You are on page 1of 2

NAME: JADE EMMANUEL REPOSO EBANO

GRADE & SECTION: 9-APITONG


TEACHER: JOCELYN GEROLEO

Topic: Does freedom of speech mean that a person can say whatever he wants
in any circumstance?
I. Thesis statement: The right to free expression is to have a fundamental one
that is defended by many national constitutions. It safeguards people's freedom
to express their ideas without restraint or retribution.
A. However, the right to free expression is not unrestricted and is subject to
several restrictions. This essay will knowledge of free speech, restraint,
and the rationale for possible reasons it is crucial for a civilized,
democratic society.
II. Introduction: The idea of individual liberty serves as the foundation for free
speech. It enables people to express their views and beliefs without worrying
about censorship or punishment.
B. A free and democratic society must allow for the independence of
expression because it encourages open discussion, create an opportunity
nation to hold those in authority accountable, and supports the
information of knowledge.
C. The idea of injury is the first restriction on free expression. Speech that
is harmful to people or groups is not legally protected. For instance, hate
speech that encourages violence or discrimination against a specific
group of individuals may be prohibited because it harms and diminishes
the honor of the group that becomes targeted.
D. Similar to how threatening, blasphemous, and libelous communication
may be restricted or outlawed because it may hurt people.
III. Body The idea of public interest is the second restriction on free expression.
1st paragraph. Speech that, for instance, jeopardizes national security or
encourages illicit activity may be restricted since it could not be injurious to
both people and society.
2nd paragraph. In some circumstances, the government may also impose
restrictions on speech forasmuch derogatory or harmful to particular groups of
individuals, such as religious or racial minorities, since it may jeopardize
equality and social cohesion.
3rd paragraph. Furthermore, democracy cannot work without freedom of speech.
To seize part in politics and hold the leaders responsible.
IV. Conclusion: In a democratic society, the government ought to be receptive to
the wants and requirements of its people, and the right to free speech provides
the capability to voice their opinions and influence public policy.
NAME: JADE EMMANUEL REPOSO EBANO
GRADE & SECTION: 9-APITONG
TEACHER: JOCELYN GEROLEO

E. In conclusion, expression is crucial to a free and democratic society. A


universal right there have some restrictions in place to safeguard other
significant values and interests. Harmful speech undermines the public
interest and invades privacy or other laws and regulations.

You might also like