Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practical Exercise GPR Urban Planning
Practical Exercise GPR Urban Planning
W/E
Utrecht - Tilburg, maart 2012
Instructions for practical exercise
W/E adviseurs
http://gprsoftware.nl/english/sustainability-
assessment/gpr-urban-planning/
a
Unfortunately GPR UP cannot not execute on Apple computers unless they are running Windows.
Theme Energy
Theme Health
Results screen
Sustainability label
For a number of measures extra information is available in the form of an explanation (click on the ‘i’
symbol). Users can also add their own notes (click on the ‘pencil’). Notes can be edited by the user,
explanations cannot.
Open the Excel document ‘GPR Urban Planning-Exercise’ and click on the following icon:
________________________________________________________
See pull down menu on right side with the language choice. Choose your preferred language.
Also select your preferred Energy regulation according to country and region
B See the pull-down menu at the subjects ‘Features planning area / types of areas’
________________________________________________________
→ Adjust in this tab the region typology to ‘green urban’ at the region type variant 2.
→ Look at the differences at theme ‘Spatial Layout / subject ‘Space and land usage’
What are the differences in:
- density (FSI)
- amount of open space (GSI)
- pressure on public space (OSR)
→ Select design choices in both variants, based on the entry data below
(and use the checkbox to mark your choices)
(you will see differences between the variants. These result from the differences in housing
programs and the spatial planning)
- Area with stacked functions increases from less than 10% in the basic variant increases to 15%
in compact variant
- there is no soil pollution
- both variants are developed based on layer approach, with optimal use of differences in height
and geomorphology
- in both variants, there is a clear separation of water/green and infrastructure
- in both variants the ground is excavated by 2 metres in order to prepare it for construction and
water structure
- no groundwater is pumped up
→Enter the following remark in the explanation of the field about sanitation
- ‘Ground sanitation was the motivation of the project, expansion with housing makes the
sanitation financially feasible.
Energy is considered as an important theme. It has been indicated that an energy vision will be
prepared. Make a beginning for that by entering choices for both variants.
Data
→ Check which performance scores are attained on the submodules and on the total.
→ Het section “usage quality public space” still has to be entered. Use the data below
- the basic variant is mainly aimed at the residential function. In the compact variant other
functions are inlcuded (small offices, cultural services, more shops and catering). In the
compact variant there is function mixing.
- the public space in the basic variant is prepared for average accessibility for disabled persons; in
the compact variant more attention is given to this aspect, the public space is maximally
accessible.
- In the basic variant green and water are maximally adjusted to recreational use. In the compact
variant that is only partially possible.
- In the compact variant there are less playing possibilities. Adequate in the basic variant, in de
compact variant the play grounds for the groups 6-11 and 12- 18 year are sub-standard (tip:
click on info-button)
- in both variants a urban green structure is available at maximally 900 meter
- in the basic variant almost every dwelling is at short distance to usable greenery. In the
compact variant that share decreases to below 50 %.
→ You can see the ‘star rating’ for the basic variant
________________________________________________________
→ You will see the annotations that you have made with the themes
________________________________________________________