You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/282276234

IsaMill medium competency and its effect on milling performance

Article  in  Minerals and Metallurgical Processing · May 2001


DOI: 10.1007/BF03402882

CITATIONS READS

24 1,341

4 authors, including:

Gregory Harbort
Geometallurgical Engineering Consultants (Geometecon)
50 PUBLICATIONS   340 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Flotation Trends View project

Geometallurgy View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Gregory Harbort on 06 January 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


IsaMill medium competency and its
effect on milling performance
M. Gao
Senior Metallurgist, MIM Process Technologies, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

M.F. Young and 0. Cronin


Mount Isa Mines Ltd., Mount Isa, Queensland, Australia

G. Harbort
MIM Process Technologies, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract
Traditional fine-grinding mills in mineral processing rely on the use of steel medium for particle size
reduction. The IsaMill (a horizontal stirred mill with a 3,000-L net chamber volume and a rated motorpower
of 1,120 kW) has successfully adopted a novel product-separator design, which has led to a major revision
of medium use infine grinding. The IsaMill separator has successfully operated with a wide variety of medium
types, such as silica sands, river gravel, smelter slag, run-of-mine ore fractions and steel shots, with sizes
ranging from 0.5 to I0 mm. Greatflexibility in the IsaMill operations has been achieved for processing feed
as coarse as 120 p to a product asfine as 5 p.This paper discusses the performance of two inert grinding
media in the IsaMills that are used at Mount Isa Mines Ltd. for the processing of galena- and sphalerite-
bearing ores to below I0 ,um. They are the copper reverheratory&rnace slag ICRFS) and the heavy-medium
plant rejects (HMPR).A methodology was also demonstratedfor comparing the medium pe~ormanceandfor
scaling up the IsaMills from a 1.5-L laboratory batch mill to a full-scale 3,000-L mill.
Key words: Comminution, Fine grinding, IsaMill

Introduction Mines lease that could be used as the medium for the IsaMill.
The IsaMill (a horizontal stirred mill) was developed by They are the copper reverberatory furnace slag (CRFS) and
Mount Isa Mines Ltd. for fine or ultrafine grinding processes the heavy-medium plant rejects (HMPR). After extensive
in the minerals industry. The mill has a 3,000-L net chamber trials in laboratories and in full-scale plant operations, these
volume and is driven by a 1,120-kW motor. It is now operating local waste materials were successfully used as the IsaMill
in a number of base-metal mines for economically reducing grinding medium for producing products that were 80%
the size of mineral particles to as fine as 80% passing 7 pm passing 10 or finer.
(P80 sizing) (Enderle et a]., 1997; Johnson et al., 1998). This paperreports on the evaluation process for theIsaMill's
One of the major issues for fine grinding with stirred mills medium performance. A methodology for scale-up is also
is the medium selection. The traditional medium, such as introduced using the data from a 1.5-L laboratory mill and a
silica-alumina-zirconia (SAZ) beads, for stirred mills costs full-size IsaMill in the zinc regrinding circuit of the leadlzinc
more than US$25/kg. A load of the SAZ medium alone for an concentrator at Mount Isa Mines Ltd., Australia.
IsaMill costs more than US$125,000. For high-value powders
in the pigment or cosmetic industries, such a cost may be Experimental
justified by the high return from the product values. But, for Test material. The material for verifying the medium compe-
the minerals industry, the unit value of the end product is low. tence was the zinc rougher concentrate. The assays of the
Thus, alternative low-cost media must be material are listed in Table 1. Its particle size
sought, preferably local and dispensable. Table 1 - A of the ~ ~ s a ~ distribution
~ measured
~ ~ by aMalvern Laser Sizer
At an earlier stage of the IsaMill develop- zinc rougher concentrate. is given in Fig. 1. The size distribution has an
ment, glass beads (US$4/kg) and river sands 80% passing size of 46 pm.
(US$O.l/kg) were tested. Their performance l3ement Assay, %
was satisfactory as the IsaMill medium, but Medium preparation. The copper reverbera-
Pb 4.77
the glass beads were still expensive for pro- tory furnace slag (CRFS) and the heavy-me-
cessing low-value minerals, and the river sand Zn 16.3
dium plant reject (HMPR) werecollected from
had a disadvantage of not being available Fe 19.5
the site of Mount Isa Mines to test as IsaMill
locally. S 21.5 grinding medium. Two size fractions for each
Further study discovered that there were SiO, 15.5 material were produced in a laboratory for the
two waste materials found on the Mount Isa . test work, i.e., -1.7 +0.4 mmand-0.8 +0.3 mm.

Preprint number 00-034, presented at the SME Annual Meeting, February 28-March 1,2000, Salt Lake City, Utah. Revised
manuscript accepted for publication December 2000. Discussion of this peer-reviewed and approved manuscript is invited
and must be submitted to SME Publications Dept. prior to Nov. 30, 2001 Copyright 2001, Society for Mining, Metallurgy,
and Exploration, Inc.

MINERALS & METALLURGICAL PROCESSING 117 VOL. 18, NO. 2 MAY 2001
-.-- - ~ -

j I
0.45 - I
+CRFS
0.40 --
!
Ij : -0- HMPR
I
0.35 -1 - -
f
8

-1
0.30 -1
-
0
0.25 -. 1
f

10 15 20 25 30 35

500 Grinding time, min

Figure 5 - Net mill power draw of CRFS and HMPR


media (-0.85 +0.3-mm media size).
r0
.-c, loo
70

5a so
40
30
>
p 20
al
5
c 10
s 7

Figure 4 - CRFS and HMPR media performance.

tests, as is seen in Fig. 5. On average, the CRFS medium drew P80, pm


about 0.33 kW and the HMPR about 0.1 1 kW. The medium
Figure 6 -CRFS and HMPR media energy performance
ability to draw different power during the milling process (-1.7 +0.4-mm media size).
showed a significant effect on the energy consumption as well
as the milling capacity.
Figure 6 shows the energy required by CRFS and HMPR
media at different product P80 sizing. The lighter HMPR
seemed to consume less energy than the heavier CRFS for a
P80 sizing coarser than 5 pm.The difference increases when
the product size becomes coarser.
On the other hand, as is shown in Fig. 7, the CRFS required
less grinding time than the HMPR for a given P80 size. The
grinding time during a batch test is proportional to the mill
capacity for a full-scale production unit. Thus, the results in
Fig. 7 indicate that the CRFS medium, though less energy
efficient for a P80 sizing coarser than 5 p,is a better medium
of the two for achieving a high mill throughput. The differ-
ence, as can be seen in Fig. 7, is about two to three times for
a P80 below 10 pn.

IsaMill scale-up
Scale-up with the CRFS medium. The energy vs. P80 Figure 7 - CRFS and HMPR medium productivity (-1.7
relationships for the 3,000-L IsaMill and the 1.5-L Netzsch +0.4-mm media size).
laboratory mill using the CRFS as medium are shown in Fig.
8. A major feature of the diagram is that the energy vs. P80 up to 20 L (Weit et al., 1986). The results in Fig. 8 further
relationships for the two mills were both on a straight line on demonstrated that the energy-P80 relationship holds up well,
a log-log scale. This line covered a P80 sizing range of 3 to 30 even for a stirred mill of 3,000 L.
p or an energy consumption range of 15 to more than 400
kWh/t. Scale-up with HMPR medium. A good correlation for the
The scalability based on the energy vs. P80 relationship for energy-P80 relationship between the 3,000-L IsaMill and the
different stirred mills has been reported before for mill sizes 1.5-L Netzsch mill was also confirmed by using the HMPR

MINERALS 8 METALLURGICAL PROCESSING 119 VOL. 18, NO. 2 MAY 2001


Figure 8 - IsaMill scale-up with CRFS medium. Figure 9 - IsaMill scale-up with HMPR medium.

medium as is shown in Fig. 9. The results for the IsaMill were 3,000-L IsaMill. Under similar conditions, e.g., feed
from the test work described in a report by Duffy (1996). size, medium size and medium type, the relationships
between the energy consumption and the product P80
Conclusions sizing of both mills followed a linear correlation on a
The competence of two inert IsaMill media, namely, log-log scale. This energy-P80 sizing relationship formed
copper reverberatory furnace slag (CRFS) and heavy- the basis for the scale-up of the IsaMills.
medium plant rejects (HMPR), were studied. It was
shown that, for both medium, specific gravity and Acknowledgment
medium size affect the IsaMill's efficiency. The results The authors wish to acknowledge the management of Mount
lor the medium specific gravity indicated that the lighter Isa Mines Ltd. for permission to publish this paper.
HMPR medium (specific gravity = 2.6) was more en-
ergy efficient than the heavier CRFS (specific gravity = References
3.7) but produced less finished product per unit of time Duffy, M., 1996, "Bead Mill Regrinding of Zinc Cyclone Underflow," MIM
Technical Report.
(less milling capacity). On the other hand, the study Enderle, U., Woodall, P., Duffy, M., and Johnson, N.W., 1997, "Stirred mill
with two medium fractions (- 1.7 +0.4 mm and -0.8 +0.3 technology for regrinding McArthur River and Mount Isa zincllead ores,"
mm) indicated that the finer medium (for both HMPR Proceedings of the XX IMPC, Aachen, Sept. 21-26, Vol. 2, pp. 71-78
Johnson, N.W., Gao, M., Young, M.F., andcronin. B., 1998. "Application ofthe
and CRFS) was more energy efficient for performing a ISAMILL (a horizontal stirred mill) to the lead-zinc concentrator (Mount Isa
similar size reduction duty. Mines Ltd.) and the mining cycle," Proceedings of the AuslMM Annual
A scale-up procedure for designing the world's largest Conference; The Mining Cycle, Mount Isa, April 19-23, pp. 291 -297.
Weit, H., Schwedes, J. and Stehr, N., 1986, "Comminution and transport
horizontal stirred mill, the IsaMill, was demonstrated behaviour of agitated ball mills," 6th European Symposium Comminution,
with data from a 1.5-L laboratory stirred mill and a Nurnberg, 16-18, April, pp. 709-724.

MAY 2001
View publication stats
. VOL. 18 NO. 2 MINERALS & METALLURGICAL PROCESSING

You might also like