Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TERM PAPER
PLANNING THEORY
Before discussing to our chapter matter, you surfacially start with the utopian society, modern, pre-
modern society,, mid 13th & 14th – roman civilization,18th century – renaissance, environmental ethics.
Vastu Purusha mandala, public-oriented planning example- neighborhood planning, social sector –
housing, water resources, health services, decrease mother death rate, decrease infant mortality rate,
GDP (gross domestic product), FDI.
Theory is basically a set of independent propositions to explain a certain phenomenon. Theory is a set
of assumptions, propositions, or accepted facts that attempts to provide a plausible or rational
explanation of cause-and-effect (causal) relationships among a group of observed phenomena. There
are two types of theories: a theory which is related to “natural science” and “social science”. The natural
science theory is a cause and effect theory; and is objective in nature. Whereas the social science theory
deals with people and its subjective in nature. Theory aims to make an activity more practicable by
not actually doing ‘it’ but telling how to do ‘it’. There are two types of theory: Basic or Fundamental
theory and Applied theory. The fundamental theory is applicable to wide variety of subjects, while
Applied theory is subject-specific and has limitations on where it can be applied.
Planning is simply a process of figuring out what needs to be done at present to meet the needs of
the future. It is the process of setting goals, developing strategies, and outlining tasks and schedules
to accomplish the goals. Although there are no universally agreed definitions of planning, depending
upon what constitutes planning, planning can be defined as means to end product i.e. description of
objectives and benefits such as land use planning, sustainable development planning; planning as
methodology such as participatory planning, strategic planning; and planning as a process of decision
making such as Rational planning, disjointed incremental planning. In general, planning should include:
Village is a ‘small’ physical group of shelters where there is predomination of primary activity, usually
common to everyone, commonly agriculture which results in hand to mouth economy (subsistence
economy). Town is a large settlement with reduced sense of community/closeness or belonging. There
is a predomination of secondary and tertiary activities with surplus economy. Density, population, and
revenue are the defining characters of any town. Neighborhood is the building lock of urban area. It is
an abstract word which gives more of a sense of space rather than physical space.
Characteristics of a settlement:
1. Site: Location, Citing.
2. Situation: Relation to the surrounding areas, Rural Urban continuum
3. Size: Population, Density
4. Function: Land use function, Economic
5. Form: Shape, Size, Density, Configuration
6. Structure: Spatial arrangement/configuration of elements-streets, blocks, identifiable pattern,
forms, social interactions and control, social structure.
Urban planning is done for orderly management of land and its use such as living, working, resting and
recreation with consideration of social equity and social justice. It includes spatial planning and physical
Submitted by: Manisha K.Sah (078MSURP008) Page | 2
planning. Urban Planning leads to benefits in various aspects:
• Convenience Benefit: access to services, locational arrangement of land uses and intensity, etc.
• Social Equity Benefits: fairness in access to services, fairness in distribution of cost and benefits,
participation in decision making.
• Health and Safety Benefits: reduction of traffic dangers and environmental hazard, better
sanitation and water systems, better light, and ventilation.
• Efficiency Benefits: reduction of costs of land development, transport and energy cost.
• Environmental Benefits: reduction of air, water and noise pollution and protect ecological and
open areas.
• Amenities Benefits: better living environment, conservation of nature and culture, space and
values.
Urban Planning Outputs:
1. Land use Plan
2. Infrastructure Development Plan
3. Zoning
4. Zoning Ordinances
5. Sub-division Regulations
6. Building Bylaw
Stakeholder analysis
Rationality is a logical and defined way of doing something. Therefore, rational decision making can
be understood as a decision-making process where each decision is backed up by certain theoretical
logic.
Axioms of Rationality:
Substantial theory
Disjoint incrementalism and mixed scan, incremental(part of rational not participatory)
Decision making-science of mudding through
Imperical methos, cost benefit analysis.
The transactive planning approach focuses on the intact experience of people's lives revealing policy
issues to be addressed. Planning is not carried out with respect to an anonymous target community of
beneficiaries, but in face-to-face contact with the people affected by decisions. Planning consists less
of field surveys and data analyses, and more of inter-personal dialogue marked by a process of mutual
learning. In contrast to incremental planning, more emphasis is given to processes of personal and
organizational development, and not just the achievement of specific functional objectives. Plans are
evaluated not merely in terms of what they do for people through delivery of goods and services, but in
terms of the plans effect on people-on their dignity and sense of effectiveness, their values and behavior,
their capacity for growth through cooperation, their spirit of generosity. By contrast, incremental
planning adheres more closely to the economic logic of individuals pursuing their own self-interest.
Advocacy planning
The advocacy planning movement grew up in the sixties rooted in adversary procedures modeled upon
the legal profession, and usually applied to defending the interests of weak against strong-community
groups, environmental causes, the poor, and the disenfranchised against the established powers of
business and government. Advocacy planning has proven successful as a means of blocking insensitive
plans and challenging traditional views of a unitary public interest. In theory, advocacy calls for
development of plural plans rather than a unit plan. In practice, however, advocacy planning has been
criticized for posing stumbling blocks without being able to mobilize equally effective support for
constructive alternatives.
Radical planning
Radical planning is an ambiguous tradition, with two mainstreams of thinking that occasionally flow
together. One version is associated with spontaneous activism, guided by an idealistic but pragmatic
vision of self-reliance and mutual aid. Like transactive planning, it stresses the importance of personal
growth, cooperative spirit, and freedom from manipulation by anonymous forces. More than other
planning approaches, however, its point of departure consists of specific substantive ideas about
collective actions that can achieve concrete results in the immediate future. It draws on varying sources
of inspiration-economics and the ecological ethic, social architecture, humanistic philosophy, and
historical precedents
• Teleological ethics: goodness of the results of action: In planning terms this would mean an ethical
concern with the goals of action. This basically concerns with output i.e. higher cost benefits
(utilitarianism- act oriented). In utilitarianism, the public good is an aggregate concept i.e. sum of
all preferences or the balance of pleasure over pain for all. However, the problems with teleological
ethics is that it fails to appropriately consider non- monetized values such as aesthetic values or/
and environmental values, and moral values which cannot be substituted by utility values.
• Deontological ethics: rightness of the action itself: Deontological ethic concerns with rule of
process. It is focused on right or wrongs of actions and not of their results or benefits and harms.
Deontological ethics was developed as a reaction to utilitarianism which concerns with prioritizing
the needs of people from urban poor, slums, squatters; environment and ecological issues, etc. so
that no one can benefit at the cost of others.
Planning Process:
Sustainable Development
As per WCED, sustainable development aims to meet ‘the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of the future generation to meet their own needs.’ Sustainable development aims to have a
closed production cycle that is self-organizing and self-producing i.e. either no waste product is reduced,
or the waste product is fed again into the cycle as input.
For urban sustainability, a balance needs to be achieved between the economic system, social system,
and natural system by:
• Economic pursuit: changed from the economy of luxury, plenty, and surplus towards the
economics of sufficiency and ethics of economic competitiveness i.e. limitation of waste generation,
management against decay and assimilation of waste into resource field, etc.
• Social heterogeneity: the extent of harmony and communication within heterogeneity, urban
The Urban Indicators Program of the United Nations Human Settlements Program (UNCHS) was
established in 1988 to address the urgent global need to improve the base of urban knowledge by helping
countries and cities design, collect and apply policy- oriented indicators data. The global indicators
provide vivid picture and status of housing and other urban issues, state of human settlements and
provide a comprehensive means for monitoring, evaluating and reviewing global urban conditions,
trends and issues through gender perspective and an adequate tool for evaluating the implementation of
the Habitat Agenda.
The Urban Indicators Program of the United Nations Human Settlements Program (UNCHS) was
established in 1988 to address the urgent global need to improve the base of urban knowledge by helping
countries and cities design, collect and apply policy- oriented indicators data. The global indicators
provide vivid picture and status of housing and other urban issues, state of human settlements and
provide a comprehensive means for monitoring, evaluating and reviewing global urban conditions,
trends and issues through gender perspective and an adequate tool for evaluating the implementation of
the Habitat Agenda.
City Development Index was developed in 1997 by Urban Indicators program of UN- habitat which
measures average well- being and access to facilities by urban residents, the CDI was based on 5 sub-
indices: Infrastructure, waste, health, Education and city product. The five modules of urban indicators
are:
• Housing development