Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROSPECTUS AND
ALLOTMENT OF
SECURITIES
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Define prospectus & its types and explain the procedure for
issue of prospectus and other related concepts
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
1. INTRODUCTION
One of the advantages of floating a company is raising of capital. Capital could
be raised from public at large or from a defined group or inner circle (pre-known
select group of persons). The former is called the ‘Public offer’ and the latter is
called ‘Private Placement’. Capital acquisition is inflow of funds for the issuer and
needs advertisement which should be in accordance with the relevant legal
provisions so that any investor is not defrauded or be-fooled. On successful
closure of the application process, securities are allotted to investors which could
be then listed on an appropriate segment of a recognised stock exchange.
The provisions related to raising of capital such as issue of prospectus, allotment
of shares etc. and other matters incidental thereto are contained in Chapter III of
the Companies Act, 2013, which is divided into two parts:
Part I – Public Offer of the chapter comprise sections 23 to 41, and
Part II – Private Placement comprises section 42.
IPO
Public Co.
Right Issue
Bonus Issue
Private Placement
Bonus Issue
“Securities” include—
(i) Shares, scrips, stocks, bonds, debentures, debenture stock or other
marketable securities of a like nature in or of any incorporated company or
other body corporate;
(ia) derivative;
(ib) units or any other instruments issued by any collective investment scheme
to the investors in such schemes;
(ic) security receipt as defined in clause (zg) under section 2 of the
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act, 2002.
(id) units or any other such instrument issued to the investors under any
mutual fund scheme.
Securities however, shall not include any unit linked insurance policy or
scrips or any such instrument or unit, by whatever name called, which
provides a combined benefit risk on the life of the persons and investment
by such persons and issued by an insurer referred to in clause (9) of section
2 of the Insurance Act, 1938.
(ie) any certificate or instrument (by whatever name called), issued to an
investor by any issuer being a special purpose distinct entity which
possesses any debt or receivable, including mortgage debt, assigned to
such entity, and acknowledging beneficial interest of such investor in such
debt or receivable, including mortgage debt, as the case may be;
3. PROSPECTUS
As per the definition given in Section 2(70) of the Companies Act, 2013,
prospectus means any document described or issued as a prospectus and
includes a red herring prospectus referred to in section 32 or shelf prospectus
referred to in section 31 or any notice, circular, advertisement or other document
inviting offers from the public for the subscription or purchase of any securities of
body corporate.
1
clauses (a), (b) and (d) have been omitted [Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017,
Enforcement Date: 7th May, 2018]
Contravention of section 26
Fine
Company
( 50 thousand - 3 lacs)
Fine ( 50 thousand - 3
lacs)
Any person Imprisonment
knowingly a party to
issue of prospectus (upto 3 years)
Company
•fine varying from five lakh rupees to fifty lakh rupees
Officer
•punishable with imprisonment upto one year, or
• with fine varying from fifty thousand rupees to three lakh rupees, or
• with both.
shall not exceed 5% of the price shall not exceed 2.5% of the
at which the shares are issued, price at which the debentures
or are issued, or
as specified in the company’s
a rate authorised by the articles,
articles,
(d) Disclosure of the particulars: the prospectus of the company shall disclose
the following particulars -
(i) the name of the underwriters;
(ii) the rate and amount of the commission payable to the underwriter;
and
(iii) the number of securities which is to be underwritten or subscribed by
the underwriter absolutely or conditionally.
Answer: Every company making a public offer shall, before making such offer,
make an application to one or more recognised stock exchange or exchanges and
obtain permission for the securities to be dealt with in such stock exchange or
exchanges. [Section 40 (1)]
Where a prospectus states that an application has been made, such prospectus
shall also state the name or names of the stock exchange in which the securities
shall be dealt with. [Section 40 (2)]
From the above it is clear that not only the company has to apply for listing of the
securities at a recognized stock exchange but also obtain permission thereof
before making the public offer.
Hence, under the Companies Act, 2013 by making the offer of shares before
getting the approval from the stock exchanges, it has violated the provisions of
section 40.
capital. Are the decisions taken by the Board of Directors valid under the
Companies Act, 2013?
Answer: Under the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014
the rate of commission paid or agreed to be paid shall not exceed, in case of
shares, five percent (5%) of the price at which the shares are issued or a rate
authorised by the articles, whichever is less.
The same rules allow the commission to be paid out of proceeds of the issue or
the profit of the company or both.Therefore, the decision of the Board of
Directors to pay 5% commission to the underwriters is invalid while the decision
to pay out of the proceeds of the share issue is valid.
(2) The amount payable on application on every security shall not be less than
five per cent. of the nominal amount of the security or such other percentage or
amount, as may be specified by the Securities and Exchange Board by making
regulations in this behalf.
(3) If the stated minimum amount has not been subscribed and the sum
payable on application is not received within a period of thirty days from the date
of issue of the prospectus, or such other period as may be specified by the
Securities and Exchange Board, the amount received under sub-section (1) shall
be returned within such time and manner as may be prescribed.
(5) In case of any default under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4), the company
and its officer who is in default shall be liable to a penalty, for each default, of
one thousand rupees for each day during which such default continues or one
lakh rupees, whichever is less.
Allotment of securities
application money shall
application money have not be less than 5% or
Minimum amount
been paid and recieved by such other percentage
subscribed, and
the company or amount as specified
by SEBI
amount recieved shall be returned within 15 days from the closure of issue
In case of default
Company shall pay penalty of
` 1000 for each day during 1 lac which ever is less
which such default continues, or
Once securities are issued and subscribed for, these needs to be allotted in tune
with the conditions as given below:
♦ Minimum subscription to be received within 30 days of issue of prospectus.
In case minimum subscription is not received, the issue is regarded as failed.
To take care of such eventuality, the merchant bankers in case of public
offer resort to underwriting, suitable pricing, bringing in anchor investors
etc. among other things. In case failed issue, the entire issue proceeds need
to be refunded along with applicable interest.
♦ Application money > 5% of the nominal amount.
♦ Return of allotment needs to be filed with the ROC
As per Rule 11 (Refund of Application Money)
(1) If the stated minimum amount has not been subscribed and the sum payable
on application is not received within the period specified therein, then the
application money shall be repaid within a period of fifteen days from the closure
of the issue and if any such money is not so repaid within such period, the
directors of the company who are officers in default shall jointly and severally be
liable to repay that money with interest at the rate of fifteen percent per annum.
(2) The application money to be refunded shall be credited only to the bank
account from which the subscription was remitted.
Example: After receiving 80% of the minimum subscription as stated in the
prospectus, a company allotted 100 equity shares in favour of ‘X’. The company
deposited the said amount in the bank but withdrew 50% of the amount, before
finalisation of the allotment, for the purchase of certain assets. X refuses to accept
the allotment of shares on the ground that the allotment is violative of the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer: The company has received 80% of the minimum subscription as stated in
the prospectus. Hence, the allotment is in contravention of section 39(1) of the
Companies Act, 2013 which prohibits a company from making any allotment of
securities until it has received the amount of minimum subscription stated in the
prospectus. Under section 39 (3), it is required to refund the money received (i.e.
80% of the minimum subscription) to the applicants. It has no other option
available.
Therefore, in the present case, X is within his rights to refuse to accept the
allotment of shares which has been illegally made by the company.
6. MIS-STATEMENTS IN PROSPECTUS
In common parlance, mis-statement is the act of stating something that is false or
not accurate. It could either be by commission or by omission or by both.
Mis- statement of prospectus is a serious offence which attracts section 34 and /
or section 35. Liabilities can be classified under two headings:
regarding their hard earned money invested in Stock Market. During that time, it
was felt that it was not at all viable regarding cost effectiveness for a small
stakeholder to file a case independently against the defendant. Millions of
cheated investors during that time formed a large group and filed the case
against the company, but since there was no available legal remedy or law which
can actually support this type of litigation of a group filing charges, it became
tough for those investors to take a recourse or gain advantage in the Indian
Judicial System by this method. Class action suits in India were so far filed
under the guise of public interest litigations. Courts were free to dismiss these.
These shareholders ran pillar to post right from the National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission up to the extent of Supreme Court and had their claims
rejected.
Example: M applies for share on the basis of a prospectus which contains mis–
statement. The shares are allotted to him, who afterwards transfers them to N.
Can N bring an action for a rescission on the ground of mis-statement under
section 37 of the Companies Act, 2013?
Answer: No, N cannot bring an action for rescission of the contract to buy shares
from M on the ground of mis-statement as under section 37 of the Companies
Act, 2013. A suit may be filed or any other action may be taken under section 34
or section 35 or section 36 only by any person, group of persons or any
association of persons affected by any misleading statement or the inclusion or
omission of any matter in the prospectus.
♦ any act,
♦ omission,
♦ abuse of position
committed by any person, or any other person with the connivance in any
manner, with intent to deceive, to gain undue advantage from, or to injure the
interests of, the company or its shareholders or its creditors or any other person,
Fine Imprisonment
Private Placement
Provided that monies received on application under this section shall be kept in a
separate bank account in a scheduled bank and shall not be utilised for any
purpose other than—
(a) for adjustment against allotment of securities; or
(b) for the repayment of monies where the company is unable to
allotsecurities.
(7) No company issuing securities under this section shall release any public
advertisements or utilise any media, marketing or distribution channels or agents
to inform the public at large about such an issue.
(8) A company making any allotment of securities under this section, shall file
with the Registrar a return of allotment within fifteen days from the date of the
allotment in such manner as may be prescribed, including a complete list of all
allottees, with their full names, addresses, number of securities allotted and such
other relevant information as may be prescribed.
(9) If a company defaults in filing the return of allotment within the period
prescribed under sub-section (8), the company, its promoters and directors shall
be liable to a penalty for each default of one thousand rupees for each day
during which such default continues but not exceeding twenty-five lakh rupees.
(10) Subject to sub-section (11), if a company makes an offer or accepts monies
in contravention of this section, the company, its promoters and directors shall be
liable for a penalty which may extend to the amount raised through the private
placement or two crore rupees, whichever is lower, and the company shall also
refund all monies with interest as specified in sub-section (6) to subscribers
within a period of thirty days of the order imposing the penalty.
(11) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (9) and sub-section (10),
any private placement issue not made in compliance of the provisions of sub-
section (2) shall be deemed to be a public offer and all the provisions of this Act
and the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the Securities and
Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 shall be applicable.
As per Rule 14 of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014,
(1) For the purposes of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) of section 42, a
company shall not make an offer or invitation to subscribe to securities through
private placement unless the proposal has been previously approved by the
shareholders of the company, by a special resolution for each of the offers or
invitations:
(3) 2 A return of allotment of securities under section 42 shall be filed with the
Registrar within fifteen days of allotment.
(4) 3 The provisions of sub-rule (2) shall not be applicable to -
(a) non-banking financial companies which are registered with the Reserve
Bank of India under the Reserve Bank of India Act,1934 and
(b) housing finance companies which are registered with the National Housing
Bank under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987,
if they are complying with regulations made by the Reserve Bank of India or the
National Housing Bank in respect of offer or invitation to be issued on private
placement basis:
Provided that such companies shall comply with sub-rule (2) in case the Reserve
Bank of India or the National Housing Bank have not specified similar regulations.
(5) 4 A company shall issue private placement offer cum application letter only
after the relevant special resolution or Board resolution has been filed in the
Registry:
Provided that private companies shall file with the Registry copy of the Board
resolution or special resolution with respect to approval under clause (c) of
subsection (3) of section 179.
SUMMARY
♦ Securities could be offered to public at large (public offer) or through
private placement subject to the type of issuer company
♦ Prospectus, deemed prospectus, abridged prospectus, red-herring
prospectus, shelf prospectus, information memorandum need to comply
with the minimum information requirements as prescribed in the Act and
the Rules
♦ Fraudulent Omission or commission in the issue documents attract civil as
well as criminal liability.
2
Rule 14 (6)
3
Rule 14(7)
4
Rule 14(8)
12. A public company sent private placement offer letter to 200 persons of its
choice in March 20XX and allotted shares to them in April 20XX. Can it send
private placement offer letter to 200 new people in May 20XX?
(a) Yes
(b) No
(c) Yes with the permission of ROC
(d) Yes with the permission of NCLT
13. Which of the following statement is contrary with the provisions of the
Companies Act; 2013?
(a) a private company can make a private placement of its securities
(b) company has to pass a special resolution for private placement
(c) Minimum offer per person should have Market Value of ` 20;000
(d) a public company can make a private placement of its securities
14. A company can change terms of contracts mentioned in prospectus by way
of:
(a) Ordinary resolution though postal ballot
(b) Ordinary resolution in meeting
(c) Special resolution in meeting
(d) Special resolution through postal ballot
15. A shelf prospectus filed with the ROC shall remain valid for a period of:
(a) one year from the date of registration
(b) one year from the date of closing of first issue
(c) one year from the date of opening of first issue
(d) Ninety days from the date on which a copy was delivered to ROC
Answer to MCQs
Question 1
Unique Builders Limited decides to pay 2.5 percent of the value of debentures as
underwriting commission to the underwriters but the Articles of the company
authorize only 2.0 percent underwriting commission on debentures. The company
further decides to pay the underwriting commission in the form of flats. Examine
the validity of the above arrangements under the provisions of the Companies
Act,2013.
Answer
Section 40 (6) of the Companies Act 2013, provides that a company may pay
commission to any person in connection with the subscription or procurement of
subscription to its securities, whether absolute or conditional, subject to a number
of conditions which are prescribed under Companies (Prospectus and Allotment
of Securities) Rules, 2014. In relation to the case given, the conditions applicable
under the above Rules are as under:
(a) The payment of such commission shall be authorized in the company’s
articles of association;
(b) The commission may be paid out of proceeds of the issue or the profit of
the company or both;
(c) The rate of commission paid or agreed to be paid shall not exceed, in case
of shares, five percent (5%) of the price at which the shares are issued or a
rate authorised by the articles, whichever is less, and in case of debentures,
shall not exceed two and a half per cent (2.5 %) of the price at which the
debentures are issued, or as specified in the company’s articles, whichever
is less;
Thus, the Underwriting commission is limited to 5% of issue price in case of
shares and 2.5% in case of debentures. The rates of commission given above are
maximum rates.
In view of the above, the decision of Unique Builders Ltd. to pay underwriting
commission exceeding 2% as prescribed in the Articles is invalid.
The company may pay the underwriting commission in the form of flats as both
the Companies Act and the Rules do not impose any restriction on the mode of
payment though the source has been restricted to either the proceeds of the
issue or profits of the company.
Question 2
PQR limited wants to raise funds for it upcoming project. It has issued private
placement offer letters to 55 persons in their individual name to issue its equity
shares. Out of these four are qualified institutional buyers. Before allotment under
this offer letter company issued another private placement offer letter to another
155 persons in their individual name for issue of its debentures. Being a public
company can it issue securities in a private placement? Is it in compliance with
provisions related to private placement or should these offers be treated as public
offers? What if the offer for debentures is given after allotment of equity shares but
within the same financial year?
Answer
According to section 42 of the companies act, 2013 any private or public
company may make private placement through issued of a private placement
offer letter.
But the offer shall be made to persons not exceeding fifty or such higher number
as may be prescribed, in a financial year. For counting number of persons
qualified institutional buyers and employees under employees stock option
scheme will not be considered.
Here rules prescribed limit as 200 persons in a financial year. But this limit should
be counted separately for each type of security.
If a company makes an offer or invitation to more than the prescribed number of
persons it shall be deemed to be an offer to the public and shall be governed by
the provisions related to prospectus.
Also a company can not make fresh offer under this section if allotments with
respect to any offer made earlier have been completed or that offer has been
withdrawn or abandoned by the company. This rule is applicable even if the issue
is of different kind of security.
Any offer or invitation not in compliance with the provisions of this section shall
be treated as a public offer and all provisions will apply accordingly.
In the given case PQR limited is a public company and looking at above
provisions we can say that even a public company can make private placement.
Company has given offer to 55 persons out of which 4 are qualified institutional
buyers hence the offer is given to effectively 51 persons which is well within the
limit of 200 persons. From this angle company is in compliance with private
placement rules.
But company has given another private placement offer which is non compliance
of provisions of section 42 hence the offers given by company will be treated as
public offer and will be governed accordingly.
But if the company gives offer for debentures in the same financial year after
allotment of equity shares is complete then both the offers can well be treated as
private placement offers. Here we should not add 51 and 155 persons for
checking the limit of 200 because this limit should be checked
Question 3
State in what way does the Companies Act, 2013 regulate and restrict the following
in respect of a company going for public issue of shares:
(i) Minimum Subscription, and
(ii) Application Money payable on shares being issued?
Answer
The Companies Act, 2013 by virtue of provisions as contained in Section 39 (1)
and (2) regulates and restricts the minimum subscription and the application
money payable in a public issue of shares as under:
Minimum subscription [Section 39 (1)]
No Allotment shall be made of any securities of a company offered to the public
for subscription; unless; -
(i) the amount stated in the prospectus as the minimum amount has been
subscribed; and
(ii) the sums payable on application for such amount has been paid to and
received by the company-
Application money: Section 39 (2) provides that the amount payable on
application on each security shall not be less than 5% of the nominal amount of
such security or such amount as SEBI may prescribe by making any regulations in
this behalf.
Further section 39 (3) provides that if the stated minimum amount is not received
by the company within 30 days of the date of issue of the prospectus or such time
as prescribed by SEBI, the company will be required to refund the application
money received within such time and manner as may be prescribed.
In case of any default under sub-section, the company and its officer who is in
default shall be liable to a penalty, for each default, of one thousand rupees for
each day during which such default continues or one lakh rupees, whichever is
less.
Section 40 (3) provides that all moneys received on application from the public
for subscription to the securities shall be kept in a separate bank account
maintained with a scheduled bank.
Question 4
The Board of Directors of Reckless Investments Ltd. have allotted shares to the
investors of the company without issuing a prospectus with the Registrar of
Companies, Mumbai. Explain the remedy available to the investors in this regard.
Answer
According to Section 23 of the Companies Act, 2013, a public company can issue
securities to the public only by issuing a prospectus. Section 26 (1) lays down the
matters required to be disclosed and included in a prospectus and requires the
registration of the prospectus with the Registrar before its issue.
In the given case, the company has violated with the above provisions of the Act
and hence the allotment made is void. The company will have to refund the entire
moneys received and will also be punishable under section 26 (9) of the Act.
Question 5
An allottee of shares in a Company brought action against a Director in respect of
false statements in prospectus. The director contended that the statements were
prepared by the promoters and he has relied on them. Is the Director liable under
the circumstances? Decide referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer
Yes, the Director shall be held liable for the false statements in the prospectus
under sections 34 and 35 of the Companies Act, 2013. Whereas section 34
imposes a criminal punishment on every person who authorises the issue of such
prospectus, section 35 more particularly includes a director of the company in the
imposition of liability for such mis statements.
The only situations when a director will not incur any liability for mis statements
in a prospectus are as under: