You are on page 1of 3

John Broadus Watson, Behaviorist

B. F. Skinner

Science, New Series, Vol. 129, No. 3343. (Jan. 23, 1959), pp. 197-198.

Stable URL:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819590123%293%3A129%3A3343%3C197%3AJBWB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X

Science is currently published by American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained
prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in
the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/journals/aaas.html.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.

The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic
journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,
and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take
advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

http://www.jstor.org
Sun Feb 10 13:24:22 2008
chobiology") and with Curt Richter and
Lashley, the latter fresh from Jennings'
laboratory.
From all this exceptional stimulation,

John Broadus Watson, Watson emerged with a burning recogni-


tion of the need for a science of behavior.
I n 1912, when he first outlined his "be-
Behaviorist haviorism," there was no scientific disci-
pline devoting itself to this important
aspect of nature. Sociologists and econo-
mists frequently considered the behavior
John Broadus Watson, self-styled "the below-average and troublesome school- of men, but seldom of man as an indi-
behaviorist," died on 25 September 1958 boy with little to show for his early edu- vidual. Psychology, in spite of the early
at the age of 80. His scientific life had cation except a love for manual skills. American movement of functionalism,
come to a close a third of a century (He later built a ten-room house with was dominated by an introspective "sci-
earlier, and he was unknown personally his own hands.) His five years at Fur- ence of mind" which Watson viewed
to a whole generation of younger men man University, where he received an with an impatience which was never to
whose field of scientific activity he had A.M. instead of an A.B., were aso re- be satisfied. I n his most important book,
defined and vigorously developed. His membered as a bitter disappointment. Psychology from the Standpoint of a
place in the history of science, and some- But his educational luck suddenly im- Behaviorist, published in 1919, Watson
thing of his stature, are indicated by proved when an interest in philosophy defined the field he wanted to see studied
three names-Darwin, Lloyd Morgan, took him to the University of Chicago. and assembled available techniques and
and Watson-which represent three criti- Few men have made as many fortunate facts. A second edition in 1924 contained
cal changes in our conception of be- contacts during their graduate careers: a clearer and bolder programmatic state-
havior. with John Dewey (though Watson later ment. The emphasis was necessarily on
I n establishing the continuity of spe- complained "I never knew what he was the program, for not more than one-third
cies Darwin had attributed mental proc- talking about and, unfortunately, still of even the 1924 edition contained facts
esses to lower organisms. He was sup- don't"); with Angell (who taught him strictly relevant to the science of be-
ported by a host of anecdotal naturalists to write); with Jacques Loeb (whom havior the author was proposing. Ana-
who recounted instances of reasoning, Angell thought "unsafe" as Watson's tomical and physiological material were
sympathy, and even artistic enjoyment thesis advisor); and, particularly, with used to complete the book. Watson's own
on the parts of dogs, cats, elephants, and Mead. Under the Chicago influence his contributions were not great, and he was
so on. The inevitable reaction was epi- interests turned to biology, and he always to have no opportunity to extend them.
tomized in the writings of Lloyd Morgan, regretted that, in addition to his Ph.D., His studies on maze behavior and his
who argued that such evidences of men- he was not able to finish work for the concept of "habit" made an uneasy mar-
tal processes could be explained in other M.D. degree at Chicago. At the age of riage with Pavlov's principle of condi-
ways. A third step was inevitable, and it 29 he went to Johns Hopkins University tioning, then just beginning to attract at-
was Watson who took it: If there were as professor of psychology, where he tention in this country. His frequency
other explanations of mental processes came into even closer contact with biolo- theory of learning was short-lived.
in lower organisms, why not also in man? gists and medical men, particularly Jen- In spite of its shortcomings the book
I n dispensing with mentalistic ex- nings and Adolph Meyer. Among psy- had a tremendous effect. The new move-
planations of behavior, Watson cleared chologists he worked with Knight Dun- ment immediately attracted attention
the way for a scientific analysis. In doing lap and Robert Yerkes (who were later and adherents. Dissenters fell into line
so he acknowledged his debt both to to formulate their own variety of "psy- on the other side. I n the controversy
Lloyd Morgan and to Thorndike, who, which followed, Watson's taste for, and
though he remained a mentalist, sup- skill in, polemics led him into extreme
plied a classical alternative explanation positions from which he never escaped.
of "reasoning" in his experiments on He could not content himself with prose-
trial-and-error learning. The epistemo- cuting an empirical study of behavior
logical issue was also in the air. Watson simply as such, for he believed that psy-
never took to philosophy (though, as he chology was the science destined to deal
later said, his "milk teeth were cut on with that subject matter, and he wanted
metaphysics"), but it was George Her- to reform it accordingly. He had an-
bert Mead's great personal interest in other reason for crusading against the
Watson's animal experiments which sup- strongly entrenched introspectionists,
plied an immediate and crucial contact since they claimed to offer direct evi-
with relevant philosophical issues. A be- dence of the mental processes he wanted
havioristic interpretation of mental proc- to discard. Watson seized upon laryngeal
esses was later adopted by operationists and other covert verbal activities as the
and logical positivists, but the issue was "thought processes" of the introspective
to remain primarily empirical rather psychologists and refused to acknowledge
than logical. sensory aspects of behavior which could
Born in Greenville, South Carolina, also be observed by the behaver himself.
Watson was to remember himself as a John Broadus Watson I t has been suggested that he might not
23 JANUARY 1959 197
himself have had visual or auditory imag- even beggar-man and thief, regardless of a too narrow interpretation of self-obser-
ery. I n any case his sweeping denial of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abili- vation, for an extreme environmentalism,
the existence of self-observed sensory ties, vocations, and race of his ancestors. and for a coldly detached theory of child
events (the acknowledgment of which I am going beyond my facts and I admit care, no one of which was a necessary
would not, as we now know, have implied it, but so have the advocates of the con- part of his original program. His bril-
the dualism he was so anxious to avoid) trary and they have been doing it for liant glimpse of the need for, and the
occupied him in what he later described many thousands of years." nature and implications of, a science of
as "a continual storm." TZ'atson also went beyond his facts, and behavior Jras all but forgotten. Perhaps
T h e same taste for polemics led him in the same crusading spirit, in his views history is ready to return a more accu-
into a n extreme environmentalistic posi- on child training. Experiments on the be- rate appraisal. A year before his death
tion. I n Psychology from the Standpoint havior of infants had shown him that he had the satisfaction of dedicating a
of a Behaviorist he had devoted two emotional patterns could often be traced paperback edition of his popular book
chapters to hereditary behavior. Like all to conditioned emotional reflexes ( a Behaviorism to the American Psychologi-
those who want to do something about term he took from Pavlov via Lashley). cal Association, which on 7 September
behavior, he had emphasized the possi- H e thought he saw the seeds of many 1957 cited him as follorvs: "To Dr. John
bility of environmental modification, and behavior problems in early home exppri- B. Watson, whose .ivork has been one of
this was widely misunderstood. Under ences, and in his Psychological Care of the vital determinants of the form and
the stress of battle he was led at last to the Infant and Child-a book he later substance of modern psychology. E-Ie in-
the well-known cry: "Give me a dozen publicly regretted--he cautioned parents itiated a revolution in psychological
healthy infants, well-formed, and my against the unconsidered display of af- thought, and his writings have been the
own specified world to bring them up in fection. (Current "mother love" theories point of departure for continuing lines of
and I'll guarantee to take any one a t are the other slving of that pendul~lm.) fruitful research."
random and train him to become any .4nd so it came about that Watson was B. F. SKINNER
type of specialist I might select-doctor, to be rerncmbered for a long time, by Psychological Laboratories, H a ~ v a r d
lawyer, artist, merchant-chief, and yes, both 1a)men and psychologists alike, for University, Cambridge, Li4assachusetts

and the L.S. Weather Bureau. is de-


signed to further research into meteoro-
logical phenomena in an effort to im-
prove the accuracy of weather predic-
tions. It will also be of assistance to the
L.S. M'eather Bureau's Hurricane
News of Science
Weather Research Project in the field of
hurricane photography.
Instrumentation
The Hugo-Nike-Cajun rocket consisted
of a recoverable instrument head attached
Frontal Cloud System miles further eastward. The rnosaic strip, to a standard Nike-Cajun vehicle. Gross
covering approximately 1000 miles in takeoff weight of the assembled rocket
Pictures Obtained by Rocket
lmgth, compares roughly xvith the ex- was 1552 pounds. Second stage gross
Clear pictures from the first rocket- panse between the southern tip of Maine weight was 270 pounds. The instrument
camera unit designed specifically to pho- and mid-Florida. The launching from head contained two 16-millimeter movie
tograph weather frontal systems and the Yational Aeronautics and Space cameras, a radar tracking beacon, a
their associated cloud formations. from Agency's Pilotless Aircraft Research Sta- hfytymouse homing transmitter, a pri-
extreme high altitudes over ocean areas tion at Wallops Island, Va., was ac- mary programming device, a secondary
where thcre are no permanent weather complished from a land-based inst;llla- programming device, a nose ogive jetti-
stations, have been obtained from a suc- tion of a shipbo;~rtl-typeTerrier missile son circuit, a drag parachute, a split-
cessful firing and recovery of a Project launcher, and was eirectctl without any ring separation system, four blocks of
Hugo rocket. delays or difficulty. Signals emitted by s l o ~ l ydissolxing sea dve marker, and
This is the first time that man has the nose co~le's miniature transmitter appropriate pot\ er supplies.
been able to look down from so high a were easily tracked by one surface ship Dcsign and construction of the Project
vantage point on physical manifestations and one aircraft, each carrying portable EIugo rocltet-camera assembly was done
of the Norwegian weather front theory radio tracking equipment. Follorving the by the New Mexico State University at
by which meteorologists have been fore- flight, the instruriientation package was Las Cruces, under cont~act with the
casting the weather for the past 40 years. successfully located and recoverrd from Office of Naval Research. T h e cameras
T h e frontal cloud pictures arc, the best the sea by the destroyer USS LEARY, themselves were specially designed and
obtained to date from a rocket. despite 8- to 10-foot s~rellsand 25- to prepared by the Xaval Research Labo-
T h e film, recovered at sea from the 40-knot winds. ratory.
nose cone of the Nike-Cajun rocket,
which reached an altitude of 86.25 miles Project Hugo Performance
on 5 December 1958, sho~vsthe froiital Project Hugo (highly unusual geophys- I n the 5 December shot the instru-
cloud formations over an Atlantic Ocean ical operations), conducted by the Office ment head was not stabilized. T h e effect
area, starting about 200 miles off the Vir- of Saval Research with funding asist- of this as it appeared in a showing of the
ginia coast and stretching about 700 ance from the Bureau of Aeronautics film was a rather rapid turning of the
198 SCIENCE, VOL. 129

You might also like