Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chemistry
LAB REPORT
Student: Teacher:
change.
Research Question: What effect does capacitance of fluid have on the change in
temperature?
Theoretical Background:
faster the atoms vibrate, the higher the temperature. Thermal energy is measured as the
sum of the kinetic energy of the atoms. It is measured in joules (J). Temperature is
defined as the mean kinetic energy of the atoms of an object, it is measured in kelvin
and Celsius (°C). Heat is defined as the amount of thermal energy transferred between
constant of every substance which describes its capability to take and receive thermal
energy. It is defined as the quantity of heat absorbed per unit mass of the specific
per kilogram Celsius/kelvin. The specific thermal capacity of water is 4.186 J/g°C1. The
specific thermal capacity of extra-virgin olive oil is 2.0J/g°C 2. The formula which
connects heat transfer, mass, specific thermal capacity and change in temperature is Q =
m * c * ∆t. Q here represents the amount of heat transferred, m represents the mass of
the object that the heat is transferred to, c is the specific thermal capacity of the object
Hypothesis
- I believe that when the specific thermal capacity is higher then, the change
inversely proportional.
Materials
- 100ml beaker
- 500ml beaker
- 100ml of water
- Lighter
- Gas torch
- Wooden clamps
- Paper
Methodology
1. Put 10ml of ethanol into the measuring cylinder and pour it into the 100ml
beaker
2. Put 100ml of water into the measuring cylinder and pour into the 500ml beaker
3. Wrap aluminium foil around and a little over the 500ml beaker, so that it can still
receive air
5. Turn gas flow up in the gas torch and light a fire with the lighter
6. Heat up the dry piece of wood with the flame so that there is a bit of flame on the
wood
7. Stick the piece of wood while it’s still on fire into the 100ml beaker with ethanol
8. Put a thermometer into the water and measure the initial temperature
11. Put the beakers out of one another with the wooden clamps and place it on some
12. Repeat the same process but instead of 100ml of water do 100ml of olive oil.
Variables
Independent
Dependant
the specific thermal capacity in in the 500ml beaker (formula), the temperature
of the air (the air will transfer some of its thermal energy into the fluid), the
thermal capacity of the beaker and thickness of beaker walls (the energy from
the burning of the ethanol isn’t directly transferred but through the beaker), the
amount of energy that the fuel releases (Q in the formula), the mass of fluid in the
it
- The properties of the beakers – the small beaker must transfer the heat from the
fuel into the fluid in the 500ml beaker and the big beaker must keep the
Safety Issues
Since I was operating with fire, that is burning alcohol, I needed to be careful not
to burn myself. Firstly, I had to light the fuel from a distance so as to not let the flame
burn my hand. Secondly, I had to use wooden clamps to move the beakers around
because they were extremely hot. Similarly, when emptying the water and olive oil, I
had to pour them out carefully as they were also very hot. When cleaning the beakers, I
had to wait some time so the beakers could cool off to the point where I could handle
Raw Data
Trial 1: water
T0 = 23°C
T1=180°C
V = 100ml = 0.1L
T0 = 23°C
T1=120°C
V = 100ml = 0.1L
Processed data
Trial 1: water
m = V*ρwater=0.1l*1kg/l = 0.1kg
Trial 2:
m = V*ρoliveoil=0.1l*0.92kg/l3 = 0.092kg
Uncertanties:
On temperature ±1 °C
On volume ±0.01 ml
On mass ±0.01 kg
Conclusion
At first, it might seem that the results discourage my hypothesis but, due to an
error I made during the process, this result can be explained. Since I put the
thermometer in the fluid, it rested on the beaker in which the fuel was, meaning it
would be impacted by its heat. Which is proven correct by the fact that the temperature
of the water measured 120 degrees Celsius even though it was not boiling. This could
explain the results that I got, since in the trial with the water, the temperature was
higher meaning that the temperature of the fuel beaker was higher. This suggests that
3
Appendix. (2014). The Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Handbook, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118460412.app1
the water absorbed less energy due to its capacitance and the beaker absorbed. In the
trial with olive oil, things could have played out similarly but since the capacitance is
lower the temperature of the beaker would be also be lower because the olive oil
absorbed more heat. This is one explanation of the results, but it could also be that some
other factors skewed the results. Overall, the results are mixed and my hypothesis is not
fully supported.
Evaluation
Regarding the systematic errors I made during the experiment, one of them was
the one with the thermometer that I mentioned in the conclusion. I could have fixed it
by taping the thermometer to the bigger beaker or possibly lining the tops of the
beakers with Styrofoam or some other good isolator so it wouldn’t affect the readings.
Aside from that, during the first trial, the ethanol stopped burning for a few seconds and
it had to be re-lit, possibly cooling down the water and skewing the results slightly.
Another error that I had was that I used the same volume of water and olive oil even
though they had different densities in turn making them have a different mass which
affected the final results though not too significantly as their masses were still
approximately the same. I could have fixed this by calculating the volume of olive oil I
Regarding the random errors, one that I had was that the reading on the
thermometers varied from viewing angle and I could have misread the temperatures on
it. This could have been fixed by ducking and viewing them straight on. Another one was
the fact that the air around the beakers affected the temperature of the beaker. I could
WWW Pages
2022)
Journals
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118460412.app1