Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article
Submitted By: Muhammad Bilal Khan, Fareha Jamal, Hasnain Sattar, and
Fatima Altaf
Submitted To: Ma’am Farrah Shahid
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY:
It is the persuasion of the general mass to support some cause. It can take many forms
like philanthropic works, financial and material support in times of crisis, educational
programs, welfare programs, etc.
CRISIS MANAGEMENT:
It encompasses both the pre-disaster preparedness and post-disaster minimization of
impact and provision of aid to the affectees.
DIRECT COMMUNICATION:
It is the direct appeal to the general public to support both financially and ideologically or
politically some cause.
NEGOTIATION:
It is a type of conflict that brings the conflicted parties to solve the matter using finding a
middle ground.
Twitter diplomacy: Twitter has become a popular platform for diplomats to engage in
"Twitter diplomacy," which involves using the platform to make public statements and
engage in discussions with other diplomats, governments, and the public. For example, in
2018, U.S. President Donald Trump used Twitter to communicate with North Korean
leader Kim Jong-un during negotiations over North Korea's nuclear program.
Facebook diplomacy: Many governments have Facebook pages that they use to
communicate with the public and promote their policies. For example, the U.S. State
Department has a Facebook page that it uses to share news and information about U.S.
foreign policy.
Instagram diplomacy: Instagram is a popular platform for sharing photos and videos,
and many diplomats use it to share images of their travels and meetings with other
diplomats. For example, the British Embassy in Washington, D.C., has an Instagram
account that it uses to share photos of the ambassador's travels and meetings.
YouTube diplomacy: YouTube is a popular platform for sharing videos, and many
governments and diplomats use it to share videos of speeches, press conferences, and
other events. For example, the U.S. Department of State has a YouTube channel that it
uses to share videos of Secretary of State Antony Blinken's speeches and press briefings.
LinkedIn diplomacy: LinkedIn is a professional networking platform, and many
diplomats use it to connect with other diplomats and professionals in their field. For
example, the United Nations has a LinkedIn page that it uses to connect with
professionals in the fields of diplomacy, international relations, and development.
These examples highlight the diverse ways in which social media is being used by diplomats as
well as statesmen to communicate, engage, and cooperate between countries and people around
the world.
INCREASED ENGAGEMENT:
Social media provides a platform for diplomats to engage with foreign audiences and
stakeholders, allowing them to promote their countries’ interests, share information, and
build relationships.
FASTER COMMUNICATION:
Social media allows for real-time communication and faster dissemination of information, which
can be particularly useful during crises or time-sensitive situations.
COST-EFFECTIVENESS:
TRACK RECORD:
Diplomats can track and analyze social media data to gain insights into public opinion,
identify trends, and monitor potential crises or threats.
LACK OF CONTROL:
Social media platforms are public forums where anyone can post content, including
individuals who may not have the best intentions. As a result, diplomats risk losing
control of their message when it is shared on social media, as they cannot control the
interpretation of their message
MISINFORMATION:
Social media is often used to spread fake news, propaganda, and conspiracy theories.
Diplomats need to be conscious when using social media to communicate, as
misinformation can quickly spread and damage diplomatic relations.
SECURITY RISKS:
Diplomats may unwittingly reveal sensitive information when using social media, putting
themselves and their countries at risk. Social media can also be a tool for cyber-attacks
and hacking attempts, making it important to use caution when communicating on these
plate forms.
LACK OF NUANCE:
Diplomacy often requires nuance and subtlety, but social media platforms are not always
conducive to this. Massages can be easily misinterpreted or taken out of context, and the brevity
of social media posts can limit the ability to fully communicate complex ideas.
EXAMPLES
Here are some examples of how social media has been used for political activism:
Arab Spring:
Social media played a critical role in the Arab Spring uprisings in 2010 and 2011,
particularly in Tunisia and Egypt. Activists used platforms like Twitter and Facebook to
organize protests, share information, and mobilize supporters.
Black Lives Matter:
The Black Live Matter movement has relied heavily on social media to raise awareness
about police brutality and systematic racism. Activists use hashtags like
#BLACKLIVESMATTER to share stories, organize protests, and amplify their messages.
Hong Kong Protests:
Social media played a key role in the 2019 protests in Hong Kong, with demonstrators
using platforms like Telegram and LIHKG to coordinate their actions and share
information.
Advantages of using social media in political activism
Increased outreach
Social media allows political activists to reach a much larger audience than traditional
forms of activism. This is because social media platforms have a vast user base, which
allows activists to connect with people whom they might not have been able to reach
otherwise.
Cost-effective
Using social media to promote political activism is relatively inexpensive compared to
traditional forms of activism such as rallies, or print advertisements. This makes it a
viable option for activists who have limited financial resources.
Empowers marginalized Communities
Social media provides a platform for marginalized communities to have their voice heard.
This is because social media allows activists to share their experiences and perspectives
with a wider audience, which can help to raise awareness about important issues.
Increased reach
Social media allows candidates to reach a much larger audience than traditional campaign
methods, such as door-to-door canvassing or TV ads.
Real-time engagement
Social media provides candidates with the ability to interact with voters in real-time
allowing them to respond to feedback and adjust their messaging accordingly.
Data Analysis
Social media platforms provide campaigns with valuable data on voters’ behavior and
preferences, allowing them to tailor their messaging and outreach efforts accordingly.
User-generated content
Social media platforms allow supporters to create and share their content, such as memes
and videos, which can amplify a campaign’s message and reach.
EXAMPLES
Barak Obama was the first politician to use social media in his campaign. He used
platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to connect with voters, share his message,
and encourage people to get involved in his campaign. His social media strategy is often
credited with helping him win the presidency in 2008.
Narendra Modi is known for his social media savvy. During his 2014 election campaign,
he used social media to reach out to young voters and build a coalition of supporters.
Imran Khan has been using social media to connect with voters and promote his
political agenda for many years. He uses these platforms to share updates on his political
activities, interact with his supporters, and promote his party’s message.
Dissemination of information
Social media has made it easier to disseminate information about foreign policy issues to
a wider audience. Governments and diplomats can use social media platforms such as
Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to share their views on various foreign policy issues.
Diplomacy
Social media has become an important tool for diplomacy, allowing diplomats to contact
their counterparts in other countries and build relationships. It has also facilitated public
diplomacy efforts by governments, allowing them to engage with citizens of other
countries and promote their policies and ideas.
Crisis communication
During times of crisis, social media has become an important tool for governments to
communicate with their citizens and the international community. It has been used to
disseminate information about crises such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and
conflicts.
Influence Operation
Social media has also been used by foreign actors to influence foreign policy outcomes in
other countries. It has been used to spread disinformation, sow discord, and influence
public opinion in other countries.
Overall, social media has had a profound impact on foreign policy, providing new
opportunities for communication, diplomacy, and influence operations. However, it has
also created new challenges, such as the need to manage disinformation and protect
against foreign interference.
CONCLUSION
Social media has had a significant impact on international politics in recent years. It has had a
profound impact on international politics, both positive and negative. It has enabled people to
connect and communicate across borders, but it has also created new challenges and risks. As
social media continues to evolve, its impact on politics is likely to continue to be significant.
Social media has become an important tool for international politics, enabling diplomats and
government officials to communicate, share opinions and conduct diplomatic negotiations.
Diplomats use social media for public diplomacy, crisis management, direct communication,
negotiation, and finding a middle ground. State actors use social media to influence public
opinion, spread false information, promote political ideology, and demonize opponents. Non-
state actors use social media to spread their messages, recruit new messages, and radicalize
individuals. It has been used to organize protests, rallies, and election campaigns, often with
success. It has revolutionized election campaigns to target specific demographics and engage
with voters in real time. It is indeed a powerful tool for shaping public opinion and influencing
foreign policy outcomes.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Social media has both positive and negative impacts on international politics, and it is important
to be aware of both. It can be used to facilitate diplomacy, raise awareness about important
issues, and promote positive change. However, it can also be used to spread disinformation,
facilitate cybercrime and espionage, and create social unrest. Social media can be used to
promote democracy and human rights, by facilitating the spread of information and promoting
free expression. Social media has significant implications for cybersecurity in international
politics, and governments and organizations must be aware of the risks and opportunities
presented by social media in the context of cybersecurity.