GROUP 9 Summary Presentation Style Engagement of Facilitation TOTAL

Team
(…/8 pts) (…./6 pts) (…/3pts) (…./5pts)
(…/3 pts)

AVERAGE 7.2 5.7 3 2.8 4.8 23.5

SCORE

COMMENTS
Summary
 Group 9 had a very strong presentation; I was able to understand the information and I
was able to make connections to my job. The summary of this presentation has done a
wonderful job.
 I appreciated the synthesis slide at the beginning. I thought it was a good idea to show
how the articles from this week tied in to the other weeks. Would have been good to
itemize or list the course topics under the five headings. For example, principal
accountability was not specifically named as one of the bubbles, but it was presented on.
 Overall, very well done, especially as the last group who had to battle the fatigue of their
classmates. Was one of my favourite presentations
 Present a refined and brief summary of leading PD. Key points of the topics are well-
rounded highlighted, and use bullet points for important information and expand on it.
The expression of concepts and crucial points are accurately and clearly. The key points
are clearly presented.
 The summaries of the articles are very interesting and succinct and articulated the most
important points in very digestible way. The presenters have a concrete and strong
knowledge of the material, and it shines through. The group members were extremely
knowledgeable about the material.
 The three speakers worked well together, with a clear division of labor, to relate the
chapter to what we had learned previously.
 A good, clear and creative presentation with details about the subject matter.
 Content was very significant to the topic.

Presentation

1
  The presentation was well organized and made a lot connections with the content.
 Slides had a good balance of written points. It was good that the group did not just read
the slides but added other information and examples along the way. Nice to include some
videos for variety. Not sure the video about action theory was a rigorous video on the
topic
 The presentation is exceptionally holistic and clear. All the work was laid out by the
logical and well-organized presentation structure. The main concepts are presented in an
organized and clear way, highlighting one peer reviewed additional resource. The
introduction hooked the peer by look back the knowledge of PD. Use specific examples
and facts to help illustrate key points. Properly detailed and concise. Made excellent
transition between slides. Presentation is polished and practised. Each part of the
presentation is in a cohesive, clear, and logical manner
 The videos are great for enhancing the material. The PowerPoint is very well done and
appealing to look at. There are not too many words on each slide, but enough to have
talking points and allow the audience to read during the presentation. Overall, this
presentation is very well done. I think the PowerPoint is nicely done.
 The presentation was divided into three parts and the participants were allowed to discuss
it by grouping them. The three presenters effectively control the presentation time
 Great time management.

Style

 The style of the presentation is good. Love the group talks.

 No formatting errors were noticed
 The use of the APA 7th edition format is outstanding with no editorial errors. The citation
and reference of peer reviewed articles are appropriate and accurate. Slides have been
proofread and contain no grammatical and spelling errors.
 The APA is used correctly in the slideshow and adds to the validity of the presentation.
 Outstanding use of the APA 7th edition format, with little or no editorial errors.

Participation

 The engagement was interesting and very understandable content.

2
  The team seemed to support each other well. They knew what each other was presenting on and
were able to transition between presenters well. During group discussions, the members checked
in on discussions which showed engagement and kept groups accountable. I heard them comment
on how they had gotten together to discuss the presentation. This helped them present as a
cohesive unit
 Teammates equitably cooperate and support each other throughout. They help each other to play
ppt and test the sound of quality of video.
They lead discussions for 3 groups respectively.
 This group started with a question to get us thinking about our learning throughout the class. The
graphics, charts and videos keep the classmates engaged throughout the presentation. It was a
very useful exercise to get us working in groups on the theory of action. Very applicable.
 The three presenters distributed the tasks evenly and gave a clearer account of the
knowledge in each section.

Facilitation

 The facilitators are very clear and verbal. Good job!

 There was a good balance of presenting and group work. Having a group project as one
of the activities enabled classmates to interact with each other and move around and get
to know others
 Involve the classmates through group project and videos to engage peers. Actively
participate in group discussion to listen classmates’ idea. Find ways to inspire classmates
through warm-up discussion. The quality of discussion questions are excellent. Presenters
speak clearly with passion, making good eye-contact with audience.
 The group facilitates discussion in an inclusive and collaborative manner. Working in
groups is a strong way to have everyone’s voices heard. I enjoyed the discussion
questions and mini-group projects to get us thinking about the material in action.
 Presenters use lectures, videos and mini-activities to keep students actively engaged. The
three are well divided to actively engage students in the discussion through lecture and
the use of external resources. The discussion questions were answered using logical
reasoning in an innovative format.
 The discussion questions within the presentation make it more engaging.
 Very engaging

3
General comments

 The summary of the articles was well-rounded, very interesting and succinct and
highlighted the crucial points accurately and clearly in a very digestible way. The
presenters were extremely knowledgeable about the material and were able to show how
their articles connected to those of the previous weeks. However, it would have been
good to itemize the course topics under the five headings.
 The presentation was exceptionally holistic and clear, with the main concepts presented
in a well-organized, logical, detailed, concise and appealing slide that had a good balance
of written points which made lot connections with the content and excellent transition
between slides. The videos used were great for enhancing the material, though that on
action theory was a rigorous video on the topic, and the use of specific examples and
facts helped to illustrate key points.
 Outstanding use of the APA 7th edition format, with little or no editorial errors. The
citation and reference of the peer reviewed articles are appropriate and accurate. Slides
contained no grammatical and spelling errors.
 The team supported each other well, distributed the tasks evenly and gave a clearer account
of the knowledge in each section. Transition between presenters was well done and they
presented as a cohesive unit.
 Presenters use lectures, videos and mini-activities to keep students actively engaged. The
quality of discussion questions were excellent.