2.

How does digital software affect the teaching’s strategies on students and classes in terms
of the following:

Table 2.1 Teaching Strategies

Table 2.1 The results of Teaching using the Digital Software.

Indicators Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

1. I use Flip grid in 2.50 1.18 Agree
my class
discussion to
share videos
and activities.
2. I use One note 2.74 1.20 Agree
to create a plan
and notes for
my class
discussion.
3. I use Microsoft 4.04 1.01 Strongly Agree
Forms for
collecting and
making quizzes
and results.
4. I use 2.57 1.21 Agree
whiteboard to
let my students
participate in
my discussion.
Overall Mean 2.98 0.85 Agree

Legend: 1.00-1.75: Strongly Disagree; 1.76-2.50: Disagree; 2.51-3.26; Agree; 3.27-4.00: Strongly Agree
 Table 2.1 shows how it affect the respondents using the digital software when it comes to
teaching strategies, in which it obtained an overall mean score of 2.98 and a standard deviation
of 0.85. With a results of the majority of respondents are in a agreement that the microsoft forms
were used mostly to create the quizzes and findings for its study that make a strategy and notes
for its class discussion.

Table 2.2 Monitoring Application

Table 2.2 The results of Teaching Strategies using the Microsoft Application

Indicators Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

1. I use Microsoft 3.80 1.13 Agree
Teams'
homepage to
post a brief
introduction
and lay out my
daily class plan
for my
students.
2. I use Microsoft 3.58 1.27 Strongly Agree
Teams' Grades
to input and
keep track of
my students'
scores and
current grade
percentages.
3. I use Microsoft 3.55 1.25 Strongly Agree
Teams'
Bulletins to
post
introductory
 statements and
reminders for
my students to
keep them
prepared and
on time.
4. I use Viva 2.82 1.40 Agree
Insights for
Microsoft
Teams to
monitor my
students’
attendance and
hours of work
in my class.
5. I use Microsoft
Teams' 3.9 1.19 Strongly Agree
SharePoint to
access data
needed for the
academic
activities and
records of my
students.
Overall Mean 3.49 0.95 Strongly Agree

Legend: 1.00-1.75: Strongly Disagree; 1.76-2.50: Disagree; 2.51-3.26; Agree; 3.27-4.00: Strongly Agree

In Table 2.2 Monitoring Application how it affect the respondents using the digital software
when it comes to teaching strategies, for which it obtained an overall mean score of 3.49 and a
standard deviation of 0.95. This shows that it provide quick introduction and daily lesson plan
for student and access the information required for students academic records and activities using
the Microsoft Teams site and sharepoint.

2.3 Task Technology Fit

Table 2.3 The Result of Microsoft Team Task Technology in terms of Satisfaction

Indicators Mean SD Verbal Interpretation

1. Microsoft 4.19 0.78 Strongly Satisfied
Teams’
integrated
applications
are easy to
learn.
2. Microsoft 4.12 0.74 Strongly Satisfied
Teams’
integrated
applications
are easy to
understand
and navigate.
3. It is easy to 4.09 0.75 Strongly Satisfied
select which
application is
appropriate to
use for class
discussion and
activities.
4. It is easy to 4.10 0.74 Strongly Satisfied
become skilled
in using
Microsoft
Teams’
 integrated
applications.
5. It is easier to 4.16 0.71 Strongly Satisfied
know the
progress of the
students in an
online class
using the
Microsoft
Teams’
integrated
applications
Overall Mean 4.13 0.65 Strongly Satisfied

Legend: 1.00-1.75: Strongly Dissatisfied; 1.76-2.50: Dissatisfied; 2.51-3.26; Satisfied; 3.27-4.00: Strongly Satisfied

The descriptive data, notably the mean and standard deviation, for the degree of how it affect
the respondents of students using the digital software when it comes to teaching strategies in
terms of Task Technology Fit are shown in Table 2.3. With a mean score of 4.13 and a standard
deviation of 0.65, Respondents concur and appear satisfied with the Microsoft Team's ability to
make it simpler to know the easy way of using the Microsoft Teams' integrated apps like with an
easy way of knowing the progress of students in online classes.