You are on page 1of 1

52nd US Rock Mechanics/ A new methodology for the wormhole initiation and propagation

Geomechanics Symposium
2018 Seattle, Washington, USA Alejandra Arbelaez-Londoño, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin Campus, aarbelal@unal.edu.co
Guillermo Arturo Alzate-Espinosa, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin Campus, gaalzate@unal.edu.co
ARMA 18 - 1206 José Gildardo Osorio, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin Campus, gosorio@unal.edu.co

Cold heavy oil production with sand is a primary recovery method widely used in the world as a profitable and easily technology. This single well technique produces massive sand due to high oil rates, generating foamy-oil
flow and wormholes formation as the governing mechanisms of the massive sand influx. The wormholes are channels of high-porosity and high-permeability, which are created during the early stage of aggressive sanding.
These channels are cavities or volumes in which there is no grain-to-grain contact, and are plenty of slurry. A new methodology is proposed to model the initiation and propagation of wormholes under critical production
conditions incorporating failure criteria, and porosity and permeability changes during massive sanding. The wormholes initiate due to mechanisms such as in-situ stresses, failure criteria, pressure gradient and erosion,
defining four zones around the well: liquefied zone, yielded zone, transition zone and intact zone, each one with different mechanical and petrophysical properties, which change during the oil and sand production. A single
well model that couples a fluid flow model and an elastoplastic geomechanical model is the tool to implement the wormhole methodology. The general characteristics of the coupled model are described and a flow chart is
proposed for the implementation of the methodology and the definition of the four different zones. A preliminary case is run to illustrate the wormhole formation and its effect on the well productivity with suitable results in
terms of increment in porosity and permeability, and a advance in the wormholes up to 0.5 ft.

CHOPS and wormhole formation Preliminary case

Fig. 1. Mechanisms of CHOPS (Dusseault, 2002) (Modified).

Results

Fig. 2. Wormhole formation. (Dusseault, 2002) Fig. 3. Zones around the wellbore during Fig. 5. Porosity and permeability evolution
(Modified). massive sand production (Arbeláez-Londoño et during simulation time.
al., 2014).

Coupled model Wormhole flow chart Concluding remarks


• 3D single well model that couples fluid flow and For each time step: The wormholes formation causes a significant
geomechanics - cylindrical coordinates. • Calculate displacements and pore pressure improvement in porosity and permeability, resulting in
• Three-phase fluid flow model (oil, gas and water) with initial conditions of saturation. drainage area increment and production increase. The
- Finite Difference Method. • Calculate pressure gradient. results of the preliminary study show that this
• Elastoplastic model - Finite Elements Method - • Calculate saturation changes for each phase methodology is a suitable strategy to model this
with a yield surface (Dracker-Prager surface) and due to pressure gradient. phenomenon. However, a sensitivity study is required to
a flow rule and a hardening / softening law. • Update saturation dependent properties as stablish the advance of the wormhole and its effect on
• Sand production model - sanding onset and sand relative permeability for each phase. well productivity. It must be considered in further study
production criterion. • Calculate pore pressure and deformation again the foamy-oil behavior and softening / hardening to
• Foamy oil model with two parameters: endpoint with the new reservoir properties and iterate to complete the complexity of this cold recovery technique.
entrained gas fraction and apparent bubble numerical precision.
point, and three elements: inflow performance • If deformation are large enough, the rock will
with three phases: dissolved gas, oil and yield, and the sand production will initiate. Acknowledgement
entrained gas, fluid characterization changing • Define four zones:
the PVT properties, and relative permeability • Yield zone: 𝜀 𝑝 > 0. The authors would like to thanks to COLCIENCIAS and
𝑝
curves. • Intact zone: 𝜀 = 0. Ecopetrol S.A. for financing this project. Also to the
• Wormhole model: conceptual model. • Sanding front: 𝜀 𝑝𝑠 . Fig. 4. The change of porosity and plastic shear Applied Geomechanics Research Group (GIGA) of the
• Wormhole zone: 𝜙 ≥ 0,52. parameter with the radius and wormhole Universidad Nacional de Colombia – Medellin Campus.
formation map.

You might also like