Major Department: Sociology Submitted to: Ma’am Qurat-ul-Ain Course code: 411 Criminology Assignment STRATEGIES AND APPROACHES: PROBLEM SOLVING POLICY: Gladstone’s framework catalyzed the development of tools for a problem-oriented approach to crime reduction and was later supplanted by a four-stage model called the scanning-analysis-response-assessment model SCANNING: Identifying recurring problems of concern to the public and the police. Identifying the consequences of the problem for the community and the police. Prioritising those problems. Developing board goals. Confirming that the problem exist. Determining how frequently the problem occurs and how long it has been taking place. Selecting problems for closer examination. ANALYSIS: Identifying and understanding the events and conditions that precede and accompany the problem. Identifying relevant data to be collected. Researching what is known the problem type. Taking inventory of how the problem is currently addressed and the strengths and limitations of the current response. Narrowing the scope of the problem as specifically as possible. Identifying the variety of researches that may be of assistant in developing a people understanding of the problem. HYPOTHESIS: Developing a hypothesis why the problem is occurring. RESPONSE: Rain storming for new intervention searching for what it is other to communities which similar problems have done choosing among the the alternative invention ordering a response plan and identifying responsible parties staring a specific object for response plan carrying out plan activities. ASSESSMENT: Determining what the plan was implemented collecting free and post response and qualitative and quantitative data, determining broad goals and specific objective we attained. CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS: When the various type of analytic services that were available to law enforcement agencies increased, so did the need for assistance. Therefore, to better reflect the roles of those within the FBI providing the assistance, profiling was remained criminal investigative analysis. creating and unknown offender profile has become and continues to be just one of the many services within this analytic framework provided to law enforcement to assist with the investigation of violent crimes. As such, criminal investigative analysis has become an umbrella term encapsulating a variety of services, including myriad behavioral advice provided by the FBI to law enforcement agencies. While criminal investigative analysis, now practiced around the world, is most well- known for the production of offenders profiles, the practice has expired into a more comprehensive investigative aid providing a variety of services of law enforcement agencies. • Indirect personality assessment. • Equivocal death analysis • Investigative suggestions • Interview strategies • Media strategies • Threat assessment • Search warrant affidavit assistance • Trial strategies • Expert testimony • Geographic profiling • Critical incident analysis To characterize criminal investigative analysis as only offender profiling is both oversimplified and antiquated. This perspective is highlighted by the findings from recent interviews with criminal investigative analysis who noted that the consultative services go far beyond providing an offender profile and may, in fact, be more useful during an investigation. GOAL OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION ANALYSIS: The primary goal of criminal investigative analysis is to examine all of the behavioral information and provide advice to the requesting agency, rather than become involved in the actual investigative process. Occasionally a criminal a investigative analyst or term will go out to the field and assist in the process of testify, but the investigation is left for the law enforcement agency that requested the assistance. The FBI does not come in and take over the case, rather, assistance is provided to an agency in its investigation. CRIME MAPPING AND GEOGRAPHICAL CRIME ANALYSIS: CRIME MAPPING: Crime mapping identifies not only where the actual crime took place, but also looks at where the perpetrator “lives, works, and plays” as well as where the victim “lives, works and plays” crime analysis has identified that the majority of criminals tend to commit crimes within their comfort zones, and crime mapping is what allows police and investigators to see where that comfort zone might be. PREDICTIVE POLICING THROUGH CRIME MAPPING: The use of predictive policing is a much more cost- effective approach to policing that past policies. This is because predictive policy not only looks at where a crime is likely to occur but also when the crime is likely to occur. These patterns can help police identify what time of day it is necessary to flood an area with officers, rather than flooding the area twenty-four hours a day. ROLE OF CITIZEN POLICE: The primary responsibility of the police is to protest Citizens from harm and danger, advocate for victims of crimes and promote the accountability of criminals by enforcing laws set forth by the city, state and county. The police are also responsible for responding to 911 calls, interviewing witnesses and victims of crimes, investigating crimes in an attempt to secure criminals and making arrests. The responsibilities of the police also extend to enforcing laws that exist by ensuring drivers are obeying traffic laws, patrolling high-traffic areas and communities within the department’s jurisdiction to protect the safety to community members and questioning suspicious activity while on patrol. Police are also responsible for responding to emergency situations that require medical attention and may need to perform first-aid duties until medical assistance arrives on the scene. Responsibilities of the police are often heightened during natural disasters. For example, the police may be called on search homes for survivors following a tornado or earthquake. In addition, police are also responsible for maintaining order during riots or protests. To perform the job duties of a police officer, members of the police force train frequently on community safety, firearm use, laws and rules of order and ethics. FORENSIC EVIDENCE AND JUSTICE SYSTEM: The collection of forensic evidence and the application of forensic sciences have become essential to criminal investigation: prove a crime has been committed or establish key elements of a crime. • Place the suspect in contact with the victims or with the crime scene. Establish the identity of persons associated with a crime. • Exonerate the innocent. • Corroborate a victim’s testimony • Assist in establishing the facts or what occurred • Police personnel devote many hours to the collection and analysis of forensic evidence. Starting with the crime scene and continuing through the entire investigation. Prosecutors prefer cases where forensic evidence provides the – smoking gunl that proves guilt beyond a responsible doubt. Many jurors expect forensic evidence to be presented and failure to present forensic analysis plants doubt in their minds. Courts have made physical reliance on statements and confessions by defendants. One of the main reasons for the focus of forensic evidence is solving crimes is the emergence of local, stats, national debates systems with forensic information. WEAPONS EVIDENCE: Weapons evidence consists of forearms (handguns, rifles, assault weapons, etc.) Ammunition (e.g., spent casings, fired projectiles, bullet fragments, and unfired bullets), gunshot residue (GSR) tests, knives. The purpose of a GSR kit is to determine whether an individual was close to a firearm at time of discharge. FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE: Fingerprint evidence will be divided into complete 10- prints (fingerprints are available for both hands and palms as in the case of fingerprinting a victim of suspect) and latent prints (only partial prints of one or more fingers are available, usually through a powdering technical on physical evidence such as a weapon or vehicle). DRUG EVIDENCE: Drug evidence includes drugs (e.g. marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine and others), and drug paraphernalia (pipes spoons, etc.) found at a scene. IMPRESSION EVIDENCE: Impressions evidence includes shoeprint impressions tire tracks, and tool marks. TRACE EVIDENCE: Three evidence is a generic term for small, sometimes microscopic , material. It covers a wide variety of evidence, including fibers, hairs, building materials (asbestos, paint, e.t.c), cigarettes, tobacco, glass and others. NATURAL/SYNTHETICS MATERIALS: Natural and synthetic materials include clothing, bed and bath material, Carpet cuttings, metal objects, plastics, and paper. GENERIC OBJECTS: Generic objects include vehicles, bicycles, containers, doors wood, and concrete. Electronic/printed data; electronics and printed data include documents and electronics (computers, cell phones, etc. ). OTHER ITEMS: Other items are a catch-all category for evidence that does not fit in any of the above categories. This typology for classifying forensic evidence proved beneficial in ILJ’s study. For the most part, forensic evidence collected at crime scenes was easy to classify into the correct categories possible a variety of resources that may be of assistance in developing a deeper understanding of the problem. Developing a working hypothesis about why the problem is occurring. RESPONSE: Brainstorming for few inventions. Searching for what other communities with similar problems have done. Choosing among the alternative inventions outlining a response plan and identifying responsible parties. Stating the specific objectives for the response plan. Carrying out the planned activities. ASSESSMENT: Determining whether the plan was implemented (a process evaluation). Collecting pre- and post response qualitative and quantitative data. Determining whether board goals and specific objectives were attained. Identifying any new strategies needed to argument the original plan. Conducting ongoing assessment to ensure continued effectiveness.