Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanism of Red Scale Defect Formation in Si-Added Hot-Rolled Steel Sheets
Mechanism of Red Scale Defect Formation in Si-Added Hot-Rolled Steel Sheets
net/publication/257757683
CITATIONS READS
106 2,056
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Researicng ,developping and commercializng of magnesium-lithium alloy, the lightest structural alloy "SanMaLia". View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Tomoki Fukagawa on 01 June 2014.
The red scale, which is one of the major defects on hot-rolled Si added steel sheets, is reproduced
6xperimentally. Onthe basis of detailed observation of the scale properties, we propose the mechanismof
formation of the red scale. Imcomplete descaling of FeOprior to hot rolling causes red scale formation even
in Si-free steels, since the reaction from FeOto Fe304 and red Fe203 is largely accelerated by the breakage
of the FeOscale, In Si-added steels, descaling is quite difficult to perform, because the eutectic compound
of FeO/Fe.SiO* is formed at the scale/steel interface and penetrates irregularly into both upper FeOand
lower steel sides. auite high strength of the eutectic compound,even just below the solidus temperature
of 11 73'C, can also makeit difficult to descale.
KEYWORDS:
scale; descaling: Si-added steelj red scale; hot rolling.
Steel C Si
Mn P S Cu Ni Cr Mo A1 N
1 0.09 0.54 1.46 0.009 0.0014 O.O l 0.02 o.02 0.01 0.019 0.0023
2 0.05 0.005 0.15 0.009 0.013 0.01 0.02 o.02 0.01 0.024 O.O016
I
Test B(Rol ing with secondary scale) A Thin scale Apparently ductile FeO+ Fe304
B Thick scale Brittle fracture FeO+ Fe304+
)-
Heating the slab Scale forRlation (Impressron ocFe203 (red)
(covered ,vith (exposed in air for 40s) mto steel)
SS sheet
Fig.
~
l.
2-ndary scale formation
(exposed in air for 40 s)
test
Desca ng I[
3-pass rolling.
3.2. Effect of Secondary Scale on the Final Structure
The slabs were heated at 1220"C for 2h in
an atmo-
sphere of 77.1"/oN2+ 14.30/0H20+8.201*C02with or Here the results of Tests and without primary A B
without the stainless steel cover. After the Tests, the
slabs were cooled by water spray in order to suppress
scale will be explained. In the Test without the A
secondary scale before rolling, the hot rolled hot bands
the further change of scale structure.
were covered uniformly with black ~cale, independent of
the kind of steel. Whereas, in Test Bwith the secondary
not affect the red scale defect formation. In fact, the scale,
a red scale was observed in both steels.
red scale defects have not been reported in Si-free high- X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the black scale
Mn hot-rolled steel sheets, in which considerable high after Test A consisted of FeOand Fe304, as shownin
amount of Mn I
more than wt"/* has been used for the Fig. 4. After Test B, Fe203wasalso detected in addition
strengthening purpose. The 30 thick plates cut from
mm
continuously cast (CC) slabs were heated at 1220'C for
to FeOand Fe304. It should be noted that the con-
stituents were independent of the kind of steel. Figure 5
2h in an atmosphere of 77.10/0N2-14.30/0H208.60/0 shows scale structures in the transverse cross sections
C02, which simulated that of the actual combustion type of both steels. After Test A
without the secondary scale,
furnace, and hot rolled into 5 thick hot bands by 3
mm thin double layer structure of FeO/Fe304was observed
passes. Figure I shows schematically the three kinds of to form tightly in the both Steels, as shownin Figs. 5(a)
tests employedin this study. In Tests A and B, the slabs B
and 5(b). Whereas, after Test with the secondary scale,
were covered with stainless steel sheets which prevented the scale structures were very complicated and were
the primary scale from forming in the furnace. In Test different from each other. That is, in addition to the
A, the formation of the secondary scale was also irregular double layer structure, upper layer of Fe304
prevented by immediate hot rolling after removing the
was broken by the rolling. On the broken Fe304 red
stainless steel sheet cover. Whereas, in Test B, the slabs Fe203 Wasobserved, as shownin Figs. 5(c) and 5(d).
were exposed for 40 s in air after removing the cover in The results of Tests A
and can be summarizedas B
order to form the secondary scale. In Test C, the slabs Table In Test A,
2. the thin scale can be deformedwithout
were heated in the furnace without the cover to form the fracture during rolling, and the scale constituent is
primary scale. After descaling, they were rolled to 25 mm preserved without any change. Whereas, in Test B with
by I pass and exposed for 40 s in air for the secondary the secondary scale, the thick oxide layer is broken by
scale formation. After being descaled again they were the shear deformation during rolling. By the increase of
hot rolled by 3 passes to bands with given thickness of surface area through the breakage supply of oxygen can
5mm.In all the tests, after the final rolling the hot bands be accelerated, Ieading to the formation of O-rich red
were cooled immediately by water spray in order to Fe203, as discussed later.
suppress further change of scale structure.
3.3. Effect of Primary Scale on the Final Scale Structure
On these hot strips and hot bands, a few scale
properties were investigated by means of surface Although any difference between Steels I and 2 did
roughness measurement, optical microscopy, scanning not appear in Tests A and B, markeddifference between
electron microscopy and EPMA analysis. the both Steels was observed in Test Cwith the primary
scale, as shownin Fig. 6. The colors of the hot bands of
3. Experimental Results low Si Steel 2 and high Si Steel I were black and red,
respectively. Figure 7showsback scattered electron and
3.1. RedScale on CommercialHot Strips SiK* X-ray image on transverse cross section of Steel
2 shows an appearance of a red scale on the
Figure 1Zig-zag interface of steel/oxide wasobserved, and oxide
.
commercial hot strip, which was hot-rolled from about particles were also formed inside the steel, as shownin
300 thick CCslab to 6 hot strip. The chemical Fig. 7(a). EPMA analysis revealed that Si atoms were
mm mm
907 C 1994 ISIJ
ISIJ International, Vol. 34 (1 994), No. 11
45 oo
OO .
(p m) R B R B R
O .
OO
45 OO .
OOO
o oo ., 7 50
. 15 OO
15,
(mm)
.
Fig. 2. Appearanceofred scale defect in a Si-added hot rolled Fig. 3. Surface roughness profile after pickling in a transverse
steel sheet. direction of the sheet shownin Fig. 2.
The chemical composition is almost the sameas that R: Red scale area before pickling
of Steel I shownin Table B: Black scale area before pickling
I .
(a)SteeJ 1 Test A
,
(b)Steel 2 Test A
,
Fig. 4.
a Fe I 122'C
FeOFe304 a Fe FeO
Fe304
(c) Steel l, Test B; pre-oxidized from 1184 to I OOO"C
a Fe203 Fe203 for 30s before rolling
(d) Steel 2, Test B; pre-oxidized from I 090 to 929'C
47 48 50 52 54 48 50 52 54 for 33 s before rolling
26 (deg)
Fe
Fig. 5.
Optical micrographs on transverse
cross sections showing scale struc-
'
10 PrT,j~ tures.
1Opm (a) Steel
i I
Test A; starting tempera-
ture of rolling: 18"C II
(b) Steel 2, Test A; starting tempera-
ture of rolling: 122'CI
(c) Steel
, I
Test B; pre-oxidized from
1 I
184 to OOO'Cfor 30s before
rolling
(d) Steel 2. Test B; pre-oxidized from
l 090 to 929'C for 33 s before
~
f~TT~~i
rolling
~ 10Hm
Fig. 6.
20, p,=m,
Fig. 7. (a) Back scattered electron and (b) Si-Kc( X-ray image
in the vicinity of the primary scale/steel interface of
Steel I in Test C.
a Fe W=FeO
(110)
w F=Fe2Si0+
(111)
W F
F (200)
F F F F F 200)
(231) (112)(221) (131 X220)(031 )(
upper FeO. In somecases FeOgrains are enveloped by this experiment, the primary scale formed at 300'C was 1
the eutectic compound. Such very complicated scale rolled directly without descaling at different tempera-
4. Discussion *
~.~.e_
~
PowderedFeO~> Fe304 ~F red~3
a Fe2
4.1. Mechanismof RedScale Formation (
First wediscuss howthe red Fe203forms through the Fig. 12. Mechanismof red scale formation by fracture of FeO
breakage of an FeOscale. Figure 12 showsschematically layer during rolling.
the mechanismof red scale formation by fracture of FeO (a) Scale structure before rolling
(b) Scale structure after rolling
layer during rolling. The kinds of oxides formed by
heating Fe in air are FeO, Fe304 and Fe203 with the
volume ratio of about 95 : 4: l, around I OOO'C.2) That 1800
2Liquids
is, the scale consists mainly of FeO under normal
conditions without deformation. If the scale is fractured
C 1994 ISIJ 91 O
ISIJ International. Vol. 34 (1 994). No. 11
(a) (b) (b)
Impression to steel and
Fe203•--> fracture of remained FeO
FeO-Fe2Si04
Fe304-~~ Remained FeO ~
Fe203( red)
FeO
FeO-Fe2Si04 l~ DescaIi ng Rol Iing
Fe
Fig. 14. Mechanismof red scale formation in Si added hot roned steet sheet.
(a) Formation ofthe primary scale (b) Remainderofthe scale after descaling (c) Red-scale formation
with the mechanismproposed by Okita et al., in which not. Since the remained FeOscale partially cut into the
the upper FeOscale is strongly connected with steel by steel is fractured by rolling, the reaction, FeO-~Fe304H-
the strong Fe2Si04 anchors. Fe203, is largely accelerated by the oversupplement of
From these results, the mechanismof red scale for- oxygen. Resultant fine particles ofFe203 Iooks thick red.
mation in Si-addei steel can be depicted schematically (4) Although the red scale on Si-added steels is also
as Fig. 14. In the furnace a thick scale consisting main- formed by the samemechanismas described above, the
ly of FeOis formed prior to hot rolling. In addition, descaling ofthe primary scaleprior to hot rolling becomes
in case of Si-added steel, the eutectic FeO/Fe2Si04 quite difficult to achieve by the existence of irregularly
compoundformed on the FeO/steel interface runs shaped lamellar compoundof FeO/Fe2Si04 between
irregularly into both FeOand steel sides (Fig. 7). When steel and upper FeOscale.
descaling carried out at temperatures below the melting
is The solidified FeO/Fe2Si04eutectic compound
(5)
point, since the strength of solidified eutectic compound has very high strength even at high temperatures 60'C
is high, it is difficult to removecompletely the upper FeO below the melting point. Cutting into both upper FeO
scale by the anchor effect. The remained FeOscale is scale and steel sides accelerates the difficulty of descal-
fractured easily by the subsequent rolling, and changed ing, Ieading to the red scale by the above-described
mto Fe304 and finally into red Fe203 by the reason mechanism.
described before. The molten eutectic FeO/Fe2Si04
compoundis not direct cause of the red scale defects. REFER.ENCES
l) K. Onoda. H. Okabe, R. Nomi and N. Hase: SumitomoMet.,
5. Conclusions 20 (1968), 1.
(1) On the
Si-added hot-rolled steel sheets, scale
2)
3)
S. Mrowecand K. Przybylski:
T. Asai,T. NakamuraandT.
Oxid. Met., n
(1977), 383.
Inoue: CAMP-ISIJ,6(1993), 357.
defects consisting of stripe red and black scales along the 4) S. Takizawa: Iron and steel Handbook, ed, by ISIJ, Maruzen,
rolling direction are often formed. Tokyo, 37.
(2) The red scale layer with manycracks is normally 5) M. Morita, M, Nishida and T. Tanaka: Tetsu-to-Hagan~, 68
(1982), S438.
thicker than the black scale. The steel surface under the
6) M.Okita, A,Nagai,1. Sinagawaand K. Horinouchi: CAMP-ISIJ,
red scale has a concave, because the upper surface
2(1989), 1509.
becomesflat by rolling. 7) C. W. Tuck and J. Barlow: hon Steel, 45 (1972), 31.
(3) The red scale is formed easily by remaining FeO 8) N. L. Brownand J. F, schairer: Am. J. Sci., 5th Ser., 24 (1932),
scale before hot rolling, whether the steel contains Si or 200.
91 1 C 1994 ISIJ
View publication stats