Professional Documents
Culture Documents
William Thurber
Introduction
communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada ("Government
bill (House of Commons) C-18 (44-1) - First reading - Online news act - Parliament of Canada,"
n.d.). Bill C-18 would mandate that internet behemoths strike agreements to compensate media
organizations for making their news material available on significant online platforms. Any
agreements the firms have already made with news organizations wouldn't be impacted. The
effort by Canada to require internet giants to pay for journalism and submit to a controlled
arbitration procedure is in response to legislation of a similar nature that was passed in Australia
last year. Facebook, which has now changed its name to Meta, took down news articles from its
platform in Australia for a few days as the country's laws were being completed. However, after
the government changed the law, Facebook reinstated the information. The head of media
partnerships for Meta Canada said in a statement that the firm was surprised not to get an
invitation to participate, especially considering public assertions by lawmakers that this law is
targeted at Facebook. Meta Canada has yet to appear before the committee (Smith,22).
Statement of Problem
Under Bill C-18, internet siegers would be required to reach arrangements to pay
media organizations for making their news content available on key online platforms. The firms'
existing partnerships with news organizations wouldn't be affected. In my opinion, one of the
concerns this bill raises is that the Online News Act might lower the bar for Canadian
journalism. The proposed bill employs a broad definition of "qualified news firms" and exempts
eligible news organizations from basic ethical requirements. The legislation would in fact
provide funding for any publication that "explains current concerns or occurrences of public
interest." Therefore, any commentary or opinion blog with two or more authors may be eligible
to receive funding. Additionally, it implies that foreign state-owned media outlets can be