Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
KARTHIK SURESH i
2101030
IPE, Hyderabad i
(July, 2022) i
1
Institute of Public Enterprise
i i i
DECLARATION
I ihereby ideclare ithat ithe iwork ipresented iin ithe iproject ientitled i“FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF NEW GENERATION PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS
IN INDIA”, iis ia iSummer iInternship iProject iReport isubmitted iin ipartial ifulfillment iof ithe
irequirements ifor ithe iaward iof ithe idegree iof iPost iGraduate iDiploma iin iManagement iis ian
iauthentic irecord iof imy iown iwork icarried iout iduring ia iperiod ifrom i29 June i2022 ito i15 iAugust
th
i
th
i2022 iunder ithe isuper- ivision iof iDr. iSyed iAzher iAli, imentor iand ifaculty iInstitute iof iPublic
iEnterprise, iHyderabad.
The imatter ipresented iin ithis iproject iwork ihas inot ibeen isubmitted iby iany ione ior iby ime ifor ithe
iaward iof iany iother idegree iof ithis ior iany iother iInstitute/University
DAKSHINESH ADITHYA K S
2101020
DATE: i30/08/2022
2
This iis ito icertify ithat ithe iabove istatement imade iby ithe icandidate iis itrue ito ithe ibest iof iour
iknowledge iand ibelief.
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It iis ia igreat ipleasure ifor ime ito iexpress imy irespect iand ideep isense iof igratitude ito imy imentor iand
iguide iDr. iAbhay K Srivastava, iProfessor, iInstitute iof iIPE, ifor ihis iwisdom, ivision, iexpertise,
iguidance, ienthusiastic iinvolvement iand ipersistent iencouragement iduring ithe iplanning iand
idevelopment iof ithis iresearch iwork. iI ialso igratefully iacknowledge ihis ipainstaking iefforts iin
ithoroughly igoing ithrough iand iimproving ithe imanuscripts iwithout iwhich ithis iwork icould inot
I iam ihighly iobliged ito iProf iS iSreenivasa iMurthy, iDirector, iIPE, iDean iAcademic iand iChairman
iPlacements, iIPE iand iDr iC iV iSunil iKumar, icoordinator iof iPGDM, iIPE ifor iproviding iall ithe
ifacilities, ihelp iand iencouragement ifor icarrying iout ithe iproject iwork. iI iam iobliged ito imy iparents
iSambasivam k iand iSridevi S ifor itheir imoral isupport, ilove, iencouragement iand iblessings ito
I iwish ito iexpress imy iappreciation ito imy ifriends iDayanesh iand iAbhimanyu iand igrateful ithanks
ito iproject ifellows iat idepartment ifor itheir ihelp iand imotivation ithroughout imy iproject iwork. iI
ialso iwould ilike ito iexpress imy ideep iand isincerely ithanks ito imy i[Anurag iSharma iand iMotilal
I iam ialso ithankful ito ithe ianonymous ireviewers iof imy iresearch iwork. iTheir icomments iand
isuggestions iwere ivery ihelpful iin ishaping imy iproject iwork. iI iwould ialso ilike ito ithank iI iwould
ialso ilike ito iextend imy ispecial ithanks ito i[Prof. iSIP iCoordinator iname], ifaculty iand iSIP
iCoordinator, iIPE iand iother istaff imembers iof iIPE, iHyderabad, ifor itheir itimely ihelp iand
Finally, iI iam iindebted iand igrateful ito ithe iAlmighty ifor ihelping ime iin ithis iendeavor
DAKSHINESH ADITHYA K S
2101020
4
Abstract
A bank is a financial institution that provides banking and other
financial services to their customers. A bank is generally understood
as an institution which provides fundamental banking services such
as accepting deposits and providing loans. There are also non-
banking institutions which provide certain banking services without
meeting the legal definition of a banks are a subset of the financial
services industry. A banking system is also referred to as a system
provided by the bank which offers cash management, services for
customers, reporting the transactions of their accounts and
portfolios throughout the day. Indian banking system for the past
three decades has several outstanding achievement to its credit. The
most striking is its extensive reach. It is no longer confined to only
metropolitans or cosmopolitans in India. In fact, Indian banking
system has reached even to the remote corners of the country. This
is one of the main reasons for India’s growth process. The banks are
the main participants of the financial system in India.
5
6
CONTENTS
1 Declaration 2
2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 4
3 ABSTRACT 5
7
CHAPTER – 1 i i
INTRODUCTION
10
after1991, with the introduction of economic reforms and financial
sector reforms are called as new private sector banks. Banking
regulation act was then amended in 1993, which permitted the entry
of new private sector banks in the Indian banking sector. However
there were certain criteria set for the establishment of the new
private sector banks.
The bank should have a minimum net worth of 100 crores.
The promoters holding should be a minimum of 25% of the paid up
capital.
Within 3 years of the starting of the operations, the bank should
offer shares to public.
The new private sector banks that were established in the private
sector after the Second World War actually escaped from the
conditions of nationalisation. There are seven new generation
private sector banks in India. They are:
S.No Name of the bank Year of Origin
Establishment (State)
1. Axis Bank Ltd. 1995 Maharastra
2. HDFC Bank Ltd 1994 Maharastra
3. Indusland Bank Ltd. 1994 Maharastra
4. Development Credit Bank Ltd. 1995 Maharastra
5. ICICI Bank Ltd. 1996 Maharastra
6. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. 2003 Maharastra
7. Yes Bank Ltd. 2005 Maharastra
11
Historically, the development of joint stock banking in India was
greatly aided by the private sector banks. Private sector banks had
extraordinary expansion over the first half of the 20th century. As a
consequence, there were 566 private banks in 1951, of which 474
were non-scheduled and 92 were scheduled according to the
amount of capital they had. With the creation of State Bank of India
in 1955 and the subsequent two waves of bank nationalization—one
in July 1969 (14 large banks), and another in April 1980—the
influence of private sector banking began to wane (takeover of 6
banks). As a result, there are now more public sector banks.
There are now 32 private banks, of which 24 were formed before
1993–1994 and eight were founded after the RBI issued guidelines
for the creation of new banks in the private sector in January 1993 in
response to the recommendations of the Narasimham Committee–I.
(1991).
Compared to new private sector banks, old banks are small in size
because today’s growth of this sector has grown huge and the
technology are advanced. So, For example, the average net value of
the 24 Old Private Banks (OPBs) at the end of March 2000 was Rs.
179.67 crore per OPB as opposed to Rs. 479.88 crore each NPB.
Although some of them have sporadic presences outside of the
locations in and around which they originated, the OPBs are mostly
regional in nature. At the end of March 2003, there were 999 NPB
branches and 3491 OPB branches.
The Narasimham Committee-I, which supported competition in the
banking sector, unambiguously recommended allowing private and
foreign banks to operate in the sector. In response to the
committee's recommendations, the RBI established regulations for
the creation of private sector banks in January 1993. According to
the rules, private banks have to be incorporated as public limited
companies under the 1956 Indian Companies Act. The paid-up capital
must be at least $100 billion. The minimum paid-up capital was
12
increased to Rs. 200 crore under the new criteria published in 2001,
and it must be increased to Rs. 300 crore within three years of the
start of company. A shareholder's right to vote and the promoters'
stake must both be at least 40% and shall not exceed 10%.
It is preferable for banks to locate their primary offices in areas
without any other banks having similar offices. These banks must
follow the same priority sector lending goals as other domestic
banks. The rules are designed to make sure that new entrants are
both financially and technologically viable from the start. One of the
factors taken into account by the RBI while approving OPBs was that
the new banks would begin operating in a professional way, sending
out crystal-clear signals that would strengthen the reputation of the
commercial banking sector and inspire trust in the depositor public.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE:
Scheduled Commercial Banks significantly outperformed 1995-96 in
terms of their financial performance in 1996-97 (Tables 3.4). For each
segment, net profits rose. Either an improvement in operational
profitability, a reduction in the requirement for provisioning, or both
contributed to the increase. According to "mark-to-market"
standards, banks' provisioning obligations significantly decreased as
a result of the relative drop in yields on government assets.
This made it possible for public sector banks—particularly
nationalised banks—to boost their net earnings. The spread or net
interest income growth in 1996–1997 also led to increasing
profitability. In the case of public sector banks, the spread-to-total-
assets ratio climbed by 8 basis points, from 3.08 percent in 1995–
1996 to 3.16 percent in 1996–1997.
During the same period, the spread for the new private sector banks
increased by 7 basis points, from 2.84 to 2.91 percent, while it
13
decreased by 18 basis points for their older counterparts, from 3.14
to 2.96 percent. With respect to international banks, the spread
increased by 35 basis points, from 3.74 percent in 1995–1996 to 4.09
percent in 1996–1997, which was the largest rise.
14
choose their investment through the study's comparison analysis.
Consequently, the investigator measured the banks.
Financial standing of India according to financial indices. The Federal
and HDFC banks are two of India's top private banking institutions.
Some of the Private sector Banks plays vital role in the Indian
economy are:
i) Offering high degree of Professional Management:
The private sector banks contribute to the introduction of a highly
skilled management and marketing idea into banking. It aids the
public sector banks in acquiring comparable expertise and
technology.
ii) Creates healthy competition:
The private sector banks provide the banking system's overall
efficiency levels some good competition.
iii) Promotes International Investment:
The private sector banks, particularly foreign banks, have a
significant impact on foreign investment in the nation.
iv) Promotes access to international capital markets:
Private sector foreign banks assist Indian businesses and government
organisations in obtaining the funding they need from global capital
markets. Because they have their main offices and other branches in
significant overseas cities, providing this service is made simpler for
them. They significantly contribute in this way to the development of
trade and industry in the nation.
NEW PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS:
Of the 13 "in principle approvals" granted by the RBI, ten new private
sector banks have already begun operations. The RBI gave its
preliminary clearance to three regional private banks, one in each of
15
Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Karnataka. In 1996–1997, the
intermediation ratio—the ratio of operational expenses to total
assets—among new private sector banks was among the lowest. In
1996–1997, the new private sector banks' intermediation ratios were
1.92 percent, compared to 2.50 percent for the old private sector
banks and 2.88 percent for the public sector banks.
The highest equivalent ratio, 3.01 percent, was, however, recorded
for international banks in the same year. In 1996–1997, the new
private sector banks had the highest net profit-to-total-assets ratio
(1.77%), followed by foreign banks (1.41%), old private sector banks
(0.92%), and public sector banks (0.56%).
16
PRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS:
In 1997–1998 the prudential regulations were adjusted and
modified. Loan defaults in any two quarters that have been rectified
prior to the balance sheet date by paying the past-due amount from
legitimate sources are not included as non-performing assets (NPA).
Agricultural advances that have interest or instalment payments that
are overdue by more than two quarters as of the due date of
repayment will be considered as NPA as of the accounting year
ending in March 1998.
18
Business per branch, which traditionally determines profitability, is a
critical factor in determining how well banks operate. If business at
each branch increases year over year, it is safe to infer that the
bank's position in the market has been improving. The business per
branch for 24 PBs, including eight new private sector banks, is shown
in Table 6.4 during the research period. Data for NPBs are available
for the years 1995 to 1996. The pace of expansion was moderate in
the first two years, 1992–93 and 1993–94, but picked up in 1994–95
and increased from 1997–98 when the growth of business per
branch of OPBs is taken into account.
According to an interbank analysis, IDBI, PBL, and LKBL, which hold
the top three spots, had the highest growth rates among PBs in
terms of business per branch, while GTB, UTI, and HDFC, which
occupy the bottom three spots, had the lowest growth rates.
Regarding Business per branch, differences in CV among various PBs
are not substantial.
19
3) PROFIT PER BRANCH:
The data relating to profit per branch for the study period are
presented in Table 1.1. With the exception of two new and two
existing private sector banks, every other bank has generated profits
per branch during the course of the time. Among the OPBs, BORI
made losses per branch in the years 1997–1998 and 1998–1999, as
well as UWBL for one year, 2001–2002. Among the NPBs, CBL during
the years 2001–2002 and 2002–2003, as well as GTB in 2002–2003,
both experienced branch losses.
By 2002–2003, GTB's condition had gotten so terrible that RBI issued
a moratorium in 2004 and it was later amalgamated with OBOC.
Throughout the research period, there is no consistency in the profit
per branch from year to year.
Table 1.1
20
The co-efficient of variance amongst banks demonstrates that there
is a loge variation in the profit per branch of PBs. As a result, profit
stability varies greatly from bank to bank and year to year.
21
Table 1.2
22
Table 1.3
23
Table 1.4
24
5. Yes Bank Ltd 2005
Table 2
25
In the majority of the nations, government regulation protected
banks from the forces of competition. This also applies to India.
Restrictions on the admission and growth of private and foreign
banks were increasingly tightened after the majority of the major
commercial banks were nationalised in 1969. Additionally, the
Reserve Bank of India started requiring nationalised banks to adhere
to standardised interest rates, spreads, and service adjustments.
Lack of free market rivalry among public and private banks is the
source of this.
The banking industry's competitive pressure is continuing to grow
over time. The viability of commercial banks was also threatened by
other areas of concern, such as the rise in non-performing assets and
the decline in profitability and efficiency. Commercial banks have had
a crucial role.
This makes the function of commercial banks in developing nations
and planned economies like India particularly crucial. The goal of the
current study is to look at developments in one of the country's top
banking sectors' financial performances (Axis Bank).
26
servicing expenses. Even a company with a lot of debt will be
able to satisfy its commitments with a strong operational
income.
The fact that the bank's earning power has increased
consistently every year between 2010 and 2015 is proof of this.
A dependable company to invest money in has a growing EPS,
which indicates good profits and a strong financial situation.
INDUSTRY PROFILE:
A bank is a financial institution that offers its customers banking and
other financial services. A bank is a financial institution that performs
basic banking functions such as receiving deposits and disbursing
loans. Money lenders conducted financial transactions prior to the
foundation of banks. Interest rates were extremely expensive at the
time, and there was no guarantee of public savings or loan
27
consistency. To address these issues, the government built an
organized banking system, which is strictly regulated.
28
• Print Magazines
• Awards properties
• Digital Publishing
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
The problem statement is centred on finance and seeks to analyse
the HDFC bank's financial performance during the last five years.
Outsiders and investors can assess past, present, and financial
condition in order to anticipate future success through the use of
financial performance analysis. With the use of financial statements
from the previous five years, the research is carried out to determine
whether or not the organization's financial performance is sound.
29
In terms of market capitalization, ICICI Bank ranks third among all the
corporations listed on Indian stock markets and is the most valuable
bank in the country. The ICICI Bank's financial analysis will support
shareholders' and investors' upcoming investments in the business.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The financial performance of ICICI Bank, which was connected to the
private sector, has been measured and evaluated in the current
study.
The study's foundation is secondary data, which was gathered from
annual reports of the relevant banks, periodicals, journals, papers,
and other public sources.
The research spans a five-year period, from the years 2014–15 to
2018–2019. To examine and contrast the trends in banking business
and financial performance, ratio analysis was used.
30
Globalise the boundaries of their business.
Be proactive in assisting India in achieving its greatest potential.
To keep a sound financial position, one should diversify one's
income across industries and regions.
DIGITAL GROWTH:
The Bank had upgraded I Mobile, its mobile banking app, to I Mobile
Pay in December 2020, providing payment and banking services to
users of any bank. As of the end of December 2021, there were 53
lakh activations from non-ICICI Bank account holders. Non-ICICI Bank
account holders' transaction value climbed by 73% sequentially in
Q3-2022.
At Rs. 4,55,326 crore (US$ 61.3 billion), the value of mobile banking
transactions surged by 50% year over year in Q3-2022. Over 90% of
transactions involving savings accounts were made using digital
channels such the internet, mobile banking, point of sale, and others
in 9M-2022. Through FASTag, The Bank dominates the market for
electronic toll collection. In Q3-2022, the Bank had a market share of
39% by value in electronic toll collections through FASTag, with a
42% increase in collections year over year.
31
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) engaged in manufacturing,
trading services, and exporting can choose from a wide range of
banking products and services offered by the commercial banking
division. It features specialised divisions that offer financing to the
agricultural industry, operators of commercial vehicles, and
infrastructure companies. By offering term loans for the purchase of
tractors, it assists farmers all throughout India. Additionally, the Bank
provides company loans and small ticket gold loans.
C) TREND ANALYSIS:
Trend analysis aids in the forecasting of diverse objects' future
trajectories. The base year is considered to be equal to 100 for the
purposes of calculating the trend, and the percentage of each item is
then determined.
It has 1600 branches and 2519 ATMs, making it the second-largest
private sector bank in India as of April 2019.
5) YES BANK LTD:
In 2004, YES BANK Limited, a private sector bank, was established.
Mr. Rana Kapoor took over as the bank's managing director and chief
executive officer when Mr. Ashok Kapur, one of the bank's founders,
passed away. With the passing of time, this bank has developed into
a "Full Service Commercial Bank," delivering a broad range of goods,
33
services, and technology-driven digital solutions to corporate, MSME,
and retail clients.
Following the central bank's asset quality examinations in 2017 and
2018, which sharply increased its bad loans ratio and exposed
serious governance flaws that necessitated a full change of
management, YES BANK encountered problems. The bank then had
trouble fixing its capitalization problems. After IL&FS's demise in
2018, the YES BANK essentially lacked the resources to revive. How
could the bank increase its loan book by 80% between March 31,
2017, and March 31, 2019, despite a weak economy, exceptionally
low demand for credit, and a lack of indicators of a rebound in
private investment? According to M. K. Venu (7 March 2020), the
collapse of YES BANK raises a lot of questions.
ANALYZING PERFORMANCE:
In the first four years of our analysis, the capital adequacy of the YES
bank was good; nevertheless, the last year was poor. This is how it
may be explained:
34
The capital adequacy ratio is positive for the first three years,
growing, then declining, but it is disastrous in 2020, sharply
declining.
Although the debt-to-equity ratio varies, overall performance
during the study period has been strong.
Until 2019, advances to assets are rising. Liquidity issues arise
when this ratio is excessively raised.
Although YES Bank's earnings have been declining during the study
period, they were particularly poor last year. Here are some
explanations that should help.
Except for 2018, the net profit margin has been declining
throughout the research period, but in 2020 it dropped
significantly and reached a loss-making level. Net profit margin
declines are a bad sign for banks.
The net interest margin was stable for the first two years,
slightly improved the following year, but has been declining for
the past two years. Net interest margin declines are a bad sign
for banks.
Yes Bank is one of the best performing banks in the private banking
sector. This study looked at the performance analysis of the YES Bank
from 2016 to 2020. It has been determined that Yes Bank's
performance has improved relative to the criteria, but not overall.
In a word, the loans made to deserving businesses with bad credit
continue to be the root of the issue that Yes Bank is currently
experiencing. Both the bank's management and its oversight agency,
the RBI, are at fault for this because they have the authority to
determine and control the bank's activities.
BANKING POLICY:
1) BANK SUPERVISION:
35
Bank Supervision: Starting with the inspection cycle that began in
July 1997, a new method has been implemented in the yearly
financial inspection of banks as advised by the Working Group on the
On-site Supervision of Banks by RBI (The Padmanabhan Working
Group—1995). Based on a modified version of the CAMEL model
called CAMELS, which assesses banks' capital adequacy, asset quality,
management, earning, liquidity, and systems and control, it adds the
statutorily required characteristics of solvency, liquidity, financial,
and operational health.
3) CONSORTIUM FINANCE:
36
Borrowers are now entirely free to offer credit on their own when
the loan ceiling exceeds Rs. 50 crore per borrower without being
required to participate into consortium arrangements. In
collaboration with the borrower and the funding institutions, banks
are now free to select any other option, including syndication.
4) REFINANCE FACILITY:
The RBI has created a General Refinance Facility in place of the
sector-specific refinance Facilities that were either deleted or
rationalised as a result of the process of CRR and refinance facilities
rationalisation.
In 1996, the refinancing option using government securities was
discontinued. With effect from April 26, 1997, banks are given export
credit refinancing at bank rates to the extent of 100% of the increase
in outstanding export credit eligible for refinancing over the level of
such credit as of February 16, 1996. Previously, export credit
refinancing to scheduled commercial banks was based on
outstanding level of export credit.
37
The public sector banks in India continue to be many people's chosen
locations despite the technical obstacles since they are thought of as
safer possibilities for money deposit.
38
The total amount of bank credit as of January 2013 was Rs. 50,427.9
billion. Private bank advances totaled Rs 9,928.6 billion. In
comparison to FY11, the credit-deposit (C-D) ratio increased to 78.6%
in FY12. In FY12, private banks' C-D ratio was 82.27%. Return on
Assets (RoA) for private banks increased from 1.43% in FY11 to 1.53%
in FY12.
39
Private Sector Indian banks have asset quality concerns under
control.
40
quality, profitability, and lending growth, among other things, PSBs
appeared to underperform private banks in 2015.
The PSBs, for instance, had the greatest percentage of stressed
assets at 14.1%, followed by private banks at 4.6% and international
banks at 3.4%. The PSBs have been lending more carefully due to the
strain on asset quality, which has resulted in sluggish loan growth for
them.
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION :
The major cities served as the foundation for the private banks.
Private sector banks are growing their network into urban, semi
urban, and rural areas after seeing expansion in metro areas. The
network distribution of private banks across various sorts of
demographic groups is shown in the table. Private banks are not only
mostly concentrated in urban areas; they have also begun to enter
the rural sector. The establishment of private sector banks has
greatly benefited the semi-urban areas. Private bank branches are
located in semi-urban regions in proportion of 30%.
TABLE 1
41
STATE WISE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS
TABLE 2
STATE WISE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE SECTOR BANK
42
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEW BANKS:
Total loans and advances:
The table above shows the total advances made by private sector
banks between 2011 and 2020. All loan kinds, both secured and
unsecured, are included in advances. Regarding advances, there has
been a varied rise among all banks. In terms of total advances in
2020, HDFC showed off the most with Rs 10,43,670.88 crores. The
two years with the highest growth rates are 2014 (27.57%) and 2018
(19.57%). ICICI had the highest growth rate in 2014 (17.39%) and the
lowest growth rate in 2017 (4.37%).
The KMB growth rate ranged from 2.64% in 2020 to 63.36% in 2016,
with the former being the greatest. KMB has the highest Annual
Average Growth Rate (AAGR), with HDFC coming in second and ICICI
coming in third. KMB has a low Standard Deviation of Advances,
followed by ICICI, while HDFC has a high Standard Deviation of
Advances.
Three banks are taken for the comparative analysis, they are HDFC
Bank, ICICI Bank and Kotak Mahindra Banks.
43
YEAR HDFC Annua ICICI (Rs in Annua KMB Annua
(Rs in cr.) l cr.) l (Rs in cr.) l
growt growt growt
h rate h rate h rate
(%) (%) (%)
2011 2.08,287.21 - 2,59,106.0 - 27,312.98 -
0
2012 2,46,539.58 18.37 2,81,950.4 8.82 36,460.73 33.49
7
2013 2,96,091.77 20.10 3,14,770.5 11.64 49,389.14 35.46
4
2014 3,67,080.33 23.98 3,59,512.6 14.21 56,929.75 15.27
8
2015 4,50,283.65 22.67 3,85,955.2 7.36 72,843.46 27.95
5
2016 5,45,873.29 21.23 4,51,077.3 16.87 1,35,948.7 86.63
9 6
2017 6,43,134.25 17.28 5,12,587.2 13.64 1,55,540.0 14.41
0
2018 7,88,375.14 22.58 5,85,796.1 14.28 1,91,235.8 22.95
1 0
2019 9,22,502.68 17.01 6,81,316.9 16.31 2,24,824.2 17.56
4 6
2020 11,46,207.1 24.25 8,00,784.4 17.53 2,60,400.2 15.82
3 6 1
AAGR 20.89 13.41 29.95
MEA 5,61,437.50 4,63,285.7 1,21,08851
N 1
SD 2,95,830.18 1,70,999.6 80,023.54
9
Total deposit Total Advance
YEAR HDFC Annual ICICI (Rs in Annual KMB Annual
(Rs in cr.) growth cr.) growth (Rs in cr.) growth
rate rate rate
44
(%) (%) (%)
2011 1,60,831.42 - 2,56,019.31 - 41,241.95 -
2012 1,98,837.53 23.63 2,92,125.42 14.10 53,143.61 28.86
2013 2,47,245.12 24.35 3,29,974.13 12.96 66,257.65 24.6
2014 3,15,418.86 27.57 3,87,341.78 17.39 71,692.52 8.20
2015 3,83,407.97 21.56 4,38,490.10 13.20 88,632.21 23.63
2016 4,87,290.42 27.09 4,93,729.11 12.60 1,44,792.82 63.36
2017 5,85,480.99 20.15 5,15,317.31 4.37 1,67,124.91 15.42
2018 7,00,033.84 19.57 5,66,854.22 10.00 2,05,997.32 23.26
2019 8,69,222.66 24.17 6,46,961.68 14.13 2,43,461.99 18.19
2020 10,43,670.88 20.07 7,06,246.11 9.16 2,49,878.96 2.64
AAGR 23.13 11.99 23.14
MEAN 4,99,143.97 4,63,305.9 1,33,222.39
2
SD 2,82,251.88 1,42,666.2 75,810.60
6
45
Chapter -II
i
Review Of Literature
46
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:
This section covers a review of the literature that includes some of
the most significant studies, research papers, publications in various
national and international magazines, official standard books, and
websites on the internet. It also discusses how to analyse financial
statements of companies.
The problem of changing the value of the monetary unit and its
effects on financial statements were discussed by the researchers Al-
tamimi and Hussain (2016) because accountants were preparing
these statements based on the monetary unit stability assumption
without taking into account how prices were changing as a result of
the inflation phenomenon. Their article comes to the conclusion that
continuing to use the historical cost principle when prices are
changing would result in deceptive financial statements, and the
outcomes of financial analysis won't accurately reflect the company's
true status.
47
Since the financial analysis process occurs after the disclosure of
accounting system output, Yaseen (2011) looks at the effects of
accounting principles and accounting assumptions.
The results of the search show that accounting principles and
assumptions have an impact on the accounting measurement
process both positively and negatively. In order to make the findings
of the financial analysis more precise and realistic, research is looking
for ways to reduce the negative consequences of these principles.
According to the study's findings, the historical cost principle was
inconvenient, and the organisation must now use methods like fair
value and work to develop financial management and analysis
approaches in order to reach a compromise between the accounting
and economics concepts of the organization's value.
48
Mahindra Bank performance is
good in profitability ratios.
According to K. Dinesh Kumar and G. Venugopal (2018), ICICI Bank
performed well in terms of balance sheet ratios and debt coverage
ratios, coming in second place to HDFC Bank. The profitability ratio
performance of SBI and Kotak Mahindra Bank is strong.
Through ratio analysis, Tirkeyi and Salem (2013) compared the
financial statements of ICICI and HDFC and looked at the financial
status using various ratios. It was discovered that ICICI's financial
situation is substantially better than HDFC's.
Pandya (2015) examined the effects of priority sector advances made
by Indian scheduled commercial banks on their profitability. The
author took into account all the scheduled commercial banks
currently active in India for this. Ratios of Priority Sector Advances to
Total Advances (PSATA) of all Commercial Banks were taken during
the study period as an independent variable, whereas Return on
Assets (ROA), Return on Investment (ROI), Return on Equity (ROE),
Ratio of Operating Profit to Total Assets (OPTA), and Ratio of Interest
Income to Total Assets (INTTA) were taken as dependent variables.
The link between the independent and dependent variables was
investigated using linear regression models. The study finds a
statistically significant association between PSATA and ROI, ROA,
OPTA, and INTTA.
According to the findings, bank profitability is influenced by
developments in key sectors. Additionally, the study demonstrates
that bank ROA and ROI are impacted by priority sector advances. In
order to avoid harming their profitability, the author advises banks to
be cautious when providing loans to priority sectors.
49
Sharifi and Akhter (2016) used the credit deposit ratio as a gauge of
how well a financial institution like a commercial bank is doing. They
claim that it shows the amount of credit that banks have deployed in
relation to the deposits that they have raised. A high credit deposit
ratio shows that banks are creating more credit from their deposits,
and vice versa. Additionally, they claim that the result of this ratio
shows how well the bank is able to utilise its resources. They
conducted a research to illustrate the performance of public sector
banks through the credit-deposit ratio using secondary data
gathered from 26 public sector banks over a 7-year period (2008-
2015). Using descriptive statistics and model for panel data
regression. Their research and analysis shows that the CDR has a
favourable influence on the financial health of public sector banks.
In their study, Jilkova and Stranska (2017) used a few key drivers to
analyse how the Czech Republic's economic environment affected
the functionality and profitability of the banking industry. Using a
"Multiple Linear Regression Model," they have concentrated on
assessing the effectiveness and profitability of the banking industry.
They looked at the model's overall fitness as well as which
independent factors affected the dependent variables' dispersion the
most and least. In addition to focusing on the performance and
profitability over the specified time period, their article also
compares the Czech banking sector's structure to other nations'
banking sectors and indicators in addition to focusing on the
performance and profitability over the specified time period.
Through the use of financial ratios, Karim and Alam (2013) evaluated
the performance of a sample of private sector banks in Bangladesh.
These ratios primarily reflect the sufficiency of risk-based capital,
credit growth, credit concentration, non-performing loan position,
liquidity gap analysis, liquidity ratio, return on assets (ROA), return
on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The effects on credit
risk, operational effectiveness, and asset management were
50
examined using multiple regression analysis, and a well-fit regression
model was developed to forecast the future financial performance of
these institutions.
Chapter-III
Research Methodology
51
DATA COLLECTED FOR THE STUDY:
As an academic activity, research should only be used in a technical
meaning. The study includes gathering, organising, and analysing
secondary material as well as redefining a few major concerns. The
audited annual reports of Federal Bank and HDFC Bank served as the
foundation for the whole study.
The secondary data that have been gathered are used to conduct
this research. The analysis of the financial performance of HDFC and
Federal Banks is limited to two years' worth of audited annual
reports, starting in 2013-2014 and ending in 2017-2018. The ratio
analysis, one of the management methods with a larger range of
applications nowadays, was used throughout the entire project.
Current ratio, liquid ratio, debt-to-equity ratio, net profit margin,
return on net worth, and CRAR are the ratios that are being used.
The current work made use of analytical methods including mean,
SD, CAGR, ANOVA, and CAGR.
There are few important factors for the private banks:
1) SMALL SAMPLE:
The best way to find the sample how effective is it in the banks.
380 people are chosen as the sample size. Since the population is
unknown, a 5% confidence interval and confidence level
calculation model are used to estimate the sample size. To gather
sample responders, a practical sampling technique was used.
Although the intention was to choose 380 consumers, the
researcher was unable to reach 20 respondents owing to
respondents' unavailability and some customers' failure to
52
answer. When the sample was finally reduced to 360, it was
agreed to include a sample of 40 clients from each of the chosen
banks.
2) STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES:
With the use of a computer, the gathered data were coded,
categorised, and then tallied. Henry Garrett Ranking analysis and
the Chi-Square Test were the only statistical tools employed.
III. IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY:
In the majority of the nations, government regulation protected
banks from the forces of competition. This also applies to India.
Restrictions on the admission and growth of private and foreign
banks were increasingly tightened after the majority of the major
commercial banks were nationalised in 1969. Additionally, the
Reserve Bank of India started requiring nationalised banks to adhere
to standardised interest rates, spreads, and service adjustments.
Lack of free market rivalry among public and private banks is the
source of this.
The banking industry's competitive pressure is continuing to grow
over time. The viability of commercial banks was also threatened by
other areas of concern, such as the rise in non-performing assets and
the decline in profitability and efficiency. Commercial banks have had
a crucial role in giving direction to economic development by
catering the financial requirement of trade and industry in the
country.
The primary source of funding for banks is deposits, and when
deposit growth is muted, bank credit expansion also slows. As a
result, all bank groups had reduced increase in advances in FY12
53
compared to the prior year. Private banks had slower growth in FY12
(21.2%) compared to FY11 (26.1%).
Chapter-IV
Data Analysis
54
1. RATIO ANALYSIS:
Table-1:
Financial Performance of Private Sector Banks with Reference to ICICI
Bank and Selected Private Banks.
55
GRAPH 1
Interpretation:
According to the data, ICICI Bank has a higher average net profit
margin than the other private banks, with Kotak Mahindra Bank,
Axis, and HDFC Bank following closely behind. The HDFC Bank has
the greatest average return on net worth when compared to other
banks, followed by Axis Bank, ICICI Bank, and Kotak Mahindra Bank,
in that order. From the table. Kotak Mahindra Bank clearly has the
greatest average return on assets when compared to other banks,
followed by HDFC Bank, Axis Bank, and ICICI Bank, in that order. It
shows the ICICI bank's poor performance in terms of return on total
assets. When compared to other banks, it is obvious that Kotak
Mahindra Bank has the greatest average interest spread, followed by
HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, and Axis Bank, in that order. It shows that
ICICI Bank's overall interest income and costs are more than its
typical working fund, which is a vulnerability.
2. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCES:
Table-2:
Analysis of mean Standard deviation, Coefficient of Variance of Net
profit margin.
PARTICULAR ICICI HDFC AXIS KMB
MEAN 20.65 19.93 19.99 20.438
SD 2.147 1.022 0.752 2.210
CV 0.104 0.051 0.038 0.108
56
Interpretation:
It is clear from the data that, in comparison to other banks, ICICI has
the greatest mean net profit margin (20.65). When compared to
other banks, Kotak Mahindra Bank has the largest standard deviation
of net profit margin (2.210) and coefficient of variation (0.108),
followed by ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, and Axis Bank, in that order. On
Net Profit Margin, ICICI Bank has the highest Mean value (20.65), a
moderate standard deviation (2.147), and a low covariance
coefficient (0.104).
Interpretation:
The table shows that, when compared to other banks, Axis Bank has
the highest Mean value of returns on net worth. Kotak Mahindra
Bank's fund Return on Net Worth has a larger standard deviation and
coefficient variance than that of other banks. On Return on Net
Worth, ICICI Bank has a moderate Mean Value (13.294) that is lower
than HDFC and AXIS Banks, a moderate Standard Deviation (1.446),
57
and a moderate Coefficient Variance (10.877) that is lower than
Kotak Mahindra Bank. AXIS and HDFC Bank follow, respectively.
Chapter-V
Findings, Suggestions and
Conclusion
58
FINDING:
The Indian banking sector has developed over time to provide clients
with excellent and transparent financial services. It contains
information on the country's various social strata' financial
circumstances.
India's public and commercial banks are becoming more flexible with
their services and programmes. However, private banks are now
better positioned to be customers' top options. In terms of
operational effectiveness and degree of innovation, private banks in
India do better. Because they are profit-driven, they offer a higher
calibre of service.
After the LPG policy was established in the 1990s, private banks were
acknowledged. Axis Bank and IndusInd Bank are two of the oldest
and most well-known private banks in India, having opened its doors
in 1993 or 1994 after receiving permission from the government to
do so.
SUGGESTIONS:
New generation banks will play an unavoidable part in the Indian
economy, but they will have a long way to go before they catch up to
public sector banks. In order to provide their consumers with
superior service, all Indian new generation banks develop their own
strategies and use cutting-edge programmes.
59
A new platform for the next generation of banks to discuss their
issues and challenges is advised.
The expansion of branch locations across India, especially in rural
areas, should be a priority for all banks.
They should step up and raise their cash to cover any market
unforeseen circumstances.
CONCLUSION:
Due to their extensive influence over the amount of money in
circulation and their function as the primary drivers of economic
growth, banks play crucial roles in the economic development of
nations. Economic development is a dynamic, ongoing process that
heavily depends on resource mobilisation, investment, and the
operational effectiveness of the many economic sectors. Because it is
defined as the reflection of how a bank's resources are employed in a
way that enables it to achieve its objectives, the performance of
bank institutions and other financial institutions has to be assessed.
Since the banking industry is seen as a crucial component of the
modern economy, efficiency is of utmost significance. Banks and
other financial institutions need to be thoroughly analysed if a sound
financial system and a productive economy are to be ensured. While
offering a variety of goods and services, banks and other financial
institutions assist commercial organisations. However, these
products and services are mostly the same from one bank to the
next, leaving little room for differentiation.
60
Chapter-VI
References
61
1. Joshua D., Thakkar S., Machhi R., and Chauhan D. (n.d.). Indian
banking industry financial performance analysis. European Journal of
Molecular & Clinical Medicine, volume 8, issue 8. (03).
Available:www.moneycontrol.com
2. Mohan M and Rao KS. an investigation of the efficiency of a few
Indian public and private sector banks. 2021;6(9):26-33 in
International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary
Research. DOI:https://doi.org/10.54121/2021/09/1494
3. Balasubramanian S. An evaluation of the financial performance of
Indian private sector banks. (2011) 07(01) SSRN Electronic Journal;
70–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1044621
4. Mohanty Anoop and Bansal Rohit. Application of the camel model
to a study of Indian commercial banks' financial performance.
2013;5(2):18-35. Al-Barkaat Journal of Finance and Management
5. Joshi A. Analysis of the profitability of a few private sector banks.
2012; 2(5):37–38. International Journal of Scientific Research
DOI:https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/may2013/16.
6. Ravi Agarwal a study of choose using the camel model. 2017;
(April):153–62.
7. Ali MA, Khan MA, Pervez A, Bansal R. Analysis of Indian bank
performance using a strong regression analysis method. In both
nature and society, discrete dynamics. 2022;1–9.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8103510.
62
8. Comparative performance analysis of a few Indian public and
private sector banks using the Camel model, Nandi JK.
2013;36:3/4:1-28 Journal of the Institute of Public Enterprise.
63