Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Components for WRITING SKILLS at each level of the Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages (CEFR):
A1:
• Simple sentence structures
• Basic vocabulary and grammar
• Ability to write short messages or simple notes
• Basic punctuation and spelling
A2:
• Ability to write simple descriptions or narratives
• Use of present, past, and future tenses
• More complex sentence structures
• Ability to write simple emails or letters
• Basic knowledge of paragraph structure
B1:
• Ability to write clear, coherent paragraphs
• Use of more complex grammar and vocabulary
• Ability to write formal letters, emails, and reports
• Knowledge of cohesive devices such as conjunctions and linking words
• Awareness of tone and register
B2:
• Ability to write longer, more complex texts such as essays or articles
• Use of a range of tenses and grammatical structures
• Ability to write in different styles, such as descriptive or argumentative
• Use of rhetorical devices and persuasive language
• Ability to summarize and synthesize information
C1:
• Ability to write complex and nuanced arguments or analyses
• Use of advanced vocabulary and idiomatic expressions
• Ability to write in a range of formats, such as academic essays or creative writing
• Knowledge of advanced grammatical structures and syntax
• Ability to write with clarity, precision, and coherence
C2:
• Mastery of the language, including its nuances and subtleties
• Ability to write fluently and confidently in any context
• Use of rhetorical and stylistic devices to create a range of effects
• Knowledge of literary and cultural conventions and their use in writing
• Ability to produce polished and sophisticated texts for any purpose or audience.
Components for READING COMPREHENSION skills at each level of the Common European Framework
of Reference for Languages (CEFR):
A1:
• Ability to understand short, simple texts with basic vocabulary and grammar
• Knowledge of basic sentence structures and word order
• Ability to identify main ideas and some supporting details
• Basic knowledge of cognates and common expressions
• Basic understanding of punctuation and capitalization
A2:
• Ability to understand short, simple texts on familiar topics
• Use of context and inference to understand unfamiliar vocabulary
• Ability to identify main ideas and some details in longer texts
• Basic understanding of paragraph structure and topic sentences
Simulated Teaching - MRMS |2
• Ability to use appropriate pronunciation and intonation patterns to convey meaning and convey subtle
nuances
C2:
• Mastery of the language, allowing for complete fluency in any context
• Ability to participate in complex discussions and debates with ease
• Use of advanced vocabulary and grammar structures to express complex and nuanced ideas and
opinions with a high degree of precision
• Ability to deliver engaging and persuasive presentations with a high degree of sophistication and
rhetorical flair
• Ability to use appropriate pronunciation and intonation patterns to convey meaning and convey subtle
nuances with complete accuracy.
introduction to engage students and sets the context for the lesson. The main part of the lesson focuses on a
discussion of the theories of Vygotsky and Ryan and Deci and how they relate to the use of technology in
education. The teacher demonstrates the use of a specific technology tool or app that aligns with the theories
discussed, and students have the opportunity to try it out and provide feedback. The lesson concludes with a
group activity where students brainstorm how technology can be used to enhance learning in a specific subject
area or topic. This lesson plan aims to provide a theoretical and practical foundation for students to explore
and experiment with technology to enhance their learning.
Simulated Teaching - MRMS |6
feedback on their writing, and the teacher provides additional resources for students to further explore
argumentative writing.
SCORING CRITERIA FOR LESSON PLAN: Writing an Argumentative Essay
1. Engagement (10 points)
The lesson plan engages students through a discussion of the importance of persuasive writing, by asking them
to share their own experiences, and by providing real-world examples.
2. Theory Application (20 points)
The lesson plan effectively explains and applies Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Ryan and Deci's
Self-Determination Theory to persuasive writing.
3. Model Essay Analysis (20 points)
The lesson plan provides a clear model of an effective argumentative essay, including an explanation of its
structure, persuasive techniques, and rhetorical appeals.
4. Writing Activity (30 points)
The writing activity provides students with autonomy and choice in their topic selection, utilizes graphic
organizers to scaffold their writing, and includes peer feedback to encourage revision.
5. Peer Review Activity (10 points)
The peer review activity encourages constructive feedback and revision based on peers' comments, which is
aligned with Vygotsky's concept of collaborative learning.
6. Conclusion and Resources (10 points)
The conclusion summarizes the main ideas discussed in the lesson and provides additional resources for
students to continue developing their persuasive writing skills.
Overall, the lesson plan effectively incorporates Vygotsky's and Ryan and Deci's theories to support students
in developing their argumentative writing skills through scaffolded activities, constructive feedback, and student
autonomy.
Simulated Teaching - MRMS |8
exemplar text and how it conveys implicit meanings and multiple perspectives. Students have the opportunity
to practice identifying implicit meanings and multiple perspectives in their own texts, and participate in a group
discussion to explore different viewpoints. The lesson concludes with a recap of the main ideas discussed and
additional resources for students to further explore critical reading and multiple perspectives.
Scoring Criteria for Reading Comprehension Lesson Plan:
1. Introduction (10 points)
• Engaging discussion of the importance of identifying implicit meanings and multiple perspectives in a
text (3 points)
• Clear explanation of the focus of the lesson on developing critical reading skills through Vygotsky and
Ryan and Deci's theories (3 points)
• Effective engagement of students through sharing their own experiences reading texts with implicit
meanings and multiple perspectives (4 points)
2. Discussion of Vygotsky's theory (15 points)
• Clear explanation of Vygotsky's ZPD and its application to reading skills (5 points)
• Effective discussion of how critical reading skills can be scaffolded through technology tools, such as
online reading prompts, graphic organizers, and peer feedback (5 points)
• Relevant and meaningful examples of how critical reading can facilitate understanding and
appreciation of multiple perspectives (5 points)
3. Discussion of Ryan and Deci's theory (15 points)
• Clear explanation of Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory and how it can be applied to critical
reading (5 points)
• Effective discussion of how giving students autonomy and choice in their reading materials can
increase motivation and engagement (5 points)
• Relevant and meaningful examples of how technology tools can be used to enhance students' sense
of autonomy and choice in their reading (5 points)
4. Model Text (10 points)
• Effective provision of an exemplar text that contains implicit meanings and multiple perspectives (3
points)
• Clear review of the elements of the text, including the author's purpose, audience, and tone (3 points)
• Effective discussion of how the exemplar text utilizes literary devices such as symbolism, imagery, and
metaphor to convey implicit meanings and multiple perspectives (4 points)
5. Reading Activity (20 points)
• Effective provision of a reading prompt that allows students to choose their own text with implicit
meanings and multiple perspectives (5 points)
• Clear direction for students to use a graphic organizer to identify the main themes, implicit meanings,
and multiple perspectives in their text (5 points)
• Effective provision of peer feedback and opportunity for revision before sharing with the class (5
points)
• Meaningful assessment of students' ability to identify implicit meanings and multiple perspectives in
their chosen text (5 points)
6. Group Discussion Activity (20 points)
• Effective direction for students to form groups and share their reading responses with each other,
discussing the different implicit meanings and multiple perspectives they identified in their texts (5
points)
• Encouragement for students to listen to each other's perspectives and challenge their own assumptions
about the text (5 points)
• Effective guidance on how to respectfully disagree and explore different viewpoints (5 points)
• Meaningful assessment of students' ability to engage in group discussion and consider multiple
perspectives (5 points)
7. Conclusion (10 points)
S i m u l a t e d T e a c h i n g - M R M S | 10
• Clear recap of the main ideas discussed and how Vygotsky and Ryan and Deci's theories can be
applied to critical reading (4 points)
• Effective encouragement for students to continue using the techniques learned to enhance their
critical reading skills (3 points)
• Provision of additional resources for students to further explore critical reading and multiple
perspectives (3 points)
Total Score: 100 points
S i m u l a t e d T e a c h i n g - M R M S | 11
how Vygotsky and Ryan and Deci's theories can be applied to reading skills. The main part of the lesson
focuses on a discussion of the exemplar text and how it conveys figurative language and cultural references.
Students have the opportunity to practice identifying figurative language and cultural references in their own
texts, and participate in a group discussion to explore different viewpoints. The lesson concludes with a recap
of the main ideas discussed and additional resources for students to further explore figurative language and
cultural references.
SCORING CRITERIA FOR THE LESSON PLAN on Listening Comprehension:
1. Clarity and Organization of Content (5 points)
• The introduction is clear and engages students.
• The lesson is organized logically and follows a clear structure.
2. Use of Theories (10 points)
• The lesson effectively incorporates Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development and Ryan and Deci's
Self-Determination Theory.
• The theories are well explained and their relevance to critical reading is clear.
3. Text Analysis (10 points)
• The exemplar text is appropriate for the lesson and effectively demonstrates the use of figurative
language and cultural references.
• The analysis of literary devices is clear and easy to understand.
4. Reading Activity (10 points)
• The reading prompt allows for student choice and engages them in critical reading.
• The use of graphic organizers and peer feedback is effective in scaffolding reading skills.
5. Group Discussion Activity (10 points)
• The group discussion activity encourages students to share their perspectives and challenge
assumptions.
• The guidance on respectful disagreement and exploration of different viewpoints is appropriate for
the level and topic.
6. Conclusion (5 points)
• The conclusion effectively summarizes the main ideas and emphasizes the importance of continued
practice.
• The provision of additional resources is helpful for students who wish to further explore the topic.
Total Score: 50 points
Overall, this lesson plan effectively incorporates theory and practical activities to enhance students' critical
reading skills in recognizing and understanding figurative language and cultural references. The use of student
choice, technology tools, and peer feedback is appropriate for the middle school level, and the group
discussion activity encourages collaboration and exploration of different perspectives.
S i m u l a t e d T e a c h i n g - M R M S | 13
focuses on a discussion of the model dialogue and how the speakers use pronunciation and intonation to
convey meaning and nuance. Students have the opportunity to practice their own pronunciation and
intonation using speech recognition software or online pronunciation guides, and participate in a group
discussion to explore different nuances and meanings. The lesson concludes with a recap of the main ideas
discussed and additional resources for students to further practice their pronunciation and intonation skills.
SCORING CRITERIA:
1. Participation and Engagement (20 points)
• Actively engages in the discussion of the importance of pronunciation and intonation in effective
communication.
• Shares personal experiences related to using different tones and intonations to convey meaning.
• Contributes to group discussions and activities.
2. Understanding of Theories (30 points)
• Demonstrates understanding of Vygotsky's theory of the zone of proximal development and how it
can be applied to speaking skills.
• Demonstrates understanding of Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory and how it can be
applied to speaking skills.
• Provides examples of how technology tools can enhance pronunciation and intonation skills.
3. Model Dialogue Analysis (20 points)
• Analyzes the model dialogue, including the speakers' tone, pitch, and rhythm.
• Identifies how the speakers use these elements to convey meaning and nuance.
• Provides insightful and thoughtful analysis of the dialogue.
4. Speaking Activity (20 points)
• Chooses an appropriate topic for the speaking prompt.
• Uses speech recognition software or online pronunciation guides to practice pronunciation and
intonation.
• Incorporates feedback and revises speaking responses before sharing with the class.
5. Group Discussion Activity (10 points)
• Actively participates in group discussions and respectfully challenges assumptions and explores
different viewpoints.
• Listens attentively to others' responses and provides thoughtful feedback.
Explanation: The scoring criteria assesses students' participation and engagement, understanding of the
theories, ability to analyze the model dialogue, performance in the speaking and group discussion activities.
The criteria also include the use of technology tools to enhance students' pronunciation and intonation skills.
The scoring ranges from 0-100, with each criterion having different weightings. This approach allows for a
comprehensive evaluation of students' learning and ensures that students are graded based on their
performance in various activities.
S i m u l a t e d T e a c h i n g - M R M S | 15
SCORING CRITERIA for the Lesson Plan on Using Pronunciation and Intonation to Convey Meaning and
Nuance:
1. Pronunciation and Intonation (40 points)
• Uses appropriate pronunciation and intonation patterns to convey meaning and nuance (20 points)
• Demonstrates an understanding of how pronunciation and intonation can be used to convey different
nuances in speaking (10 points)
• Utilizes feedback and revisions to improve pronunciation and intonation skills (10 points)
2. Engagement and Participation (30 points)
• Actively engages in the discussion and activities (10 points)
• Demonstrates respect and consideration for peers' viewpoints during group discussions (10 points)
• Contributes to the overall learning environment (10 points)
3. Comprehension and Application of Theories (20 points)
• Demonstrates an understanding of Vygotsky and Ryan and Deci's theories as they relate to speaking
skills (10 points)
• Applies the theories to improve their own pronunciation and intonation skills (10 points)
4. Technology Use (10 points)
• Utilizes technology tools effectively to improve their pronunciation and intonation skills (5 points)
• Demonstrates an understanding of how technology can be used to enhance learning (5 points)
Explanation: The scoring criteria for this lesson plan are designed to assess students' ability to use
pronunciation and intonation effectively to convey meaning and nuance in their speaking, as well as their
engagement, participation, and comprehension of the theories discussed. Additionally, the criteria evaluate
students' use of technology tools and their understanding of how technology can be used to enhance learning.
The criteria are weighted to reflect the importance of pronunciation and intonation in effective
communication, and the engagement and participation of students in the learning process. The criteria also
reward students for their comprehension and application of the theories discussed, as well as their ability to
use technology tools effectively. Overall, the scoring criteria are intended to assess students' learning outcomes
and encourage them to improve their speaking skills through practice and engagement.
S i m u l a t e d T e a c h i n g - M R M S | 16
1. Content Knowledge
2. Engagement and Participation
3. Differentiation and Accommodation
4. Application and Transfer of Learning
5. Assessment
SCORING:
• 4 = Exceeds Expectations
• 3 = Meets Expectations
• 2 = Progressing towards expectations
• 1 = Below Expectations
CRITERIA:
1. Content Knowledge:
• Demonstrates a deep understanding of mathematical modeling and its applications.
• Uses appropriate language, concepts, and examples to convey complex ideas.
• Provides accurate and relevant information to support understanding of mathematical modeling.
2. Engagement and Participation:
• Actively engages in reading and discussion activities.
• Participates in small group activities and discussions.
• Demonstrates a positive attitude and willingness to learn.
3. Differentiation and Accommodation:
• Adapts instruction to meet the needs of diverse learners.
• Provides multiple opportunities for practice and application of skills.
• Uses a variety of instructional strategies to engage and motivate learners.
4. Application and Transfer of Learning:
• Applies reading comprehension strategies to mathematical modeling texts.
• Demonstrates an understanding of how mathematical modeling can be applied in different
contexts.
• Transfers learning to real-world situations beyond the classroom.
5. Assessment:
• Uses a variety of formative and summative assessments to measure learning.
• Provides timely and specific feedback to guide student learning.
• Uses assessment data to inform instructional decisions and differentiate instruction.
OVERALL SCORE:
1. 16-20 = Exceeds Expectations
2. 11-15 = Meets Expectations
3. 6-10 = Progressing towards expectations
4. 1-5 = Below Expectations