- we will now use imrad format

- meta analysis (gather related, maybe 2 rsrch studies very very closely related sa
inyong study. e summarize rana nnyo sa inyong meta analysis)

- imrad format parts (introduction, methodology, results and discussion) max 15 pages,
included na ang references. pwde rsad 8 or 9, less than 10 pages, oks ra na kay and
imrad dli padaghanay. the shorter the better. brief and concise.

INTRODUCTION: immediately tell the readers what ur study is all abt. give a
background of your study (povide 2 sentences or statements) dapat mu answer sa "why
are we conducting this study?". the rest of the introduction will be the rrl (2 pages at
most). dapat daghan mog ma cite na rsrch papers, include at least 5 related papers
pero dapat dli mu lapas sa 10. select the most significant studies na related sa imong
study. end it with the objectives of the study

METHODOLOGY: it has to be concise but detailed.

1) first sentence: research design. since atoa kay meta analysis, simply define wat meta
analysis is about or wat meta analysis design is. "this research paper is a meta analysis
where researchers..."

2) second sentence: research locale "this paper utilized various rsrch studies acquired
from countries across the globe such as... from harzing's perish" sa research locale,
inyong e mention ang countries in which asa g conduct and rsrch study. do not forget to
mention g unsa nnyo pag obtain sa rsrch study. ex: imo gikuha ang study from harzing's
perish/ publish software, scopus, researchgate, or sciendirect.

3) third sentence/parag: the process of data collection. ibutang asa mo nagbencmark.

kangkinsa mi na research study nag adopt or nag anchor sa amoang procedures.
(note: meta-analysis - quanti meta-synthesis quali, pareha ra na silang duha)
if ganahan mo mu replicate/ mu use sa procedure ni mdm, its alright. pero if u can find a
paper talking abt meta analysis procedure or naa sd silay ilahang procedure closely
related sa kang mdm, feel free to use it. but if u cannot find, kang mdm na lay gamita.

if mu use mo og harzings publish, kindly use the google scholar database. if not, e input
lng google scholar. sa inyohang pag search sa related studies, e mention ang keywords
na gi use. these keywords should be based on the problem.

4) fourth parag: set the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

- inclusion criteria: e list nimo ang conditions or reasons ngano pasok ni nga study sa
inyong meta analysis . ex. "criteria for inclusion are rsrch papers w the folllowing info:
a)... b)..." For the rsrch title to be part of the paper, dapat nag talk abt sya sa naka lista
sa a,b,c etc. Sa last letter, very important to include the inclusivity dates. very good if
mas recent ang study, like for the past 5 yrs or within 6 yrs. ex: k) the inclusivity dates
from 2010-2021
- exclusion criteria: if naa moy papers na nang gawas pero dili pwede ma gamit, e list
nimo ang reasons why u r excluding these papers. ex. "studies excluded from the meta-
analysis were a)... b)..."

4.1) "Studies were carefully selected by sharing the list of research studies chosen by
the researchers to ensure that no duplication of studies were made." sa ilaha, ilang gi
bahin bahin ilang studies. like kada usa kay dapat mka generate og 5 studies unya
dapat dili magkapareha. so they used google sheets tas ddto gi input ilang mga
research studies.

5) Quality assessment. inyo e narrate how u meticulously sifted or gipilian ang inyohang
mga titles na nagenerate after u encoded or searched the key words. usually, daghan
kaaug search results sa harzings so ilaha rang giset to 500 search results. sa 500 na
results, dli na need e open or basahon ang abstract, ilaha rang tan awon ang title. if u
have ur inclusion criteria, u can identify kung asa na title ang dapat isud or di. for our
case, out of 500 results, we r limited to only 2 rsrch studies na e apil sa meta analysis. e
mention sad nimo ang info na gi extract gikan sa duha ka study. "In the data extraction
and presentation, the following information were extracted: name of authors, country of
study, year of publication, name of journal, etc." tas kani nga info dapat e present sa
table

6) Prisma Diagram (e watch nlang ang vid ni mdm ahahha lisod e explain, naa syas
25:00-28:39 dapita)

7) Table 1. Profile of the research studies. dapat naay: Author/Country/Design sa study,

Population (kinsay g experimentan), Setting (refers to the number of the population),
Objective (copy and paste ang objective sa study), Program Content (unsa all abt ilang
study)
- at least 2 papers na related sa problem
- write a description for the table. summarize what the table is all abt, give at least 3-5
sentences.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: "title nato" ibutang nato unsa abt atong study.
Table 2. put the data into numbers to analyze and interpret the data. u can use
frequency in the event na naa silay post test and pre test. after sa table, magbutang og
analysis, interpretation, and implication sa table.
(analysis): "from the results, it was found out.. t value is greater than critical t value"
(interpretation): "the findings show that there is a significant difference between... which
means that.."
(implication): unsay pasabot og effective ang nigawas sa inyohang data "these results
are coherent to the study of..." mag cite or mag include namo og related studies or
literature na ni coincide sa results sa inyong paper. if naay studies na ni oppose sa
inyohang results and meta analysis, e include na nimo para mka put ka og implication.
"from this, it can be proposed that..." mao nanay implication, one sentence only.

CONCLUSION: gamay ra og sentences. only 5 sentences at most.

first statement: thesis statement. a form of significance ngano ilang gi conduct ilang
rsrch paper. simply present your variables. "it has been shown that... like the following.."
second statement: answer sa problem
third statement: simply present your findings in one sentence. "the findings of this study
only showed that..."
last statement: answer sa inyong problem. "thus, the..."

RECOMMENDATION: follow the format ni mdm. "From the gathered data..." u include
how many studies ang nahabilin. sa recommendations, ur recommending it to specific
people. "the following are recommended to..." in ur case, u might want to be adressing
ur recommendation to the ppl of the scientific community, the researchers, scientists,
maybe also to the policymakers and the local government, especially if it has significant
contributions for the communuty. specify kangkinsa ni nimo e rercommend.
- summary rani ang recommendation. ang recommendations kay naay mga citation then
naka cite ang authors bcs these rsrch papers belong to those ppl na nisuwat sa katong
rsrch papers.
- provide at least 3 recommendations

- REFERENCES: at least 5, kung unsa ray naa ninyo. if more than that, very oki.