Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Clinical laboratories serve an essential role in the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control of disease. This
requires rules and regulations that would ensure accurate, precise, and reliable laboratory test from the
laboratories. Moreover, time is gold in health and medicine. Thus, it is important for these test results to be
delivered in a timely manner.
In this paper, we will know about two rules and regulations that are used as basis for guidelines for Clinical
Laboratories
Administrative Oder No. 2021-0037 - New Rules and Regulations Governing the Regulation of Clinical
Laboratories in the Philippines
Mandated by: Department of Health (DOH) through the Bureau of Medical Services, now known as the Health
Facilities and Services Regulatory Bureau (HFSRB)
ISO 15189:2012
ISO 15189:2012 - Medical Laboratories - Requirements for quality and competence
Prepared by: the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) through ISO technical committee,
specifically the ISO/TC 212 Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems
General Comparison
AO 037 DOH RLED ISO 15189:2012
Objective To serve as the new guidelines in intended for use throughout the
the licensing of diagnostic clinical currently recognized disciplines of
laboratories in the Philippines medical laboratory services, those
which shall ensure accountability working in other services and
of the laboratory on generation of disciplines such clinical
accurate, precise, and reliable physiology, medical imaging, and
laboratory results in a timely medical physics
manner through continuous basis for activities of bodies
compliance engaged in the recognition of the
competence of medical
laboratories
General Guidelines All Clinical Laboratories (CL) shall not intended to be used for
secure DOH-LTO prior to its certification purposes
operation and must comply with
Document to
the minimum regulatory standards
Secure
and requirements at all times.
From where shall
The DOH-LTO shall be secured
the document be from the DOH regulatory office in
secured? accordance with DOH guideline.
Services allowed
Comments
ISO 15189:2012 has a more proper outline of its inclusions and components. Requirements were clearly
subdivided into Management Requirements and Technical Requirements
AO No. 2021-0037 has clearer and more defined scope. It is maybe because it is specifically intended for
local use. ISO on the other hand could not mandate specific requirements or scope since it is intended as a
guideline for global use. There are rules and regulations that may or may not be applied to a country.
Comparison of Requirements
This comparison table aims to put the details of the two standards side-by-side in order to have a clear picture of
how they are outlined and to determine differences and resemblances in their mandates/requirements.
Quality Management System No specific section for Quality 4.2 Quality Management System
Management System. A separate
manual serves as basis (as indicated establish, document,
implement and maintain a
in the references):
quality management system
Manual of Standards on and continually improve its
Quality Management System in effectiveness in accordance
the Clinical Laboratory , Health with the requirements of this
Facility Development Bureau, International Standard
Includes requirements on:
Department of Health. Manila. General requirements
2019. Documentation
requirements
Quality Manual
No concrete/separate
laboratory shall verify upon
requirement stating this
installation and before use that
the equipment is capable of
achieving the necessary
performance and that it
complies with requirements
Equipment instructions for use
Equipment instructions for use
No concrete/separate
requirement stating this Equipment shall be operated at
calibration, preventive
shall have a documented
maintenance and repair
procedure for the calibration of
program
equipment that directly or
No concrete/separate
indirectly affects examination
requirement related to
results
metrological traceability
Others
Comments
PERSONNEL: The personnel requirements were differently presented or organized compared to ISO. ISO's
presentation is according to the details enumerated in the left column. In AO 037, the types of personnel
are enumerated and each has its own list of requirements.
EQUIPMENT AND REAGENTS: ISO 15189:2012 have separate and detailed requirements for equipment and
reagents/consumables. AO 037 have a somewhat generalized requirements. Also, there are requirements
that are specified in AO but are not specified in ISO, and vice versa.
SERVICE DELIVERY: As what can be clearly seen on the comparison table above, the completeness and
details of the requirements for service delivery based on ISO 15189:2012 is really comparable to that of AO
037. A0:037 provided requirements that are general and vague while ISO 15189:2012 provided specific
guidelines from Pre-examination until the Release of Results.
LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT: A0:037 has detailed requirements regarding this. Some
requirements are not stipulated in the information management part for ISO 15189:2012 but are already
included in other sections of the standards.
Conclusion:
ISO 15189:2012 and AO No. 2021-0037 are two rules and regulations that aims to provide guidelines for Clinical
Laboratories to achieve the best and quality services. Though they have some differences, specific items that are
lacking in each other, they still are both important. Each rules and regulations have its own strengths which if used
together, would be very helpful in achieving an excellent clinical laboratory in the service of the people.