Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ans to Q1
Introduction
Free consent is a crucial requirement for the formation of a valid contract. It implies
that the parties involved in the agreement must give their consent willingly, without
any form of coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence, or mistake. Free
consent ensures that the agreement is entered into voluntarily and without any unfair
advantage or deception.
Here are the instances under which free consent in an agreement can be affected:
4 Undue Influence: Undue influence occurs when one party takes advantage of
a position of power or trust to influence the decision-making of the other party.
The dominant party manipulates the weaker party's judgment, impairing their
free will. For instance, if an employer uses their authority to unduly influence
an employee to enter into a contract that is unfavourable to the employee, the
employee's consent is affected by undue influence.
In all these instances, the affected party's consent is not considered free and
voluntary, and therefore, the contract may be voidable or unenforceable. Free
consent ensures fairness, integrity, and the voluntary nature of contractual
agreements, protecting the rights and interests of all parties involved.
Conclusion:
It is crucial for parties to be aware of their rights and the instances under which free
consent can be compromised. By understanding the concept of free consent and
being vigilant in recognizing potential issues such as coercion, fraud,
misrepresentation, undue influence, or mistake, individuals and businesses can
protect themselves from entering into unfair or disadvantageous contracts.
Seeking legal advice, conducting due diligence, and ensuring transparent and
honest communication during the negotiation and formation of contracts can help
mitigate the risks associated with compromised free consent. By upholding the
principle of free consent, parties can maintain the integrity of contractual agreements
and promote fairness and justice in business transactions.
Ans to Q2
Please highlight two (2) instances where the courts in India have intervened to
protect environment or prevent degradation/pollution of environment. Kindly note that
the instances should be real life cases.
Introduction
Here are two real-life instances where courts in India intervened to protect the
environment and prevent degradation or pollution:
2 M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986) – Oleum Gas Leak Case: This case
involved a gas leak from the Shriram Food and Fertilizer Industries' plant in
Delhi, where oleum gas leaked, resulting in significant environmental and
health hazards. The Supreme Court took suo moto cognizance of the matter
and issued several orders to address the situation. The court ordered the
closure of the plant, directed the compensation to affected individuals, and
established the concept of "absolute liability" for hazardous industries. This
case laid the foundation for the principle that industries engaged in hazardous
activities must ensure strict adherence to safety measures and be held liable
for any harm caused to the environment and public health.
These instances demonstrate the proactive role of the Indian courts in safeguarding
the environment and holding polluting industries accountable for their actions. The
judiciary has played a vital role in shaping environmental jurisprudence in India and
promoting sustainable development by enforcing environmental laws and protecting
the rights of citizens to a clean and healthy environment.
Conclusion
These cases demonstrate that the judiciary in India recognizes the importance of
environmental protection and upholds the rights of citizens to a clean and healthy
environment. The courts have set important precedents by establishing principles
such as the "polluter pays" principle and the concept of "absolute liability" for
industries engaged in hazardous activities.
By taking suo moto cognizance of environmental matters and issuing orders to close
non-compliant industries, enforce environmental regulations, and provide
compensation to affected individuals, the courts have played a crucial role in
ensuring environmental justice and promoting sustainable development.
The interventions by the Indian courts have had a lasting impact on environmental
governance and have contributed to raising awareness about environmental issues.
They serve as a reminder that the protection of the environment is a collective
responsibility, and all stakeholders, including industries and individuals, must adhere
to environmental regulations and work towards sustainable practices.
Ans to Q3 - a)
Gaurav is a new joinee in an organization and he has certain queries with respect to
employee related laws. He has been directed to reach out to you with the queries.
Kindly advise him:
a. As the organization deducts Provident Fund from the salary, can you please
explain applicability of the schemes under Provident Fund and how is the calculation
and apportionment of the Provident Fund done against various schemes?
Introduction
The employee's contribution is deducted from their salary, while the employer also
contributes an equal amount. Out of the employer's contribution, a portion is
allocated to the EPF scheme, and the remaining portion is allocated to the
Employees' Pension Scheme (EPS). The EPF and EPS schemes are interlinked,
providing lump sum amounts and pensions to employees upon retirement,
resignation, or other eligible events.
The PF contributions made by both the employer and employee are deposited with
the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), which manages the PF funds
and maintains individual PF accounts for employees. Employees should familiarize
themselves with the withdrawal and transfer procedures, nomination facility, and
other rules and regulations as per the EPF Act and EPFO guidelines.
It's important to note that the EPF and EPS schemes are interlinked. The EPF
scheme provides a lump sum amount at retirement, resignation, or other eligible
events, while the EPS scheme provides a pension to the employee after attaining a
certain age or in the event of disability or death.
The PF contributions made by the employer and employee are deposited with the
Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), a statutory body that manages the
PF funds. The EPFO maintains individual PF accounts for employees, which reflect
the contributions made and the accumulated balance.
It's important for Gaurav to review the specific policies and practices of his
organization regarding PF, as some organizations may offer additional benefits or
have their own internal policies related to PF management. Gaurav can seek
clarification from the HR department or consult the EPF Act and relevant guidelines
for more detailed information.
Conclusion
Overall, the PF scheme ensures that employees have a dedicated fund for their
future financial security and retirement, and it is important for employees to
understand their rights and obligations related to PF contributions.
Ans to Q3 - b)
b. Who is entitled for Gratuity and how is the pay-out of gratuity calculated?
Introduction
Employers are responsible for managing gratuity funds and making the payout to
eligible employees within 30 days of it becoming payable. Employees should review
their employment contracts, company policies, and relevant laws to understand their
specific gratuity entitlement and calculation. Consulting with the HR department or
seeking professional advice can provide accurate and detailed information tailored to
their individual circumstances.
Entitlement for Gratuity: Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity is
applicable to employees in establishments that have ten or more employees. Both
private and government sector employees are eligible for gratuity. However, there
may be variations in the eligibility criteria based on the specific laws of the country or
the employment contract.
• Last Drawn Salary: This refers to the employee's basic salary plus dearness
allowance (if applicable) at the time of termination.
• Years of Service: The total number of completed years of service with the
employer. Any period less than a year is ignored, while a year or more is
considered a full year.
It's important to note that the maximum gratuity amount is currently capped at Rs. 20
lakh under the Payment of Gratuity Act. If the calculated gratuity amount exceeds
this cap, the pay-out will be limited to Rs. 20 lakh.
Employers are responsible for managing the gratuity funds and making the pay-out
to eligible employees within 30 days from the date it becomes payable, as per the
law.
Employees should review their employment contract, company policies, and relevant
laws to understand the specific gratuity entitlement and calculation applicable to their
situation. Additionally, consulting with the HR department or seeking professional
advice can provide more accurate and detailed information based on the specific
circumstances.
Conclusion: