Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Client counselling Competition promotes knowledge and interest Among law students in
the field of preventive law and counselling functions of law practice. It also happens to
encourage students to develop planning, interviewing and analytical skills in the lawyer-client
relationship in the law office. interviewing and advising are a major part of a lawyer’s work.
All too often, lawyers are assumed to have the listening and questioning skills necessary to
conduct an effective interview. Regrettably, not all lawyers have these skills and abilities.
This Competition Provides an excellent opportunity for valuable educational and cultural
interchange changes between students, law Teachers, and lawyers.
As the name suggests, client counselling is all about making your client feel that you are as
concerned about his problem as he is. The Competition simulates a consultation, in which
two Students of law, acting as lawyers (attorneys / solicitors / legal practitioners) shall be
presented with a client matter. A brief written memorandum is given to them that identifies
the general nature of the subject-matter of the client 's problem (e.g., that a client wants
advice about a problem arising from building a house, that the customer faces a shoplifting
charge, etc.) before of the interview is started. When the client enters your room, he talks
about his problem and he lays bare everything he's been through. Since he's already grieved,
the first step that the student takes is to calm him down. Choose a conversational style while
talking to your client, or questioning them. Being too professional might not be taken very
well by both the client and the judges. The students conduct an interview with an individual
who plays the client’s role. Students are Expected to obtain relevant information, explore
with the client his or her preferred outcome, outline the nature of the problem, and present the
client with a means (or range of alternatives, if appropriate) for resolving the problem. Start
inquiring about his problem once the client feels comfortable with you, and try to determine
what remedy he is looking for. Make him trust you. The exercise to build confidence will
earn you bonus points. Even though his problem can sound complex, give him some ray of
hope and tell him that his issue will be resolved and you will support him to the best of your
abilities.
Judges observe and evaluate how well you can advise your client and provide him with a
practical solution to his problem. Judges are not there to test how well you know the law,
how well you can explain it to your client and flaunting your legal knowledge to them is a big
no. So, the students are evaluated against specific criteria emphasizing the use of questioning
listening, planning, and analytical skills in a lawyer/client interview. Once the evaluation of
interview has been completed by the judges, the students are called back in and the judges
provide a quick overview of the team's handling of the consultation period and post-
consultation.
Ability to explain the law and legal terms in a simple laymen language – excessive
legal jargon is to be avoided.
Comfort level between client and the lawyers
How well-versed you are with the laws with which you’ll be dealing.
Client satisfaction - whether your resolution or approach to his problem would make
him come to you again.
Your performance largely depends on the client client that you are provided. His
reactions and responses could make or break your show. Also, the client’s problem is
another important factor.
Negotiating the fee with your client – has to be done with great care, bearing in mind
his / her occupation and financial position.
The competition is on-the-spot. There are no announced solutions and one will never
know exactly what the client's question will be like. However, there may be a general
theme on which the problems will be based. One doesn’t know how the other teams
have performed as they are not pitted against each other.
Have good knowledge of the remedy or the grievance redressal system under that law.
The client does not need your knowledge of law but instead needs a solution to his
problem. So, if you are suggesting a remedy, make sure you have legal backing.