Sign Up Sign In

ISKCON Desire Tree

!

Blog

All Posts

Like 31

Scienti'cally proving
that Darwin's theory of
VVO
OLLU
UNNTTEEEER
R

evolution is wrong-
Evolutionary Fraud from
Piltdown, England(Part 2)
Posted by Gourab Saha on November 23, 2012 at 2:30pm

Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove

Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong.

The body and soul of Charles Darwin's Theory of

Evolution was his idea that evolution was made
possible through natural selection. This concept is
based on the suggestion that those members of a
species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a
little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with
these superior adaptations. Darwin's theory suggests
that millions of generations later the changes will
result in new species. These adaptations are called
links or intermediates between the old species and the
new.

The idea of natural selection sounds great when

considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the
quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the
predator on a more consistent basis. However, other
examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many
laughable flaws. One of the best examples of
evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird
began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not
answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not
make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The
first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to
fly. Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are
useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary
theory of natural selection, which states that birds
adapt and change in order to survive better in their
environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed
at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the
bird continue for millions of generations to improve a
wing stub that is useless? The Theory of Evolution is
based on natural selection of the most adaptable
member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a
useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the
opposite of natural selection. According to natural
selection, the members of the bird species with the
smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable
and most likely to survive in the largest numbers.
According to the theory of natural selection birds could
never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This
is so funny.

We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of

carrying around a worthless half-size wing, so they
grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings
became arms and a new species was developed.
Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense.

The theory of "natural selection" is the basis and

foundation for the Theory of Evolution. The existence
of birds literally destroys the theory of natural
selection, sending the Theory of Evolution crashing
like Tweety Bird below. The rest of this page stomps
and grinds into dust the failed Theory of Evolution.

Help! I can't fly. My head is too big, and my

wings are too small.

Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less

weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-
term plan to the millions of generations in order to
keep the lighter bone plan progressing? The idea that
birds or anything else has million-generation
evolutionary plans is childish. The evolutionary
concept of growing a wing over millions of generations
violates the very foundation of evolution, natural
selection.

Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of

natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be
found in all species in one way or another. Take fish
for example. We are told by evolutionists that a fish
wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a
land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish
wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't
breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things
at times. Whales keep swimming up onto the beach
where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to
expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs?
That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish
story. The gills of the fish are made for extracting
oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps
before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why
would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and
choking continues for millions of generation until the
fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so
he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of
drowning in the water. One day he simply stays out on
the land and never goes back into the water. Now he
is a lizard. If you believe this evolutionary nonsense,
you need psychiatric help.

Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene

during the Triassic period. The fossil record (petrified
bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National
Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or
transitional species. Where are the millions of years of
fossils showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs?
They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did not
evolve.

Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant

Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending
upright eating from the treetops. They claimed natural
selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long
neck. This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder
that other species could not reach. One day during the
assembly of a skeleton for a museum display
someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that
the neck could not be lifted higher than stretched
horizontally in front of them. The natural selection
theory was proven to be a big lie. The Cetiosaurus
dinosaur was an undergrowth eater. The long neck
actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in
his environment, just the opposite from the natural
Theory of Natural Selection. Evolutionists will now
claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had
the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side
of the river. This is typical of the stupid logic of an
evolutionist.

Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species Without a

Link Proves Evolution is Wrong.

The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many

individual species proves evolution. This shallow
statement is devoid of reason, logic, and scientific
proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar-looking
species and claim they evolved one from another. The
human "family tree" is an example of this flawed
theory. Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds
of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists
line up the most promising choices to present a
gradual progression from monkey to modern man.
They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe
creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be
done with humans only because there are many
extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this
with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. The pictures
are placed in all of the textbooks that evolutionists use
to teach kids this nonsense. The pictures are simply a
grouping of individual species that does not prove
evolution.

Close to the Missing Link -- Oldest Human

Ancestor Discovered.

Why do they claim the above discovery is "close to the

mission link." The answer is simple. Look at the
picture. It is a monkey. A monkey species that has
become extinct. Lot of species have become extinct.
Thousands of species have become extinct. It is
obviously not similar to a human. Look at the feet with
the big toe spread away from the smaller toes exactly
like a modern chimpanzee, not like people. A newly
discovered extinct species does not prove a "missing
link" has been found. Don't let them brainwash you
with this nonsense.

Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional

links between species would have to be found in order
to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these
transitional links have never been found. We only find
individual species. Evolutionists try to form these
individual species into a link according to similar major
features such as wings or four legs, but this simply
proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud. Darwin
was hopeful that future fossils would prove his theory
correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has
proven his theory to be wrong.

The presence of individual species actually proves

they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If
evolution were true, all plants, animals, and insects
would be in a continual state of change. No two
creatures would be identical, because they would not
be separate species. All life forms would be a
continual blend of characteristics without a clear
definition among the species. Everything would be
changing, and every animal, insect, and plant would
be different. The cheetah above proves evolution does
not exist. All species are locked solidly within their
DNA code.

Evolutionists are
going ape over
"Ape-Girl."

The fossilized
bones of a new
animal have been
found in Ethiopia
near the site where
"Lucy" was
discovered many
years ago. By the
way, Lucy was a
monkey, not an
early humanoid. The number of bones of the Ape-girl
skeleton are unique because Lucy had only a few
head fragments. This find gives us a lot of information
about the animal because major parts of the skeleton
were unearthed (assuming these are all from the
same animal). It has teeth in the jaw and is said to
also have unerupted teeth still within the jaw. The
evolutionists call the animal a "human-like" female
child about three years of age and an "individual." This
is not a "human-like" fossil. It is an "ape-like" fossil
because it was an ape. Duh!

The evolutionists call the animal a "transitional

species" and a human ancestor even though it has a
head exactly like a modern-day ape. The jaw is thrust
forward and the forehead pushed back and slanted.
The true appearance is more easily seen from side
picture below.

Ape-girl also has arms "that dangled down to just

above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder
blades which suggest it could have been skilled at
swinging through trees." It looks like an ape. It has a
head like an ape. It has arms like an ape. It has
shoulder blades like an ape. It is obviously an ape, not
a human, pre-human or humanoid. Evolutionists
simply will not accept the obvious. This animal is
simply a young ape. Its size is as would be expected
for a young modern-day ape.

Scientists call these ape-like features "evolutionary

baggage." In other words, these scientists are
discrediting their own evolutionary theory of "natural
selection." They are calling the ape-like features
unnecessary "baggage." The theory of natural
selection is not supposed to have unnecessary
baggage, remember?

The age of this fossilized animal is also very much in

doubt. Scientists many years ago claimed a tooth
found was Nebraska Man, a pre-human fossil millions
of years old. They determined the age of the tooth.
The scientists had sculptured an entire ape-like
skeleton from information they found in one tooth.
These lies were exposed when real scientists found
the tooth to be from a modern-day pig.

'Lucy's baby' found in Ethiopia - BBC News -

September 21, 2006.

"The 3.3-million-year-old fossilised remains of a

human-like child have been unearthed in Ethiopia's
Dikika region. The find consists of the whole skull, the
entire torso, and important parts of the upper and
lower limbs. CT scans reveal unerupted teeth still in
the jaw, a detail that makes scientists think the
individual may have been about three years old when
she died."

"Remarkably, some quite delicate bones not normally

preserved in the fossilisation process are also present,
such as the hyoid, or tongue, bone. The hyoid bone
reflects how the voice box is built and perhaps what
sounds a species can produce. Judging by how well it
was preserved, the skeleton may have come from a
body that was quickly buried by sediment in a flood,
the researchers said. "In my opinion, afarensis is a
very good transitional species for what was before four
million years ago and what came after three million
years," Dr Alemseged told BBC science
correspondent Pallab Ghosh. "In my opinion, afarensis
is a very good transitional species for what was before
four million years ago and what came after three
million years," Dr Alemseged told BBC science
correspondent Pallab Ghosh. "[The species had] a
mixture of ape-like and human-like features. This puts
afarensis in a special position to play a pivotal role in
the story of what we are and where we come from.""

Climbing ability

"This early ancestor possessed primitive teeth and a

small brain but it stood upright and walked on two feet.
There is considerable argument about whether the
Dikika girl could also climb trees like an ape. This
climbing ability would require anatomical equipment
like long arms, and the "Lucy" species had arms that
dangled down to just above the knees. It also had
gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could
have been skilled at swinging through trees. But the
question is whether such features indicate climbing
ability or are just "evolutionary baggage"."

Evolution is in trouble. The growth of biological

knowledge is producing scientific facts that contradict
the evolutionary theory, not confirm it, a fact that
famous Prof. Steven Jay Gould of Harvard has
described as "the trade secret of paleontology." The
fossil record simply does not support the evolutionary
theory, which claims there once existed a series of
successive forms leading to the present-day organism.
The theory states that infinitesimal changes within
each generation evolve into a new species, but the
scientific fact remains. They don't. Fossils prove the
sudden emergence of a new species out of nowhere,
complete with characteristics unknown in any other
species. The fossil record has no intermediate or
transitional forms. This is popularly known as the
"missing link" problem, and it exists in all species. The
missing link problem is getting worse, not better, with
the discovery of more fossils. The missing links are
not being discovered, which proves they never
existed. Darwin assumed transitional forms would be
discovered in the fossil record over time, but that has
not been the case. The fossil record, or lack thereof, is
a major embarrassment to evolutionists. The fossil
record is a serious rebuke of the Theory of Evolution.
New species literally explode onto the scene out of
nowhere. New fossil discoveries continue to prove
evolution to be wrong.

Evolution: A Theory in Crisis by Michael Denton.

Michael Denton says,

"Despite the tremendous increase in geological

activity in every corner of the globe and despite the
discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown
forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not
been discovered and the fossil record is about as
discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the
Origin."

A reader of the Michael Denton's book says,

"Denton a Molecular Biologist removes all of the

supports (if there ever were any) from Darwin's
theory of macro-evolution (continuity of life). Denton
blasts all of the previous arguments made by the
pro-evolutionists showing that there is essentially no
support of macro-evolution in the fossil record. He
also, clearly demonstrates that there is no support
coming from his specialty molecular biology. In the
end the only sound explanation he can make is that
life is profoundly discontinuous."

Harvard Professor Gould claims that evolution occurs

in spurts, not gradually. This theory attempts to explain
the lack of continuity in the fossil record. However, this
theory is more troublesome than the gradual change
theory. Large jumps or spurts in the fossil record don't
prove evolution at all. In fact, they disprove evolution.
The theory that evolution can occur in spurts, because
the fossil record shows it did not occur gradually, is a
wild stretch of the imagination. Species have some
characteristics similar to other species, but similarity
doesn't prove any evolutionary link whatsoever. There
are more than missing links in biology. There are
entire missing chains in 100% of the branches of the
false evolutionary tree.

Many species are dependant upon another species for

their coexistence. Hummingbirds and flowers are a
good example. The flower would not be pollinated and
would become extinct without the bird. They are said
to have coevolved together. That is a stretch of the
imagination without any basis in science. There are
hundreds of these examples that cannot be explained
by evolutionists.

Charles Darwin had

concern about his
theory of natural
selection. He knew
that a failure to find
the missing
transitional links would seriously cripple his theory of
evolution, but he was hopeful the missing links would
be found some day. Well, guess what. He died not
finding them. Evolutionists have never found the
missing links. Each time they announce finding one it
is later proven to be false. The Coelacanth fish was
touted to be a transitional form with half-formed legs
and primitive lungs, ready to transition onto land. This
myth was exploded in December, 1938 when a live
Coelacanth was caught in a fisherman's net off the
eastern coast of South Africa. It is now known that the
natives of the Comoro Islands had been catching and
eating the fish for years. It did not have half-formed
legs or primitive lungs. It was simply a regular fish that
people thought was extinct. Click the picture to see an
enlargement. Evolutionist claimed the 350 million-
year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals with legs,
feet, and lungs. That was a lie. We now see that the
fish recently caught is exactly like the 350 million-year-
old fossil. It did not evolve at all. The Coelacanth is a
star witness against the false theory of evolution. After
350 million years the fish still doesn't have a leg to
stand on.

Fisherman catches 'living fossil' - BBC News -

August 1, 2007.

"The 1.3m-long (4.3ft), 50kg (110lb) coelacanth is

only the second ever to have been captured in Asia
and has been described as a "significant find". An
autopsy and genetic tests are now being carried out
to determine more about the specimen. Coelacanths
provide researchers with a window into the past;
their fossil record dates back 350 million years."

The Archaeopteryx
fossil was herald by
evolutionists as a
significant
transitional missing
link. The fossil was
discovered in a
limestone quarry in
southern Germany
in 1861 and has
been debated ever
since. The dinosaur
creature appears to be a reptile with bird
characteristics of wings and feathers. It had the
skeleton of a small dinosaur with a tail, fingers with
claws on the leading edge of the wing, and teeth in the
jaws.

The owners of the property discovered six fossils of

which only two had feathers. This inconsistency smells
of fraud from the beginning. Upon close examination
the feathers appear to be identical to modern chicken
feathers. Click the picture to see an enlargement.

The Archaeopteryx fossils with feathers have now

been declared forgeries by scientists. "Allegedly, thin
layers of cement were spread on two fossils of a
chicken-size dinosaur, called Compsognathus. Bird
feathers were then imprinted into the wet cement"
according to Dr. Walt Brown's book, In the Beginning:
Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood,
page148.

This is simply another forgery by evolutionists in a

desperate attempt to prove Darwin's Theory of
Evolution. Evolutionists can lie and commit fraud
without blinking an eye. This example would not have
proven evolution even if the feathers had not been
forgeries. Finding a few species with characteristics
similar to two other species does not prove a link.
There should be millions or billions of transitional links
if evolution were true, not simply a few.

Evolutionists keep getting hit in the face with scientific

truth. Therefore, they spend most of their time
developing complex lies and molding them into
complex theories. They modify fossil evidence in an
attempt to support their false theories. Cheat, cheat,
cheat. Lie, lie, lie.

The Platypus
(Ornithorhynchus
anatinus), with its
duck bill and
webbed feet, is a
unique Australian
animal. It and the
two species of echidna are the only monotremes or
egg-laying mammals to be found on earth. The
marsupials (mammals with pouches, e.g. kangaroos)
and eutherians (placental mammals that give birth to
well-developed young, e.g. humans) both give birth to
live young. The monotremes have lower body
temperatures than other mammals and have legs
which extend out, then vertically below them. These
features, together with their egg-laying ability, are
more like that of a lizard than a mammal. Platypus are
readily identified by their streamlined body, webbed
feet, broad tail, and characteristic muzzle or bill which
is soft and pliable. The Platypus males have spurs on
their hind feet that deliver a poisonous venom like a
snake. A Platypus sting is powerful enough to make
people sick and kill a dog. Click the picture to see an
enlargement.

The Platypus of Australia has characteristics of many

species but certainly is not the missing link to all of
them. In fact, it is not a link to any of them. The
Platypus has made a joke and a mockery of Charles
Darwin's theory of evolution and his unproven theory
of natural selection.

April 6. 2006 -
Tiktaalik is the
latest fossil gap
evolutionary
fraud.

Scientists fraudulently claim a newly-discovered fish is

the second bridge fossil gap between sea and land
creatures. The scientists have apparently forgotten
that the first fossil gap, Archaeopteryx, shown above
was also a fraud. Tiktaalik therefore becomes fossil
gap fraud number 2. Click the picture to see an
enlargement.

"Called "Tiktaalik" by scientists, the fish lived in

shallow, swampy waters. Most remarkably, the
creature, which was less than 3 feet long, had the
body of a fish but the jaws, ribs, and limb-like fins seen
in the earliest land mammals." The claim that the
stubby little fossil fins are "limb-like" is a real hoot. The
fish doesn't even have fins as large as expected for its
size. The scientists are claiming the fish walked
around on the ground out of water and breathed air.
This is pure make-believe speculation. No evidence
exists that the fish is anything more than just another
species.

The excitement about the Tiktaalik fossil is puzzling.

Modern-day seals have fins and waddle around on the
ground. Modern-day catfish have fins and walk around
on the ground. Catfish can live out of water for a long
time. Tiktaalik does not provide any support for
evolution.

Test: If you believe the nonsense that Tiktaalik is a

fossil gap species, you are brainwashed.

Evolutionists are now

claiming that a dolphin
captured with two little extra
fins near the tail is proof that
dolphins evolved from four-
footed animals related to the
dog. Click the picture to see
an enlargement.

Dolphin with four-wheel

drive stuns the scientists -
November 5, 2006.

"Experts believe that the dolphin's ancestor was a

dog-like creature which roamed the earth many
millions of years ago. And now the extraordinary
discovery of a bottlenosed dolphin with an extra set of
flippers has provided living proof of the theory. At first
glance it looks like any other of its kind. But closer
inspection reveals a rogue set of rear fins. Each the
size of a human hand, the fins are thought to be the
remains of a pair of hind legs, adding to evidence that
dolphins once walked on all fours."

This is nonsense, folks. First, evolutionists tell us that

land animals evolved from sea creatures. Now they
are trying a new approach, claiming sea creatures
evolved from land animals. Dog are still dogs, but they
claim that some of the dogs long ago evolved into
dolphins. These "scientists" claim the dolphin evolved
from the dog while the rest of the dogs didn't evolved
into anything. They simply remained dogs.

These "scientists" are not scientists. No scientific

evidence exists for these evolutionary theories. This
article is an attempt to brainwash the naive. Don't be
fooled by these claims. Evolutionists typically use
words like "may have evolved" or ""probably evolved"
because they lack scientific proof. The truth is obvious
here.

God created many species of dolphins. This is

simply one species that is very rare.

The Fossil Record is Clear

Click the image to Click the image to

see full scale. see 1/10 scale.

One Day in the Past The Next Day

There Were T-REX
Trilobites

Scientific Fact No. 3 - Missing Inferior

Evolutionary Branches.

The Theory of Evolution states that minute

improvements in an individual within a species
increases the likelihood of survival of the offspring.
These small steps of improvement continue for
countless years until the individuals are changed to
such a large extent that a new species has appeared.
This progression is an uninterrupted branch of the
"evolutionary tree." These lines of progression can be
seen in any biology text book for many species,
including mankind. They almost look believable, but
they are a lie.

The siblings of an individual on the uninterrupted

branch may fail to develop the minute improvement
and may even suffer from an inferior evolutionary
change. Each of these individuals represents a new
branch on the tree that is moving away from the
uninterrupted branch. Let us say we have 100,000
coexisting individuals in a species such as a horse.
Only a few of these individuals will begin new
branches that will eventually become a new species
such as a Zebra. The other 99,999 individuals may
each begin a neutral or inferior branch that may
continue for millions of years but will eventually stop,
because the last individual on the branch fails to
produce an offspring. The odds that the branch will
stop producing offspring is increased when the minute
evolutionary changes are inferior. The theory of
survival of the fittest or natural selection also works in
reverse to produce death to the branch where the
changes are inferior. The branch stops. This part of
the tree is dead.