SCCA2083 COMMUNICATION LAW INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC

REQUIRED ELEMENTS & LOW MIDDLE HIGH MARK

MARK (1-3) (4-6) (7-9) (20%)
Introduction: Neither implicit nor explicit reference is Readers are aware of the overall The topic is introduced, and /9
Writing purpose made to the topic or purpose of the problem, challenge, relevant law or groundwork is laid as to the direction of
Issue background article. topic of the article the article as required.
Relevant law
Writing structure
Body: - The summary appears to have no - There is a basic flow from one section - The summary goes from general ideas /9
Flow of the review direction, with subtopics appearing to the next, but not all sections or to specific conclusions. Transitions tie
Analysis & Discussion disjointed. paragraphs follow in a natural or logical sections together, as well as adjacent
- Major sections of pertinent content order. paragraphs.
have been omitted or greatly run-on. - All major sections of the pertinent - The appropriate content in
The topic is of little significance to the content are included, but not covered in consideration is covered in depth
course. as much depth, or as explicit, as without being redundant. Sources are
expected. Significance to the course is cited when specific statements are
evident. made. Significance to the course is
unquestionable.
Conclusion - There is no indication the author tried - The author provides concluding - The author was able to make succinct /9
A synthesis of ideas and to synthesize the information or make a remarks that show an analysis and and precise conclusions based on the
application to conclusion based on the literature synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the review. Insights into the problem are
Communication Law course under review. conclusions, however, were not appropriate.
- No application to Communication Law supported in the body of the report. - Conclusions and the application to
course is provided. - The relevant application to Communication Law course are strongly
Communication Law course is obvious. supported in the review.
Format: - It is hard to know what the writer is - Writing is generally clear, but - Writing is crisp, clear, and succinct. /9
Clarity of writing and writing trying to express. Writing is convoluted. unnecessary words are occasionally The writer incorporates the active voice
technique Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, used. Meaning is sometimes hidden. when appropriate and supports ideas
Citations/References - and improper punctuation are evident. Paragraph or sentence structure is too with examples. No spelling, grammar,
Proper APA format - Citation for the article did not follow repetitive. Few spelling, grammar, or or punctuation errors are made.
APA format and was missing essential punctuation errors are made. - Citation for the article did follow APA
information. - Citation for the article did follow APA format. Essential information was
format; however; a few errors in accurate and complete.
essential information were evident.
GRAND TOTAL XX /36 x 20
= markah
tugasan
individu

]
 SCCA2083 COMMUNICATION LAW INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC
REQUIRED ELEMENTS & LOW MIDDLE HIGH NET MARK
MARK (1-3) (4-6) (7-9) (20)
Introduction: Neither implicit nor explicit reference is Readers are aware of the overall The topic is introduced, and /3
Writing purpose made to the topic or purpose of the problem, challenge, relevant law or groundwork is laid as to the direction of
Issue background article. topic of the article the article as required.
Relevant law
Writing structure
Body: - The summary appears to have no - There is a basic flow from one section - The summary goes from general ideas /10
Flow of the review direction, with subtopics appearing to the next, but not all sections or to specific conclusions. Transitions tie
Analysis & Discussion disjointed. paragraphs follow in a natural or logical sections together, as well as adjacent
- Major sections of pertinent content order. paragraphs.
have been omitted or greatly run-on. - All major sections of the pertinent - The appropriate content in
The topic is of little significance to the content are included, but not covered in consideration is covered in depth
course. as much depth, or as explicit, as without being redundant. Sources are
expected. Significance to the course is cited when specific statements are
evident. made. Significance to the course is
unquestionable.
Conclusion - There is no indication the author tried - The author provides concluding - The author was able to make succinct /5
A synthesis of ideas and to synthesize the information or make a remarks that show an analysis and and precise conclusions based on the
application to conclusion based on the literature synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the review. Insights into the problem are
Communication Law course under review. conclusions, however, were not appropriate.
- No application to Communication Law supported in the body of the report. - Conclusions and the application to
course is provided. - The relevant application to Communication Law course are strongly
Communication Law course is obvious. supported in the review.
Format: - It is hard to know what the writer is - Writing is generally clear, but - Writing is crisp, clear, and succinct. /2
Clarity of writing and writing trying to express. Writing is convoluted. unnecessary words are occasionally The writer incorporates the active voice
technique Misspelled words, incorrect grammar, used. Meaning is sometimes hidden. when appropriate and supports ideas
Citations/References - and improper punctuation are evident. Paragraph or sentence structure is too with examples. No spelling, grammar,
Proper APA format - Citation for the article did not follow repetitive. Few spelling, grammar, or or punctuation errors are made.
APA format and was missing essential punctuation errors are made. - Citation for the article did follow APA
information. - Citation for the article did follow APA format. Essential information was
format; however; a few errors in accurate and complete.
essential information were evident.
GRAND TOTAL /20