You are on page 1of 4

Sensing Concept for Practical Performance-

Monitoring of Centrifugal Pumps


Bryan Bohn1, James Olson1, Bhushan Gopaluni2, Boris Stoeber1,3
Departments of Mechanical Engineering1, Chemical and Biological Engineering2, Electrical and Computer Engineering3
The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Abstract—A sensing concept for quantifying the performance


of centrifugal pumps is proposed herein. The system uniquely
combines three measurement approaches: thermodynamic
Pressure Sensor
efficiency monitoring, vibration monitoring, and dynamic fluid
pressure analysis. The instrumentation comprises five Temperature Sensor
conventional sensors; two pressure transducers, two temperature
sensors, and an accelerometer. Pressure and temperature Accelerometer
measurements are collected at the pump intake and discharge, and
vibration data is collected on the axial face of the pump volute.
This study discusses the theoretical basis of the proposed system
and puts forth a method intended to quantify thermal efficiency,
the extent of impeller wear, and the presence of cavitation,
vortexing, or flow recirculation. In practice, the proposed sensor
system could be employed as a static installation or a portable tool.
The sensing approach is suitable for a variety of pump p1 T1 a T2 p2
configurations, fluid compositions, and operating conditions.
Feature Generation
Keywords—centrifugal pump, performance monitoring, wear
detection, vibration monitoring Thermal Vibration Dynamic Pressure
I. INTRODUCTION Efficiency Spectral Content Spectral Content
Centrifugal pumps are universal in industrial processes. As
primary workhorses in bulk fluid-moving operations, they are Performance Feature Extraction
also a major contributor to electrical power consumption.
Studies have shown that centrifugal pumps account for between
25% and 60% of the total electrical motor energy consumed in Thermal Cavitation Flow
processing plants of various industries [1]. It has also been Efficiency Recirculation
demonstrated that 40% to 60% of pumps currently operating Impeller
across industries are performing inefficiently in their respective Wear Vortexing
Outputs
application [2]. The pervasiveness, economic impact, and
environmental effects of inefficient operation of centrifugal Fig. 1. Block diagram of the propsed performance-monitoring system
pumps have created a significant need for reliable, accurate
performance monitoring. II. BACKGROUND
‘Performance-monitoring’ can convey a variety of meanings
Commercial systems for monitoring the performance of with respect to centrifugal pumps. For the purposes of this
centrifugal pumps are not uncommon [3, 4, 5]. However, in research, ‘performance’ is comprised of three elements; a)
practice, these systems are not extensively used. The primary thermal efficiency, b) the extent of impeller wear, and c) the
barriers include procurement costs, associated technical labor, presence of cavitation, vortexing, or recirculating flow. Though
and difficulty in scaling the systems to suit extensive or diverse these phenomena can be discussed individually, in practice, they
pumping applications. Practical challenges in managing are intrinsically related (e.g. impeller wear can generate
proprietary software, analysis tools, and sensors compound the cavitation, which, in turn, affects thermal efficiency). Individual
issue further. These concerns underpin the pressing need for methods for characterizing these performance features have
more affordable, practical, and flexible systems for been extensively studied, both analytically and experimentally.
performance-monitoring of centrifugal pumps. It is the objective of this research to develop a unique method
This research is supported by the Energy Reduction in Mechanical Pulping that captures these performance elements with a single
(ERMP) program at The University of British Columbia. Supporting partners comprehensive, yet practical sensor system.
of the ERMP program are: Alberta Newsprint Company, AB Enzymes, Andritz,
BC Hydro, Canfor Pulp, Catalyst Paper, FPInnovations, Holmen, Meadow A diagram of the proposed system is shown in Fig. 1. The
Lake Pulp, Millar Western, NORPAC, NSERC, Westcan Engineering, and system combines three instrumentation concepts:
Winstone Pulp International. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to
funding from the Canada Research Chairs program.

XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X/XX/$XX.00 ©20XX IEEE

978-1-7281-1634-1/19/$31.00 ©2019 IEEE


Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Waterloo. Downloaded on May 30,2020 at 23:04:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
i) thermodynamic efficiency monitoring, ii) vibration efficiency determination method is straightforward. However,
monitoring, and iii) dynamic fluid pressure monitoring. in a typical industrial plant, where there may be hundreds of
pumps operating in ever-changing configurations, the challenge
i) Conventional thermal efficiency measurement utilizes of affordably determining flow rate presents significant barrier.
pressure, flow rate, and power measurements to determine
pumping efficiency as the ratio of output fluid power to input Thermal efficiency can also be determined by the deviation
power. This sensing approach is applied frequently in literature between the input power for the actual pump and that required
[6, 7, 8]. In industry however, obtaining reliable flow rate for an idealized, isentropic centrifugal pump [9].
measurements can be problematic, particularly in applications
with diverse pumps moving different media under varying = / (2)
conditions. A. Whillier describes a thermodynamic method for In an isentropic compression cycle of a fluid with average
efficiency determination that utilizes only pressure and specific volume ̅ from pressure to and mass flow rate ,
temperature measurements, eliminating the need for a flow where the pressure rise − = ∆ , the input power is
sensor [9]. The approach is experimentally demonstrated by
both A. Cattaert [10] and F. Papa et al. [11] in their respective = = ̅∆ = ∆ , (3)
studies. Whillier’s technique does not, however, provide an
explicit measure of impeller wear, flow conditions, or any other where is the average fluid density. Even in an ideal pump,
forms of mechanical pump degradation. As such, it is not there is a small temperature increase ∆ when the liquid is
independently sufficient for making broad determinations of compressed. If it can be suitably assumed that heat loss from
pumping performance. the pump to the atmosphere is negligible, total temperature rise
ii) Vibration monitoring with accelerometers has proven as between the pump intake and discharge ∆ is the sum of the
a useful method for observing fluid and mechanical phenomena expected temperature increase from ideal compression ∆ and
in centrifugal pumps, as demonstrated in research by Abdulaziz the additional thermal energy resulting from pumping
et al. [12] and Birajdar et al. [13]. The applications discussed do inefficiency ∆ ′. That is,
not, however, independently provide a suitably complete ∆ =∆ +∆ ′. (4)
measure of pump performance to meet the objectives of this
research. Using the specific heat at the constant discharge pressure ,
iii) Dynamic pressure monitoring utilizes pressure wasted power can be equated to the increase in enthalpy beyond
transducers to observe fluctuations within the working fluid and the ideal compression such that
allows the user to analyze the dynamic content of the resulting − = ∆ ′. (5)
signal. Though not widely used in performance-monitoring of
centrifugal pumps, it enables refined characterization of fluid Combining (2) through (5), the efficiency can be determined by
conditions, as shown by Yao et al. [14]. However, like the
previous methods, dynamic pressure monitoring is not = . (6)
( )/( )
independently capable of establishing pumping performance.
Equation (6) serves as the basic model for the proposed
It is proposed that by combining and correlating the monitoring system’s efficiency determination [9]. There are
thermodynamic method for efficiency determination, vibration again four measurands, however flow and electrical power
monitoring, and dynamic pressure measurement, a practical and measurements are no longer necessary. Instead, this method
comprehensive measure of centrifugal pumping performance utilizes temperature sensors at the pump intake and discharge.
can be achieved. This novel sensing arrangement has potential Practically speaking, the method measures waste heat, rather
to yield unique avenues for evaluating fluid and mechanical than total power. It can be considered as a direct measurement
parameters that impact the performance of centrifugal pumps. of inefficiency. A. Whillier discusses considerations for
III. OPERATING PRINCIPLE amending the model to for non-negligible heat transfer into the
environment [9].
A. Thermal Efficiency Measurement
B. Vibration Measurement
The thermal efficiency of a centrifugal pump is
conventionally determined as the ratio of output fluid work Vibration monitoring is the application of accelerometers for
to pump input power , the purpose of evaluating the characteristic vibrations that
propagate through the pump’s mechanical structure. These
= = = , (1) vibrations result from both mechanical and fluid phenomena.
This study focuses on fluid-borne phenomena that impact
where is the fluid density, is the acceleration of gravity, and efficient pump operation, so a vibration transducer is affixed on
H is the head added by the pump, which corresponds to the the pump volute, at the fluid discharge, closest to the fluid
pressure change across the pump Δ . is the volumetric flow phenomena of interest.
rate. Instrumenting a centrifugal pump to employ this efficiency Using a vibration signal to characterize the presence of
measurement approach requires four sensors; pressure sensors certain phenomena can range from trivial to complex, depending
at the pump intake and discharge to determine Δ , a flow rate on how the behavior manifests. For example, examination of
sensor to measure , and a wattmeter to determine the input the lower frequency content of a centrifugal pump in typical
power . For an individual centrifugal pump, applying this

Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Waterloo. Downloaded on May 30,2020 at 23:04:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
RF RF BPF
4 × RF
BPF

0.5 × RF 1.5 × RF 3 × RF

Fig. 4. Comparison of frequency spectra for the accelerometer (red) and intake
Fig. 2. Example of the frequency spectrum of an accelerometer measurement dynamic pressure (blue) measurements.
taken at the volute of a centrifugal pump operating under minimal fluid load.
The sample is collected at 5 kHz. The rotating frequency (RF) is 26 Hz and the The difference between the average pressures at the intake
blade-passing frequency (BPF) is 52 Hz – a factor of two. The spectrum also and discharge provide the Δ term for the efficiency calculation
identifies lower energy peaks at 0.5, 1.5, and 3 times the RF. These are likely in (6). It is observed that the intake pressure signal in Fig. 3
the result of a mechanical irregularity within the pump.
displays a dynamic character. Fig. 4 shows the intake pressure
data after conversion to the frequency domain using FFT. The
frequency content is overlaid with the normalized accelerometer
frequency spectrum from Fig. 2 for comparison.
The comparison demonstrates significant correlation
between the dynamic pressure content and the vibration
measurement, but with different magnitudes. This suggests that
dynamic pressure analysis could be used to supplement
vibration analysis for certain phenomena. The dynamic pressure
measurement also identifies a new energy peak at four times the
RF, which would not have been revealed by vibration
monitoring alone. The higher energy BPF peak in the pressure
Fig. 3. Time domain signals for pressure measurements at the pump discharge signal suggests that dynamic pressure analysis is well-suited for
(green) and intake (blue). The samples are collected at 5 kHz. identifying fluid-borne phenomena.
operation readily yields the rotating frequency (RF) and blade- IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
passing frequency (BPF) in the form of two prominent peaks in A sensing concept for practical performance monitoring of
the spectrum. An example for a 40-horsepower, two-bladed, centrifugal pumps is presented herein. The system comprises
open-impeller centrifugal pump operating at 1560 rpm is shown pressure and temperature sensors at the pump intake and
in Fig. 2. The normalized sample is assessed in the frequency discharge, and an accelerometer on the volute casing. Using this
domain using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm. sensor configuration, a novel, three-component approach to
More complex features, like the presence of cavitation or performance-monitoring can be applied. The approach employs
vortexing, can be extracted using a variety of analysis methods, a) a thermodynamic method for pump efficiency determination,
including machine learning algorithms like Support Vector which eliminates the practical challenges of utilizing flow
Machines (SVM) [15] and decision trees [16]. sensors b) an analysis of the vibratory emissions from the
pump’s structure, and c) an evaluation of the dynamic pressure
C. Dynamic Pressure Measurement behavior of the working fluid, which allows for improved
The proposed system utilizes pressure sensors for dual differentiation between fluid- and structure-borne vibration.
purposes. The static averages of the pressure measurements This approach is expected to enable a wide range of performance
supply the values necessary to implement the thermodynamic features to be analyzed with straightforward instrumentation.
method for efficiency determination discussed previously. The
dynamic content of those same pressure signals is utilized as a The required scope of feature generation and extraction
fluid-borne vibration measurement, much like a hydrophone. algorithms for identifying more complex elements of pump
This approach yields two significant benefits for performance performance will be evaluated and implemented. In addition,
monitoring: a) the ability to more clearly discriminate fluid the system parameters required for practical implementation of
phenomena from mechanically induced vibration phenomena the thermodynamic method for efficiency determination need to
and b) the means to compare fluid pressure fluctuations between be more thoroughly characterized.
the intake and discharge without additional instrumentation. An
example of intake and discharge pressure sensor waveforms is
shown in Fig. 3. To accurately capture the dynamic character of
the fluid pressures, the transducers must have a response time
faster than one half of the shortest period of dynamic pressure
interest.

Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Waterloo. Downloaded on May 30,2020 at 23:04:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
V. REFERENCES [16] N. Sakthivel, V. Sugumaran, and S. Babudevasenapati, “Vibration based
fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using decision tree,”
[1] T. Sahoo and A. Guharoy, “Energy cost savings with centrifugal pumps,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 2010, no. 37, 2010, pp. 4040-
World Pumps, vol. 2009, no. 510, 2009, pp. 35–37. 4049.
[2] M. Pemberton and J. Bachmann, “Pump systems performance impacts
multiple bottom lines,” Engineering and Mining Journal, Jacksonville,
vol. 211, iss. 3, 2010, pp. 56-59.
[3] Ono Sokki Co., Ltd., “VC 2200 Vibration Comparator Specification,”
Ono Sokki Co. Ltd., 2017. [Online]. Available:
https://www.onosokki.co.jp/English/hp_e/products/keisoku/s_v/vc2200.
html. [Accessed March 30, 2018].
[4] Thermancy, “Acuity Wireless Thermodynamic Pump Monitor,”
Thermancy, 2017. [Online]. Available:
http://www.thermancy.co.uk/products/products-fixed-wireless/.
[Accessed March 30, 2018].
[5] Robertson Technology, “Robertson P22 Portable Pump Monitor,”
Robertson Technology, 2017. [Online]. Available:
https://www.robertson.technology/p22-portable-pump-monitor.
[Accessed March 30, 2018].
[6] M.S. Al Tobi, G.Bevan, K.P. Ramachandran, P. Wallace, and D.
Harrison, “Experimental Set-Up for Investigation of Fault Diagnosis of a
Centrifugal Pump,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and
Technology International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics
Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, 2017, pp. 481-485.
[7] M. Šavar, H. Kozmar, and I. Sutlović, “Improving centrifugal pump
efficiency by impeller trimming,” Desalination, vol. 249, 2009, pp. 654-
659.
[8] T. Ahonen, J.T. Kortelainen, J.K. Tamminen, and J. Ahola, “Centrifugal
Pump Operation with Motor Phase Current Measurement,” Electrical
Power and Energy Systems, vol. 42, 2012, pp. 188-195.
[9] A. Whillier, “Pump Efficiency Determination in Chemical Plant from
Temperature Measurements,” I&EC Process Design and Development,
vol. 7, no. 2, 1968, pp. 194-196.
[10] A. E. Cattaert, “High Pressure Pump Efficiency Determination from
Temperature and Pressure Measurements,” 2007 IEEE Power
Engineering Society Conference and Exposition in Africa - PowerAfrica,
2007.
[11] F. Papa and D. Radulj, “Thermodynamic method used for pump
performance and efficiency testing program,” Environmental Science and
Engineering Magazine, March 2013, pp. 44-48.
[12] A. Abdulaziz and A. Kotb, “Detection of pump cavitation by vibration
signature,” Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2,
Australia, 2015, pp. 103-110.
[13] R. Birajdar, R. Patil, and K. Khanzode, “Vibration and noise in centrifugal
pumps – sources and methods,” 3rd International Conference on Integrity,
Reliability and Failure, Portugal, 2009, pp. 1-12.
[14] Zhifeng Yao, Fujun Wang, Lixia Qu, Ruofu Xiao, Chenglian He, and Min
Wang, “Experimental investigation of time-frequency characteristics of
pressure fluctuations in a double-suction centrifugal pump,” ASME,
Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 133, no. 101303, 2011, pp. 1-10.
[15] A. Panda, J. Rapur, and R. Tiwari, “Prediction of flow blockages and
impending cavitation in centrifugal pumps using Support Vector Machine
(SVM) algorithms based on vibration measurements,” Measurement, vol.
2018, no. 130, 2018, pp. 44-56.

Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Waterloo. Downloaded on May 30,2020 at 23:04:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like