Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The fluctuation of oil prices and their effects has been a continuous debate globally
due to the massiveness of the impacts. In the last four decades, there have been several oil
crises that cause the level of economic development across the globe to change. However, the
situations have been different due to the dependency of the various countries on oil, the
policies of the diff states and the level of development. About the oil-producing countries and
the oil consuming countries, in the different circumstances, the effects are the reverse. The
regulations and policies of the oil-producing countries, the group coordinates all the
activities. Due to the significance of oil in the globe and the dependency of all the other
sectors of oil, all the countries globally have to adjust their plans depending on the OPEC's
influence.
OPEC was established through the influence of the major oil-producing countries to
enable them to have a significant influence over the world and to avoid the misuse of
resources and the instability of the oil prices across the globe. Therefore, after the
establishment, the roles and functions were defined and uniform policies enhanced since then
for the regulation of the oil supply across the globe and the stabilization of the oil prices as
well as the distribution of wealth accordingly considering the contribution of the different
investors. The changes in the oil prices in the last few decades are influenced by OPEC's
different decisions depending on the supply and the factors underlying the economy.
Although sometimes the organization loses the power to determine the fuel prices, it is the
primary contributor of the price fluctuations in the various eras. The paper will contend how
Luhur 2
OPEC influences the oil supply and hence the prices of oil across the globe and the factors
In the establishment of OPEC, after the consideration of the issues that were
disturbing the individual countries, OPEC decided to take control through setting the
objectives. In the review of the different policies and operations of the countries, OPEC
objected to formulate common policies favoring all oil producing countries (Bentzen 1375).
Also, the cartel aimed to stabilize the prices of oil across the globe to prevent random
fluctuations which affect the growth and development of the world's economy. Moreover, the
organization saw the need to regulate the supply of oil in the market to ensure a stable
equilibrium between the demand and provision of oil in the market. Furthermore, by
recognizing the importance of the foreign investments that helped in the maintenance of the
energy sector, the organization focused on ensuring that the investors received their equitable
In the 1950s, the oil producing countries were operating on different governance
under various cartels and hence had different decisions which apparently in the oil monopoly
market, failed to work accordingly. Since the oil-producing countries were developing
countries, the developed countries which were carried out investments in the producing
countries exploited the resources as they were in control of the minerals (Hossein, Yazdan
and Ehsan 272). Moreover, due to the inability to operate the fuel and maintain as a result of
the inferior technology, the investors made the major decisions and were the influencers of
the prices of oil. The producing countries were operating differently and hence here was a
Luhur 3
collision whereby there were different prices for oil making the international oil market
stagnant and unstable. During this period, the exploration of the oil was mainly in Iran, Iraq,
Kuwait, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Venezuela which discovered the severity of the
conditions approached the government of the other four countries which then agreed to
connect for a proper coordination of policies. After close negotiations, the five countries
agreed to form OPEC which established in September 1960 in Baghdad (Fombona 70).
After 1960, Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar and the United Arab
Emirates joined the organization. OPEC defined the roles, functions, responsibilities, and
policies to operate under to ensure a smooth operation across the globe. Since the origin of
the cartel, OPEC decided to control the world prices in effect to the growth and development
of the individual countries. In 1974, OPEC influenced all the different countries to increase
the fuel prices. In effect to that, the countries which were previously under the control of the
investing countries experienced an increase in income and wealth which then led to a rise in
Since 1974, the world was sure that OPEC has a significant influence over the world's
prices. There oil importing countries spent a lot of their capital on the oil regulation which in
response led to inflation and a high cost of living. The oil importing governments responded
by rationing the level of consumption of fuel. However, the reaction of the different states
was not the same since OPEC had agreed to partner with individual countries. Therefore, for
the countries that refused to partner with the organization especially the western countries
had to extremely ration the consumption while the other economies in partnership received
the same supply as before (Kisswani 231). UK, Germany, Netherlands, the US, Sweden, and
Britain were among the countries that specifically had a severe oil crisis. After the 1974
crisis, there was a decline in the growth rate of the world economy. International trade was
ineffectively operational due to the increase in costs. Also, the foreign direct investment
Luhur 4
dropped drastically. The GDP of the developed and developing countries declined to a
negative rate. There was also increase in the rates of unemployment due to the increase in the
In 1979, there was a similar oil crisis which was as a result of the political and
religious conflicts in Iran that caused a trigger in the energy sector. During the period, the
Iranian government stopped exporting the oil and hence, there was a decline in the oil supply
globally. As a result, there were increases in the prices of oil to regulate the equilibrium in the
market. OPEC countries responded to the decline in the production by increasing the own
production of oil (Loutia, Mellios and Andriosopoulos 263). However, the price increased
even further. Due to the increase in the rate of the imports, the government went back to the
rationing like previously in 1974 to reduce the costs of living and to regulate the costs and
prices of the local fuel. However, in the process of controlling the prices, there emerged
political conflicts due to the different interest of the politicians. The currency differences in
response affected the entire international trade business (Hossein, Yazdan and Ehsan 275).
Later on, after the high prices, Iran went back to the supply of oil on the routine basis.
From 1980, the prices started falling, and the industrial sector which had retarded started
picking. However, it was the weakness of the OPEC to fail to make appropriate policies to
stabilize the oil prices; hence a change in the supply or demand affected the fluctuation of the
prices to a large extent. From that time to 1986, the prices of oil fell drastically (Fombona
75). There was a regulation of the rates after 1986 to 2000. However, there were rises in the
oil prices from 2000 up to 2008. The politics of Iran led to the hike in the prices. However,
there were other insignificant reasons as to which governments gave as to the cause of the
price increase. In response to the global recession in 2008, the oil prices still increased. In this
period, the OPEC, realizing the effects of its activities on the world economy, it decided to
stabilize the prices to a level that would favorably influence the producing countries without
Luhur 5
Despite the agreement, some researchers outlined that there was a limit of the exports
by some OPEC countries which hence led to more development on the producing countries'
side and a straining growth among the consuming countries. As a result, the limited
exportation of oil resulted in a declined supply where the prices must increase to adjust the
equilibrium. Despite the average predicted, the prices still rose in summer due to the
increased demand which the current limited supply could not meet. However, after the
predictions, the price level fell to $60 per barrel which then threatened the investments in the
energy sector (Loutia, Mellios and Andriosopoulos 270). The recent price rises in 2014 also
attribute to the regulation of prices by the OPEC countries and the currency changes across
the world. Therefore, looking back at the previous operations in the global economy,
international trade and the sequential operations in the related sectors, OPEC controlled the
prices. Every decision that the individual countries made and the organization in whole
influenced the amount of fuel in the market and hence the prices (Kisswani 236).
From the various incidences in the past that have led to the fluctuations in prices,
some factors spurred the changes. All the factors affect the oil producing countries or the
conducts of the investors hence causing the changes. First, variations in the energy sector
regarding the number of refineries affect the regulation in the industry. Without considering
the amount of oil in the production area, there are insufficient oil refineries and storage
capacities (Fombona 79). As a result, when the production of oil from the producing
countries decline, all the oil-dependent countries are affected, and the prices must go up in
response to the adjustments in the OPEC countries. Therefore as much as there are
fluctuations in the oil supply and demand, there should be enough storage capacity when the
Luhur 6
prices are expected to rise. Secondly, OPEC members are the major oil producing countries.
Other countries with oil supply have not been fully explored, and hence a reduction in
production of oil in the OPEC members due to the variant reasons affects the entire world.
Also, the other oil producing countries have a minor influence on the energy sector (Hossein,
Thirdly, the fuel prices and the amount of oil in the market have a non-linear
relationship where a significant change in the supply of oil in the market does not
equivalently vary with the change in prices. There is different elasticity where there the future
expectation cannot be predicted. Demand and supply fail to affect the prices the same way
due to other constraints. Also, the future expectations in the supply demand and prices change
the prices as the producing countries have different policies and economic conditions.
Therefore, the OPEC countries respond to the expectations to their advantage, and hence the
prices fluctuate in response to the decisions of the individual countries (Loutia, Mellios and
Andriosopoulos 272). Furthermore, the exchange rates have a significant influence over the
prices of oil. The US dollar is used to measure the price of oil in the countries. The latter
explains that a decline in the value of a dollar leads to a drop in the other currencies that
exchange with the dollar. Depending on the particular currency, the response in the market
varies differently.
Other factors which have been considered to influence the oil prices and production
are the political conflicts within individual countries such as Iraq which as a result limit the
level of production hence affect the entire economy. Also, the attacks and conflicts in various
countries such as in Saudi Arabia also limit output and distribution of oil among the
countries. The investments in the financial market also influence the price regulation of oil in
the market. As the investors seek to increase the profits within the market, they cause an
Just like other oil-exporting countries, OPEC regulates the rate by making
adjustments in the production quotas. Researchers explain that the fluctuations in oil prices
are determined by the OPEC and non-OPEC policies as well as the supply regulation in the
market. The many efforts by OPEC to regulate and stabilize the prices do not come to
accomplishment just as they have planned due to the variant factors contributing in the
energy sector. The persistent efforts by the organization to increase the revenue through the
increase of prices no longer work since other constraints affect the production capacity. The
cartel uses the predictions in the futures markets to affect the markets prices. However, the
interpretation and perception of the consuming countries affect the price elasticity (Fombona
80). In many occasions, OPEC has failed to achieve its aims of regulating the prices due to
the fear of making losses considering the production level of the other oil-producing
countries. Also, sometimes, the organization makes policies to control the production
capacity and the prices, but some member states fail to respond accordingly due to the
The major influence OPEC has is that it produces the world's largest capacity. Hence,
even though there are fears of more production in the market, OPEC is assured of its
significant contribution. For instance, in the 1990s, the demand for oil in the market
increased, and the non-OPEC oil-producing countries increased their production by 35%
which was their maximum limit. As a result, OPEC members had to supply the other 65%,
and that led to an increase in the welfare of the OPEC members more than the other countries
(Bentzen 1385). The latter explains that the world's energy sector can be dormant or inactive
without the contribution of the OPEC countries. However, OPEC's management must limit
the production of the oil in such a way that the production must not be close to the maximum
Luhur 8
production of control over prices in the economy will decline. For instance, in cases where
the supply of oil in the market is low, the energy sector looks over Saudi Arabia which is the
largest supplier. Therefore, OPEC uses such an opportunity and fails to deliver the production
OPEC works through checking the range of production in the market. The cartel gives
an absolute price control whereby a decrease in output in the markets causes an increase in
price over the set price while an increase in production leads to a reduction in the price. The
same happens to the adjustments in the manufacture. However, in extreme cases where the
prices increase, and it is beyond the control of OPEC, the member countries limit the
production to the actual amount. Furthermore, in consideration of the limited capacity, the
situation has to be solved through the regulation of national policies (Loutia, Mellios and
Andriosopoulos 272).
Three things are right from the observed behavior of OPEC. First, according to
researchers, the behavioral phenomenon of OPEC is not constant. Therefore, OPEC is always
influential, but there cannot be a prediction of the expected behavior. Secondly, the influence
on the world's economy changes since it depends on with the conditions in the individual
countries. The third concept is that with the dependency on the futures market, many people
have been attracted to the market and hence, OPEC only has an indirect influence on the
Saudi Arabia and Iran are the top suppliers of the oil energy market. Therefore, most
of the demand in the market is met by the supply of the specific countries. The other OPEC
members contribute only a quarter of what the two largest countries provide. Therefore, there
Luhur 9
should be more foreign investments on the OPEC countries to maintain the volume of oil
produced. The latter is because there is a high elasticity of the change in the production level
to the change in prices and the OPEC countries need to prevent that in advance. The pricing
power is therefore influenced by many investments in the OPEC countries, where lack of
investments increase the prices, and there is an easy tendency of fluctuation of prices. Also,
lack of investments in OPEC guarantees a bigger market share. Moreover, the elasticity of
supply is low which makes the other oil producing countries more insignificant (Hossein,
Despite the objective of OPEC to produce oil in the market abundantly, the cartel
limits the production limit of its members through the quotas which define the level of which
a given country should not exceed. Regarding the private decisions of the organization,
unless the problem is an international crisis, OPEC does not announce its intentions publicly
due to the possibility of quick action by individual countries which may cause diversity in the
plans. For instance, in 2004, OPEC proclaimed in the market increase in production to an
absolute output limit while it produced more than it announced in the market. With the kind
of policy, the world reacts to resolve the issue against the producing countries and towards
the consuming countries, and they end up favoring the OPEC producing countries.
Considering the aim to stabilize the prices in the world economy, as OPEC seeks to be
the dominant influence in the world to gain commendable profits, it focuses on the
appropriate investments to improve the welfare of OPEC (Hossein, Yazdan and Ehsan 278).
Moreover, regarding the foreign investments, the cartel is accurate on the specific countries it
allows to invest in the country depending on the influence that the individual state has.
Therefore, through such actions, OPEC can take appropriate measures to benefit from the
Conclusion
OPEC influences global prices due to the contribution of the large reserve of oil in its
member countries to the world. Saudi Arabia and Iran are the major producers while
combining the rest of the members increases the significant influence on the production of oil
globally. The other oil producing countries also contribute to the reserves. However, even
their production limits depend on the level of production of the OPEC countries. Therefore,
the paper has outlined that the amount of oil disposed of in the market affects the oil prices
and OPEC decisions affect the current and future production and release of oil in the market.
However, despite the significant role the organization takes in the energy sector, due to
various factors that have come up, OPEC mostly indirectly affect the industry.
The individual member countries political, religious and economic activities also
affect the production level of oil and hence the prices of oil in the economy. In countries like
Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Nigeria where conflicts have been, they have affected the entire oil
production in the mentioned periods. The different elasticity of prices and the unpredictability
of the next price to the various prices also make the energy sector invariant. In the current
century, OPEC still determines the amount due to the position in the market. The effects of
the oil fluctuations affect the different individual economies whereby the commodity prices
have to increase for a better payoff. Also, other countries respond by restricting more oil
imports and regulating the consumption patterns within the country. Also, through the
activation of OPEC policies, the monopoly controls the operations of the global economy.
With the accomplishment of the objectives and regulation accordingly, OPEC influences the
world's economy.
Acknowledgement
I would like to give a vote to my friend, Chelsee for helping me in choosing the right
preferences and for proofreading my work frequently as I requested. Also, I would like to
Luhur 11
thank my professor, Lisa Donegan for helping me with the clear guidelines regarding the
research work. Moreover, I would like to thank all my friends that helped me in the
completion of the project by leading to the appropriate sites for the research work and
proofreading my work.
Work Cited
Bentzen, Jan. "Does OPEC Influence Crude Oil Prices? Testing For Co-Movements
and Causality Between Regional Crude Oil Prices". Applied Economics 39.11 (2007): 1375-
1385. Web.
Luhur 12
Hossein, Abbasinejad, Gudarzi Farahani Yazdan, and Asghari Ghara Ehsan. "The
Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices And Economic Growth: Case
Study (OPEC Countries)". OPEC Energy Review 36.3 (2012): 272-286. Web.
Kisswani, Khalid. "Does OPEC Influence Crude Oil Prices? Testing For
Cointegration and Causality Effect". Journal of Economic Research (JER) 20.2 (2015): 231-
255. Web.