Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes 5
Notes 5
VERSUS
Kathiawar Co-Operative
Housing Society and another ….………………………..… Respondents.
6. That the contents of paragraph # 6 of the petition are not denied being
false and baseless. It is clarified that the respondent 2’s approval to
the construction is available with the respondent # 1. The petitioner
lives on the other side of the road and not in close proximity of the
plot in question, hence apprehensions about right of easement are un-
called for.
11. That the contents of paragraph # 13 of the petition are denied being
false and baseless and it is submitted that respondent # 1 is raising
construction according to approved plan.
12. That the contents of paragraph ground # 1 of the petition are denied
being false and baseless.
13. That the contents of paragraph ground # 2 of the petition are not
regarding to the answering rspondent , hence no comments.
16. That the contents of paragraph ground # 6 of the petition are correct.
17. That the contents of paragraph ground # 7 are denied being false
and baseless and it is submitted that there is no violation in raising
construction.
18. That the contents of paragraph ground # 8,9 and 10 are denied
being false and baseless and it is submitted that there is no violation
in raising construction.
19. That the contents of paragraph ground # 11 of the petition are denied
being false and baseless.
20. That the contents of paragraph ground # 12 of the petition are formal
, hence no comments.
21. That the contents of paragraph ground # 13 of the petition are denied
being false and baseless.
22. That the prayer clause is denied as allegations raised in the petition
are vexatious and for wasting valuable time of this Honorable court .
Karachi Respondent # 1
Dated: 22-01-2003