PSSg Marjorie P Pagulayan

Class 012-RCSP

Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism

Throughout my learning about preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE), I
have gained valuable insights into the complex nature of this global challenge. The multifaceted
approaches and strategies employed to address this issue have shed light on the importance of
comprehensive and holistic approaches. This reaction paper aims to summarize my key
takeaways and highlight the significance of collaborative efforts in combating violent extremism.
One of the lessons I learned is that violent extremism knows no boundaries and can
emerge in any region, regardless of cultural, religious, or socio-economic factors. It is crucial to
recognize that violent extremism is not solely rooted in religion; it can also be fueled by political
ideologies, economic disparities, social grievances, and identity crises. This understanding
dispels the misconception that religious affiliation is the sole driver of extremism, emphasizing
the need for nuanced analysis and context-specific solutions.
In this discussion I also learned about the DOTMLPF which is an acronym for Doctrine,
Organization, Training, Material, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities. It is a framework used by
the Philippine government to prevent and counter violent extremism (PCVE).
The DOTMPLF framework is based on the understanding that PCVE is a complex and
multi-faceted challenge that requires a comprehensive and coordinated response from all
sectors of society. The framework identifies seven key areas that need to be addressed in order
to effectively prevent and counter violent extremism:

 Doctrine: This refers to the development of a shared understanding of PCVE among

all stakeholders.
 Organization: This refers to the establishment of a coordinated and effective PCVE
architecture.
 Training: This refers to the provision of training to all stakeholders on PCVE
concepts, strategies, and techniques.
 Material: This refers to the provision of the necessary resources, such as equipment
and funding, to support PCVE efforts.
 Leadership: This refers to the provision of strong and effective leadership at all
levels of government and society.
 Personnel: This refers to the recruitment and training of qualified personnel to
implement PCVE programs and initiatives.
 Facilities: This refers to the provision of the necessary facilities, such as training
centers and community centers, to support PCVE efforts.

The DOTMPLF framework is a valuable tool for the Philippine government in its efforts to
prevent and counter violent extremism. By addressing the seven key areas identified in the
framework, the government can build a more resilient and peaceful society.
In addition to the DOTMPLF framework, the Philippine government has also implemented
a number of other initiatives to prevent and counter violent extremism. These initiatives include:

 The National Action Plan on Countering Violent Extremism (NAPCVE): The

NAPCVE is a comprehensive plan that outlines the government’s strategy for
preventing and countering violent extremism. The NAPCVE is based on the
principles of human rights, rule of law, and inclusive development.
 The Bangsamoro Transition Plan: The Bangsamoro Transition Plan is a roadmap for
the establishment of a new Bangsamoro region in the southern Philippines. The
Bangsamoro region is intended to be a self-governing region for the Moro people,
who have a long history of conflict with the Philippine government.
 The Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP): The E-CLIP is a
government program that provides support to former members of armed groups who
wish to peacefully reintegrate into society. The E-CLIP includes a range of services,
such as livelihood assistance, psychosocial support, and education and training.
 Preventive Approaches: Prevention plays a vital role in addressing violent extremism
effectively. It involves early intervention, community engagement, and empowering individuals to
reject extremist ideologies. I discovered the significance of investing in education, promoting
critical thinking, and fostering dialogue as effective tools for countering radicalization. Engaging
local communities, religious leaders, educators, and civil society organizations emerged as key
stakeholders in the prevention process. By creating inclusive spaces for dialogue, we can
challenge extremist narratives and foster resilience within communities.
Countering Extremist Propaganda: The proliferation of extremist propaganda through
online platforms has posed unprecedented challenges. I learned about the power of counter-
narratives and the importance of leveraging technology and social media to challenge extremist
ideologies. Initiatives focusing on digital literacy, online monitoring, and collaboration with tech
companies have proved instrumental in countering extremist content. Additionally, efforts to
provide alternative narratives, highlighting the positive aspects of diversity and inclusivity, are
crucial for countering the appeal of extremist messages.
Role of Law Enforcement and Security Agencies: Understanding the role of law
enforcement and security agencies in preventing and countering violent extremism was
enlightening. Effective intelligence gathering, investigation, and prosecution of extremist
individuals and groups are essential for disrupting their activities. However, it is equally important
to ensure respect for human rights, avoid stigmatization, and maintain trust within communities.
Striking the right balance between security measures and safeguarding civil liberties is a delicate
task that requires ongoing collaboration and dialogue.
Lastly, In International Cooperation, I recognized the significance of international
cooperation in addressing the global nature of violent extremism. Sharing best practices,
intelligence, and resources across borders is crucial for a coordinated response. Collaboration
between governments, multilateral organizations, and civil society actors can enhance the
exchange of knowledge and contribute to more effective prevention and response strategies.
Building partnerships based on trust, mutual respect, and shared objectives can foster a united
front against violent extremism.
In conclusion, my exploration of preventing and countering violent extremism has
highlighted the need for comprehensive and collaborative approaches. By addressing the root
causes, promoting dialogue, countering extremist narratives, and engaging diverse stakeholders,
we can make significant progress in preventing radicalization and fostering resilient
communities. Likewise, The Philippine government’s efforts to prevent and counter violent
extremism are ongoing. The government is committed to working with all stakeholders to build a
more resilient and peaceful society.