Professional Documents
Culture Documents
&
DIFFERENT APPROACHES to POLITICS
( LEM-214 )
IN GENERAL
If the world were a "heaven on earth", there would be no need for politics.
The ruled: They want to be sure of (the arbitrary use of) power.
CONCEPT
Penalties for crimes against the state or for maintaining public order
political murder
3
CONCEPT
Definitions of politics will also change according to how the concept is perceived. We are faced with
perceptions of politics, good or bad.
Art
Science
The state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of force. Political power actually uses this power. To both
use and protect power.
In that case, it would not be wrong to say that politics includes the element of violence.
These intersecting demands do not cause conflict; It is necessary to try to meet them peacefully without
disturbing the social order.
It is an understanding that keeps the scope of the concept of politics quite "narrow".
«Practices of authority»
10
In this understanding, "politics" is confined only to the apparatus of government; namely, ministry
buildings, legislatures, government offices, in short, a very specific and limited group.
All social groups (NGOs) are seen outside the realm of politics.
This understanding of politics is also closed to international and global influences and processes.
This understanding of politics reflects an understanding from the days when nation states were the only
actors in world events.
11
It is such a narrow understanding that, apart from politicians, even bureaucrats are considered outside
the field of politics.
Limiting politics to state affairs also contributes to negative and even condescending attitudes towards
this concept/activity.
It can be seen as the activity of people who seek power and act with their personal ambitions.
Machiavelli
Liberal understanding: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton)
12
13
These views are skeptical that politics is an inevitable and permanent feature of social existence.
So, how do we protect society from falling into conflict if there is no politics necessary for the formation
of authority and the fulfillment of its duties?
The solution should not be sought in ending politics, but in preventing the abuse of power.
14
The division "public" and the "private" determine the difference between the political and the non-
political.
In this view, the field of politics can also be determined by the distinction between "public sphere" and
"private sphere".
15
Politics is limited only to the activities of the state itself and the responsibilities carried out by public
bodies.
The economic, social, cultural, personal and domestic activities that individuals carry out for themselves
are in the private sphere and are outside of politics.
16
An alternative Public-Private distinction defines the field of politics through the concepts of "political"
and "personal".
Accordingly, although civil society is a separate domain from the state, it still encompasses a range of
public institutions.
An indication of this is our political demands that have moved from the private to the public sphere.
For example, it cannot be said that there is no politics in our workplaces, associations and unions.
Feminists also object to this, arguing that a narrow definition of politics refers to a concept that "cannot
enter the house", "cannot find a place in personal relationships".
17
This understanding of politics can have both positive and negative aspects.
However, it is not always easy to separate the private from the public.
18
It is not related to the process of making political decisions; It is result and solution oriented.
Politics, participation in politics and politicians are evaluated from a more positive perspective.
19
20
Production
Share
Use of resources
“Politics: determining who gets where, when, and what” (Harold Laswell)
From this point of view, politics is based on a 'division', the cause of which is 'scarcity'.
Politics is a struggle over limited resources.
21
In particular, the views of feminists and Marxists on politics are within the framework of the concept of
"power".
Feminist theorists react to the classical understanding of politics keeping women out of the political
sphere by confining women to the "private" sphere, inside the home. Because in this case, the
dominance in the field of "public" is dominated by men, and women are excluded from the field of
politics.
22
From the point of view of Marxist theory, politics is part of the superstructure and political power is the
oppression of an organized class over others.
The belief that politics exists in a limited space is itself a political attitude.
Civil society is the center of politics as an area where class conflicts persist.
23
Marxist and feminist understandings of politics approach politics from a negative point of view. This is
because politics is seen as a tool of oppression and intimidation.
Traditional politics in capitalist society is shaped by the exploitation of the working class by the bourgeois
(Marxist theory)
However, these negative meanings are balanced by the intervention of politics as a means to challenge
this injustice and inequality.
24
An Understanding of Politics Based on the Friend - Enemy Distinction: Carl Schmitt
For Carl Schmitt, the political is reducible to the existential distinction between friend and enemy.
Although the sovereign "stands outside the normally valid legal system, he nevertheless belongs to it".
Sovereignty is more than the technical: it is the personal privilege of the ruler.
Exception is present where an extreme necessity occurs, which means the existence of the state or
something similar (matter of life and death).
27
The principle that the sovereignty belongs to the nation or the parliament and our constitutional
guarantees are actually just a fairy tale under some conditions*.
these exceptional situations that shape the future of that society; and
28
Politics and government are different. Politics existed before the state. Politics does no need to the state.
We have one criterion for determining whether a relationship is political: the "friend-enemy
relationship"
29
The main thing in politics is to set aside all moral and legal considerations and to identify the enemy(ies)
and take action against him/them.
It doesn't matter if the enemy is really a threat: even the "probability" of a future conflict with him is
enough.
For the existence of the political sphere in a society, there is absolutely a need for a "foreigner" or
"other".
30