Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sol Mal PDF
Sol Mal PDF
SOLUTIONS 4.1
= 3 af = 0.15af wb/m2
13p
SOL 4.1.7 Option (C) is correct.
According to Biot-savart law, magnetic field intensity at any point P due to the
current element Idl is defined as
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 227
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
H = # Idl4p#R R3
= 2az A/m
SOL 4.1.8 Option (B) is correct.
According to right hand rule if the thumb points in the direction of outward or
inward current then rest of the fingers will curl along the direction of magnetic flux
lines, This condition is satisfied by the configuration shown in option (C).
SOL 4.1.9 Option (B) is correct.
According to right hand rule if the thumb points in the direction of current then
rest of the fingers will curl along the direction of magnetic field lines. This condition
is satisfied by the configuration shown in option (C).
SOL 4.1.10 Option (D) is correct.
According to Ampere’s circuital law, the line integral of magnetic field intensity H
around a closed path is equal to the net current enclosed by the path.
Since we have to determine the magnetic field intensity due to the infinite line
current at t = 5 cm so we construct a circular loop around the line current as shown
in the figure.
Now from Ampere’s circuital law we have
# B : dl
L
= m0 Ienc
or B (2pr) = m0 # 10 (Ienc = 10 A)
Therefore we have the magnetic flux density at t = 5 cm as
-7
B = 4p # 10 # -10 = 5 # 10-5 wb/m2
2p # 5 # 10 2
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
228 Magnestostatic Fields Chap 4
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
SOL 4.1.11 Option (B) is correct.
According to Ampere’s circuital law the contour integral of magnetic field intensity
in a closed path is equal to the current enclosed by the path.
i.e. # H : dl = Ienc
Now using right hand rule, we obtain the direction of the magnetic field intensity
in the loop as it will be opposite to the direction of L.
So, # H : dl =- Ienc =- 20 A
(10 A is not inside the loop. So it won’t be considered.)
SOL 4.1.12 Option (C) is correct.
The magnetic field intensity produced at a distance r from an infinitely long
straight wire carrying current I is defined as
H = I
2pr
As determined by right hand rule, the direction of magnetic field intensity will
be same(in - ay direction) due to both the current source. So, at point P the net
magnetic field intensity due to both the current carrying wires will be
H = H1 + H 2
= I ^- ay h + I ^- ay h
2p ^4h 2p ^1 h
5 ^8 h
=- a =- 4 ay (I = 8 A )
8p y p
SOL 4.1.13 Option (B) is correct.
As calculated in previous question the magnetic field intensity produced at the
centre of the current carrying circular loop is
H = I
2a
So by symmetry the semicircular loop will produce the field intensity half to the
field intensity produced by complete circular loop.
i.e. Field intensity at the centre of semicircular loop = 1 H = I
2 4a
SOL 4.1.14 Option (C) is correct.
Since current in the wire is distributed over the outer surface so net enclosed
current, Ienc for any Amperian loop inside the wire will be zero.
and as from Ampere’s circuital law we have
# H : dl = Ienc
So # H : dl =0 (Ienc = 0 )
or H = 0 for r < R
SOL 4.1.15 Option (C) is correct.
Consider the cylindrical wire is lying along z -axis as shown in the figure. As the
current I is distributed over the outer surface of the cylinder so for an Amperian
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 229
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
loop at a distance r (> R) from the centre axis, enclosed current is equal to the total
current flowing in the wire.
and 6Id@enc = dt
d
: # e0 E1 : dS + #eE 0 2 : dS D
where E1 is the electric field intensity produced by charge Q1 while E2 is the field
intensity produced by charge Q2 .
So, 6Id@enc = dt
d e Q1 + e Q2 = 1 dQ1 + 1 dQ2
= 0 c 8e0 m 0c
2e0 mG 8 dt 2 dt
(1)
As the current flows from Q1 and terminates at Q2 so the rate of change in the net
charges is given as
dQ dQ2
- 1 = = 16 A
dt dt
Therefore from equation (1) we have the enclosed displacement current as
6Id@enc = 18 (- 16) + 12 (16) = 6 A
Thus, the circulation of magnetic flux density around the closed loop is
# B : dl = m0 ^6 h
= 8m0 Wb/m
Magnetic field intensity at any point P due to an infinite current carrying sheet is
defined as
H = 1 K # an
2
where K is the current density and an is the unit vector normal to the current sheet
directed toward the point P .
Since we have to determine the magnetic field intensity at origin so from the figure
we have
an =- az
Therefore the magnetic field intensity at the origin is
H = 1 (20ax ) # (- az ) = 5ay A/m ( K = 20ax )
2
Magnetic field intensity at any point P due to an infinite current carrying sheet is
defined as
H = 1 K # an
2
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 231
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
where K is the current density of the infinite sheet and an is the unit vector normal
to the current sheet directed toward the point P .
Since we have to determine the magnetic field intensity at point (2, - 1, 5) which
is above the plane sheet as shown in figure, so we have,
an =+ az
Therefore the magnetic field intensity at the point (2, - 1, 5) is
H = 1 (20ax # az ) =- 20 ay =- 5ay A/m (K = 20ax )
2 2
SOL 4.1.19 Option (C) is correct.
Consider one of the sheet carries the current density K1 . So, the other sheet will
have the current density - K1 .
Magnetic flux density produced at any point P due to a current sheet is defined as
m
B = 0 K # an
2
where K is current density of the sheet and an is the unit vector normal to the
sheet directed towards point P .
So for any point in the space between the sheets normal vector will be opposite in
direction for the two sheets as shown in figure
i.e. an2 =- an1
Therefore, the resultant magnetic flux density at any point in the space between
the two sheets will be
m
B = 0 6K1 # an1 + (- K1) # (- an1)@ = m0 K1 # an1
2
Since an1 is unit vector normal to the surface, and K1 is given current density. So
the cross product will be a constant.
SOL 4.1.20 Option (D) is correct.
The magnetic flux density at any point is equal to the curl of magnetic vector
potential A at the point.
i.e. B = d # A = d # (12 cos qa q)
Magnetic field intensity produced at any point P due to a current sheet is defined
as
H = 1 K # an
2
where K is current density of the sheet and an is the unit vector normal to the
sheet directed towards point P .
So, for y > 0 H = 1 ^Kaz h # ^ay h =- 1 Kax (K = Kaz A/m , an = ay )
2 2
and for y < 0 H = 1 ^Kaz h # ^- ay h = K ax (K = Kaz A/m , an =- ay )
2 2
SOL 4.1.22 Option (D) is correct.
Consider the current density at r = 8 cm is J directed along + az .
Now the magnetic field for r > 8 cm must be zero.
i.e. H =0 (for r > 8 cm )
So from Ampere’s circuital law we have
# H : dl = Ienc = 0
Since for the region r > 8 cm the Amperian loop will have all the current distributions
enclosed inside it.
i.e. Ienc = 14 # 10-3 + 2 # (2p # 0.5 # 10-2) - 0.8 # (2p # 0.25 # 10-2)
+ J (2p # 8 # 10-2)
= 6.43 # 10-2 + J (16p # 10-2)
So we have
6.43 # 10-2 + J (16p # 10-2) = 0 ( Ienc = 0 )
-2
or J =- 6 . 43 # 10
16p # 10-2
or J =- 0.23az A/m
SOL 4.1.23 Option (C) is correct.
where dS is the differential surface vector having direction normal to the surface
So, for the given surface z = 4 , 0 # x # 1, - 1 # y # 4 we have
dS = (dxdy) az
and as calculated in previous question we have
B = (- 8xz - 0) ax + (0 + 8yz) ay + (2y2 - 2x2) az
Therefore, the total magnetic flux through the given surface is
4 1 4 1
F = # #
y =- 1 x = 0
(2y2 - 2x2) (dxdy) = 2 # 1 #
-1
y2 dy - 2 # 5 #
0
x2 dx
3 4 3 1
y
= 2 ; E - 10 :x D = 2 # 65 - 10
3 -1 3 0 3 3
40 wb
SOL 4.1.25 Option (D) is correct.
For determining the magnetic field at any point above the plane z = 0 , we draw
a rectangular Amperian loop parallel to the y -z plane and extending an equal
distance above and below the surface as shown in the figure.
From Ampere’s circuital law,
# B : dl = m0 Ienc
***********
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 237
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
SOLUTIONS 4.2
Therefore, H = 10 c1 + 3 m (ax )
8p 13
= 1.73ax A/m
SOL 4.2.2 Option (D) is correct.
According to Biot-savart law, magnetic field intensity at any point P due to the
current element Idl is defined as
H = Idl # 3R
# 4pR
where R is the vector distance of point P from the current element.
+3
(2x - 8)
= 4.4 (2az - 3ay) = G
4p 26 (x2 - 8x + 29) 1/2 -3
According to Ampere’s circuital law, the line integral of magnetic field intensity H
around a closed path is equal to the net current enclosed by the path.
Since we have to determine the magnetic field intensity at point (4, 2, 3) so we
construct a circular loop around the infinite current element that passes though the
point (4, 2, 3) as shown in the figure.
Now from Ampere’s circuital law we have,
# H : dl = Ienc
(2pr) H = 4.4 (Ienc = 4.4 A)
or H = 4. 4 r = 13 from figure.
2p # 13
Now direction of the magnetic field intensity is defined as
af = al # a r
where al " unit vector in the direction of flow of current
a r " unit vector normal to the line current directed toward the point.
6(4ax + 2ay + 3az ) - (4ax )@
So we have, af = ax #
(4 - 4) 2 + 22 + 32
(2ay + 3az ) 2a - 3a y
= ax # = z
13 13
Therefore the magnetic field intensity at the point (4, 2, 3) is
(2az - 3ay)
H = 4. 4 = 4.4 (2az - 3ay)
2p 13 13 26p
= 1.5az - 2.5ay A/m
SOL 4.2.3 Option (D) is correct.
As the magnetic field intensity at the center of the triangle produced by all the
H = # KdS4p#
s R
a
2
R
We note that the x component is anti symmetric in z about the origin (odd parity).
Since the limits are symmetric, the integral of the x component over z is zero. So
we are left with
2
- 12az
# #
3
H = 2 2 3/2 dydz
-2 - 3 4p (9 + y + z )
y
=- 3 az
2 +3
p ; #2
-2 (z + 9)
2
9 + y + z -32 E dz
=- 3 az
2
2 dz =- 6 a 1 tan-1 z 2
p 2#
-2 z + 9 p z :3 a 3 kD
-2
2
=- # (2) # (0.59) az =- 2az A/m
p
SOL 4.2.5 Option (D) is correct.
Since the uniformly charged disk is rotating with an angular velocity w = 2 rad/s
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
242 Magnestostatic Fields Chap 4
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
about the z -axis so we have the current density
K = rs # (angular velocity) = rs (wr) = 2 # 2 # r
or K = 4raf
According to Biot-savart law, magnetic field intensity at any point P due to the
current sheet element KdS is defined as
H = KdS #2 aR
#
s 4pR
where R is the vector distance of point P from the current element.
Now from the figure we have
R = az - ra r
or R = 1 + r2
a - ra r
and aR = z
1 + r2
So the magnetic field intensity due to a small current element KdS at point P is
(4raf) # (az - ra r) 4r (a r + raz )
dH = KdS #2 aR = =
4pR 2
4p (r + 1) 3/2
4p (r2 + 1) 3/2
On integrating the above over f around the complete circle, the a r components get
cancelled by symmetry, leaving us with
2p 3 4r2 az
H (z) = # # ^rdrdfh
0 0 4p (r2 + 1) 3/2
3 r3 1 3
=2
0
# 2
(r + 1) 3/2 dra z = 2 = r + 1 +
2
2
r +1 0 G az
3 + 2 (1 - 1 + 3 )
= 2> H az = 5az A/m
1+3
SOL 4.2.6 Option (B) is correct.
As all the four sides of current carrying square loop produces the same magnetic
field at the center so we consider only the line current AB for which we determine
the magnetic field intensity at the center.
Now the magnetic field intensity at any point P due to a filamentary current I is
defined as
H = I 6cos a2 - cos a1@ af
4pr
where r" distance of point P from the current filament.
= 1 # 2 = 2 A/m
p 2 p
and the magnetic flux density produced by the line current AB is
B1 = m0 H1 = 4p # 10-7 # 2
p
-7 2
= 5.66 # 10 wb/m
Therefore the net magnetic flux density due to the complete square loop will be
four times of B1
i.e. B = 4B1 = 4 # (5.66 # 10-7)
= 3.26 # 10-6 wb/m2
SOL 4.2.7 Option (D) is correct.
According to Biot-savart law, magnetic field intensity at any point P due to the
current element Idl is defined as
H = Idl # a
# R
4pR2
where R is the vector distance of point P from the current element.
As the cross product of two parallel lines is always zero so the straight segments
will produce no field at P . Therefore the net magnetic field produced at point P
will be only due to the two circular section.
i.e. H = HCD + HAB
(Irdfaf) # (- a r)
p/2 p/2
Irdf (- af) # (- a r)
or H == #0 4pr2 G += #
0 4pr2 G
at r = 1 m at r = 2 m
p/2
Iaz df - p/2 Iaz df
= #
0 4p (1) 0
#
4p (2)
3 . 2 1 p
4p # :
= 1 - D # a k az = 0.2 A/m
2 2
Alternate Method :
The magnetic field intensity produced at the center of a circular loop of radius R
carrying current I is defined as
H = I
2R
and since the straight line will not produce any field at point P so due to the two
quarter circles having current in opposite direction, magnetic field at the center
will be
H = 1: I - I D
4 2a 2 b
where a " inner radius
b " outer radius
3 (2) 3 (2)
H = 1;
4 2 # 1 2 # 2E
- = 0.2 A/m
Magnetic field intensity produced at any point P on the axis of the circular loop
carrying current I is defined as
Ir2
H =
2 (r + h2) 3/2
2
where h is the distance of point P from the centre of circular loop and r is the
radius of the circular loop.
From the figure we have
r = 3 m and h = 5 - 1 = 4 m
and using right hand rule we conclude that the magnetic field intensity is directed
along + az . So the magnetic field intensity produced at point P is
50 # 10-3 (3) 2 9 # 50 # 10-3 a = 2.8a mA/m
H = a z = z z
2 (32 + 42) 3/2 2 # 125
SOL 4.2.10 Option (D) is correct.
Let the cylindrical tube is of radius a for which we have to determine the
magnetic field intensity at the axis of solenoid.
2 q=p # 2
= nI = 1000 # 6 # 10-3 = 6 A/m (n = 1000, I = 4 mA )
SOL 4.2.11 Option (D) is correct.
As calculated in the previous question the magnetic field intensity inside a long
solenoid carrying current I is defined as
H = nI where n is no. of turns per unit length
and since using right hand rule we conclude that the direction of magnetic field
intensity will be right wards ( + ay ) due to outer solenoid and left wards ((- ay))
due to inner solenoid. So the resultant magnetic field intensity produced inside the
inner solenoid will be
H = H1 + H2 = n1 I (- ay) + n2 Iay
where n1 and n2 are the no. of turns per unit length of the inner and outer solenoids
respectively.
So H =- (3 # 10-3) (2000) ay + (3 # 10-3) (1000) ay
= 3 # 10-3 (- 1000) ay =- 3ay A/m
SOL 4.2.12 Option (D) is correct.
Since no any magnetic field is produced at any point out side a solenoid so in
the region between the two solenoids field will be produced only due to the outer
solenoid.
i.e. H = n2 Iay = 100 # 4 # 10-4 ay = 4ay A/m
SOL 4.2.13 Option (B) is correct.
Since no any magnetic field is produced at any point out side a solenoid so, at any
point outside the outer solenoid, the net magnetic field intensity produced due to
4 4
2z2 + 24z dydz
=-
3 1
# #e
(y + 1) 2 o (x = 2 m )
2 4
=- ;- 2z + 24zyE dz =- b 3 z2 + 72z l dz
4 4
3
#
y+1 1 3
# 5
=- 145 A
SOL 4.2.18 Option (C) is correct.
Consider the point P on z -axis is (0, 0, h) and current flowing in the current element
is I in ax direction. Since the magnetic field intensity at any point P due to a
current element I is defined as
H = I 6cos a2 - cos a1@ af
4pr
where I is the current carried by the conductor, L is the side of the square loop and
a, b are the distance of the two sides of square loop from the conductor.
So we have L = 0.5 m
a = 0.3 - 0.5 = 0.05 m
2
b = 0.3 + .5 = 0.55 m
0
2
0.55 m I mI m0 I
Thus, ym = # 0
^0.5drh = 40p 6ln r@00..55
05 = 4p ^ln 11h
r = 0.05 2pr
Therefore the current that produces the net flux ym = 5 # 10-5 Tm2 is
I = 4p -5
# 5 # 10
m0 ^ln ^1 hh
= 238.5 A
SOL 4.2.28 Option (D) is correct.
Consider the flux density at the given point due to semi infinite wire along y -axis
is B1 and the flux density due to wire along z -axis is B2 .
The magnetic flux density B produced at any point P due to a straight wire
carrying current I is defined as
mI
B = 0 6cos a2 - cos a1@ af
4pr
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 255
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
The magnetic flux density B produced at any point P due to a straight wire
carrying current I is defined as
mI
B = 0 6cos a2 - cos a1@ af
4pr
where r " distance of point P from the straight wire.
a1 " angle subtended by the lower end of the wire at P .
a2 " angle subtended by the upper end of the wire at P .
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 257
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
and the direction of the magnetic flux density is given as
af = al # a r
where al is unit vector along the line current and a r is the unit vector normal to
the line current directed toward the point P .
Therefore, the magnetic flux density produced at centre O due to the half side of
the square loop is
mI
B1 = 0 ^cos a2 - cos a1h af
4pr
where r = 1 m a1 = p and cos a2 = 1 = 1
2 2
1 +1 2
2
^4p # 10 h^1 h 1
-7
Thus, B1 = c 2 - 0 m az (af = ay # ^- ax h = az )
4p ^1 h
-4
= 10 az Wb/m2
2
As all the half sides of the loop will produce the same magnetic flux density at the
centre so, the net magnetic flux density produced at the centre due to whole square
loop will be
B = 8B1 = 4 2 # 10-7 az Wb/m2
SOL 4.2.32 Option (D) is correct.
Using right hand rule we conclude that the field intensity produced at centre of the
loop by the loop wire and the straight wire are opposing each other, so, the field
intensity at the centre of the loop will be zero if
Hwire = Hloop ...(1)
where Hwire is the field intensity produced at the center of loop due to the straight
wire and Hloop is the field intensity produced at the center of loop due to the current
in the circular loop.
Since the magnetic field intensity produced at a distance r from an infinitely long
straight wire carrying current I is defined as
H = I
2pr
So we have Hwire = I = 20 = 10 ^I = 20 A, r = 1 mh
2p ^ 1 h 2p p
and as calculated in Q.59 the field intensity produced by circular loop at its center
is
Hloop = I where a is the radius of the loop
2a
Hloop = I 10I
or, -2 = 2 = 5I (a = 10 cm )
2 ^10 # 10 h
So putting the values in eq. (1) we get
10 = 5I
p
Thus, I =6A
p
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
258 Magnestostatic Fields Chap 4
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
SOL 4.2.33 Option (D) is correct.
Consider one half side of the square loop to determine the magnetic field intensity
at the centre O as shown in the figure.
The magnetic field intensity H produced at any point P due to a straight wire
carrying current I is defined as
H = I 6cos a2 - cos a1@
4pr
where r " distance of point P from the straight wire.
a1 " angle subtended by the lower end of the wire at P .
a2 " angle subtended by the upper end of the wire at P .
So we have
r = a/2
a1 = p/2
and a2 = p/4
Therefore the magnetic field intensity produced at centre O due to the half side of
the square loop is
I cos p - cos p k = I
2p (a/2) a
H1 =
4 2 2 pa
As all the eight half sides produces same field intensity at the centre of the loop so,
net field intensity produced at the center due to the complete square loop is
Hnet = 8 c I m = 2 2 I
2 pa pa
SOL 4.2.34 Option (A) is correct.
For the shown current loop we divide the loop in two segments as shown in figure
Now the field intensity due to segment (1) (Semicircular loop) at point P can be
given directly as calculated in Que.60
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 259
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
i.e. H1 = I where a is radius of semicircular loop
4a
or H1 = 8 = 2 A/m (a = 1 m )
4 ^1 h
again for determining the field intensity due to segment (2) we consider it as the
half portion of a complete square loop of side 2 m and since the field intensity due
to a completer square loop of side a carrying current I can be directly given from
previous question.
i.e. H = 2 2I
pa
so the field intensity due to the half portion of square loop is
H2 = 1 H = 2 I
2 pa
2 ^8 h 4 2
or H2 = = (I = 8 A , a = 2 m )
p ^2 h p
As determined by right hand rule the direction of field intensity produced at point
P due to the two segments will be same (inward) therefore, the net magnetic field
intensity produced at point P will be
Hnet = H1 + H2 = 2 + 4 2 = 3.8 A/m inward.
p
SOL 4.2.35 Option (B) is correct.
The flux density due to infinite current carrying sheet is defined as
m
B = 0 K # an
2
where K is surface current density and an is unit vector normal to the surface
directed toward the point where flux density is to be determined
So, for the sheet in z = 0 plane,
m
B1 = 0 ^4ax h # ^az h =- 2m0 ay ^an = az h
2
and for the sheet in z = 2 m plane
m
B2 = 0 ^- 4ax h # ^- az h =- 2m0 ay ^an =- az h
2
Therefore, the net flux density between the sheets is
B = B1 + B2 =- 4m0 ay
Thus the magnetic flux per unit length along the direction of current is
ym /l = B # (Dis tan ce between the plates)
=- 8m0 ay Wb/m
***********
SOLUTIONS 4.3
Since, the hole is drilled along the length of wire. So, it can be assumed that the
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 261
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
drilled portion carriers current density of - J .
Now, for the wire without hole, magnetic field intensity at point P will be given as
Hf1 (2pR) = J (pR2) & Hf1 = JR
2
Since, point O is at origin and the cross section of the wire located in x -y plane.
So, in vector form the field intensity due to the current carrying wire without
considering the hole is given as
H1 = J (xax + yay) (1)
2
Again, only due to the hole magnetic field intensity at point P will be given as
(Hf2) (2pr) =- J (pr 2)
Hf2 = - Jr
2
Again, if we take Ol at origin then in vector form
H2 = - J (xlax + ylay) (2)
2
where xl and yl denotes point ‘P ’ in the new co-ordinate system.
Now the relation between two co-ordinate system will be
x = xl + d and y = yl
So, putting it into equation (2) we have
H2 = - J [(x - d) ax + yay]
2
Therefore, the net magnetic field intensity at point P is
Hnet = H1 + H2 = J dax
3
i.e. the magnetic field inside the hole will depend only on d .
SOL 4.3.3 Option (A) is correct.
Due to 1 A current wire in x -y plane, magnetic field be at origin will be in x
direction as determined by right hand rule.
Due to 1 A current wire in y -z plane, magnetic field be at origin will be in z
direction as determined by right hand rule.
Thus, x and z -component is non-zero at origin.
SOL 4.3.4 Option (D) is correct.
The total flux, F = 1.2 mWb = 1.2 # 10-3 Wb
Cross sectional area, A = 30 cm2 = 30 # 10-4 m2
So, the flux density is given as
-3
B = F = 1.2 # 10-4 = 0.4 Tesla
A 30 # 10
SOL 4.3.5 Option (D) is correct.
The relation between magnetic flux density B and vector potential A is given as
B = d#A
SOL 4.3.6 Option (B) is correct.
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
262 Magnestostatic Fields Chap 4
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
For an isolated body the charge is distributed over its region which depends on the
total change and the curvature of the body. Thus Statement 1 is correct
Since the magnetic flux lines form loop so the total magnetic flux through any
closed surface is zero. Thus Statement 2 is correct.
SOL 4.3.7 Option (D) is correct.
The magnetic flux density in terms of vector potential is defined as
B = d#A
# B : dS =# ^d # AhdS
F = # A : dl
i.e. the line integral of vector potential A around the boundary of a surface S is
equal to the flux through the surface S .
SOL 4.3.8 Option (B) is correct.
Consider the current element along z -axis as shown in the figure.
Using right hand rule we get the direction of magnetic field directing normal to
radial line OP .
SOL 4.3.9 Option (D) is correct.
For the given circular cylinder, consider the surface current density is K . So, the
total current I through the cylinder is given as
K ^2pr h = I
where r is radius of circular cylinder.
So, K= I = 5 = 50 A/m
2pr 2p ^5 # 10-2h p
SOL 4.3.10 Option (B) is correct.
Magnetic vector potential of an infinitesimally small current element is defined as
m0 Idl
A= #4p R
where R is the distance from current element. Given that R " 3
So A =0
SOL 4.3.11 Option (A) is correct.
Consider the two parallel sheets are separated by a distance ‘d ’ as shown in the
figure below
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia
Chap 4 Magnestostatic Fields 263
For View Only Shop Online at www.nodia.co.in
***********
GATE CLOUD Electromagnetics By RK Kanodia & Ashish Murolia