Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contoh Cross Linking - Thesis Hydrolize of Cellulose by Immob Cellulase
Contoh Cross Linking - Thesis Hydrolize of Cellulose by Immob Cellulase
by
A THESIS
IN
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty
of Texas Tech University in
Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for
the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Approved
Acc&TTted
August 1982
900
'7 -'M
,-i^
• ^'?5îi-,.-^
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
work.
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii
LIST OF TABLES vi
Production of Cellulase 12
Immobilization of Enzymes 14
Carri ers 16
A. S i l a n i z a t i ô n of Fe^O^ 22
iii
PAGE
2. Discussion 34
2. Discussion 54
2. Discussion 65
2. Discussion 69
Conclusions 73
LITERATURE CITED 74
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
VI
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
vn
PAGE
VI 1 1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
biomass in the U.S. exceeds one billion tons (1). In the South Plains
of Texas, there are 1.8 billion pounds of cotton-gin trash (CGT) pro-
free solutions.
recover the carrier to obtain the enzyme for reuse, thus overcoming
dustrial catalysts.
culty in the hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass arises from the fact that
causes problems because of its small surface area on which the enzymes
are to be bound and because of its slow movement which makes it diffi-
size. This task may be carried out through a carrier which can be
tem must be carried out by a method which does not deactivate any of
immobilized on the same carrier may operate with high efficiency be-
cause the components of the system are present a \/ery short distance
from each other. The intermediate products made by one component are
(3).
cellulases.
LITERATURE REVIEW
rials.
a(l-^4) linkage and cellulose has 3(1-^4) linkage (4). The number of glu-
OJ
co
O
OJ
u
:^
s_
-M
(/1
S-
03
OJ
s_
CT)
The cotton gin trash used in this research was harvested in Fall,
gin trash is shown in Table 1. The cotton burr trash which is a kind
showed that the lignin content had to be less than 1% for good utiliza-
tion (13).
Beck and Tuttle (14) reported that a caustic pretreatment increas-
due to the fact that the mesquite was swollen during the caustic treat-
more easily.
Walseth (15) showed that cellulase readily degraded the more ac-
Bract 41.5
Leaf 4.7
Petiole 1.6
Bark 3.3
Wood 1.1
Exo-mesocarp 1.8
Endocarp 3.8
Seedcoat 2.4
Cotyledon 0.3
Others 2.4
Weeds 33.7
to attack the less accessible, crystalline portion. Consequently, a
attack (17). Ghose and Kostick (18) found that excellent levels of
ball-milled to -200 mesh. Pew and Weyna (19) obtained essentially com-
plete cellulase digestion of milled spruce and aspen after milling com-
pared to less than 10% digestion for the initial 60-80 mesh sawdust.
140 min. of milling, aspen and sweetgum showed 80% digestibility and
red alder showed only 20% digestibility. Softwoods were even less re-
sponsive than red alder; five different softwoods showed a maximum di-
gestion of only 18% after 120 min. of vibratory milling. Thus, this
cellulase. Halliwell and Griffin (23) isolated the C-, component from
the cellulase system of Trichoderma koningii and found that the C-i
glucosidase (26).
n
another. The molecular weights of C-, and C components lie in the re-
G-75 (27). The smallest C yet found had mol. wt. of 5,300 (28). The
3-glucosidase of Fusarium solani has mol. wt. of 400,000 (29). C-, and
mass but the 3-glucosidase does not (32). A contact time of 15 minutes
of hydrolysis.
sible cellulosic regions that are readily reacted by the C-, and C
cally with other hydrolytic components, i.e. C-j and C components for
Production of Cellulase
Although many of these grow quite rapidly, only a few produce extracel-
sent in the medium but not when substrates such as glucose are the sole
QM9414 was isolated and produces four times the amount of cellulase as
has been presented by Wilke and Yang (35). This process has been formu-
lated on the basis of small-scale laboratory data for the key steps,
that the methods under development show at least some promise of econo-
rently in three mixer-filter stages with feed solids for enzyme recov-
min. contact time and a horizontal belt vacuum filter to separate the
trapped inside of collagen matrix so that it was hard for the enzymes
lase. They infer that the cellulose particle may be adsorbed on cellu-
lases which are bound on the surface of collagen matrix and hydrolyzed
celluloses may penetrate into the collagen fibril matrix and be hydro-
Immobilization of Enzymes
Nelson and Griffin in 1916 (37). These researchers reported the adsorp-
The work of the last several years has demonstrated that a wery
The most widely used technique for placing reactive organic groups
The amine groups on the carrier and the carboxyl groups on enzyme
was found that the efficiency of this solid-bound system of three en-
zymes was higher than that of the corresponding soluble system priot to
reaching steady-state.
carrier particles.
Carriers
Many carriers have been reported in the literature during the past
The morphology and size of the carrier are extremely important with re-
spect to surface area and pore parameters, both of which in turn will
pore titania (49), nickel oxide (50), hydroxyapatite (51), iron oxide
(52), cellulose (53), agarose (54), colloidon (55), starch (56), poly-
carriers, including iron, iron oxide, steels and ferrites are available
with properties which can be used to tailor materials for different re-
rials, precipitated iron oxide activated with amino silane reagent and
Closset et al. (65, 66) have analyzed and presented data for a
Enzyme and starch were contained in the membrane, which was permeable
to the produce, maltose, but not to the starch and enzyme. Venkatasub-
butor.
been carried out a step further by Gelf and Boudrant (68) who used a
MATERIALS
mesh, was purchased from Fisher S c i e n t i f i c Co., New Jersey. This chem-
Glutaraldehyde was purchased from Eastman Co., New York, and was
sulfonate was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., Missouri. This chem-
thesis.
Kodak, Co., New York and was 99.9% pure. This chemical will be abbre-
Toluene was purchased from MCB Co., Ohio and was A.C.S. reagent
grade.
19
20
Glycine was purchased from MCB Co., Ohio and was 99.5% pure.
still.
The origin and composition of cotton-gin trash (CGT) used for the
The raw CGT was hammer-milled first and then pebble-milled for longer
than 3 days. After this period of milling, the CGT was in a state of
fine powder. Many batches of the CGT powder were collected in a large
thesis except the experiment which was carried out to study the effec-
„ 4. -
c j • í^9 qlucosex A sample - A blank
Amount of reducing sugars( Igg •. ) = T ^ ^ x -,p,p,
100
standard ' blank
A. Silanization of FepO.
The black fine power of Fe^O., 25.0 g, was dried at 200 ± 10°C
and washed thoroughly with distiUed water. The silanized Fe^O. par-
was employed in this thesis for this determination. The 3.0117 s sil-
anized Fe^O. was mixed with 20.0 ml of 0.766 mM TNBS solution made
period of agitation, all the amino groups were assumed to react with
TNBS molecules which were present in excess amount. After the agita-
tion and reaction, some of the TNBS molecules were left unreacted.
glycine which has an amino group as a part of it. The agitated mix-
ture of silanized Fe^O^ and TNBS was centrifuged. Excess glycine was
oo
23
ro
+
C
o
X u
o o (T3
OJ
rn s_
c
o
T3
<V
M
c c
13
(/) (/)
c
o
03
OJ OJ
c
fT3
03
z t/1
X OJ
-C
o
x-^ O)
C\J
oô"
OJ
>. s.
o
Q.
O
c
03
I
-I- cn
X>
u X
«_) '^
OJ
c ^
cn o
n ^
24
TNBS. If we subtract this amount of TNBS from the amount of TNBS ori-
ginally used, we can find the amount of amino groups bound on Fe^O^
particles because amino groups react with TNBS molecules at 1:1 ratio.
cles.
was mixed with 50.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.0. The magnetic re-
shaped permanent magnets, 2.8 cm outer diameter. The magnets were placed
in a Ziploc sandwich bag (Dow Chemical Co., Indiana) and dipped into
the mix-ture. The silanized Fe^O. particles were attracted onto the
were still attached onto the magnets. The recovered silanized Fe^O^
5.10, by taking the magnets out of the sandwich bag. These procedures
to settle for several hours until all the particles settled down on
bottom of the beaker. The buffer was then decanted. The moist
25
particles were dried on a boiling water bath. The dried particles were
The 2.00 g silanized Fe^O^ was mixed with 20.0 ml of 2.5% glu-
tion with distilled water. The mixture was shaken for 1 hr. at room
Fe^O. was mixed with 50.0 ml of 0.1 M NaPi buffer, pH 6.0, and 0.5201
was carried out through shaking of the mixture for 1 hr. at room temp-
this thesis, the weight of the IMC will beassumed to be the same as
that of silanized Fe^O^ which has been used to prepare the IMC because
The 2.00 g IMC which had been prepared above served as a pool of
was taken from the IMC pool and washed by employing centrifugation
26
O)
o^4
(V
-o
03
s_
03
cn
o
W
^n o
ro
N O)
o U
N
03
OJ
m >í (/)
-C
O) OJ
-a ri
03
03
X
+->
o O)
.o^ <v
03
OJ
C
o
03
cr
A OJ
03
OJ
ro
0)
s-
O)
27
©
03
c
o
O)
00
03
r—"
3
r—
•
(U
t ^
-o
OJ >«)
u _c
OJ
OJ <4- -o
03 o r—
03
-t-> i_
OJ
^ 03
gj -)->
c/) c ;3
O) 03
N CJ ^U 1 —
CTí
03
-l-J - C
-.-' cn
CU .T3 3
U o
M- i -
"O O ^
OJ -t->
M
c
o O)
o H
O
•r—
-l->
r—
03 • r—
u
^
-y
.4-)
s_
QJ 03
1 —
^
í"
03
U OJ
•f— • r—
"" S-
Q
-C
J s-
03
CJ U
U
•^
O)
i_
3
\J
^ \ .
28
with 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10. The supernatant was discarded. The
IMC was washed again with 100 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.0 and then
0.5005 g IMC, 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. A blank was prepared
by mixing 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank
the IMC. This was the first hydrolysis run. The activity of IMC at
The'used IMC was recovered from the sample of the first run by
bag. The IMC was washed by swirling in 200.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer,
pH 5.10, while the IMC was attached on the sandwich bag by magnets.
The IMC was released from the bag into 125.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer,
pH 5.10, by removing the magnets from the inside of the bag. The IMC
was centrifuged and the supernatant was saved for preparation of a new
sample and blank for the second hydrolysis run. The preparation of the
new sample and blank followed the same procedure as the first run.
IMC activity.
29
OJ > í
C\J LO
> .(->
•^ •^
-M > o CD ro LO
03 •r- o <m
n— •+->
OJ OJ
CÍ:
u
<:
T3
>> ^^ s
-C
OJ OJ
oo
-o
o
CJ
> i
s_ -(-> 3
03 •1— r— S-
-»-> > CD J C
C\l CM
• r— LO CVJ
-(-> OJ C_J «^ <r)
cn CJ n— CM co
03
s: U3 cn c\j CM CSJ C\J
o 1—t
C7) C_) CT
O
s_
dJ
on
O 03
-o CU
OJ O
13 on
-C
O
CJ
(J
03
-(-> CSJ
co cn C\J LO o
-M
03 -o cr> o o o o
cn CsJ
(_J
•ão i
-
s_ :3.
O Q. —
>í cu
<u
oo
O
<U
u 03
(/1 oo
u CT
O
U
03
c^ LO
«
CD CNJ
ro CT>
<u CU CsJ CM CSJ Osl oo
C u
,3
o 3 -o
o o
c s-
OJ Q.
-l->
OJ on
C\J
00 OJ «r <0 o
U3
>> -— CNJ
Osl ,— oo I
O s- I
OJ S_ -C o «:3- LO 00 o
(U -o —' CVJ CvJ «:r
>í
03
00 S-
•r- OJ
OO -û
>, E -a XJ
+->
,— Z3 00 c s-
O C OJ ro «^ LO U3
s_
-o c
>. ^
-rr s_
30
100 -
90 -
80 -
70 -
>i
•M
60 -
CJ
<
<U
>
50 -
•^
03
(U 40
Csl
30 -
20 -
10
0
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
ture was adjusted to 3.6 by adding 6 M HCl. The mixture was shaken for
the silanized ^eJd. during this shaking (Figure 6 ) . The IMC was cen-
trifuged and then washed thoroughly with distilled water. The IMC was
washed again with 200 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10, and centrifuged,
sample and blank. The sample was prepared by mixing the 0.5021 g IMC,
5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The blank was prepared by mixing
5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were shaken
The used IMC was recovered from the sample by using two rings of
permanent magnet which were placed in a Ziploc sandwich bag. The IMC
it was attached on the sandwich bag by the magnets. The IMC was then
released from the bag into 125.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10, by
removing the magnets from inside of the bag. The IMC was centrifuged
and the supernatant was saved for preparation of new samples and blank
for the 2nd run. The sample was prepared by mixing all of the recov-
ered IMC, and CGT, 5.00 g, and supernatant, 50.0 ml. A blank was
32
03
•f <U
s.
•o
<u
0=v 03
(U
00
03
3 cu
oo
00 03
^"
3
<U 1—
U
4- ^—
CU
"O
<u
•
u *r—
<4_ ^
o •I—
•r—
-(-> • o
+ cOJ Jo3
f^ í.
- C 03
U
u
03
•M - C
C^ 0=0 -M CJ)
03 Z3
<u o^ s_
o
-o <u O JIZ
î
oo ^-)
C
03 <D
o
•r~- r—
-o -(-> U
o 03 • 1 —
X) CU 3 -(_>
s- U O"
03 s_
03
U -o <u CL
dc^ O)
N
r—
03 S_
U
<u
z' A
o ^\ J3
• p—
c:
<U
^
.*M
r
O JC 03
c_> u
N •
(U
s_
C7)
A
o
PO
<u
•o
<u
M
c
03
00
33
<u >^
> .(_> ro co
•(->
03 -r-
>
o CVJ
LO LD
OsJ
O
<u <u U
-o CíL <
<U
-o oo
O >^ O
J2 u
•I- 3
s_ > 1—
03
U •I- ai C_) LO CO LO
u cu CTi oo CNJ
03 1—
O o cn
S- c—) E
"O cu
<u
JZ o 03
u u <u
03 o 00
-(_> o
-M cn u
03 o
CJ -o Ol co co o
<u
u <u C\J C\J C\J CSJ
o
o -o
O o o
s_
>^
-M
cu
<u
00
U
o
03
u <ã <u
00 oo
CD
o
O
u
o
-o cO ro 00
cu C7)
u co C\J
c 13 (U
-o
CU o o
•(_> E
(U s_
û:: Q.
00
CT) 00
>> ^ 00 Cvj
<u I— 00
cn CTi
-û
o s- I
03
<u s_ jr
-a —' o co CO
«^
CD
00 S_
•r- O)
00 -Q
>> E -o -o
I— Z3 -(->
o c 00 c s_
s_ C\l ro
-o c
>í o
z: s_
34
duced by the IMC was carried out with the same procedure as the Ist run.
Activity of the IMC at this 2nd run was calculated and listed in Table 3
to Figure 5.
2. Discussion
taraldehyde. Six hydrolysis runs have been carried out lasting for 12
vity of the IMC in the first run as a basis and plotted in Figure 5.
of activity between the first and second runs is the most drastic of
any of the reuses. This implies that most of the immobilized cellu-
lase molecules are denatured during the first hydrolysis. The decrease
vity remains almost constant after the fourth run. The hydrolysis runs
steps. The CGT substrate has been used for this washing to destroy
of them are essential to stability of the enzyme and some of them are
100
80
>>
-i-j
>
u 60
03
>
03
O)
40
0
0
20
0
48 96 144 192
vity of this 99.6% reusable IMC is 22.8 (y mole glucose/g IMC • hr).
This result is quite significant, because nobody has ever reported pre-
diimide. Four runs of hydrolysis have been carried out and each run
the activity of IMC at the first run as a basis and plotted against time
second runs is most drastic comparing the decreases between other runs.
This implies that most of IMC molecules are denatured during the Ist
run of hydrolysis. The decrease continues at the third and fourth run.
clear when the final activities of IMC's made with both methods are
1.6 (y mole glucose/g IMC • hr) and is still decreasing in contrast that
(y mole glucose/g IMC • hr) and is almost constant. This implies that
37
hydrolysis.
CHAPTER V
The 0.1923 g IMC was taken from IMC pool made previously with
The IMC was mixed with 20 ml of 10% glutaraldehyde solution which was
ture was shaken for 1 hr. at room temperature to cross-link the im-
shown in Figure 8. The cross-linked IMC v/as centrifuged and then wash-
linked IMC was washed again with 100 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10
to prepare the following sample and blank for the first run.
CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were shaken for 12
duced by the cross-linked IMC at this Ist run was determined by employ-
of the cross-linked IMC which had been prepared with lO:- glutaraldehyde
38
39
-Î<CH4N=CH(CH,)3CH=N
+ 0HC(CH2),CH0
=CH(CHACH=
q
-SÍ(CH4N=CH(CHZ)5CH=
o
> Fe^O^
\
o
O-5Í(CHAN=CH(CHZ)3CH=
p
+ 2.H10
Figure 8 . Chemical equation of cross-1inking of immobilized
c e l l u l a s e through glutaraldehyde.
40
o c on
s: <u c3
o •—^ <U
2 s_
M- -(->
o Xcu
J
-oc
C C^vJ OvJ <Æ C\l <T> o
O >í •
• • .
> í •r- -»-> - O ^ on <J^ c£> C\J «=^
-(-> -f- c ^ LO ci3 f^ • CO co
C > 03
cu •<-
-(-> 4-) -t->
<U ^ </1
U Cd ' ^ 1 —
03
O CU
^ oo
1—í <4- O
O
M- o u
O
-(_) O C 00 (—
C o -1- cn^—
<u > , S- 00 S- o on cr> r>-» ro
-(_) -(-> >, <U J C . • • . .
<u •r- - O r— r- • co CNJ r^ co <r)
> c o o o m <^ C\l C\l CVI
s_ •r- OsJ S_ E S I
'<v -t-> "O 1—1
-C U -(->>, ^
+-> <: 03 - C O)
c
o
o <u
2: 00
,—. M - O
M-
o u
O
c O C oo 1—
3 T - CT)--^
>, S- 1/1 S- <T> r^v U3 <X) ro
I •-(-> > , <U - C • • • • •
•r- -(-> 1 1 . U3 v^ r—
oo co
CO PO
• ^
> 00 O O O •^ ro ro
O •r- r - S_ E 21
s_ •4_) -O 1—.
u U -M > , a
e i ; 03 - C CT)
M-
O 1
u CU 00
O) C - O 00
o >> o
•.- - C s _ ^ - -
- M <U U > 5
03 - O -—
S_ .— S_
-(_> 03 O CJ) LO O O O
C S_ M- C • • • •
<U <D 03 T- o OsJ on o LD
u -•-> -o -:«í .— í—
c o <u c
03 O .— on -r-
O CD Z3 1—
41
The used cross-linked IMC was recovered by using magnets and wash-
ed with 200 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10. This IMC was released
into 125 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10. The IMC was centrifuged and
the supernatant was saved for preparation of sample and blank for the
IMC, 2.50 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. A blank was prepared by mix-
ing 2.50 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were
sugars produced by the IMC in this second run was determined by employ-
the IMC was calculated and listed in Table 4. Figure 9 shows schematic
diagram of IMC's.
activity.
The procedures for this preparation were the same as described pre-
viously in this thesis. The IMC was washed thoroughly with distilled
water. The IMC was washed again and then centrifuged with 100 ml of
saved for preparation of sample and blank for the Ist run.
42
Uncross-
linked
Cross-
linked
O
• •
«d- on
ydrolysi
*—> _c
5^
o• -^*' 0,-
Csj o
F — O)
c
•r"
00
C
^ 3
C S_
•^
-c
(
00
O 00 cCi
'—S
'w'
w
o s_ c
'~~ u 03
S- -l->
c 00
Ot_ •—
-o c
cu
00
cu
cu
3
o .._;
s
• <U <u
cc J3
> í
.C 00
<u -
•D C-)
^— s:
03 1—1
S-
03 Ob-
•«-> O
o —
• '— >.
<£) O)
vit
"Ô -..J
c u
o 03
•r—
-t-) >_-
(T: O
o ^-
^w
• ^"'
"^ ^ o
cu •.-
C\l
o
O)
< S
oo 00
00
on o
>^ >)
f**
^—
O O
i- ^
"O "O
>> >>
x: sz
u- l+-
o o cn
OO OO o• c z:
>—'
c3 c3 OsJ •^
Oi-
p — ^
^ S- O
c
•r—
-^J -o > í
^
oo c
C\J
1
00 •r—
00 >
O •^
•t->
s_
o m
u u
<t5
O s_ <U
o
<+- -C
4_>
•D
<U c
1/1
o
o C7>
0) c
O -D •f—
> i ^
• co c
"ai •^
-D ^—
^— (
00
<o (/)
s_
03
o
4~>
s_
o
^—
u
o• O) u_
" V£5 14-
o
u
<v
S_
-M
£1
<U
o u
«3- c CJ
o
o
CVJ
o
C\J
i rilU^iÍLA,) 3N ] ^o Aq.LAL;^V
^asoDntb d[o\h r'
45
A sample was prepared by mixing the 0.50 g IMC, 5.00 g CGT and
50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were shaken for 12 hrs. at
previously in this thesis. Activity of the IMC at this first run was
The used IMC was recovered by using permanent magnets. The recov-
ered IMC was washed with 200 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10 and re-
leased into 125 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 5.10. The IMC was centri-
fuged and the supernatant was saved for preparation of new sample and
blank for the second run. The sample was prepared by mixing all of the
IMC, 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The blank was prepared by
mixing 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were
cost production.
dehyde.
46
-o
<u
c
C\J co CO
ro
I LO o •
C 00 PO CD «^ co oo
o CJ oo OJ ro
O C^sJ
S-
-o u
<u
4-> 3 cn u
"D \
03 cu
O
S- </í "O
3 O
E CL cu
o 3 <U u c
U oo 3
u O
cn
u ( LO 00 CT»
C7) • 3. 00
oo oo •
3 00 cn cn 00
r^
«X) LO «X)
oo c\i
O •f— o OvJ oo ro
s_ oo S-
u
.c >í
4-> ^— c
O 3
•c
s_
cu -o
-^ >.
•D
cu
c
•r— 00 c
r— 0.- <r> CT» <o CO
s-
( o c co
00
00
o I LO LD CT)
oo C^J 00
o C 00
u c
u s_ 3 c
"O s_
o u
s_
_-, c/) C- u <zn - c
fO cu
> a^ <u CU <u
-û c </) c
•r— o 00
c S_ u 03 o
o 3 3^
u I cn
•^ -D 3 00
-(-> o 00 ro o o c\i O CT)
<U a^ LT) LO
u
3 •o o
> cn u
-o .^
o OJ c
s_
Q.-C
r—
<u 03 oo
oo S-
O 03 s_
U 4->
00
<:3 CT) M- -1- OsJ «3- 00 o cvj
O 00 ro <sD
CVJ
<U r— I
on E O (
•<- s_ O v£5 co O
cu h- -D oo c\i ro «X>
03
00 S_
•f- <U
00 J2
>> E
•— 3 -o -D
O C 00 c S. •i-> x:
s_ OsJ ro Ln 4->
T3 C
>> 3
IC S_
47
Od
r>.
O
LO
n by I M C ' s .
00 o
•^ •r—
-—^ .«_)
oo u
S- 2
^ 13
^-^ o
oo s.
o.
•^
00
<u
>> </)
<•£> o
ro o u
s_ 3
r—
-o
>^ CT)
sz "D
TD ^-
CU cu
.(_>
JÍÍ: "D o o:
c CU ^_
•r— ^
cu
c= 3
r—
1
c
•r- «:r •f— c
Accu
C\l 1—
OO p—
00 (
o co
00
s.
u o
c
3
s.
u OsJ
o o C\J
<u
s_
3
cr>
o o o O O O O o o o
o Ln O Ln O LO
o Ln o Ln
on «;r ^ ro ro CNJ OsJ r— r—
6th 60 - 72
•
18.1
48
49
OsJ
r^
C during si runs of
ution was u ed for
o
LO
X 00
00 2: r-
«^ «—>. •— 0
00 00
s. -D
x: <U <U
""^ ^ -D
c >,
00 •1- x:
•^ r— cu
00 1 -a
>) 00 (—
r— 00 n
LO o 0 s-
ro s_ S_ 03
-D U 4-)
>> 3
-C
0 cn
<+-
o
4.) 0
<u •r— •
E >
•r-
^
•^
^ f— 4-J <U
Retention of ac
hydrolysis: th
C\J
cross-linking.
CVJ
ro
s_
3
cn
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 C3^ 00 r^ LO on •^r 00 OsJ
/C:;LAL:^oe a A L ^ e ^ a y
50
2. Discussion
are reacted with amino groups of adjacent two cellulase molecules. Re-
tention of IMC activities between first and second runs is high when
IMC's at first run decrease sharply at early stage when the concentra-
run, however, decrease mildly. These results show only the effects of
glutaraldehyde during six runs of hydrolysis. The IMC has been prepared
are originated from the same experiment. Figure 13 has been plotted
from the data which are shown in Table 6. Activity of IMC decreases
The chemical reaction of cross-linking may damage the IMC and make it
produced by the cross-linked IMC during the many runs of hydrolysis with
that produced by the uncross-1inked IMC. The data of Table 5 have been •
calculated from the data of Table 2 and Table 6. The accumulated amounts
plotted in Figure 12. This figure shows that the accumulated amount of
i n f o l l o w i n g experiments of t h i s section.
The 0.20 g a l i q u o t of Fe^O. was taken from the Fe^O^ pool prepared
above and mixed w i t h 0.1057 g cellulase and 20.0 ml of 0.1 M NaPi buf-
mixing 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc b u f f e r , pH 4.00. The sample
00
CT^
co CT>
<U cs: f o CD
iL.
•a
03
-a
<u
N
<4-
c o ^
03
;<u
C |00
C ] 03
00 • - - <U >,!—
4 J </) ^ j O ro ^— r^
<o 03 •»— r— Ln
00
Ln
>^
00 ro 4J
M 1— > 1—
•r- ^ • - - ICU
• . . •
o 00 OsJ o o
<u <T3 <— r— +J l U
00 U •1 u 4->
rc •r- 4-> o j 03 i c n U
^^ C O u l E 03
3 cu
1 — -C ^—^
GJ
1 —
u ^^,_^
<U
U cn O)
c </) O)
<+- • t—
O '
c
O -C
u !s_ •r—
4->
u
fO
>^ ^'r^ .:^
4") 1 ; 03
c 4-í •r- CDi 4_>
3 4.) > 1 r--« r^ CD Ln
O 03 •
•r- CU J O • . . >.
E 4-^ >— fc^ o O on o — J 3
03 c
03
u o p m Ln vO <r>
uo
<C E "D
3 OO jo. <U
4->
O 03 03
•^ r—
s- CU
,,^ 3
03 - D U
> > í "^ f —
-C -D o 03
M- cu CU ro U
O r—
-D oo <u
r-
3 U-
cn 03 <u
c S_ cu •o cu
•f—
<o OO <u JO
-o 4_> o <o N
03 3 •r— r— '^ 00 <Ti CT) ro <u
o r— .(_> 3 c r__ CJ^ C\l ro >
1 cn 03 r— 03 o o Ln 00 o:
CÍ; <— • • • . JZ
cu »r— o o o o O
u 00 00 o
r-^ CU .
cnicn •^ o
<u ""^^ 4->
cn
•r—
-Q > oo
•r- 03
03
4-1
u o
fo • r -
<+- <u 4->
O oo <u 03
03 c£) co r^ v^ > S_
4-i ' — •r—
• • • •
C 3 — o ro CTi
r—
Ln LO 4_> ro
3 r— - D cn o
r—
oû 03 ro
O
E
-— cu
<U 00
E
—
1— 1 — C3
<: u 3
<U .
Q : o
54
imide were mixed in 50.0 ml distilled water. The pH of the mixture was
adjusted to 3.60 by adding 6 M HCl. The mixture was shaken for 2-1/2
hrs. at room temperature to produce IMC. The IMC was washed thoroughly
with distilled water. The IMC was washed again with 100 ml of 0.05 M
sample was prepared by mixing all of the IMC, 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml
supernatant. The sample and blank were shaken for 48 hrs. at 46°C in
Activity of the IMC was calculated and listed in Table 8. The ratio
2. Discussion
activities of this table have been plotted against ratio in Figure 14.
and then no increase later. This phenomenon implies that cellulase can
not be loaded any more on the surface of the carrier once the surface
i
00
<V
cu
N
<Æ
•^ (/) 1 —
o o
ro c u
<U '•^ . .^
U- =
<U OJ
• 00 SZ
: 'O u
•f— r—
.. Ln 00 3 cn
r- C
r— • r -
cn
•\ <D J C
<u
00
U U
03
03 0 ( - 4_>
^_ C 4->
3 03
^ rI—
— oo
,— —J c
<u C
~T
03
u
O 00
cn = 03
•.—r •o
<u
o 00 " O
• 1 — 3 >,
- ro 4-1 O J=
03 • ^ CU
Cí s_ -c
03 - —
> 03
S_
Oi_ 03
O ^
^ M '
oo cn^
c cn
•f—
-a ^
03 —J
O -r-
-^ s
<u
o o o o o
o 00
>sû CVJ
o
CT>
oo
03
activity*
4_>
Relative
03
S_
65.7
87.2
86.5
90.0
88.4
35.1
o
O o
on
O
ro
cu
-o
cu <4-
N O -—
icu <u
c -o
C oo 03
03 O -03
•r- CU >>í—
0.060
0.080
0.147
0.156
0.109
0.149
oo 4-> 00 4-> : 3
<C fO •r— 1 <_)
N r— > j
• 1 - 3 T- \<V
O 03 O
r— r— 4-> i U
U •r- r - O ,
CU - 1 - 4-> CU 03 I C D
00 E
03 CU o u ;E >>
•— ^ -l_>
3 U
mole glucosev
>— c n
<u c 4->
U •(- S- U
03
M- U
Activity
O 03 <U
•c:
4->
19.5
19.3
19.1
14.5
4->
19.9
OO 4_> 00
4_> 03 •
C
C_) O r— cn
3 C
O 03
E 03
03 00 cn
/
03
oo
3 CU
>,
J3
O T3
Z E o -o
^
03 - 1 - ro CU
> •t- cu 4->
-a M_ 03
^ o
-o
( g cellulase
O J2
U
Ratio
s- <U
N
0.500
C7) 03
0.260
0.652
0.355
0.100
03
0.195
C U •r-
U
•r— C
03
-o ^ C
03 4-) O <u
O •r- OO CU
cn
<u
00
>
03
CU
oo
J3
<U
03
Amount of
cellulase
250.0
326.0
4->
177.5
50.0
130.0
97.5
o >
(mg)
used
u
03
cu
>
03
<u
Cíl
57
- oo
- r
o
ro
<u
u_
-D
CU
N
on •r—
C
03
r—
•r—
-—« OO
'd- •
o C i—
ro O 03
cu U
i ! (U -r-
</i E
- "^ . 03 CU
r— >— -C
•r— 3 U
OO —
r- cn
cn OJ c
""^ U '^
<u _:z
00 -t- u
03 C 03
/— -.->
3 00 —J
- ro ,—
(— -_J .-13
<V ^ :;z
u O 'O
c:
C71 03 O!
03
oo
o 3 <U
•^ c -o
4-> •r—
-f—
03 'i_ E
. cvi Q: 03 - r -
> -r-
-a
M- O
O J2I
>-
CT) 03
C U
•r—
-D -C
03 4-)
C •'-
_l 5
on
<u
Ô)
o o o o o
00 <vO OvJ
o X' LAL Oe 9AL B[ay
58
about 0.26. If larger ratio than the saturation ratio is employed, only
and the rest of them will be wasted. If smaller ratio than the satura-
activities of this table have been plotted against the cellulase to car-
rier ratio in Figure 15. The results shown on the table and figure can
0.26 which is the same value as above. The plots of Figures 14 and 15
These data were obtained using IMC's at their optimum pH's. These data
show that IMC's made with glutaraldehyde are 300 times more active than
the IMC's made with carbodiimide. The reason for this phenomenon may
are the same in both preparations but most of the IMC molecules made
glutaraldehyde.
ly in this thesis. The IMC was mixed with 10.06 g CGT and 100.0 ml of
0.05 M KAc b u f f e r , pH 5.10. The mixture was shaken for 6 days at 46°C
i n the f o l l o w i n g experiments.
The 0.193 g a l i q u o t of IMC was taken from the pool of IMC. The
IMC was washed with 100 ml of 0.05 M KAc b u f f e r , pH 7.63 and then cen-
blank. The sample was prepared by mixing the 0.193 g IMC, 5.00 g CGT
and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were shaken f o r 48 hrs.
60
61
<u
-D
03
CU >,
> 4_>
cu •r- "^ ro ro O r— r--
oo 4_J > • • • . •
03 03 -1- *^ v£) on co •^
1— 4-> <o <x> ro OsJ
<v u
Û: <C
cu •
u (—
03
-o U
cu •f—
N E
•r- cu
r— ^
• I —
u
J2
O CD <u
F c oo
c: 1 o
•r— J^ >> u
u 4_> 3 s_
<+- 03 •r— ^— JZ ro o 00 r^
o 4-) > CJ)
o• • • • •
+J •r— « 1 — Ln Ln 00 on
03 4-» <U C_) r— r—
<u
^ — U >— 2:
• f— oo <: o 1—1
M- 03 E
O _, CD
s_ <U •-^
CL-D
>>
>>x:
4_> <U
•r— -D
> r—
•r— 03
4_> S_
u 03
03 4_)
3
C2. CT)
VO <D Ln 00 <r)
oz ro • r «^ <T «a-
c^ • • • • •
CT) Osl ro ^ Ln r^
cu
03
62
peating the same procedures as above except employing 0.05 M KAc buf-
fers whose pH's had been adjusted to other pH's than 7.63 by adding
imide were mixed in 250 ml distilled water. The pH of the mixture was
adjusted to 3.40 by adding 6 M HCl. This mixture was shaken for 2-1/2
ing was centrifuged and then washed thoroughly with distilled water.
The 0.2503 g aliquot of IMC was taken from the pool of IMC and
washed with 100 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 7.65. The IMC was washed
again with 100 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer, pH 7.65, and centrifuged. The
and blank. The sample was prepared by mixing the 0.2503 g IMC, 2.50 g
CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The blank was prepared by mixing 2.50 g
CGT and 50.0 ml supernatant. The sample and blank were shaken for 48
peating the same procedures as above except employing 0.05 M KAc buf-
fers whose pH's had been adjusted to other pH's than 7.65 by adding
63
70 -
60
50 -
>,
-i->
•T—
> 40 -
u
03
<U
>
-l_>
03
;2 30
<u
cc
20 -
10 -
0
8
PH
4-)
•r—
<u
-D
<T3
a> >,
> 4_>
CU Osl on 00 C\J
oo
+-> >
03 -r-
03 LO r»v Ln
C\J «•0 <X5 on
CU u
cc
<:
<u
u
•
- o I—
<U 03
N U
•^ •r—
^ E
•r- OJ <u
JD J Z 00
o u >, o
4_) u
Ê cn •I— 3
•<- c Ln o <^o
> 1 —
•I—
cn Ln Ln Ln ro
o u -l-i
03 U cu o
<U -M <a: 1 —
•— 4_> o
•f- 03 ;=
M-
O 00 cn
S_ 03
Q.
<U
>^-o
4_> -r-
•<— E
> •!-
•r— T—
4-> - D
U O
03 J 2
S_
z : 03 CT o on Ln
CJ. u LD on LD
•
Ln <>o
<u
03
65
50.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer whose pH had been adjusted to 7.47 by add-
ing glacial HAc. A blank was prepared by mixing 5.00 g CGT and 50.0 ml
of 0.05 M KAc buffer whose pH also had been adjusted to 7.47 by adding
glacial HAc. The sample and blank were shaken for 6 hrs. at 46°C in an
M KAc buffers whose pH's had been adjusted to other pH's than 7.47 by
2. Discussion
16. This figure shows that the immobilized cellulase attached through
tivities have been plotted against pH's of buffer solution in Figure 16.
66
<u >>
CU > 4_)
oo •r- •T—
on ro
03 4-> >
03 •r- ro on r^
r— 4-> <X) Ln ro
cu U
CíL <=a:
<u
U
<U
<U
S-
o
cu cu 5-
00
>, o •
4-> u <U
o •r— 3 oo ro cn ro
s_ > ^— 1 03
CL •f—
cn 13
— Ln CT> «r on
4-) Ln O. c\i ro
>, U cu 1 — o Ln
4_) < r—
(—
o <U
E U
4_> CD
u
03
cu
o r— CT LO
JD Ln •vr
03 Ln Ln «
c\j ro Ln
67
This figure shows that the immobilized cellulase attached through carbo-
Figure 16. This figure shows that the free cellulase optimum pH is
4.10 at 46°C.
more acidic than the reported value of 4.80 (70). This difference may
ment, cotton gin trash has been used instead of pure cellulose which
the structures of the enzyme proteins so that the optimum pH's are
that of free cellulase. The optimum pH's and shapes of curves are
very similar in two graphs. This phenomenon may indicate that the
68
(Serial No. 74, J5124, Type SH, MikroPul Division, U.S. Filter Corpora-
filled with this hammer-milled CGT. After 17 hrs. milling, about 1/50
The 1.3503 g CGT was taken from the 17 hrs.-milled CGT made above
and mixed with 0.1736 g free cellulase and 50.0 ml of 0.05 M KAc buffer,
pH 4.8. This mixture was shaken for 69 hrs. at 45°C in the incubator-
shaker. Amount of reducing sugars produced during this shaking was de-
Other data of Table 12 were obtained by taking the CGT out from
2. Discussion
cotton gin trash for enzymatic hydrolysis. The glucose production from
each size of cotton gin trash are plotted against milling times in Fig-
69
70
0 2.9
17 11.4
26 13.7
39 16.1
46 17.8
62 19.7
71
20.0
cu
c/î
03
-^ 15.0 -
cu
u
cn
cu
oo
o
u
3
cn
10.0 -
<u
o
c
o
•r—
4->
U
3
"D
O
5.0 -
S-
CL
<v
</l
o
u
3
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
M i l l i n g time (Hrs)
structure of CGT invites the enzymatic attack. Between these two ef-
fects, the size effect may play more role than the crystallinity effect
does because the CGT appears to be more brittle than many other ligno-
to small pieces rather than flattened out to flakes during the grinding.
CHAPTER IX
Conclusions
enzymatic hydrolysis.
73
LITERATURE CITED
10. Beck, S. R., Clements, L. D., "Ethanol Production from Cotton Gin
Trash," Symposium on Cotton Gin Trash Utilization Alternatives,
Lubbock, TX (1982).
12. Baker, A. J., Mohaupt, A. A., Spino, D. F., "Evaluating Wood Pulp
as a Feedstuff for Ruminant and Substrate for Aspergillus fumiga-
tus," J. Animal Sci., 37(1), 179-182 (1973).
74
75
16. Reese, E. T., Segal, Tripp, V. M., "The Effect of Cellulase on the
Degree of Polymerization of Cellulose and Hydrocellulose," Text.
Res. J., 27_, 626-632 (1957).
17. Dehority, B. A., Johnson, R. R., "Effect of Particle Size Upon the
In V U r o Cellulose Digestibil ity of Forages by Rumen Bacteria,"
J. Dairy Sci., 44, 2242-2249 (1961).
18. Ghose, T. K., Kostick, J . A., "Enzymatic Saccharification of Cellu-
lose i n Semi- and Continuously-Agitated Systems," Adv. Chem. Ser.,
95, 415 (1969).
34. Mandels, M., Weber, J., Parizek, R., "Enhanced Cellulase Production
by a Mutant of T_^ viride," Appl. Microbiol., 2]^, 152-154 (1971).
36. Karube, I., Tanaka, S., Shirai, T., Suzuki, S., "Hydrolysis of Cel-
lulose in a Cellulose-bead Fluidized Bed Reactor," Biotechnol. Bio-
eng., J^, 1183-1191 (1977).
39. Baum, G., Ward, F. B., Weetall, H. H., "Stability, Inhibition and
Reactivation of Acetylcholinesterase Covalently Coupled to Glass,"
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 268, 411-414 (1972).
44. Srere, P. A., Mattiasson, B., Mosbach, K., "An Immobilized Three-
enzyme System: A Model for Microenvironmental Compartmentation
in Mitochondria," Proc Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 70, 2534-2538
(1973). —
48. Tosa, T., Mori, T., Fuse, N., Chibata, I., "Studies on Continuous
Enzyme Reactions: I. Screening of Carriers for Preparation of
Water-insoluble Aminoacylase," Enzymol., 3j_, 214-224 (1966).
55. Goldman, R., Silman, H. I., Caplan, S. R., Kedem, 0., Katchalski,
E., "Papain Membrane on a Collodion Matrix: Preparation and En-
zymatic Behavior," Science, 150, 758-760 (1965).