Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(PA-121)
Topic of the assignment: Administrative Reforms
(National Pay Commission,1972)
Submitted by: Md.Tasneem Siddiquee
Department of Public Administration
University of Dhaka
Class roll: ZR-139-024
Submitted to: Maruf Hasan Rumi
Lecturer
Department of Public Administration
University of Dhaka
National Pay Commission 1972
Introduction
The progression of the administrative system in a state stretches over time and is also modified
by environments and the nature of government which differ not only from country to country but
also between one period and another. This usually happens in all the nations of the world, though
their prevalence varies widely and most frequently in the politically unstable ones. Bangladesh is
a relevant case in point. Since its birth through a baptism of fire in 1971, several reform attempts
have been made to restructure and alter the existing so-called colonial administrative system for
the well-being of the masses.(Tarek and Ahmed,1989)
Administrative reform is the administrative reconstitution of the state institution that targets
rationalization of the administrative machinery, which enhances the quality and capacity of civil
service.(Kalimullah, Hassan and Sarkar,2017) While Caiden(1969, P.65) defines administrative
reform as “an artificial inducement of administrative transformation against resistance.”
This paper discusses the historical background behind the reformation of the Bangladesh
administration to understand why the national pay commission(NPC) in 1972 was formed as a
part of this reformation, and the recommendations made by the commission. It also analyzes
whether or not those recommendations were implemented, the barriers to the implementations,
and concludes the paper.
So it was the challenging and utmost priority for the government right after independence to
reinstate the civil service. To face this challenge, the government formed the Civil
Administration Restoration Committee (CARC) in 1971 to scrutinize and propose methods for
the renovation of civil administration.(Kalimullah, Hassan and Sarkar,2017) In 1972, CARC
submitted its report detailing the examination of the distinct affairs associated with the
administration to be considered by another committee delegated by the prime minister. The
provincial secretariat was converted into the national secretariat with 20 ministries and related
directorates/departments and corporations by the recommendations of CARC (GoB 1973a).
In the first term of the Awami League rule (1972-75), the government assigned two utmost
committees in 1972, namely the Administrative and Services Reorganization Committee (ASRC)
and the National Pay Commission (NPC). The committee/commission was entrusted with the
authority of proposing measures towards reorganizing the central bureaucracy, encompassing
local government, by devolution of power from the central to the local level and a national pay
structure. (Kalimullah, Hassan and Sarkar,2017)
Conclusion
The preceding analysis points towards a few conclusions about forming the National Pay
Commission in 1972 as a part of the reformation of administration in Bangladesh. Firstly,
reformation of administration was necessary to make administration an effective tool and to
replace the colonial legacy. Consequently, Initiatives were taken by forming two committees
ASRC and NPC and they also gave recommendations regarding the reformation of
administration but unfortunately, those were never taken into account or maybe implemented
partially. The reason behind NPC’s propositions not being implemented was the then-higher civil
servants’ objection to monopolize their interests. Thus, the formation of the NPC in 1972 and
most of its recommendations went in vain mostly due to these reasons.
Bibliography
Kalimullah, N. A., Hassan, A. R., & Sarkar, M. G. K. (2017). Administrative reforms in
Bangladesh. In Public administration in South Asia (pp. 279-296). Routledge.
Tarek, M. A., & Ahmed, F. (1989). The political motive of administrative reform in Bangladesh
from 1972 to 1981. South Asian Studies, 6(2), 1.