Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M. Sue Bozgoz
3553 Burr Court Unit A
Fort Mead, Md 20755
Attached are: (1) your unsigned document you sent to my ADA Clients in
violation of the ADA interference Act which is a crime and (2) the documents that I sent
on behalf of my ADA Client, NICKY SENN under TITLES II and III of the 1990 ADA Act.
See: https://www.scribd.com/document/646576430/Nicky-s-Response-to-Court-
Attorney-Doolittle-DOD-Public-as-This-is-a-Public-Interest-Case-Which-Involves-
Retalaition
I am sure you know that your for-profit court cannot continue to collect ADA funds
and deny ADA Rights. You can NEVER deny ADA HUMAN RIGHTS unless you are
going broke. The last time I checked, your for-profit courts weren’t going broke.
You are making a profit by collecting ADA funds (and children) and denying ADA
rights. Please kindly read Executive order 13164 which you obviously don’t follow.
Secondly, here is the oath that you violated by sending my client’s documents
Third, I am sure you [the judges, magistrates, and Attorneys] know if you violate your
oath of office/CHARTER, you forfeit the right to work as a clerk… And ignorance is not
an excuse. Also, kindly tell whomever your boss is that they are in violation of 42 USC
BOTTOM LINE: I am resending my ADA client’s full packet again under TITLES
II AND III of the 1990 ADA Act. I also posted your crime and the packet again on scribe
see: https://www.scribd.com/document/646576430/Nicky-s-Response-to-Court-
Attorney-Doolittle-DOD-Public-as-This-is-a-Public-Interest-Case-Which-Involves-
Retalaition
NICKY SENN – Do not EVER tell my ADA clients to follow your rules. Not when you get
Lastly, Kindly step down after you post the attached documents on the record for
v/r
M. Sue Bozgoz
ADA Advocate