The document provides a rubric for assessing written tasks on 7 levels across 6 criteria: task completion, sentence structure/organization, format and style, specific grammar, general grammar and spelling. For each level and criteria, descriptors are given to explain the expected quality and number of errors. A total score out of 10 is also provided to give an overall assessment of the written work.
The document provides a rubric for assessing written tasks on 7 levels across 6 criteria: task completion, sentence structure/organization, format and style, specific grammar, general grammar and spelling. For each level and criteria, descriptors are given to explain the expected quality and number of errors. A total score out of 10 is also provided to give an overall assessment of the written work.
The document provides a rubric for assessing written tasks on 7 levels across 6 criteria: task completion, sentence structure/organization, format and style, specific grammar, general grammar and spelling. For each level and criteria, descriptors are given to explain the expected quality and number of errors. A total score out of 10 is also provided to give an overall assessment of the written work.
Format and style Task* General grammar and comuncation organization spelling
Ideas were expressed in a All sentences were well-
Complied with all the clear and organized fashion constructed with varied requirements for the type of All grammar structures No errors in grammar or UNAM FES IZTACALA 2 achieving the task 2 structure. They clearly 2 written task. The style was 2 expected were used 2 spelling that distract the completely. It was easy to showed how ideas were DEPARTAMENTO DE IDIOMAS figure out what the text was connected and in a logical appropriate and with the correctly. reader from the content. correct register. about. order. WRITTEN EXAM Most sentences were well Complied with several of MID-TERM OR FINAL Ideas were expressed in a constructed in a fairly the requirements for the All grammar structures 1-2 errors in grammar or pretty clear manner, but the logical order, but there was type of written task. The 1.5 task was not totally 1.5 no variation in structure 1.5 style was appropriate but 1.5 expected were tempted but 1.5 spelling that distract the LEVELS 1-7 completed. and there was little variety with some problems of with some errors. reader from the content.
WEEKLY OR SATURDAY of connectors. register.
Ideas were not very clear. It
Some sentences were not GROUP: ________________ took more than one reading well-constructed or varied; Complied with few of the All notions were covered 3-4 errors in grammar or to figure out what the letter requirements for the type of 1 was about and there were 1 connections between ideas 1 written task. The style and 1 but using structures below 1 spelling that distract the were fuzzy making the text their level. reader from the content. BIMESTER: ________________ several aspects from the seem a little confusing. register were mixed. task missing.
The format wasn’t clearly
Most sentences were not distinguished and it didn’t The text seemed to be a collection of unrelated well-constructed or varied. comply with the Grammar structures and More than 4 errors in TOTAL The transitions between requirements for the type of grammar or spelling that 0.5 sentences. It was very 0.5 ideas were unclear OR 0.5 written task. The style was 0.5 notions weren’t applied for 0.5 distract the reader from the 10 difficult to figure out what the written task. the letter was about. nonexistent making the text inappropriate and the content. POINTS seem very confusing. correct register wasn’t Students Name: used.