritical carbon dioxide, one of the most important fluids in the chemical industry.
We study the response functions of CO2 in the supercritical state and calculate the locations of their maxima
(Widom lines). We also report the preliminary calculations of the Frenkel line, the line of crossover of microscopic
dynamics of particles. Our insights are relevant to physical processes in the atmosphere of Venus and its evolution.
022111-2
THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERCRITICAL . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 91, 022111 (2015)
022111-3
FOMIN, RYZHOV, TSIOK, AND BRAZHKIN PHYSICAL REVIEW E 91, 022111 (2015)
022111-4
THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERCRITICAL . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW E 91, 022111 (2015)
and pressure, the Frenkel line becomes approximately parallel excellent agreement between simulations and experiments.
to the melting line in logarithmic coordinates. We showed that similar to model liquids studied before, the
Investigation of CO2 is important for planetary sciences lines of supercritical maxima of CO2 rapidly diverge and
and in particular for understanding the physical processes on form a wide bunch of lines. Furthermore, even the maxima
Venus. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of the same quantity taken along different lines (isotherms or
of Venus is approximately 96%. The current temperature of isobars) form different lines. These results justify our earlier
Venus is estimated to be as high as 735 K, and the atmospheric conclusion that the concept of the Widom line as the line of
pressure is estimated to be 9.3 MPa. One can see from Fig. 8(b) supercritical maxima is ill-defined and does not have a clear
that this (P ,T ) point lies deeply inside the gaslike state above physical sense [5]. We have calculated the Frenkel line for
the Frenkel line. However, it is argued in the literature [22] carbon dioxide and showed that it is approximately parallel
that, at the earlier stages of Venus’s evolution, the atmospheric to the melting line in logarithmic coordinates, providing a
pressure may have been as high as several dozens of MPa. useful guide for estimating the line for other conditions and
This means that the atmosphere in the early Venus consisted systems.
of carbon dioxide in the rigidlike state below the Frenkel line,
but has later undergone a transition across the Frenkel line into
the nonrigid gaslike fluid. The crossover was accompanied by ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
the microscopic dynamics of the fluid and qualitatively altering
many physical properties [11–13], with important implications We are grateful to K. Trachenko for discussions. Yu.F.
for forming the landscape of the planet. thanks the Russian Scientific Center at Kurchatov Institute
and Joint Supercomputing Center of Russian Academy of
Science for computational facilities. Yu.F., E.Ts., and V.R.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
are grateful to the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No.
Using MD simulations, we reported the equation of 14-12-00820) for the support. V.B. is grateful to the Russian
state and supercritical maxima of carbon dioxide and found Science Foundation (Grant No. 14-22-00093).
[1] L. Xu, P. Kumar, S. V. Buldyrev, S.-H. Chen, P. H. Poole, [12] V. V. Brazhkin, Yu. D. Fomin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov, and
F. Sciortino, and H. E. Stanley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031203 (2012).
102, 16558 (2005). [13] V. V. Brazhkin, Yu. D. Fomin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov,
[2] V. V. Brazhkin and V. N. Ryzhov, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 084503 E. N. Tsiok, and Kostya Trachenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 145901
(2011). (2013).
[3] V. V. Brazhkin, Yu. D. Fomin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov, and [14] Zh. Zhang and Zh. Duan, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 214507
E. N. Tsiok, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 14112 (2011). (2005).
[4] H.-O. May and P. Mausbach, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031201 (2012). [15] S. Plimpton, J. Comp. Phys 117, 1 (1995); http://lammps.sandia.
[5] V. V. Brazhkin, Yu. D. Fomin, V. N. Ryzhov, E. E. Tareyeva, gov/index.html.
and E. N. Tsiok, Phys. Rev. E 89, 042136 (2014). [16] C. Yang, V. V. Brazhkin, M. T. Dove, and K. Trachenko, Phys.
[6] A. Dey, P. Roy, and T. Sarkar, Phys. A 392, 6341 (2013). Rev. E 91, 012112 (2015).
[7] A. R. Imre, U. K. Deiters, T. Kraska, and I. Tiselj, Nucl. Eng. [17] K. Trachenko, Phys. Rev. B 78, 104201 (2008).
Des. 252, 179 (2012). [18] K. Trachenko and V. V. Brazhkin, Sci. Rep. 3, 2188 (2013).
[8] G. Franzese and H. Eugene Stanley, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter [19] J. Frenkel, Kinetic Theory of Liquids (Oxford University Press,
19, 205126 (2007). London, 1947).
[9] J. L. F. Abascal and C. Vega, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 234502 (2010). [20] http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/.
[10] B. Boates, A. M. Teweldeberhan, and S. A. Bonev, Proc. Natl. [21] V. M. Giordano, F. Datchi, and A. Dewaele, J. Chem. Phys. 125,
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 14808 (2012). 054504 (2006).
[11] V. V. Brazhkin, A. G. Lyapin, V. N. Ryzhov, K. Trachenko, Yu. [22] H. C. Urey, The Planets, Their Origin and Development (Yale
D. Fomin, and E. N. Tsiok, Phys.-Usp. 55, 1061 (2012). University Press, New Haven, CT, 1952).
022111-5