Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/330291214
CITATIONS READS
9 4,988
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ali hadi Ghawi on 03 December 2019.
Key words: hydraulic flocculator, vertical floc- the Iraqi side. The Directorate General of
culator, package water treatment plant, velocity Water in Iraq has taken some measures
gradient, detention time, baffle to address this issue through the instal-
lation of package water treatment units
that contributed to reducing the water
Introduction scarcity rate from 42% in 2006 to 20%
in 2010 (Ministry of Municipalities and
The issue of water in general and po- Public Works of the Iraq, 2010).
table water in particular is of the highest Surface water treatment is generally
interest and that the provision of pota- aimed at removing suspended materials
ble water to all citizens in all areas and that cause turbidity and color and odor
villages in Iraq requires the availability change. Most of the methods used to treat
of several factors, the most important this type of water have been limited to
of which is the provision of water and coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation,
electricity sources and the provision of filtration and disinfection. The suspended
financial allocations and land for the es- material consists of organic and clay ma-
tablishment of water stations. terials, and contains some microorgan-
In view of the problems experienced isms such as algae and bacteria. Due to
by the water sector as a whole and drink- the small size of these components and
ing water in particular, which relate to the large surface area compared to their
the quantities and quality of water flow- weight, they remain stuck in the water
ing into the Iraqi territory from neigh- and not deposited. Therefore, depend-
boring countries, which decreases annu- ing on their surface and chemical prop-
ally or deteriorate qualitatively because erties, and using flocculation processes,
of the implementation of neighboring the main method of surface water treat-
countries for a large number of develop- ment, where some chemicals are used
ment projects without coordination with
125
100
75
50
25
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time [Month]
FIGURE 4. Raw water turbidity values for the period from January 2016 to December 2016
section [N], the baffle spacing (BS) [m], rate. The height of the vertical hydraulic
the baffle dimensions, head losses [m], flocculatore is determined by the height
basin depth (FH) [m], clearance height of the sedimentation basin, which is 2.0
(CH) [m], and water depth (L) [m]. m. As package water treatment plant need
We have been exploring by using the longer residence time and more baffles
ANSYS Fluent program different ratio number. The width of the flocculator basin
of FH/BS and CH/BS. is determined by the width of the settling
Using the results of the analysis of basin, which is 2.2 m. The hydraulic ver-
these ratios we obtain the ideal design tical flocculator in EPWTP is divided into
of the flocculator basin. The energy dis- three sections filled with vertical baffles
sipation rate indicates that the breakup (Fig. 6). The purpose of adding baffles is
of flocs is the most important constraint. to increase gradient velocity (G) by acting
The more uniform energy dissipation rate as an obstacle and forcing water through
means the optimum flocculator design. a restricted flow path. A hydraulic floc-
culator design was created based on opti-
Procedures for tank design mized parameters available in the previ-
and configuration ous studies (McConnachie & Liu, 2000;
The flocculation basin available di- Haarhoff & Van Der Walt, 2001). The
mensions are 4.0 × 2.2 × 2.2 m (length × initial design divided the total minimum
× width × height) with a wall thickness mixing value (60,000) evenly among the
of about 0.8 cm in EPWTP. From the three sections, with each section having
design criteria imposed by the reality an even velocity gradient of 50 s–1. The
of the project, the depth of the floccula- current setup has a baffle spacing of 10
tor basin is the depth of the sedimenta- cm with 22 baffles per section. ANSYS
tion basin. The water level at the end of Fluent CFD software will be used to find
the flocculator basin is similar to that of the best design for the vertical hydraulic
the water level in the sedimentation ba- flocculator to get the efficient of turbid-
sin. The width of the channels is deter- ity removal < 1 NTU.
mined by the need to construct the chan-
Velocity gradients
nel using humans. The channel width
is also determined by the efficiency of As previous studies have shown, ve-
the flocculator basin which was 0.70 m. locity gradient is the central variable to
The distance between the baffles and improve flocculation performance. The
their number is determined by the flow velocity gradient value is usually ex-
3 CFD model
* (1)
P In order to better understand the be-
havior of the fluid in the flocculation tank,
U gh1 the CFD simulation has modeled the tank
G (2) using ANSYS Fluent 16.1 software. This
PT approach allows the analysis of different
geometries, flows and boundary condi-
H tions without the difficulty of setting.
* U (3) The results produced by the simulation
P
ª n f Ls ( w b) º V 2 enables examining detailed profiles of
h1 « ¦ minor
K
2 wb » 2g velocity, turbulence energy dissipation,
¬ ¼
turbulent kinetic energy, and any derived
(4) parameter in terms of these variables.
where: The turbulent flow in the flocculator was
P – total power input to flocculator simulated with the Navier–Stokes equa-
[N·m–1·s–1], tions and the standard k–ε model. The
FIGURE 7. Vertical hydraulic flocculator tank geometry
FIGURE 9. The contours of the turbulent dissipation rate for clearance heights with 1.5BS
We would also like to begin our inves- we hope to reduce the inert area. There-
tigation into geometric space by having fore, in Figure 11, we increase the ratios
more interference in the energy dissipa- of FH/BS = 11.25, but we did not notice
tion zone. Using these two impediments, any significant change in the turbulent
we come up with the initial FH/BS = 7.5. dissipation rate. This is consistent with
We believe that the rate of energy dis- the findings of most researchers (Casey
sipation is fairly uniform. Since this is et al., 2017; Marques & Ferreira Filho,
our starting geometry, there is no other 2017).
geometry to compare with. So this will In Figure 12a, the ratio change was
be the new incumbent (Fig. 10). tested, where it was observed that the
From the initial dimensions of the ratio of FH/BS of 15, which provides
flocculator in Figure 10, we see that there overlapping zone. Reducing the interfer-
is a large blue zone at the inner bend. By ence of the tail of the energy dissipation
minimizing the spacing of the fenders, zone may lead to a more uniform distri-
FIGURE 11. The contours of the rate of energy dissipation at FH/BS = 11.25
bution. In the Figure 12b, the ratio was The value of Gθ decreases with the
increased to 22.5, where it was observed increase in the height of the floccula-
that these dimensions of the basin give tion tank, indicating that the most effi-
us this geometry rate of energy dissi- cient flocculation occurs in the FH/BS
pation more uniform than the previous ratio of 22.5. Among the results is that
rate. This geometry configuration will be the hydraulic retention time of the wa-
the new incumbent. Since changing this ter in the flocculator is 20–25 min. The
geometric space gives the desired result. optimal design was to use a single long
Results represented and analyzed using flocculator by dividing it into three chan-
CFD software included plots of water nels. The results showed that the best
contours of strain rate and contours of velocity gradient of water mixing in the
turbulence dissipation rate. flocculation tank is 40 s–1. The vertical
FIGURE 12. The contours of the rate of energy dissipation at FH/BS = 15 (a) and FH/BS = 22.5 (b)
FIGURE 13. Three section arrangement of top and bottom baffles in vertical hydraulic flocculation
tank to be constructed consists of three Casey et al. (2017), Marques and Filho
channels, each 0.70 m wide and 4.0 m (2017).
long, with baffles spacing of 10, 15, and
20 cm. There are 80 baffles and the tank
has a retention time of 20 min, and the Conclusions
velocity varies from 0.2 m·s–1 in the first
row to 0.06 m·s–1 in the third row. The Our aim was to experimentally de-
velocity gradient varies from 60 s–1 in fine G and Gθ to design vertical hydrau-
the first row to 10 s–1 in the third row lic flocculation basin and to improve the
(Fig. 13). The results above correspond effluent turbidity removal. Computa-
to the results of previous studies such as tional Fluid Dynamics (CFD) package,
Schulz and Okun (1984), McConnachie ANSYS Fluent 16.1 software have been
and Liu (2000), Haarhoff and Van Der used to hydraulic flocculators for Al-
Walt (2001), Lawler and Nason (2004), -Eskan package water treatment plant