Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
1. Overview
• A proposal might request:
– Approval for a project (internal)
– Money for a project (internal or external)
• Salary
• Equipment
• Employees
• Travel
– Time for a project (internal)
1. Overview 3
1. Overview
• What is the risk/reward tradeoff for writing a
proposal?
– Build on your existing strengths
– Expand your area of expertise
– How much time are you willing to invest?
– What is the risk of writing a poor proposal?
– Will you be able to deliver on your promises?
1. Overview 4
1. Overview
• Write for your specific audience (reviewers)
• Simpler is better
• Balance technical rigor with simplicity
• Some repetition is good (like in other technical
writing)
• Collaborate if possible
• Get preliminary reviews from colleagues
6
2. Proposal Structure and Writing Process
(4) Competence
• Are you capable of completing the proposal?
– Credentials
– Resources (time, equipment, space, personnel)
– Past performance
– Evaluation plan, including metrics
(5) Resources
• Be specific about your request
– Equipment, salary, travel, etc.
– Don’t pad the budget with excess charges, tasks,
travel, equipment, etc.
– Don’t use round numbers in your budget (in
general)
– Don’t mention money until the budget section
Proposal Outline
• Summary – this is like an extended abstract
• Introduction
– Discuss the problem/opportunity
– Background/literature review
– Summarize your proposal idea and organization
• Plan of work, including timeline
• Qualifications (may be a separate document)
• Budget (may be a separate document)
16
3. Proposal Killers
1. The research is trivial or is unlikely to produce new or useful
information.
2. The proposed research is based on a hypothesis that rests on
doubtful, unsound or insufficient evidence.
3. The problem is more complex than the author realizes.
4. The problem is local in significance, or otherwise fails to fall
clearly in the mainstream of the discipline.
5. The research is intellectually premature – only a pilot study.
5. Proposal Killers 17
3. Proposal Killers
6. The research as proposed is overly involved with too many
elements required to be investigated simultaneously.
7. The description of the research leaves the proposal
nebulous, diffuse, and without a clear aim.
8. The proposed methodology, including tests and procedures,
are unsuited to the objective. May be beyond the
competence of the investigator.
9. The overall design is not carefully thought out.
10. Statistical aspects are not given sufficient consideration.
11. Approach lacks imagination or originality.
12. Controls are either inadequately conceived or described.
5. Proposal Killers 18
3. Proposal Killers
13. Available equipment is unsuited to the research.
14. Investigator does not have experience or training for the
proposed research.
15. Investigator appears to be unfamiliar with pertinent
literature or methods, or both.
16. Investigator's previously published work in the field does not
inspire confidence.
17. Investigator relies too heavily, or insufficiently, on
experienced associates.
5. Proposal Killers 19
3. Proposal Killers
18. Investigator is spreading himself too thin.
19. Investigator needs more contact with colleagues in this or
related fields.
20. Requirements for equipment, personnel, or time are
unrealistic.
21. Other responsibilities prevent the investigator from devoting
sufficient time to this project.
22. Institutional setting is unfavorable.
23. Current research grants held are adequate in scope and
funding to cover the proposed research.
5. Proposal Killers 20
3. Proposal Killers
• No white space
• Typos
5. Proposal Killers 21
Acknowledgments
• Technical Communication, by Mike Markel (Chapter 15)
• Pocket Book of Technical Writing, by Leo Finkelstein
(Chapter 6)
• http://facstaff.gpc.edu/~ebrown/infobr3.htm
22
Letters, Memos, and Emails
1. Guidelines for Correspondence
2. Letters: most formal
3. Memos: less formal
4. Emails: least formal
Enclosure information
Information about other recipients
For inter-office
communication
Similar to letters
Less formal
Use headings to
organize material
Dan
Dan Simon
Attachments: Paper1.pdf,
Paper2.pdf, …