The document summarizes and compares three essays. Essay A has excellent coherence and logically analyzes reasons behind issues using statistics and facts before concluding and providing constructive criticism. Essay B introduces many facts but does not logically deduce them. Essay C introduces the topic of handshakes by tracing its historical roots and analyzing it psychologically to pass on knowledge.
The document summarizes and compares three essays. Essay A has excellent coherence and logically analyzes reasons behind issues using statistics and facts before concluding and providing constructive criticism. Essay B introduces many facts but does not logically deduce them. Essay C introduces the topic of handshakes by tracing its historical roots and analyzing it psychologically to pass on knowledge.
The document summarizes and compares three essays. Essay A has excellent coherence and logically analyzes reasons behind issues using statistics and facts before concluding and providing constructive criticism. Essay B introduces many facts but does not logically deduce them. Essay C introduces the topic of handshakes by tracing its historical roots and analyzing it psychologically to pass on knowledge.
Essay A has an excellent coherence of the whole essay.
The article seemingly follows a process
and every step connects to each other naturally. The first part briefly but detailedly introduces the main issue, the topic, which provides enough background information. It even indicates what the best treatment is and the opposite is. The second paragraph further introduces specific condition of each program and states the current dilemma, which makes a great preparation for the later analysis of reasons. Many statistics are applied in this part to show that the program truly suffered from many problems, which leads us to the next important part—— analyzing those reasons behind this fact. Reasons are also listed unequivocally by summarizing each reason with some core terms, like policies and strategies. Then the logical analysis connects with factual work, which finally comes to a very reasonable conclusion, like so what kind of measure cannot be adopted. For next reason, transition word like additionally is used to move to another new reason. After describing the fact, the natural conclusion is made again. Those two reasons are more focusing on analyzing status quo, which paved the way for the following part—— putting forward constructive criticism and contributing to innovative plans. The ways it suggests are also written in a very informative way, specified clearly and concisely. Using gerund as the subject is a clever way to emphasize the action, thus making the ensuing derivation more perceptible. The last paragraph reinforces the current situation of the country and infers the future trend objectively, which leaves us much room for further reflection. Such causal essay is truly meaningful and enlighting. Essay B is more like an introduction essay than causal essay, which narrates and analyzes many facts regarding the topic but not logically deduces it. Essay C is also a little bit like an introduction about handshake, but one that traces back to its historical roots. Then this kind of behavior is also analyzed from phychological way, which fulfills the function of passing on knowledge.