Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Associated Injuries
- Nerve Injury - radial nerve in 10-12% of closed fxs
- No need for urgent decompression, with good prognosis for recovery
- Holstein and Lewis proposed spiral lateral to medial fxs had high rate of nerve
entrapment (but usually recovered spontaneously)
- Soft Tissue Injuries - 63.6% of abnormal findings on MRI such as RCT or bursitis
- Floating Elbow
- More common in peds
- Need surgery, outcomes still not awesome
- Signs/Symptoms
- Swelling
- Beware hidden injuries elsewhere in the arm
- Imaging
- AP and lateral, joint above and below
- Doppler, CT or ultrasound, nerve conduction studies
Classification
- Bone Injury
- Three parts: proximal (11), diaphyseal (12), and distal (13)
- Diaphyseal - simple (A), wedge (B), complex ©
- Benign (1) to difficult (3)
- Garnavos Classification
- Proximal (P), Middle (M), Distal (D), extension into joint (j)
- Simple (S)
- Transverse (t) or spiral (s)
- Intermediate (I)
- Complex ©
Outcome Measures
- Constant-Murley Score
- 100 point functional shoulder assessment tool (worst to best)
- Pain (15 pts), functional assessment (20 pts), ROM (40 pts), strength (25 pts)
- DASH
- 30 items vs 11 on quickDASH
- 0-100 where higher score = greater disability
- American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Self-Report Form for the Shoulder
- There is also one for the elbow
- Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI)
- Pain, motion, stability, function
Pathoanatomy and Applied Anatomy
- Shaft = area below surgical neck/tuberosities; above supracondylar ridge at elbow
- Changes gradually from cylindrical to triangular as it courses distally
- Important bony landmarks
- Deltoid tuberosity at junction of proximal and middle 1/3s
- Spiral groove in middle/posterior aspect housing radial nerve and profunda brachii
artery
- Radial nerve enters posterior compartment and runs between long and lateral heads of triceps,
entering spiral groove and exiting 10-15 cm proximal to lateral epicondyle
- Axillary nerve runs 4-7 cm from tip of acromion about proximal humerus, running posterior to
anterior
Treatment Options
- Nonop
- Acute, closed, isolated fx in cooperative and ambulatory patient
- Type A fxs, proximal ⅓, long oblique fxs, segmental fxs
- Contraindicated for bilateral fxs, polytrauma patients, or periprosthetic fxs
- Union rate of 94.5% for closed treatment with functional bracing
- Sling/Swathe and Velpeau Bandage
- Velpeau is more restrictive with elbow more flexed and forearm pressed to chest
- U-Slab/Coaptation Splint
- Get it as high laterally as possible, replace soon with functional brace
- Hanging Cast - full arm cast left gravity dependent to pull fragments into place
- Functional Bracing
- Sarmiento 1977
- Two plastic sleeves tightened with velcro to apply hydrostatic pressure
- Patients encouraged to employ pendulum movements
- Outcomes - average healing 93.5%, time to union between 6.5 and 22 weeks
- Expect loss of ROM of shoulder - 5-45 deg ER
- Average nonunion rate 15.4% in type A fractures
- Higher risk in proximal fractures, larger fracture gaps, and lack of
bridging callus at 6 weeks
- Operative Tx
- Plate Osteosynthesis
- ORIF
- Supine, prone, or lateral depending on approach and fx location
- Drill, graft instruments, large bone reduction tools, large and small frag
sets and K wires
- Anterolateral approach more common for proximal and middle fxs thus
supine position
- Anterolateral approach - tip of coracoid process in line with deltopectoral
groove to lateral aspect of humerus at deltoid insertion, continued
distally until 5 cm proximal to flexion crease of elbow joint
- Cephalic vein proximally, retract deltoid laterally and pec major
medially
- Anterior circumflex artery encountered deep and should be
ligated
- In middle third, must mobilize biceps medially, exposing
brachialis which is split in midline to protect innervation
(musculocutaneous and radial)
- Posterior approach - midline incision from tip of olecranon to about 5-10
cm distal to acromion, interval between long and lateral heads of triceps,
sharply incising common tendon of triceps in midline distally
- Will encounter radial nerve and profunda proximally
- May opt for triceps sparing approach which is laterally directed,
though must mobilize radial nerve
- Lateral approach - deltoid insertion to lateral epicondyle, interval
between lateral intermuscular septum and triceps
- Anteromedial approach - medial margin of biceps directed toward medial
epicondyle, more so used for neurovascular surgery than fracture fixation
- Implant of choice for fixation is 4.5 mm narrow dynamic compression
plate (DCP) or 4.5 mm low contact plate
- Minimum 3-4 holes both proximal and distal to fx
- Ideally 4 screws each side if lagging is not possible
- Postop - collar and cuff for support, PT 2-3 days after and simple ROM
at 3-4 weeks
- No bad outcomes with immediate weight bearing
- Can accept up to 2-3 cm of shortening
- Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO)
- Most proximal extent of fx must be distal to bicipital groove and most
distal extent of fx must be proximal to olecranon fossa
- Supine or lateral, anterior approach requires 30-60 deg abduction and full
supination of forearm
- Two incisions, 3-5 cm proximally and 3-5 cm distally
- Split brachialis carefully to avoid damage to musculocutaneous
nerve
- Lateral and posterior approach also feasible with 2-3 incisions
- Tunneling instrument used to position plate (4.5mm narrow DCP) with
suture tied to end of plate and through hole in instrument
- Provisionally fix with one screw, reduce fx, secure into other
fragment
- Overall strong outcomes, though residual elbow motion deficits were
prevalent
- Intramedullary Nailing
- Antegrade
- Supine position, drill, guidewires, humeral reamers, distal targeting
device (optional)
- 2-3 cm incision from anterolateral edge of acromion obliquely forward,
identify entry point on sulcus toward its medial border
- Long head of biceps can be palpated and protected, can use small bone
hook to avoid acromion by pulling humeral head laterally
- Awl to enter canal, pass guidewire, ream (pause when passing fx site to
minimize risk to radial nerve), wash reaming debris from under rotator
cuff
- Ream 0.5 to 1 mm more than width of nail
- Targeting device to lock nail proximally, distally would go perfect
circles
- Expandable nail is an option to avoid risks of distal interlocks
- Mobilize shoulder and elbow early and often, may use axillary crutches
within 2 weeks of surgery
- Retrograde
- Lateral or prone position, nail sets and wires etc
- C arm on same side as injury
- 4-5 cm incision from tip of olecranon, triceps tendon split until olecranon
fossa is visualized
- Two drill holes connected by osteotome, pass guidewire, hand ream after
fracture reduction, introduce nail, lock distally with targeting device and
then proximally with perfect circles
- Beware iatrogenic fx of supracondylar area as canal is smaller
here than proximally
- External Fixation
- Monolateral vs hybrid
- “Sarmiento” rings
- Pin tract infections are most likely bad outcome
- Comparison Studies
- Plating or Nailing
- IMN higher rate of shoulder impingement, plating more ideal for
unstable fxs
- Consider nails for pathologic fxs, obese patients, osteopenic pts, and
large segmental humeral fxs
- Antegrade or Retrograde Nailing
- Only real difference is longer op time for retrograde
- Shoulder functional recovery may lag behind for antegrade group
- ORIF or MIPO?
- Greater postop malrotation for MIPO, though lower incidence of
iatrogenic radial nerve injury
- MIPO does perform better than antegrade nailing or open plating with
respect to nonunion, functional outcome, and complications
Author’s Preferred Tx
- Functional bracing for uncomplicated fxs, U-slab for dc from ED w/ 1 wk f/u
- IMN preferred when surgical management is indicated
- Unlocked nailing to be considered as humerus is non weight bearing bone, can tolerate wide
degrees of axial and rotational malalignment, tolerates shortening of a few CM, and given risks
associated with freehand interlocking screw placement
- Also called “bio” nailing, though use is declining
- Nailing ideally performed for acute fractures while fracture hematoma remains present
- Nonunion typically atrophic and managed with surgical debridement, autologous
corticocancellous bone grafting, and rigid fixation w/ compression plating
Adverse Outcomes and Unexpected Complications
- Generals
- Nonunion - 1-10% in nonsurgical tx, 10-15% in surgical tx
- Infection
- Secondary Neurologic Injury
- Permanent in 2-3% of patients
- Consider exploration and repair vs tendon transfers if function does not return
within 4-6 months
- Implant Specific
- Plating
- Loss of Fixation
- Nailing
- Injury to vulnerable soft tissues by locking screws
- Nail protrusion and impingement (antegrade nailing)
- Shoulder dysfunction (antegrade nailing)
- Backing out of proximal locking screws (antegrade nailing)
- Fracture at supracondylar area during insertion (retrograde nailing)
- Risk reduced by flexing elbow beyond 100 deg during nail insertion,
opening a wide entry portal, de-roofing the entry portal, reaming the
distal humeral canal, and the use of a nonrigid nail
- Complications attributed to specific nail design
- External Fixation
- Pin track infection
- Refracture after removal
Special Considerations for Humeral Shaft Fxs
- Open Fractures
- Dependent on severity, though many can be debrided and then treated without internal
fixation
- External fixation for severely contaminated or very open fractures
- Osteoporotic Fractures
- IMN reliable for these injuries as well as for nonunions
- Locking plates that produce a fixed angle implant also of use
- Pathologic Lesions and Fractures
- Fracture healing not expected, thus nail augmentation and filling of areas of bone loss
with cement is ideal
- Systemic complications and need for reoperation higher in this population
- Periprosthetic Fractures
- Wright and Cofield classification
- Type A - tip of prosthesis and extend proximally
- Type B - tip of prosthesis
- Type C - distal to tip of prosthesis
- O’Driscoll and Morrey
- Type I - periarticular/metaphyseal at level of condyles/olecranon
- Type II - level of stem of prosthesis
- Type III - beyond tip of prosthesis in diaphysis
- Replace implant, bypass fracture by at least two cortical diameters, do not allow cement
to protrude from fracture site as this will prevent bone healing
Summary
- Nonop remains king
- MIPO won’t cover them all
- Nails carry very specific risks and should be used with care and good judgment