You are on page 1of 6

Midterm I.

Performance Management only when these peers are similar to and


Performance Appraisal well-acquainted with the employee.
 Process of assessing employee  Subordinates: subordinate feedback or
performance by comparing present upward feedback is an important
performance with established standards competent of the 360-degree feedback as
which have been communicated to they can provide a very different view on
employees prior. supervisor’s behavior. Can be difficult to
 Provide feedback to employees about their obtain because they fear backlash if they
performance level to improve their rate supervisors unfavorably.
performance as needed by the organization.  Customers: provide feedback by filing
Determine Reasons for Evaluating Employee complaints or complimenting a manager.
Performance Done upon completion of evaluation cards.
1. Provide employee training and feedback. Select Best Appraisal Methods
 Feedback on what employees is doing  Two important decisions made prior to
right or wrong. developing instrument:
2. Determine salary increase. 1. Focus on the appraisal dimensions.
 Provide fair basis to determine an  Appraisal dimensions can focus on
employee’s salary increase. traits, competencies, task types, and
3. Make promotion decisions. goals.
 Determine which employees will be  Trait-Focused Performance
promoted. Dimensions – employee attributes.
4. Making termination decisions.  Task-Focused Performance
 When performance management Dimensions – organized by the
techniques are not successful, this may similarity of tasks that are performed.
suggest that the best course of action is  Competency-Focused Performance
to terminate the employee. Dimensions – employee’s knowledge,
5. Conducting personnel research. skills, and abilities.
 Correlate test scores from employment  Goal-Focused Performance
tests with measure of job performance Dimensions – on basis of goals to be
validates employment tests. accomplished.
Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance 2. Use of employee comparisons,
 Traditionally, employee performance is objective measures, or ratings.
evaluated by supervisors. However,  Evaluate performance by comparing
organizations recently observed that employees with each other.
supervisors see only certain aspects of o Ranking method – reduce
employee’s performance and behavior. leniency, employees are compared
o Example: Branch manager may with one another instead of being
observe only 30% of a teller’s work rated individually on a scale. The
behavior, the rest is observed by easiest is rank order.
customers, peers, and other personnel o Paired comparison method –
in other parts of the bank. involves comparing each possible
 360-degree feedback and multiple-source pair and choosing which one of
feedback – use of multiple sources to each pair is the better employee.
appraise performance. o Forced distribution method –
 Supervisors: most common source of predetermined percentage of
performance appraisal. Though they may employees are placed in each of
not see every minute of employee’s the five categories.
behavior, they see the end result.  Use objective measures (objective or
 Peers: often see the actual behavior. Are hard criteria). Common types include
those employees who work directly with the quantity of work, quality of work,
employee. Peer ratings are fairly reliable attendance, and safety.
o Graphic rating scale – Likert o Severity error or Strictness error –
scale, ratings can include 1-10; rater gives all workers very negative
excellent, average, poor; or performance appraisals.
satisfactory, unsatisfactory. o Central tendency error – rater
o Behavioral rating scale – gives all workers midpoint rating in
checklist containing a list of performance appraisals.
behaviors, expectations or results o Halo effect – an overall positive
for each dimension. evaluation of a worker based on one
Frame of reference – training provides known positive characteristic or
raters with job-related information, practice in action.
rating, and examples of ratings made by experts and o Recency effect – give greater
its rationale. It increases rater accuracy and reduce weight to recent performance and
rater errors. lesser weight on earlier performance.
Observe and Document Performance Termination of Employees
 Next step is for supervisors to observe  4 reasons an employee can be legally
employee behavior and document critical terminated:
incidents as they occur. 1. Probationary period – employees are
o Critical incidents – examples of given probationary period to prove that
excellent and poor employee they can perform well. Most last 3-6
performance. Must be communicated months.
to employee at the time it occurred. 2. Violation of company rules
 Importance of documentation 3. Inability to perform – organization will
o It forces a supervisor to focus on need to prove that employee cannot
employee behavior rather than perform the job.
traits. 4. Reduction in force (Layoffs) – if it is in
o It helps supervisors recall behaviors the best economic interest of an
when they are evaluating organization.
performance.  Transfer, promotion, demotion, separation
o It provides examples to use when  Voluntary separation or resignation or
reviewing performance ratings with quit is the termination of employment
employees. initiated by employee.
o It helps an organization defend  Involuntary separation or dismissal is the
against legal actions taken by termination by employer. Following
employee. causes:
 Common sources of error when not o Severe misconduct
documenting o Habitual neglect of employee of his
o First impressions duties
o Recent behaviors o Fraud
o Unusual or extreme behaviors o Crime against employer
o Behavior consistent with
supervisor’s opinion Midterm II. Leadership
Problems and Pitfalls in Performance Appraisal Leadership
 Remains very subjective.  Influencing, motivating, and enabling
 Prone to a number of systematic biases and others to contribute towards
distortions. effectiveness and success in
o Distributional error – rater rates organization.
everyone the same. Leader Emergence
o Leniency error – rater gives all  Part of Trait theory.
workers very positive performance  Postulates that certain types of people
appraisals. will become leaders and certain types
will not.
Leader Performance o Leader effectiveness – employee
 Idea that leaders who perform well motivation, employee satisfaction,
possess certain characteristics that leader acceptance.
poor-performing leaders do not.  Styles of Path Goal Theory
Theoretical Approaches to Leadership o Instrumental Style – leader plans and
1. Trait Approach organizes activities for employees.
 Leadership best understood in terms of o Supportive Style – leader shows
traits held by an individual that are concern for employees.
accountable for the observed o Participative Style – leader allows
leadership. employees to participate in decision
2. Behavioral Approach making.
 Leadership best understood in terms of o Achievement-oriented style – leader
action taken by individual when sets challenging goal and rewards
leading a group. achievement.
3. Power and Influence Approach Other Contingency Theories
 Leadership best understood by the use 1. Situational Leadership Theory
of power exercised by a person with a  Hershey and Blanchard
group.  Effective leaders vary their styles with
4. Leader-Member Exchange Theory readiness of followers.
 Leadership based on mutual influence 2. Fiedler’s Contingency Model
they have on employees.  Fred Fiedler
o In-group: members are those  Leader effectiveness depends on
with competence and skill. whether person’s natural leadership
o Out-group: members without style is appropriately matched to
such attributes. situation.
Types of Power 3. Leadership Substitute
1. Reward power – to offer incentives for  Identifies conditions that limit a
desirable behavior. leader’s ability to influence
2. Coercive power – to punish an employee subordinates.
for undesirable behavior. Types of Leadership
3. Legitimate power – authority. 1. Transformational Leadership – process of
4. Expert power – expertise in given areas. inspiring a group to pursue goals and
5. Referent power – abstract type of power; attain results.
someone referred to as having personal 2. Charismatic Leadership – product of
qualities of a leader. charisma; a trait that inspires confidence in
Path Goal Theory of Leadership others to support ideas of the charismatic
 Based on Expectancy Theory of leader.
Motivation. 3. Implicit Leadership Theory – leadership is
 Relates several leadership styles to a perceived phenomenon as attributed to
specific employee and situational an individual by others.
contingencies. 4. Authentic Leadership Theory – leaders
 Advocates servant leadership. should be honest, lead out of a desire to
o Leader behaviors – directive, serve not for self-gain.
supportive, participative, achievement- 5. Theory Y or Person-oriented Leaders –
oriented. warm and supportive manner, show
o Employee contingencies – skills and concern for subordinates. Employees are
experience, locus of control. intrinsically motivated, seek responsibility
o Environmental contingencies – task and self-controlled.
structure, team dynamics. 6. Theory X or Task-oriented Leaders – high
in initiating structure. Define their roles
and roles of their subordinates. Employees
are extrinsically motivated, lazy, and and personal experiences. Extends
undisciplined. physiological needs, includes need
for relative status. Purpose of
Midterm III. Motivation human motivation is to achieve a
Intrinsic Motivation higher position than others.
 Motivation in absence of external factors 2. Drive to bond – drive to form
such as pay, promotion, and co-workers. social relationships. It motivates
 Personal factors. people to cooperate, thus, a
Extrinsic Motivation fundamental ingredient in success
 Arise from non-personal factors such as of organizations.
pay, co-workers, and promotion. 3. Drive to learn – satisfy one’s own
Need-based Theories of Motivation curiosity. Something we don’t
1. Needs Hierarchy Theory know gives us tension that
 Abraham Maslow motivates us to close information
 From bottom to top: Physiological gap. Related to higher order needs
needs, Safety and Security needs, Love of growth.
and Belongingness needs, Esteem 4. Drive to defend – drive to protect
needs, and Self-actualization needs. ourselves. Creates a fight-or-flight
 As person satisfies lower-level need, response in face of danger. It is
the next higher need becomes the always reactive, triggered by
primary motivator, known as threat.
satisfaction-progression process. 4. Theory of Learned Needs
2. ERG Theory  David McClelland
 Clayton Alderfer  3 secondary needs that are considered
 Overcome problems with Maslow’s particularly important sources of
hierarchy of needs. motivation:
1. Need for Achievement (nAch) – to
 Existence needs, Relatedness needs,
accomplish reasonably challenging
Growth needs
goals through their own effort.
o Existence needs – person’s
Prefer to work alone than in teams.
physiological and physically-
2. Need for Affiliation (nAff) – to
related safety needs (food,
seek approval from others,
shelter, safe working
conform to their expectations, and
conditions).
avoid conflict. Desire to form
o Relatedness needs – person’s
positive relationships with others.
need to interact with other 3. Need for Power (nPw) – to control
people, receive public one’s own environment.
recognition, and feel secure Concerned about maintaining
around people. leadership position.
o Growth needs – person’s self- 5. Two-Factor Theory
esteem through personal  Hygiene factors – job-related elements
achievement. that result from but do not involve job
 Satisfaction-progression process itself.
 Frustration-regression process – o Pay, security, co-workers,
those who are unable to satisfy a working conditions, company
higher need become frustrated and policy, work schedule, company
regress to next lower need level. policy, working conditions,
3. Innate Human Drives supervisors.
 Four fundamental drives by Paul  Motivators – job elements that do
Lawrence and Nitkin Nohria concern actual tasks and duties.
1. Drive to acquire – drive to seek,
take, control, and retain objects
o Level of responsibility, amount  Supervisors should have access to
of job control, interest in work, administer different types of reinforcers.
challenge, variety, Premack Principle
independence.  States that reinforcement is relative.
6. Expectancy Theory Supervisor can reinforce an employee with
 Victor Vroom something that does not appear to be a
 Motivation is a function of: reinforcer on the surface.
o Expectancy – perceived o Financial rewards
relationship between the o Recognition
amount of effort employee o Travel
exerts and result. Individual incentive plans are designed to make
o Instrumentality – extent to high levels of individual performance financially
which outcome of a worker’s worthwhile.
performance results in a  Pay for performance – pay employees
consequence. according to how much they individually
o Valence – extent to which produce.
employee values a particular  Merit pays – base on performance
consequence. appraisal scores.
7. Theory X and Theory Y Group incentive plans are profit sharing, gain
 McGregor sharing, stock options.
 Theory X – employees dislike  Reward and punishment
working.
 Theory Y – employees like working. Exit Interview
 Participative decision making –  An organized discussion between a
decision-making model in which company representative and an employee
people involved in implementing a choosing to leave the company. Exit
decision are also involved in making interviews include questions about the
it. employee’s experiences during their time
 Quality circles – form of participative working with the company and provide a
decision making involving regular point of closure for both parties.
meetings of supervisors and  Gain insight into why people are deciding
employees. to leave the organization and contribute to
8. Equity Theory offering a solution.
 Fair balance to be struck between an
employee’s input (hard work, skill Hawthorne Effect
level, acceptance, enthusiasm) and an  Employees attempt to change or improve
employee’s outputs (salary, benefits, their behavior simply because it is being
recognition). evaluated or studied.
9. Goal Setting Theory
 Clarity – clear goal = easy to The Vroom–Yetton decision model is a situational
understand what you need to achieve. leadership theory that suggests that the best
 Challenge – motivating goals = leadership style is subject to the situation.
challenging goals.
 Commitment – commit to the goal.
 Feedback – receive feedback for goal
to continuously motivate.
 Task complexity – goal must not be
complex.
Type of Incentive
 Different employees, different values.
employee for the purpose of the mentee’s
growth, learning, and career development. 
 Modeling – employees learn by watching
how other employees perform.
 Executive coaching – involves professional
and personal development of the
executives.

 Autocratic (A1) – use existing information


for decision-making without any input
from the team.
 Autocratic (A2) – specific information
from team is acquired for decision-making.
Final decision is taken by leader which may
or may not be shared with the team.
 Consultative (C1) – acquire information
from team members individually before the
leader makes a decision.
 Consultative (C2) – where leader gathers
group for discussion but makes final
decision.
 Collaborative (G2) – requires group to
make collaborative decision, leader
supports team.

Quality Management System


 To ensure an organization is providing
consistent products or services.
o Quality planning – identify goals
and baseline. Determine what quality
standards would be, requirements to
meet the standards, and procedures
to be used.
o Quality control – process of
physically testing and inspecting
what was laid out in planning.
o Quality assurance – reviewing.
Confirm that everything is operating
as it was agreed upon.
o Quality improvement – make
necessary changes for the
betterment of product or service
offered.

Work Relationship
 Mentoring – is a reciprocal and
collaborative at-will relationship that most
often occurs between a senior and junior

You might also like