Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • SPSS (Ok)

    Uploaded by

    Mirna Inna
    28 views8 pages
    This document contains statistical data and analysis on mothers' education levels, occupations, knowledge of breastfeeding, and infant breastfeeding practices. The key findings are: 1) Mothers with higher education levels were less likely to have poor breastfeeding practices compared to mothers with lower education. 2) Mothers working closer to home were more likely to have poor breastfeeding practices than mothers working farther away. 3) Mothers with less knowledge about breastfeeding were much more likely to have poor breastfeeding practices compared to mothers with more knowledge.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    SPSS (ok)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains statistical data and analysis on mothers' education levels, occupations, knowledge of breastfeeding, and infant breastfeeding practices. The key findings are: 1) Mothers with higher education levels were less likely to have poor breastfeeding practices compared to mothers with lower education. 2) Mothers working closer to home were more likely to have poor breastfeeding practices than mothers working farther away. 3) Mothers with less knowledge about breastfeeding were much more likely to have poor breastfeeding practices compared to mothers with more knowledge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    28 views8 pages

    SPSS (Ok)

    Uploaded by

    Mirna Inna
    This document contains statistical data and analysis on mothers' education levels, occupations, knowledge of breastfeeding, and infant breastfeeding practices. The key findings are: 1) Mothers with higher education levels were less likely to have poor breastfeeding practices compared to mothers with lower education. 2) Mothers working closer to home were more likely to have poor breastfeeding practices than mothers working farther away. 3) Mothers with less knowledge about breastfeeding were much more likely to have poor breastfeeding practices compared to mothers with more knowledge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 8

    Frequencies

    Statistics

    Pemberian ASI
    pendidikan ibu pekerjaan ibu pengetahuan ibu pada bayi

    N Valid 30 30 30 30

    Missing 0 0 0 0

    Percentiles 25 1.00 .00 .00 .00

    50 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00

    75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

    Frequency Table

    pendidikan ibu

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid rendah 9 30.0 30.0 30.0

    tinggi 21 70.0 70.0 100.0

    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    pekerjaan ibu

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid jauh 16 53.3 53.3 53.3

    dekat 14 46.7 46.7 100.0

    Total 30 100.0 100.0


    pengetahuan ibu

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid kurang 14 46.7 46.7 46.7

    baik 16 53.3 53.3 100.0

    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Pemberian ASI

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid kurang 8 26.7 26.7 26.7

    baik 22 73.3 73.3 100.0

    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    CROSSTABS
      /TABLES=pnd pkrj png BY pola
      /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
      /STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
      /CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED TOTAL

      /COUNT ROUND CELL.
    Crosstabs

    Case Processing Summary

    Cases

    Valid Missing Total

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    pendidikan ibu * pemberian


    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
    ASI pada bayi

    pekerjaan ibu * pemberian


    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
    ASI pada bayi

    pengetahuan ibu *
    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
    pemberian ASI pada bayi

    pendidikan ibu * pemberian ASI pada bayi

    Crosstab

    Pemberian ASI pada


    bayi

    kurang baik Total

    pendidikan ibu rendah Count 7 2 9

    Expected Count 2.4 6.6 9.0

    % of Total 23.3% 6.7% 30.0%

    tinggi Count 1 20 21

    Expected Count 5.6 15.4 21.0

    % of Total 3.3% 66.7% 70.0%

    Total Count 8 22 30

    Expected Count 8.0 22.0 30.0

    % of Total 26.7% 73.3% 100.0%


    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 17.175a 1 .000

    Continuity Correctionb 13.644 1 .000

    Likelihood Ratio 17.220 1 .000

    Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

    Linear-by-Linear Association 16.603 1 .000

    N of Valid Casesb 30

    a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.40.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for pendidikan


    70.000 5.465 896.592
    ibu (rendah / tinggi)

    For cohort pemberian ASI


    16.333 2.337 114.155
    pada bayi = kurang

    For cohort pemberian ASI


    .233 .068 .795
    pada bayi = baik

    N of Valid Cases 30
    pekerjaan ibu * pemberian ASI pada bayi

    Crosstab

    Pemberian ASI pada


    bayi

    kurang baik Total

    pekerjaan ibu jauh Count 1 15 16

    Expected Count 4.3 11.7 16.0

    % of Total 3.3% 50.0% 53.3%

    dekat Count 7 7 14

    Expected Count 3.7 10.3 14.0

    % of Total 23.3% 23.3% 46.7%

    Total Count 8 22 30

    Expected Count 8.0 22.0 30.0

    % of Total 26.7% 73.3% 100.0%


    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 7.308a 1 .007

    Continuity Correctionb 5.242 1 .022

    Likelihood Ratio 7.905 1 .005

    Fisher's Exact Test .012 .010

    Linear-by-Linear Association 7.065 1 .008

    N of Valid Casesb 30

    a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.73.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for pekerjaan ibu


    .067 .007 .651
    (jauh / dekat)

    For cohort pemberian ASI


    .125 .017 .895
    pada bayi = kurang

    For cohort pemberian ASI


    1.875 1.094 3.214
    pada bayi = baik

    N of Valid Cases 30

    pengetahuan ibu * pemberian ASI pada bayi

    Crosstab

    pemberian ASI pada Total


    bayi
    kurang baik

    pengetahuan ibu kurang Count 8 6 14

    Expected Count 3.7 10.3 14.0

    % of Total 26.7% 20.0% 46.7%

    baik Count 0 16 16

    Expected Count 4.3 11.7 16.0

    % of Total .0% 53.3% 53.3%

    Total Count 8 22 30

    Expected Count 8.0 22.0 30.0

    % of Total 26.7% 73.3% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 12.468a 1 .000

    Continuity Correctionb 9.717 1 .002

    Likelihood Ratio 15.673 1 .000

    Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001

    Linear-by-Linear Association 12.052 1 .001

    N of Valid Casesb 30

    a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.73.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    For cohort pemberian ASI


    .429 .234 .785
    pada bayi = baik

    N of Valid Cases 30

    You might also like