You are on page 1of 8

Shree Ambabai Talim Sanstha’s

SANJAY BHOKARE GROUP OF INSTITUTES, MIRAJ


FACULTY OF POLYTECHNIC
Institute Code: 1552

Department Of ----------------- Engineering


Micro Project Report
On

Project Title
Prepared By

Roll no. Enrolment No. Name

Under the Guidance of


Name Of Faculty

Submitted To

Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education, Mumbai


(Autonomous) (ISO-9001-2008) (ISO/IEC 27001:2013)
Academic Year 2020-2021

1
MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
(Only for individual micro project report)

This is to certify that Mr. / Ms. ………………………………………………………


Roll No. ……………….…., of ………... Semester of Diploma
in………………….. Engineering , of Institute ATS Sanjay Bhokare Group Of
Institutes, Faculty Of Polytechnic, Miraj. (Code: 1552) has completed the Micro-
Project work satisfactorily in course ………………………………. ( ) for
the academic year 20…….. to 20…….. as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: …………… Enrollment No:.……………

Date: …………… Exam. Seat No: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

2
MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
(Only for Micro Project Group report )

This is to certify that following students,

Roll no. Enrolment No. Exam Seat No. Name

of …….. Semester of Diploma in………………….. Engineering , of Institute


ATS Sanjay Bhokare Group Of Institutes, Faculty Of Polytechnic, Miraj.
(Code: 1552) are completed the Micro Project work satisfactorily in course
………………………………. ( ) for the academic year 20…….. to 20……
as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: ……………
Date: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

3
Annexure – I
Format for Micro-Project Proposal in about 2 to 3 pages to be submitted at end of first two weeks of
the semester

PART A – Micro-Project Proposal

Title of Micro-Project
1.0 Brief Introduction
(Importance of the micro-project, in about 4 to 5 Sentences)
2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project ( in about 1 to 2 Sentences)
This Micro-Project aims at:

3.0 Intended Course Outcome

4.0 Literature Review


(Existing status, knowledge about chosen task summarized from books, internet and
other sources in about 200 to 400)
4.0 Proposed Methodology
(Procedure in brief that will be followed to do the micro-project) in about 200 to 500 ]
5.0 Resources Required (major resources like raw material, tools, software etc.)
S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks
1 laptop Microsoft word
2

6.0 Action Plan (Sequence and time required for major activities for 8 Weeks)
S. No. Details of activity Planned Planned Name of Responsible
Start date Finish date Team Members
1 Discussion and finalization of topic All members
2 Preparation of submission of All members
proposal
3 Planning layout of micro project All members
4 Content preparation All members
5 Discussion about required resources All members
6 Create the report All members
7 Final submission of project All members

**************

Annexure – II
Format for Micro-Project Report after Execution in about 8 to 15 pages to be submitted at end of
semester)

4
PART B – Micro-Project Report

Title of Micro-Project
1.0 Rationale
(Importance of the project, in about 100 to 200 words. This is a modified version of the
proposal after the work)
2.0 Course Outcomes Addressed
(Add to the earlier list if more COs are addressed)
a) .......................................
b) .........................................

3.0 Literature Review


(If additional literature review done, you may add in about 200 to 500 words)

4.0 Actual Methodology Followed


Write step wise the procedure of how the work was done, including which team member
did what work and how the data was analysed (if any).

5.0 Actual Resources Used (Mention the actual resources used).

S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks


1
2

6.0 Outputs of the Micro-Project


(Drawings of the prototype, drawings of survey, presentation of collected data, findings etc.)

7.0 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project


(in about 50 to 100 words)

8.0 Applications of this Micro-Project


(in about 50 to 100 words)
9.0 Area of Future Improvement
(in about 50 to 100 words)
**************

5
Annexure – III

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: ………………………………………………………… Enrollment No. ……………………………………


Name of Programme………………………………………………… Semester: ………………………………………… Course Title
……………………………………………………………….. Code:………………………………………………………………

Title of the Micro-Project: …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

(For Office Use Only)


Course Outcomes Achieved
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project
 (Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
S. Characteristic to Poor Average Good Excellent
No be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
1 Relevance to the Relate to very Related to some Take care of at- Take care of more
course few LOs Los least one CO than one CO
 ..
2 Literature Not more than At-least 5 relevant At –least 7 About 10 relevant
Survey two sources sources, at least 2 relevant sources, sources, most
/information (primary and latest most latest latest
collection secondary), very
old reference

3 Completion of Completed less Completed 50 to Completed 60 to Completed more


the Target as per than 50% 60% 80% than 80 %
project proposal
4 Analysis of Data Sample Size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
and small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
representation neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organized nor data generated data generated appropriate
presented well but not organized which is organized sample size.
and not presented and presented Proper inferences
well. No or poor well but poor drawn by
inferences drawn inferences drawn organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and graphs.

5 Quality of Incomplete Just Well Well


Prototype/Mode fabrication/asse assembled/fabrica assembled/fabrica assembled/fabrica
l mbly. ted and parts are ted with proper ted with proper

6
S. Characteristic to Poor Average Good Excellent
No be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
not functioning functioning parts. functioning parts.
well. Not in proper In proper shape, In proper shape,
shape, dimensions within tolerance within tolerance
beyond tolerance dimensions and dimensions and
limit. good good
Appearance/finish finish/appearance. finish/appearance.
is shabby. But no creativity in Creativity in
design and use of design and use of
material material

6 Report Very short, poor Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed,
Preparation quality sketches, and correct details and clear correct, clear
Details about about methods, description of description of
methods, material, methods, methods,
material, precautions and materials, materials,
precaution and conclusion, but precautions and precautions and
conclusions clarity is not there Conclusions. conclusions.
omitted, some in presentation. Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,
details are But not enough Description. charts and
wrong graphic sketches
description.

7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,


information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well organized well organized but information ,well
information is and not presented not presented well presented
not well well
organized .
8 Any other
(depending upon
nature of
project: please
write indicators
by pen)
Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied properly Replied most of
9 to considerable considerable to considerable the questions
number of number of number of properly
question. questions but not question.
very properly

7
MIcro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process Assessment Product Assessment Total


Part A - Project Project Methodology Part B - Project individual Marks
Proposal (2 marks) Report/Working Model Presentation/Viva 10
(2 marks) (2 marks) (4 marks)

Note:
Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution for each group of students in first 3
columns as per rubrics & individual evaluation in 4 TH column for each group of students as per rubrics based
on viva.

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if any)


………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Any Other Comment:


……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………

Name and designation of the Faculty Member…………………………………….

Signature………………………………………………………………………………

Date:………………………..

You might also like