Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Liverpool University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Studia Hibernica
The material here surveyed, dealing with the period of the union,
appeared in the decade and a half between 1960 and 1975. Within
this limitation of time, dictated partly by reasons of practical
convenience, a sufficient body of scholarship appeared to allow of
a meaningful historiographical assessment; in a few cases however
it has seemed necessary to refer to works of value which appeared
in print prior to 1960.
The period of the union seems to justify treatment as that age in
which the contemporary Irish Roman catholic church - at least
as it existed before the 'sixties, the decade of the Second Vatican
Council and of the recrudescence of the northern malady - took
shape. There is still no general history of the modem Irish catholic
church, although the century receives a good deal of treatment in
the unfinished work, Corish (ed.), Irish catholicism. Since 1960 some
suggestive work has appeared on the church in pre-famine Ireland,
but more needs to be done before the historian can say with con
fidence to what extent the religious traditions of the penal era were
or were not carried over into that 'devotional revolution' which Pro
fessor Emmet Larkin sees as characterisiing the era of Cardinal
Cullen The figure of Cullen dominates-if indeed in the imagiation
of some historians it does not overshadow-the generation after the
famine But O'Connell had paved the way for Cullen's liberalism
and for that of other Irishmen who became ecclesiastical leaders
abroad. The success of O'Connell in wielding the weapon of mass
opinion aroused a popular protestant reaction in Ireland and
England, which had final fruit in Ulster nationalism. The
envenombd state of the conflict between the two nationalisms
to-day makes the work done here of poignant interest.
1 In matters of abbreviations and short titles this paper follows the 'Rules for
contributors to Irish Historical Studies9, in Irish Historical Studies Supplement I
(1968) 71-80, and 'List of bibliographical abbreviations and short titles*, in
ibid., 81-124.
2 Scott, 'Will the Irish stay Christian?' in Doctrine and Life xii (1962) 461-3.
3 J. Blanchard, The church in contemporary Ireland (Dublin 1963) 19.
1. Bibliographical Sources
4 Chaps I-VII of this work were first published in I.H.S., in 1967,1968 and 1970.
2. Archival Sources
4. Periodicals
7 See also T. Wall, The sign of Dr Hay*s Head: being some account of the
hazards and fortunes of Catholic printers and publishers in Dublin from the later
penal times to the present day (Dublin 1958).
1. GENERAL WoRKs
To supply the lack of a satisfactory history of t
catholic church, so keenly felt by historians, an ambit
edited by Monsignor P. J. Corish, and entitled A histo
catholicism, was planned by Gill and Macmillan to ap
volumes. Unfortunately, after the appearance in fascic
about half the chapters out of a projected forty-three (
Sydney 1967-71), the project fell through. Althoug
appeared was uneven in quality, this was a real disappo
One must hope that A new history of Ireland, the co
work in nine volumes that is being prepared under the
of the Royal Irish Academy,'0 will not suffer a similar
plan of N.H.I. does not allow for separate sections
history; in the opinion of the editors the church is so
that its history is beinig treated as an essential part of the
This being so, there ought to be an improvement in th
of Irish historiography. Neither the lecture series
under the title The course of Irish history, ed. T. W. M
F. X. Martin (Cork 1967) nor such general works as J.
11C. ? Danachair, 'The penal laws and Irish folk tradition', in Ir. Cath. Hist.
Comm. Proc, 1961 (Dublin 1962), 10.
12 Corish, Ir. Catholicism iv 2 (1971). This chapter makes a valuable comple
ment to the opening chapter, 'Ireland in 1815', of W. F. Adams, Ireland and
Irish emigration to the new world from 1815 to the famine (New Haven 1932) and
to the latter part of L. M. Cullen, Life in Ireland (London 1968).
13 J. A. Murphy, 'Priests and people in modern Irish history', in Christus Rex,
xxiii (1969) 235-7 Cf also H. J Heanev, 'Priest and layman in Ireland. I. The
past', in ibid, xx (1966) 204-12.
14 Attendance at Maynooth between 1795 and 1868 demanded an oath of
allegiance. Cf. John Brady, 'The oath of allegiance at Maynooth', in I.E.R.,
ser 5, xciv, 129-135.
15 In Corish, Ir Catholicism iv 3 (1971) 65.
2. CHRONOLOGICAL
84 a K. B. Nowlan, 'The catholic clergy and Irish politics in the eighteen thirties
and forties', in Historical Studies 9 (ed. J. G. Barry, Belfast 1974) 119-35.
88 E. Strauss, Irish nationalism and British democracy (London 1951) 93.
86 K. B. Nowlan, Charles Gavan Duffy and the repeal movement. O'Donnell
Lecture, 1963 (Dublin 1963); Idem, The politics of repeal: a study in the relations
between Great Britain and Ireland 1841-50 (London 1965); L. J. McCaffrey,
Daniel O'Connell and the repeal year (Lexington, Ky. 1966); J. C. Beckett,
The making of the modern Ireland 1603-1923 (London 1966); M. R. O'Connell,
'O'Connell reconsidered', in Studies lxiv (1975) 107-119.
42 K. F. Roche, 'The relations of the catholic church and the state in England
and Ireland 1800-52', in Hist. Studies v (1961) 9-24.
43 See also K. F. Roche, 'Religion and politics in the eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries', in Christus Rex xix (1965) 194-204.
44 See K. F. Roche, 'Revolution and counter-revolution', in Daniel O'Connell:
nine centenary essays, ed. Michael Tierney (Dublin 1949) 96-100; M. R. O'Connell,
'Daniel O'Connell and religious freedom*, in Thought (1975).
45 See also T. McEUigott, 'Recall to a pioneer: John England, bishop of
Charleston5, in I.E.R. ser 5, cv (1966) 173-9.
48 J. T. Ellis, Perspectives in American Catholicism (Baltimore, Md., and
Dublin 1963), 39-53, 100-106; Idem, 'The Irish in relation to religious and
political freedom', in Wiseman Rev., no. 502 (1964) 328-42.
58 For this reaction, see also R. B. MacDowell, Public opinion and government
policy in Ireland 1801-46 (London 1952) 219-22.
84 H. J. Hanham, Elections and party management (London 1959) 304-8.
One can agree with Emmet Larkin55 that the modem Irish
church, both at home and abroad, is very much a creation of
Cardinal Cullen's, and it is a matter of regret that no major study
of so infl-uential a figure has yet appeared.50 D. K. Akenson's
dismissal of Cullen as a mediocrity57 is strangely imperceptive.
and both Norman and Larkin express sounder judgement in seeing
the cardinal as a bold religious reformer.
It is Professor Larkin's thesis, as stated in a challenging article,58
that Cullen not only reformed the church, but 'what was even
important, in the process . . . he spearheaded the consolidation of
a devotional revolution'. Behind the confusion of metaphors
Professor Larkin's thesis seems clear enough. In the 1840s there
were sigans of a devotional revolution, largely confined to the 're
spectable' class. The famine encouraged this revolution in two
ways, socially by increasing the relative numbers of this class
(and also the number of priests relative to people59) and psycho
logically by making the Irish 'guilt-ridden', so that they sought in
the practice of their religion to recover that sense of identity that
they had been losing through anglicisation since about 1800.
Cullen was able within a generation (1850-78) partly to make and
partly to consolidate this revolution.
It is an interesting thesis, advanced con molto bria, but not
perhaps as presented compelling. For one thing, Larkin does not
set out to demonstrate this great social change but only to give
the 'flavour' of it. For another, he is really unclear as to what
had been achieved before Cullen, and this seems to be the great
centres were Achill and Dingle. The famine gave a new impetus
to the proselytizing effort, which had considerable success before
it went into decline about 1861. Most converts turned back to
catholicism, especially those about to emigrate.64 Professor Bowen
(whose study is wider chronologically than his title suggests) has
done much to demonstrate that the established clergy were more
conciliation-minded than has been popularly supposed. At the
same time the dissenters were more evangelical in spirit than were
the parsons, and the main struggle was fought (it appears) be
tween the evangelical protestants on the one hand and the May
nooth (as distinct from continental-educated) priests on the other.
Bowen's study is rather deficient in sympathy with these latter
and with Archbishop MacHale in his attitude towards the national
schools.65 A catholic who turned protestant and gave notable
service to the Irish Society was Tadhg 6 Coinniallain, from Sligo
(1780-1854).Y6 Finally, John J. Meagher gives us a 'field-report',
on the catholic side, from the baittlefield, this time in Dublin 67
While the definitive biography of Cullen remains unwritten, it
is now possible to correct the view of the 'nationalist' writers,
Gavan Duffy and Lucas, on the cardinal, and to see that the
Fenian verdict on the Irish bishops and clergy generally was un
warranted by the facts.8 The Tenant Right League of the 1850s69
which sought to combine the causes of tenant right (the question
which most immediately affected the majority of people) and the
defence of catholicism, now - especially after the Ecclesiastical
Titles Act, in which Russell included Ireland - seemingly under
64 P. de Br?n, 'An tAthair Brasbie', in Kerry Arch, and Hist. Soc. Jn. 1 (1968)
35-8. Brasbie was a Kerry priest who turned protestant.
65 Two older studies are worthy of note here: E. J. Quigley, 'Grace abounding:
a chapter of Ireland's story', in I.E.R. ser 5, xx (1922)-xxii (1923); and T. O'Neill,
'Sidelights on souperism*, in I.E.R. ser 5, Ixxi (1949) 50-64.
66 T. ? hAil?n, 'The Irish Society agus Tadhg ? Coinniall?in', in Studia Hib.
8 (1968) 60-78.
67 J. J. Meagher, 'South Dublin Union 1847-52: chaplain's report', in Rep.
Nov. iv (1971) 135-58.
68 T. W. Moody, The Fenian movement (Cork 1968) 108-110, offers some balanc
ed views on the Fenians and the church. See also L. ? Broin, Fenian fever: an
Anglo-American dilemma (London and N.Y. 1971).
62 J. H. Whyte, The Tenant League and Irish politics in the 1850s. Ir. Hist.
Series (Dundalk 1963); Idem, 'Political problems 1850-60', in Corish, Ir. Cathol
icism iii, 2 (1967); Same, The Independent Irish Party 1850-9 (Oxford 1958);
Idem, 'Fresh light on Archbishop Cullen and the Tenant League', in I.E.R.,
ser. 5, xcix (1963) 170-6.
3. PARTICULAR THEMES
and aware of the concern of the Irish bishops for the advancement
of their people should address himself to the task of considering
all the evidence that is now available on both sides.
Still on university education, there have been a few other items
of interest: L 6 Broin, The chief secretary (London 1969), which
includes a treatment of Birrell's universities bill of 1908; Donal
Kerr, 'Dr Quinn's school and the Catholic University 1850-67', in
J.E.R. ser 5, cviii (1967) 89-101; and Benvenuta Curtin, 'St. Mary's
University College', in University Rev. iii, no 4 (1963) 33-47.
R. D. Edwards, 'The beginnings of the Irish intermediate
education system 1878-83', in C. U. S. 1867-1967: a centenary
record (Dublin 1967), deals with another area of concern to the
church, and there have been survey accounts of the early educa
tional work of both Vincentians and Christian Brothers.11' D. K.
Akenson, The Irish education experiment: the national system of
education in the nineteenth century (London and Toronto 1970),
is strongest on the administrative and political aspects of the
national system. James Murphy, Church, state and schools in
Britain 1800-1970 (London 1971), which is concerned with the
religious issues in British primary education, relates the national
system in Ireland to British developments and deals with the
efforts in 1839 by Russell, an effort which proved a failure, to
introduce the national system into England. There have been other
useful contributions by Emmet Larkin and others to the history
of national education."2 EustAs 0 H6ideAin, National school
127 See R. P. Davis, 'Irish catholics and the Manitoba school crisis 1885-1921',
in Eire-Ireland viii, 3 (1973) 29-64, quoting E. R. Norman, The conscience of the
state in North America (Cambridge 1968).
128 J. A. Jackson, The Irish in Britain (London 1963); J. Hickey, Urban
catholics: urban Catholicism in England and Wales from 1829 to the present day
(London 1967); J. E. Handley, The navvy in Scotland (Cork 1970); T. Coleman,
The railway navvies: a history of the men who made the railways (London 1965).
129 Great Britain: England and Wales', in Corish, Ir. Catholicism, vi 1 (1968).
See also Handley, 'Scotland', in ibid.