Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Reflects how nursing personnel have performed during a specific period of time
Discover the aspirations of employees and reconcile these with the goals of the institution
Compatibility between the criteria for individual evaluation and organization goals
Development of behavioral expectations which have been mutually agreed upon by both the
rater and the worker
Encouragement of feedback from the rated employees about their performance needs and
interest
Provision for initiating preventive and corrective action and making adjustments to improve
performance
Collected assessments should contain positive examples of growth and achievement and areas
of needed development
“halo effect” – occurs when the appraiser lets one or two positive aspects of the
assessment or behaviour of the employee unduly influence all other aspects of the
employee’s performance
“horns effect” – occurs when the appraiser allows some negative aspects of the
employee’s performance influence the assessment to such an extent that other levels of
job performance are not accurately recorded
“central tendency” trap – manager is hesitant to risk true assessment and therefore
rates all employees as average.
Self – appraisal – can be appraisal interview or completing a joint assessment with the
manager
Ranking - evaluator ranks the employees according to how he or she fared with
co-workers
Rating scales
- types of checklist:
weighted checklist (composed of behavioral statement that represent desirable
behaviors with weighted score attached)
1. Employee and supervisor meet and agree on the principal duties and responsibilities of the
employee’s job
3. Both parties agree on the criteria that will used for measuring and evaluating the
accomplishment of goals
4. Regularly, but more than once a year, the employee and supervisor meet to discuss progress
5. The manager’s role is supportive, assisting the employee to reach goals by coaching and
counseling
6. During the appraisal process, the manager determines whether the employee has met the goals
7. The entire process focuses on outcomes and results and not on personal traits
Advantage of MBO:
- the method creates a vested interest in the employee to accomplish goals because
employees are able to set their own goals
Disadvantage to MBO:
- highly directive and authoritarian managers find it difficult to lead employees in this
manner
- one of the most effective ways to promote excellence in nursing practice is for
nurses to offer information, support, guidance, criticism and direction to one another
(Curtin, 1994)
- provides the employee with valuable feedback that can promote growth
Coaching - should be delivered in the following manner to be effective and improve work
performance (Orth, Wilkinson, & Benfari, 1990):
2. Be descriptive, not evaluative, when describing that was wrong with the work performance
3. Be certain that the feedback is not self-serving but meets the needs of the employee
6. Make sure the employee has clearly understood the feedback and that the employee’s
communication also has been clearly heard.
References:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2000), Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing (3 rd ed.)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_appraisal
By: ANGEL MAE R. BABOR